User talk:Jebiguess

Welcome!

Hi Jebiguess! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 04:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles 1601–1800, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orangism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of battles in the 21st century—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Bucha massacre, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Paris1127 (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 93rd Mechanized Brigade (Ukraine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Kharkiv.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battle of Svatovo

You may not be aware. but according to WP:DRAFTIFY articles may only be moved back to Draft: space once. See WP:DRAFTOBJECT. Your move rationale "Bold move, but again, violating WP:NOTACRYSTALBALL. Please discuss on the draft talk page before recreating." is interesting but is not relevant, I'm afraid. Your prior move to Draft was acceptable, but this one is not. I am aware that all editors can fall into this trap by accident, moving an article back to Draft a second time, but the accidental move is harder to justify when:

you were the editor who moved it the first time
it is a draft that was accepted at an AFC review

Please consider your action, and please correct both your erroneous move to Draft for the second time, and your thought process. It is easy to describe this action on your part as WP:Move warring, and I think that is probably not your intention 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I knew my moves were bold and the double-drafting was risky but I will leave it to the talk page. Jebiguess (talk) 01:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better if you actually corrected the issue. Leaving it to the talk page sounds fine, but it really is not.

Your routes were limited, the more so since you knew it to be risky. Your choice was one of the deletion processes, ideally AfD, or to leave it alone. Draft talk pages tend not to be the venue where these matters are discussed.

Since you feel strongly about this, as evidenced by your second move to Draft space, why not undo that second move, and then consider whether you wish to send it to AfD, where it will receive community consideration not just your own consideration and that of Theroadislong who accepted the draft at AFC.

Note, please, that I am making no comment about the article itself. This is a discussion about your second draftification of the same article. If you send it to AfD I may or may not choose to offer an opinion, and will consider it at that time. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, if an article is accepted by a member of the WP:AFC team, you're better off taking it to WP:AfD instead of re-draftifying. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have accepted the article a second time. If you don't think it should be in article space, a consensus process, in particular AFD, is better than move-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you are seeing is a consensus in formation. Four AFC reviewers (I am one) consider that your route was incorrect. None of us will object if you send this to AfD. Some of us may choose to offer opinions there. If you choose to take it there please make sure your rationale is policy based. You should be aware that a valid AfD outcome is to draftify, and that can be part of the nomination.

A more important things is that you take the issue of redraftification on board. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 17th Tank Brigade (Ukraine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Kharkiv.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022 MONUSCO clashes

Hello, Jebiguess. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 MONUSCO clashes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Volnovakha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vostok Battalion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2022 MONUSCO clashes

Hello, Jebiguess. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 MONUSCO clashes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2022 Mondoro attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more, have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2021 Aguelhok attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will create more in the future! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Bodio ambush. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I sincerely hope that you will write more articles in the future! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2021 Boni attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Boulikessi and Mondoro attacks (2021). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Bilohorivka (looking into the crystal ball)?

Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, comrade, this is not looking into a crystal ball, but last night I no longer had the strength to look for new sources about the Russian encirclement of the town of Bilohorivka, which they cannot take from the front for months because of the strong Ukrainian positions there. The fall of Soledar shows from the plane literally and figuratively that this is their goal. Tonight, I continue to update the article about the possible fights after the fall of Soledar on January 16. The Russians are taking a big initiative because they are again attacking Bilohorivka from the south and southwest with the aim of encircling that area, and that is why the Ukrainian media are already talking a lot about the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Bilohorivka towards Siversk (on which the Russians are attacking from the south with full force) or Sloviansk (which is the last the goal of their military engagement in Donbass). Yesterday, February 1, the Russians broke through the front on the Svatovo-Kreminna line towards Liman, which the Ukrainian, Russian, Anglo-Saxon and French media are talking about today. Today, February 2, Zaluzhny ordered that by the weekend, Ukrainian forces should withdraw from Bakhmut and Bilohorivka and probably from Siversk to the third defensive position due to the threats from a whole series of operational encirclements, but also because of the apparently spent resources due to the defense of Bakhmut and from almost Vuhledar so that probably the aim was to carry out offensive operations from Bilohorivka towards Lysychansk, Sieverodonetsk, Kreminna and Rubizhnoye have obviously failed. The prices at Soledar and Bakhmut are obviously too high for Ukraine at the moment. — Baba Mica (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you link the sources stating Ukraine plans on withdrawing from Bilohorivka? I cannot find anything about that asides from pro-RU accounts on Twitter and Telegram without video/photo evidence, which are deprecated sources. Ukrainian media and social media is silent, so this very well could be misinformation by Russian media.

Also, I don't think you understand the point of my previous message - a battle for Bilohorivka page wouldn't have a clear victor right now or in the past, as Russia and Ukraine have both captured the town (or what remains of it) multiple times since June. Even if Russia did capture the settlement, it wouldn't be a clear victory until they push further and the settlement is out of the grayzone and frontline. I understand you have created a page for the battle right now, but it is impossible to gather the facts of the past and present of the town until the war is over nor decide a clear victor.

The other breakthroughs you mention seem exaggerated based on reports I have seen on both pro-RU and pro-Ukrainian media. If you could link any reports showing tangible Russian successes in the Svatove-Kreminna area, from reliable sources, they should be added to the article for it. Jebiguess (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I'm waiting for the news to be confirmed because there is still no confirmation, and the level of destruction of Bilohorivka that the public will soon see will be terrifying and equal to those in Mariupol, Mariinka, Avdiivka, Soledar and Bakhmut. That place is strategically important for both sides, because from it offensive operations can be carried out for the Ukrainian side towards the east and north on as many as four large cities of Lysichansk, Sieverodonetsk, Kreminna and Rubezhnoye and to penetrate further into the Luhansk region, while for the Russian side it is Bilohorivka. very important because if they were to occupy it, they would have a more favorable situation for their offensive actions towards the west in the direction of the city of Siversk (which they besieged and attacked from the direction of Bilohorivka this summer, but unsuccessfully due to the Ukrainian Kharkov counter-offensive), to the northwest towards the city of Liman (which they lost also in the September Kharkiv counter-offensive) and of course Sloviansk (which is their main goal) since they squandered their chance this summer when they controlled the cities of Izyum, Lyman and Svyatogorsk and held positions near the small suburbs of Krasnopilya and Bogorodichnoe only ten kilometers north of Sloviansk. However, the Kharkiv counter-offensive blew them all the way to the line of the current Tavilzhanka-Nizhnia Duvanka front line in the north, Svatove-Kreminna in the middle and to Bilohorivka-Spirne in the south. That front was very stable for the Ukrainian side until the defeat at Soledar, which was obviously very difficult, and now we are looking at the collapse of this front, because around December 27 on the Bakhmut front, the Russians launched something similar to what the Ukrainians did on August 29 on the Herson front, and on the on January 19, the Russians carried out an ambush maneuver on Zaporozhye, similar to the Ukrainian maneuver on September 6, when the Russian front at Balakleya and Izyum first disintegrated in three days, and then in the next few days the front disintegrated at Krasnopilya and Svyatogorsk, so that everything ended with the fall of Bilohorivka and Lyman. Now we see that with the firing of Soledar, the entire Ukrainian front collapses in a similar way at Bakhmut and Sieversk, only slightly slower than the Ukrainian August-September rush. The causes are the same. The Ukrainian side has now run out of human and military resources, as well as the Russian side this summer, which spent a lot of energy on the defense of Kherson and the unblocking of Donetsk, and especially in attempts to surround Sloviansk and twice Kharkiv with measly resources, while the Ukrainian side received reinforcements in the summer human and military resources and skillfully used it. Now we see that Zelenski gambled with the lives of his soldiers in Bakhmut, who are threatened not with a strategic but with a complete encirclement similar to the one in Soledar if they do not retreat to Chasov Yar by the weekend, which is their only escape route since the Russians have closed all other routes. Zelensky did not want to listen to the military strategist Zaluzhny, but played political games with the life resources of his army, while this time Russia carried out mass mobilization and increased its human and armed resources. Now the Western press no longer questions whether and when Bakhmut will fall and what Ukraine will have to surrender until it forms a new line of defense, and especially what if the Russians completely surround Bakhmut and massacre the Ukrainians in Bakhmut in a similar way as in Soledar, because unlike them, the Russians, when the Ukrainian September storm hit, ran headfirst from Balakleya regardless for a month, leaving entire cities to the Ukrainians until they formed the Svatove-Kreminna line because they were saving human resources. With the fall of Bakhmut, and probably other important strategic cities such as Chasov Yar in the center, Toreck in the south, and Siversk and Bilohorivka, the position of Zaluzhny will only strengthen, and the fate and political career of Zelensky will depend only on the will of the Western powers. Unfortunately for the Ukrainian effort, it may happen that even the Tavilzhanka-Nizhnya Duvanka-Svatovo-Kreminna front line collapses. I expect the formation of a third line of defense on a similar route north-south Dvorichna-Kupyansk-Svyatogorsk-Sloviansk-Kramatorsk-Druzhkivka-Konstantinyvka and maybe additionally Toretsk-New York-Avdiivka-Krasnohorivka-Vuhledar if they manage to withstand strong Russian pressure until March. That's just my opinion. I am guided only by the logic of the Russian way of warfare, because Ukraine also applies Russian warfare tactics all the time, only this time with modern Western weapons, and that is why it is difficult for the Russians to quickly and easily deal with Ukraine until politicians who easily trade human lives intervene. — Baba Mica (talk) 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the same time, a new Russian invasion from the north hangs non-stop with the possibility of Belarus' participation, and it is not excluded that Poland and Romania (known as European hyenas since the First World War) will once again be involved in the thrashing of their neighbors, while the Hungarians have openly hostile relations with the authorities in Kiev. . The Ukrainians are in a very difficult position because their armed resources are limited and depend only on the political will of Western countries, and Russia has both human and armed resources unlimited at the moment. Who knows what kind of scenes of horror we will encounter when the military operations are over in Mariinka, Avdiivka, Bilohorivka and especially in Bakhmut when the weapons are lowered and the cameras are turned on. There will probably be a much larger pile of corpses of Ukrainian soldiers than in Mariupol and Soledar. If the Russians don't strike from the north from Belarus and the Belgorod region soon, then in the spring and summer we will probably see months of mauling around these big cities on the third line of defense I mentioned in the big answer above with the likely use of western tanks with occasional counterattacks from the Ukrainian side, which will give less results somewhere, but due to Russia's great mobilization and determination to destroy the Ukrainian army, it is clear to all of us that Ukraine cannot win this war without a NUCLEAR CONFLICT between Russia and the NATO alliance, because in the Russian media, this war is largely perceived as THE THIRD PATRIOTIC WAR with a huge emotional charge, while in the West they look at this war as the last opportunity to break Russia or, if they cannot win, then at least to make good money from this war and to recover their shaken economies. What is dangerous is that if NATO and the EU perceive this war as a war for their bare survival, then the future of the World is very DARK. Especially for the people of Europe who are said to have NO WORLD WAR WITHOUT EUROPE. — Baba Mica (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2022 Gaskinde attack. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Battles of Pervomaiske and Vodiane

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Battles of Pervomaiske and Vodiane, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TartarTorte Have a great rest of your day. 14:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I did not know that PRODs had to be deleted after a discussion. Jebiguess (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I'd just like to thank you for all the work you've done on modern conflicts, especially on lesser covered African conflicts. Garmin21 (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! It's very fun to learn about and create pages for these conflicts. Jebiguess (talk) 17:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 As-Suwayda clashes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 As-Suwayda clashes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 As-Suwayda clashes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on April 2022 Namissiguima attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article, I have reviewed it. I encourage you to write more articles! Have a good day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Jebiguess (talk) 16:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you, for your recent contributions to the conflict in Sudan, especially in the Battle of Geneina an article which I created and still edit. Your edits have helped us understand and process information rapidly and conveniently. And again, Thank you! NYMan6 (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 Raqqa attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Raqqa attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Raqqa attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Mangu violence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mangu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battles involving Boko Haram

Hello Jebiguess,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battles involving Boko Haram for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Battles involving Boko Haram to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Karnataka ^talk 19:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I created the page and then realized I forgot the category tag on it. It then said I wasn't allowed to move it to a category, so I created another, correct category page. Jebiguess (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2022 Mandera attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Koulogon massacre. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Taghatert and West Inekar massacres. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Ménaka offensive. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Romny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Romny, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Romny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Fafa skirmish

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fafa skirmish, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles involving Togo

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles involving Togo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Guiré attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ganar Kiyawa massacre

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ganar Kiyawa massacre, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ganar Kiyawa massacre

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ganar Kiyawa massacre, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Petel Kole attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Battle of Demoso. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of May 2023 Mayo shelling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May 2023 Mayo shelling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2023 Mayo shelling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Elakla

Hello, Jebiguess,

Thank you for creating Battle of Elakla.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, and thank you for creating this article. Readers would find it very helpful if you can provide additional context linking this incident to the broader Operation Barkhane conflict. At the moment, it is not clear why this needs to be a standalone page. Please see WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanamonde93}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanamonde (Talk) 17:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be as impartial and factual as I can. Jebiguess (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles involving Czechia

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles involving Czechia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of events named massacres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events named massacres, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events named massacres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2018 Talataye attack. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating pages of Sudanese Army & Sudanese Navy

Hello,

Sudanese Army and Sudanese Navy - two service branches of the Sudanese Armed Forces have no Wikipedia pages. Service branches of other country’s armed forces have separate pages about them, except Sudan.

I noticed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan that you're interested in military topic. So I'm requesting you to create pages about the two service branches. As a civil war is happening in Sudan right now, I think the military forces deserve separate wikipedia pages. I've added their names in 'Article Requests' at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan.

Thank you! Ragnarvrollo (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Ethnic conflict in West Darfur (2020-2022)

Template:Campaignbox Ethnic conflict in West Darfur (2020-2022) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Djebok ambush. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2017 Dogofry ambush. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Goulgountou mosque attack. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Goumakoura ambush. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Battle of Adjlal. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Battle of Kidal (2016)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Kidal (2016), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battles involving Boko Haram

Hello, Jebiguess. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battles involving Boko Haram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Abdelmalek Guenaizia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abdelmalek Guenaizia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Zeta Psi chapters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Abass Dembélé

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abass Dembélé, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battles involving Boko Haram

Hello, Jebiguess. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battles involving Boko Haram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Popular Movement for the Salvation of Azawad

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Popular Movement for the Salvation of Azawad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mohamed Ali Boughazi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mohamed Ali Boughazi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard Alert

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Floribert Anzuluni

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Floribert Anzuluni, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Battle of Anefis (May 2013)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Anefis (May 2013), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Oblast

I noticed your edit here, where you remove the definite article in "the Donetsk Oblast", claiming incorrect grammar. "The xxx Oblast" appears to be common phrasing in sources. Could you please point me in the right direction to better understand why "the" is incorrect here? SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 03:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to revert it, I just thought the the didn't flow well in the sentence. Most sources I see describe it as "the Donetsk region" anyway, I just figured with both Donetsk and Oblast being capitalized, and no "of x location" after it, it flowed better as a standalone phrase like Plateau State or Erzurum Province. Jebiguess (talk) 05:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crocus City Hall shooting

Hello Jebiguess,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kiwiz1338, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Crocus City Hall shooting, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at 2024 Crocus City Hall attack. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kiwiz1338}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kiwiz1338 (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think it might be best to merge the two pages as the former is a stub at the moment. Jebiguess (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Mohammed Touati. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2012 Malian counter-coup attempt

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2012 Malian counter-coup attempt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Battle of the Wagadou Forest (2011)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of the Wagadou Forest (2011), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on 2020 Bankass massacres. GWA88, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add categories when creating a new article. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GWA88}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GWA88 (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I've been unsure how to use Hotcat, but I'll learn a bit more. Jebiguess (talk) 16:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haiti

I appreciate the template you made concerning the Haitian crisis (as well as the articles you've created!). It really helps to give an overview of the chaos. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 00:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One problem though... if you click on E (for edit) it says the template doesn't exist, so you have to go dig into the code to find it. Could you check your syntax to be sure it's right? -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 00:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed. Thank you for letting me know! Jebiguess (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nguetchewe attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Far North Region and IDP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lionel Bilgo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lionel Bilgo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Lionel Bilgo. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mohamed Ag Intalla

Hello, Jebiguess,

Thank you for creating Mohamed Ag Intalla.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Kindly categorise.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Ibrahim Malam Dicko. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess, thank you for your work on Battle of Gourma-Rharous (2017). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rafis Kashapov

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rafis Kashapov, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Sévaré ambush. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on National Alliance for the Protection of Fulani Identity and the Restoration of Justice. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah

Bro, I see your edits in the attack on Majdal Shams.

I am asking you, Hezbollah are not innocent. Do not defend this terrorist organization. الرجل من مجدل (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check my response in the talk page. I am not defending them, I HATE Hezbollah for what they've done in Syria and Lebanon. However just because of Hezbollah is awful we do not need to whitewash the history of the Golan Heights and underscore Israel's role in the conflict. Jebiguess (talk) 17:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a saying in Arabic that goes: "يد واحدة لا تصفق," which means "one hand cannot clap... it takes two sides to play." But here, Hezbollah is interfering in a war that does not concern them, and in doing so, they are destroying Lebanon! الرجل من مجدل (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I agree with you, I am only reporting what reliable sources say. Jebiguess (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you for your support in these difficult times. الرجل من مجدل (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest adding an internal link to Hezbollah, at least the first time the term appears in each section. · ^מקףHyphen_෴ · 21:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorization in Battle of Tinzaouaten (2024)

Hello, Jebiguess. I've reverted your edit, with the edit summary "per MOSCAT" in the article "Battle of Tinzaouaten (2024)".

As a general rule (see WP:PARENTCAT in WP:MOSCAT), "an article should be categorised under the most specific branch in the category tree possible, without duplication in parent categories above it. In other words, articles should rarely be placed in both a given category and any of its sub- or parent (super-) categories. For example, the article "Paris" need only be placed in Category:Cities in France, not also in Category:Populated places in France."

Please, note that Category:Battles in 2024, added by you, is a parent category for Category:Battles of the Mali War in 2024, a more specific sub-category, which is already present in the article. Russian Rocky (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Hamada Ould Mohamed Kheirou. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Suggest putting different or more explanatory wording in in place of katiba.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Baley Beri ambush

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Baley Beri ambush, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Naungmon ambush

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Naungmon ambush. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Naungmon raid. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Naungmon raid. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March 2021 Darey-Daye massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hausa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Máximo Lira. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Muhindo Nzangi. Another editor, Chaotic Enby, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Always great to see articles about African politics!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Jebiguess, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jebiguess (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Oumar Bikimo. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Achafghi Ag Bohada. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jebiguess. Thank you for your work on Didier Dacko. Another editor, Shushugah, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for interesting article! The biography section is redundant as entire article is a biography. It would benefit from being split into Early life and career sections. Grammar can be more active, e.g "Dacko is the Malian ambassador to People's..."

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Seytenga massacre

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Seytenga massacre, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zinghara skirmish moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zinghara skirmish. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battles involving the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara has been nominated for renaming

Category:Battles involving the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheLibyanGuy (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]