User talk:FuzzyMagma

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2; 3; 4; 5;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is FuzzyMagma's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your GA nomination of September Laws (Sudan)

The article September Laws (Sudan) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:September Laws (Sudan) for comments about the article, and Talk:September Laws (Sudan)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS thank you very much. I learned alot and I would appreciate it if you have some pointers on how to get the article to FA FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review page

Anita Pendo, Thanks for your time@FuzzyMagma Vikingsam (talk) 08:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Vikingsam Hi there. I really don't see how Anita Pendo is a notable journalist. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check about her references all of them are from The New Times (Rwanda), Rwandan leading newspaper.

@VanderwaalforcesThanks

@FuzzyMagma Vikingsam (talk) 13:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whether The New Times is Rwanda's leading newspaper is not the point here. I checked most of the cited pieces (even from TNTs) they provide literally nothing useful to establish the general guideline on notability. Like I said, they already failed the one for journalists. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I understand, but She won as Best African female radio presenter in 2024.check this link

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/article/15653/entertainment/showbiz/anitha-pendo-bags-2023-african-female-radio-presenter-award Vikingsam (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vikingsam For example, this is an interview, this fails WP:INDEPENDENCE, the Ladies in Media Awards is not notable on its own, this provides no useful information to be used on an encyclopedia, and so much more. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article can rather be edited well than deletion.@Vanderwaalforces@FuzzyMagma Vikingsam (talk) 14:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vikingsam I told you before to stop posting review request on my talk. Can you please stop or I will make a complaint at WP:ANI FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll be sure it won't happen again to request review on your talk @FuzzyMagma

Thank you Vikingsam (talk) 14:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on 1973 Constitution of Sudan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on 1956 Transitional Constitution of Sudan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I deleted an irrelevant pic with a false description added to the page by "Tobby" on 24/11/2024, why are you so keen to restore it? 41.68.190.220 (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because the description of the picture match the picture caption. You on the other hand haven’t provided any evidence or discussed the picture with Toby at least. But actually engaged in warring. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tobby72 you may want to respond FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please respond at Talk:Nubians#Contested pictures FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi FuzzyMagma. Thank you for your work on MOASS. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1899 months

If possible please have more month articles for 1899 created. So far we only have December. 2600:100C:A218:9A7B:11B5:10A2:C434:3503 (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miss International 2006

Hi there! I saw that you marked the Miss International 2006 article as reviewed, even though it had a notability tag on it. Did you find sources to establish notability? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just looked through the whole Miss International series and it seems borderline. My intuition was if this article needs to be deleted then the whole series should, as they all have the same level of credible coverage in secondary sources (almost none), plus I didn’t see harm in having the article.

None of what I have mentioned is a policy so I will totally understand if you reverted my review but I think tagging the article is enough to warn the reader, and having this article unreviewed will mean other reviewers will spend time to decide on it. FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]