User talk:Bunnypranav

This is Bunnypranav's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

Happy holidays!

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025!  ♦Maliner (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maliner Thanks, and same to you! Hope you have a happy holiday! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Philly6097 (17:40, 18 December 2024)

Hello Mr. Pranav, and thank you for reaching out to me. As I said on my fledgling user page, I'm a longtime reader of Wikipedia hoping to make a more regular thing of contributing, particularly to articles concerning birds and local history (mainly New England for me).

I started a teahouse conversation the other day because some of the edits I would like to do involve taking out needless trivia, cruft as someone called it. Though I see an overstuffed and ill proportioned article as being, because of the off putting effect on a reader, almost as bad as a scanty or wrong one, I want to proceed with consideration. I would find it helpful if you could point out any relevant policies or projects that come to mind, as I am not skilled in navigating the forest of WP: and so forth.

I find it an interesting philosophical question how Wikipedia should coexist with sources like Cornell Lab's eBird which have come to dominate their (sometimes narrow) realms in mind boggling detail.

As it is, I plan to cautiously start editing the article Monk Parakeet with an eye to the sort of problem I mention above, and I'm curious as to whether it will attract any pushback.

Thanks again for your message, and for any advice you care to send my way! --Philly6097 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Philly6097 I have posted a tamplate with links in your talk. You can refer to it anytime for a list of basic policies. As for this specific issue, Wikipedia:Trivia, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Verifiability might be of use. Consider browsing through the links in the above three pages as well for extended content. Hope the helps ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BunnysBot adding duplicate parms

BunnysBot is adding filmbio-work-group=yes to talk pages that already have filmbio-work-group. see this history. Davemck (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Davemck, I check if the filmbio-work-group=yes already exists, due to the page using filmbio-work-group=y, this error seems to have occured. The job is done, so no worries anymore. Thanks for pointing it out! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Close at In Search of Lost Time

Three of the four oppose votes had no basis in policy or misrepresented policy. I’d like to relist the discussion and get more eyes on it before closing. Would you be willing to undo your close for relisting? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 14:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Zanahary, sorry for the delayed response. Based on my reading of the consensus, the votes are based on policies. There are very strong arguments against the move on the move. I still think that the closure is appropriate. Please reply back if you still feel that is closure is inappropriate. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (17 October 2024 – present) and Timeline of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict (17 September 2024 – present)

Can you start splitting proposals for these two article and split if it they have consensus among Wikipedians. I think that 2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement is the best breakthrough event for splitting both articles. Thank you in advance. Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Pachu Kannan I shall plan to do it in a while. Feel free to start one. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Bunnypranav, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 10:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Hello Bunnypranav: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 10:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and same to you! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Editor experience invitation

Hi Bunnypranav. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move request for page Lingayatism

Hi @Bunnypranav, Can we please conclude the discussion on move request of page Lingayatism to "Lingayats". Thank You ! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 11:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PerspicazHistorian Per WP:RMRELIST, relisted moves stay open for 7 days after the relist (21 Dec to 28 Dec in this case). They should not be closed early unless there is a clear consensus with strong arguments, which I do not see here yet. Better leave it for 7 days. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay PerspicazHistorian (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reviewing my article, Dilshad Hussain. Taabii (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]