User:TParis/Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests	Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages	0
Wikipedians looking for help	0
Requests for unblock	19
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests	53
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests	60
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests	4
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests	2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests	101
Requested RD1 redactions	2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations	0
Candidates for speedy deletion	0
Open sockpuppet investigations	67
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Administrative backlog

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review

Requests for unblock

SPI cases awaiting administration

Template:Admin dashboard

Template:Admin dashboard/light

Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox

Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

Wikipedia:Closure requests

Wikipedia:Files for discussion

Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Wikipedia:Requested moves

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot

Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

• 2601:2c1:8a01:e40:e4:eb59:a661:d5cf (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• RIBBIT CABBAGE JUNIOR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account  $Jayhawker6$【💬】 21:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• 24.126.58.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. Z. Patterson (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• 2A02:B021:F01:E38D:347A:E7:517:536A (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Block evasion by Alec Smithson. A09|(talk) 23:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• 85.134.157.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Donkey Kong Country (TV series) (diff): Clearly block evasion of 78.135.166.12. Compare the aforementioned diff with this one from that previous IP. I compared the geolocations and they are the same too. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries Attack pages 0 Copyright violations 0 Hoaxes 0 Vandalism 0 User requested 0 Empty articles 0 Nonsense pages 0 Spam pages 0 Importance or significance not asserted 0 Possibly contested candidates 0 Other candidates 1

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: ( source / chronological order / expired ) Category:Expired proposed deletions

Deletion backlog Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 87 items Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

• PropagandaProtection (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "fake[- ]*news|disinformation|propaganda" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

• Mohamedsalahbengalurufcsuperfan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

• Digitttttttttt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "(..)\1\1\1\1" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file internal repetition -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

• Rahul SINGH Graphic Designers & Video Editor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "40chars" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

• My553cornell.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

• Stinky75 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

• Anderson1983Records (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• Anchornoor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "Used rn instead of m attempting to skip filter: homo. Violating string: anchomoor" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• Garydeangraytdcjnumber2071249 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• GlitchyNoob (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "noob" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file generally insulting Internet slang term -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• Stinkychicken (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• Frogspecial4694userspottercoat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• AutisticWoodcrawler (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ridwanks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "wank" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Iamnewyorkiampennsylvania (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• VicDieselFamily (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chickennuggetswithham1234 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Icantakeherplaceletmegetmywayoooh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Renamed user 9b69b1b5b1be9f457e3e34870778a6f4 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  User has changed their username. Username renamed and globally Locked on m:. It Is Me Here (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• 997pooop121212 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Courtesyoftheartisteditor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Public-historian-23 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chane5.wit.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Shit idek2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Salaariseave (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Appears to be using userpage as a webhost for links to promotional posts on other channels; Username is that of a well-lnown person. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

• ThopazProductions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Role account. Name represents a likely company name. Graywalls (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. To block without warning, there must be some connection between the account name and their edits, I may have missed it, but I haven't seen one. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  I also note that they've had this username since 2021. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Shiva and Parvati (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. An account name with "and" in the middle like this implies two people are operating it. No problem with the edits, just the misleading name. MarcGarver (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

MarcGarver, since Shiva and Parvati are deities instead of people, I fail to see the problem. Cullen328 (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I guess that's a fair point, although they are equally used as people's names (e.g., Aerial and Gabriel are angels, but also people's names). MarcGarver (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

If that's your concern, I would suggest discussing it with the user, and if your concerns are not addressed, you may bring it to WP:RFCN. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Not a blatant violation of the username policy. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Gamayamattos (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Per their contribution. Aqurs1 (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Aqurs1 Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Appears to be a Mark at WidgetFactory situation. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 19:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page protection

Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Request protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Girnar

• Girnar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of edit warring with a particular user removing well sourced content Expectopatronum30 (talk) 11:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Constant edit warring and removal of sourced historical information. Nabhas Chandra (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Stormbird (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours for violating 3RR in a contentious topic area. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Since this was just a case of one user, it really would have been better reported to ANEW, where the same thing would have happened, but probably faster. Daniel Case (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Titin

• Titin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP Users, especially adding the "fact" that it has long names without good reason.CricketXP (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Lenny Kravitz

• Lenny Kravitz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP appears to restore changes by 13enedict. They also referred to a talk page discussion recently started by 13enedict (with no other responses). Mellk (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

13enedict now appears to leave a comment on my talk page, stating that they will restore the changes if they do not hear from me. Since this looks like WP:LOUTSOCK and they are only focused on this particular article, it might be sufficient to only block them? Mellk (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I actually do agree this needs page or at least the section of Early Life needs protection. It is currently in an inaccurate state and User:Mellk is refusing to discuss. 13enedict (talk) 14:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Life Records

• Life Records (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent unsourced content from IP range Special:Contributions/36.71.136.0/22. The article is about Malaysian record label, but they keep change to "Malaya-Hong Kong-Singapore number one and largest oldest oldies record label owned by Hup Hup Sdn Bhd", as well as their problematic edits without any improvement. 183.171.120.157 (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Lefty Gunplay

• Lefty Gunplay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Lezgins

• Lezgins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continually changing figures. Mellk (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Toy Story 5

• Toy Story 5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, including unconfirmed cast members and characters. The Media Expert (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Khetran

• Khetran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP disruption surely by @Satoshi Nakamoto34: soon after the user account's block from the article yesterday. MŠLQr (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9/Archive

• Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9/Archive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. C F A 17:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

List of war crimes

• List of war crimes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Movement for Quality Government in Israel

• Movement for Quality Government in Israel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pyramid

• Pyramid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948

• All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Civilian casualties in the Second Intifada

• Civilian casualties in the Second Intifada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Arab Women's Association of Palestine

• Arab Women's Association of Palestine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory

• Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2002

• Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2002 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Jesse Daley

• Jesse Daley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits. Simione001 (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Further Comment IP again coming to make the same change again and again that has been explained several times over the past couple of years because of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Has been reverted a few times since last protection expiration. Has been protected in the past for one week, one month, one year, and six months. Probably due for another extended protection. RedPatch (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Sinfest

• Sinfest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BangJan1999 22:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Bryce Mitchell

• Bryce Mitchell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Athlete embroiled in controversy, already seeing vandalism. Nswix (talk) 22:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:13, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Federal monarchy

• Federal monarchy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 23:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Justin Tucker

• Justin Tucker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: BLP violations in awake of allegations. 2601:586:5301:5C00:21AB:D3DE:2532:5472 (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Moeed Pirzada

• Moeed Pirzada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Autoconfirmed SPAs trying to remove maintenance tags [1][2][3] [4] [5] [6]. Badbluebus (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Jamiroquai

• Jamiroquai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IPs have been consistently and deliberately disrupting the article which uses British English by replacing "Jamiroquai are" to "Jamiroquai is" and in one case "Jamiroquai be". [7] [8] [9] [10] I fear that this disruption may persist. 웃OO 23:37, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Request unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Request edit

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests

Gaza genocide

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Module:Disambiguation (request) 2025-01-18 20:46 Fully protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2023-09-01: "Upping to full protection as now used by Module:Pagetype" Template:Short description (request) 2025-01-29 16:37 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

4 template-protected edit requests v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry Template:Infobox sports league (request) 2025-01-25 22:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions" Template:Post-nominals/GBR (request) 2025-01-30 07:35 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ivanvector on 2019-10-25: "Highly visible template: change to TE protection per request and consensus" Template:Photo requested (request) 2025-01-30 17:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-01-20: "highly visible template" Template:Country data Austria-Hungary (request) 2025-01-30 21:10 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled (add request · view requests) User:Ojsyork Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC) I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC) @Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC) User:Needforname Needforname (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done. Hello Needforname and thanks for your contributions. All your articles seem to be in need of a decent copyedit, and therefore can use another pair of eyes. The criteria for giving autopatrolled are that the articles need to be 'nearly perfect'. One way to improve the English in your article is to nominate one of your articles at WP:GOCE, and learn from the mistakes that are corrected. Or you can use an LLM and ask it to find grammatical errors. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC) User:Ahola .O Ahola .O (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk) (Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:SDGB1217 SDGB1217 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC) User:C1K98V C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC) @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [11]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC) User:Walco1 Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC) User:S-Aura S-Aura (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC) User:बडा काजी बडा काजी (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC) User:Иованъ Иованъ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC) User:Feralpearl Feralpearl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) As part of NPP, I've reviewed and article of there's, and then checked their other recent pages. They produce appropriately referenced, well-written, and appropriately formatted pages. Klbrain (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests) User:Waddie96 Waddie96 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am requesting AWB rights to assist with repetitive and time-consuming tasks like correcting formatting issues, standardising citation styles, updating outdated links, and organising categories. My goal: improve the quality and consistency of Wikipedia articles with an interest in contributing to medicine/biology. waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)  Already done (automated response): This user already has AutoWikiBrowser access. — MusikBot talk 11:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.
Confirmed (add request · view requests)

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed (add request · view requests) User:Jjackson10003 Jjackson10003 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request the necessary permissions to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on my Wikipedia account. I value the security of my account and believe that adding 2FA will provide an additional layer of protection, ensuring the safety of my contributions and the integrity of my account. My Contributions: Username: Jjackson10003 Account Details: Autoconfirmed user since August 10, 2020, with 10 edits to date. I have actively contributed to Wikipedia by [briefly describe your contributions, such as editing specific articles, creating pages, or participating in discussions]. Reason for Request: As technology evolves, the risk of account hijacking increases, particularly with the rise of AI and changes in regimes that may encourage bad actors to exploit vulnerabilities. Enabling 2FA will significantly reduce the likelihood of unauthorized access to my account and prevent potential misuse. Ensuring account security is critical, both for individual users and for the protection of Wikipedia’s broader community and platform integrity. While I am currently an autoconfirmed user, I understand that 2FA is typically reserved for users with advanced permissions. I kindly request that I be considered for either extended confirmed user status or temporary access to enable 2FA. Commitment to Wikipedia Standards: I am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, ensuring that my contributions adhere to community standards. I believe that my request aligns with the shared goal of maintaining a secure and trustworthy environment for editors and the broader Wikipedia community. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if there is any additional information or clarification needed. I am happy to provide further details about my contributions or intentions. Sincerely, Jjackson10003 Jjackson10003 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done We do not consider requests that were rather obviously generated by AI. --Kinu t/c 16:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC) In addition to what Kinu said, extended confirmed doesn't confer the ability to enable 2FA. You'll need to follow the instructions at H:ACCESS2FA. stwalkerster (talk) 17:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC) User:AsmarTiba AsmarTiba (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC) P.S. I have previously done translation from English to Hebrew, I figured this limitation only applies when translating to English. AsmarTiba (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer (add request · view requests) User:Barrettsprivateers Barrettsprivateers (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 18:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 20:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC) User:Owais Khursheed Owais Khursheed (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)  Done signed, Rosguill talk 20:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC) User:GrabUp GrabUp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC) User:Rodney Baggins Rodney Baggins (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC) User:ViridianPenguin ViridianPenguin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I've been editing for over five years with 2.2K mainspace edits, which includes over 30 new articles. In May 2024, Clovermoss gave me a three-month trial of the NPP permission, and I got the reviewer barnstar in that month's backlog drive. I sparingly used AFD and CSD during my reviewing, but that is mostly because when I found deficient articles, I spent the time to make them passable, rather than sending them for draftification/deletion. When I did propose content for deletion, I generally received community consensus to do so. I am seeking the permission for permanent use, but another trial works too! ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 18:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover (add request · view requests) User:History6042 History6042 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? Primefac (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC) I would like to use it so I could perform more moves as right now I can't do most of them without this permission. @Primefac History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done for now due to lack of need (zero edits to WP:RMTR and only one attempted and failed move). Please feel free to request moves there and if they get done by others consider rerequesting. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:Tiggerjay Tiggerjay (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC) Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? I note that you have an RM/TR request and a couple of G6's, but otherwise not much in the way of necessity so far. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC) Currently I'm avoiding some NAC because I am not really a fan of using TR because what I've found is that the admin who does perform the TR ends up doing all of the busy work (post move cleanup). IMHO the closer should perform the dirty work of cleaning up the move, and I'm happy to do so. I would see myself closing more discussions if the bit was available. That is the reason for the low number of current TR/G6, but you can see the frequency I previously require those tools prior to a wikibreak over at my CSD log. For me the bit is not about hat collecting, but rather simply because I'm getting back involved in Wiki (due to life-schedule changes) and as a formerly trusted and well-reputed RM-NAC, these tools would make more closures with follow-on work accessible. TiggerJay (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests) User:BryceM2001 BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)  Not at this time due to limited editing experience but please do apply again later. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC) User:Ali Beary Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC) @Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC) @Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for rollback

Rollback (add request · view requests) User:Footballnerd2007 Footballnerd2007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC) Not a good idea imo, editor has not yet demonstrated ability to distinguish vandalism from good faith constructive contributions. Sorry FN, but I did say I would oppose this as your mentor, and nothing has changed imo, so here I am. CNC (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:Fishy-Finns Fishy-Finns (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)  Done Yeah, that looks better. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:CivilianArthur CivilianArthur (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)  Not done Not enough recent activity - your last 50 edits date back almost 2 years. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:Protobowladdict Protobowladdict (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC) User:Vineyard93 Vineyard93 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Some newbie editors contain IP address not their username editing wrong and fake information even if is not the area origin. Vineyard93 (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:UndeadAnarchy UndeadAnarchy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hello, I have been working on counter-vandalism with RedWarn for a while now. Despite my inconsistent and relatively low edit count compared to other requesters, I believe I would be a good fit. I approach CV with the idea that it is better to have somebody with malicious intentions get away with their behavior than it is to accuse an innocent person of Vandalism. I aim for high accuracy over total reverts. I have made mistakes in the past but I am usually quick to notice and fix them. The main reason I am requesting Rollback is to gain experience with the Huggle desktop application. Thank you for the consideration and I look forward to hearing back. UndeadAnarchy|✉ 14:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC) User:Rahmatula786 Rahmatula786 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) I would like to request rollback permission to help combat vandalism, particularly in Nepal-related articles, which I frequently come across while patrolling recent changes. Having rollback rights would allow me to efficiently revert obvious and disruptive edits, improving the quality of affected pages. I always assume good faith and am careful when reviewing edits. If I am uncertain whether an edit is vandalism, I do not revert it. I am also familiar with Wikipedia’s warning templates and know when it is appropriate to report persistent vandals to WP:AIV. I believe rollback will be a valuable tool in my efforts to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will use it responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for template editor

Template editor (add request · view requests) User:Nux Nux (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) Hi. I would like to request the rights to edit certain templates, such as the {{piechart}} template and its associated module, important when its usage increases. I want to have these rights in advance so I can apply fixes when needed. I am already a sysop on pl-wiki and an interface admin on several wikis, including meta-wiki. See more on my page: User:Nux. In real life, I am a library systems programmer with professional experience in WCAG and hold a certificate in web accessibility, which is useful for certain aspects of template development (colors, structure). I also work on gadgets and CI/CD scripts, such as Wikipedia:Wikiploy, which, while less relevant to templates, demonstrates my programming experience — an important skill for working with Lua modules. Oh, I did read the guidelines. I even translated them into Polish; it didn't gain traction on plwiki, but at least now I know them :) Nux (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)  Automated comment This user has 951 total edits and has 56 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 20:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC) {{piechart}} is not protected so anyone can edit it. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC) @Pppery When that template is used in an update to {{Pie chart}} (6927 transclusions) will it not automatically become template-protected? Rjjiii (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC) It will. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)  Done – SD0001 (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

This dashboard (talk)