Talk:Naruto: Ultimate Ninja
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naruto: Ultimate Ninja article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Naruto: Ultimate Ninja" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about any aspect of future media and fiction, such as plot and gameplay. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about any aspect of future media and fiction, such as plot and gameplay at the Reference desk. |
Character list cleanup
[edit]I'd recommend removing all the "cosmetic chracters" such as all the "(Reincarnated)" characters because, well, they serve no real purpose in the list now, do they? If anyone disagrees they're free to argue in favor of keeping them but I honestly find them as pointless as listing alternate colour schemes and/or colour scheme homages as separate characters in any other game series... I'd be all for keeping characters whose "cosmetic changes" aren't fully cosmetic but change their playstyle, too, though. - 83.189.184.228 (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Character chart
[edit](diff) This character list is unwieldy and not encyclopedic—it's video game trivia outside our scope as an encyclopedia. Describe major characters (ideally with secondary sources) if you must, but the chart is overkill. czar 07:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Woah! That's ridiculously inappropriate. I completely agree. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Perfect example of WP:GAMETRIVIA. Does not say anything substantial about the game series, or even about the characters. --Soetermans. T / C 11:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, clearly covered by WP:VGSCOPE as inappropriate. -- ferret (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- I agree too. The size is huge.Tintor2 (talk) 15:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Perfect example of WP:GAMETRIVIA. Does not say anything substantial about the game series, or even about the characters. --Soetermans. T / C 11:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Would referencing it and making List of Naruto: Ultimate Ninja be an option? (If DangerousJXD would like to keep it) Anarchyte 10:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not exactly sure why you called for me but I don't have any further comments about this. If I had to answer your question, I'd say "no", assuming you meant "List of Naruto: Ultimate Ninja characters". I only commented here because I thought that table was so outrageously silly that I just had to comment, and I saw the WikiProject section. —DangerousJXD (talk) 10:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Naruto: Ultimate Ninja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090925172332/http://www.naruto-videogames.com/it/game/playstation-2/ultimate-ninja-4%3A-naruto-shippuden/ to http://www.naruto-videogames.com/it/game/playstation-2/ultimate-ninja-4:-naruto-shippuden/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Maior
[edit]Maiores 154.127.222.102 (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)