Jump to content

End Poem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The end credits of the video game Minecraft include a written work by Julian Gough, conventionally called the End Poem, which is the only narrative text in the mostly unstructured sandbox game. Minecraft's creator Markus "Notch" Persson did not have an ending to the game up until a month before launch, and following recommendation by Twitter followers, he invited Gough to create a narrative for the ending. The work, which debuted in Beta version 1.9, takes the form of a 1,500-word dialogue between two unspecified entities who discuss what the player has done in the game. Originally referred to as a short story, it is now usually described as a work of poetry.

The dialogue, set in green and teal, scrolls across the screen over the course of about nine minutes; certain parts are obscured as intentionally glitched text. Most critical reception of the poem has been neutral to positive, often emphasising its atypicality. Several commentators have focused on its comparison of both video games and life to dreams. It has been positively received among Minecraft fans, some of whom have had quotes from it tattooed.

Gough wrote in 2022 that he never signed away his rights to the End Poem, having failed to reach an agreement with Mojang AB prior to the poem's addition to the game and then having rejected a contract in 2014 on the eve of Mojang's acquisition by Microsoft. He argued that Microsoft's continued use of the poem was copyright infringement, but said he did not want a legal dispute with them. After two psychedelic experiences with psilocybin, he was motivated by his own words in the poem that "you are love" and the affection he had received from fans to release a version of the poem into the public domain. Microsoft has not commented on Gough's characterisation of the poem's status.

Creation and use in Minecraft

[edit]
Avatar of Markus Persson
Avatar of Markus Persson
Markus Persson
@notch
Twitter logo, a stylized blue bird

Are YOU a talented writer (famous is a plus ;D) who wants to write a silly over-the-top out-of-nowhere text for when you win Minecraft?

16 October 2011[1]

In October 2011, Minecraft's creator, Markus "Notch" Persson, was preparing to launch the official version of the game, and his company Mojang had even prepared a launch event, though at that point he had no ending for the game. Persson tweeted that he was seeking someone to write "a silly over-the-top out-of-nowhere text for when you win".[2] His followers recommended the Irish writer Julian Gough, and Persson became convinced after reading Gough's earlier short story "The iHole".[3]: 139 

Gough remembers that Persson felt the death of the Ender Dragon should trigger a narrative, but since Persson "wasn't a word guy, and hadn't a clue what that narrative should say", Gough was given freedom in composing the work.[2] Gough had played Minecraft in alpha at a game jam but had not thought much of it, and was unaware of its popularity until Persson reached out to him. Gough played it some more and then wrote the text.[4][5] Upon submitting the finished work to Persson, Gough wondered if he should cut it, but Persson was pleased that it related to his philosophy of life and wanted it kept in full.[2] It debuted alongside the rest of the end credits and the full endgame mechanics in Beta version 1.9.[6]

Gough and Persson originally referred to the untitled work as a short story,[4][3]: 140  but it came to be seen more as a poem than as prose,[3]: 140  and by 2014 was generally referred to as the End Poem,[7] a name Gough went on to adopt.[5] Other sources have used the appellation "End text"[3] or not assigned it any name.[4][6][8]

After players win the game by killing the Ender Dragon and step into the End Portal, the poem comes on-screen.[7] It plays alongside the track "Alpha" from C418's soundtrack album Minecraft – Volume Beta.[9] It begins with the words "I see the player you mean" in teal and a reply of the active player's name in green, followed by about 1,500 words of dialogue between the two speakers, whose identities are never established but have been described in The Escapist as "god-like".[10] Small portions are intentionally rendered as glitched text.[11] The poem culminates with twelve consecutive lines starting with "and the universe said".[3]: 141  The poem ends with:[a]

[green] and the universe said I love you because you are love.

[teal] And the game was over and the player woke up from the dream. And the player began a new dream. And the player dreamed again, dreamed better. And the player was the universe. And the player was love.

[teal] You are the player.

[green] Wake up.

External media
A Web implementation of the poem, similar to the formatting used in Minecraft

The poem scrolls across the screen over the course of about nine minutes; speeding it up by manually scrolling is made intentionally difficult.[5] It is the only narrative text in the game,[12] and the only text of significant length oriented toward the player.[13]: 10  As of December 2022, it has not been significantly modified from Gough's original version.[11]

Reception

[edit]

An early impression by Eric Limer in The Mary Sue was sharply critical, calling the End Poem "nothing but a bunch of text that scrolls down the screen excruciatingly slowly for an excruciatingly long time", which "reads like a stereotypical JRPG ending mashed up with some stuff written by a highschooler who just discovered post-modernist literature".[6] Subsequent commentary leans more favourable: Kevin Thielenhaus in The Escapist calls the poem "mysterious, and kind of weird, and probably not what most of us were expecting from a Minecraft ending".[10] The Atlantic's James Parker calls it "a goofy/beautiful metaphysical text".[7] Ted Litchfield in PC Gamer describes it as "warm and humanistic" and compares it to the 2015 video game Undertale and the 2017 multimedia narrative 17776.[14] Lori Landay, writing in the anthology Revisiting Imaginary Worlds, calls it "weird" and unlike anything else except maybe the ending of Battlestar Galactica (2004).[3]: 140  Gough himself has called the work an "oddity" and "peculiar".[15]

Jason Anthony in gamevironments and Matthew Horrigan in Acta Ludologica both highlight the End Poem's comparison of video games to dreams;[13]: 10–12 [16]: 17  Anthony also discusses the poem's relevance to the theological implications of Minecraft players' ability to create and destroy worlds.[13]: 10–12  Jacob Creswell in Comic Book Resources analyses the poem's commentary on dreams and its reference to life as "the long dream" in comparison to "the short dream of a game".[11] Creswell notes the dissimilarity between the lengthy poem and the minimalist game, but concludes that they fit well together, writing that "[t]he poem disagrees with the idea that the player is nothing compared to the grand scale of the universe" and that "[t]he game's code creates a world that players invest time and care into, much like their real lives".[11] Similarly, in MIT Technology Review, Simon Parkin observes that most players will never encounter the poem in-game, but finds that the two share a sentiment of creation through dream, which Parkin views as revealing the game's "somewhat evangelical" nature.[8]: 79–82 

A pale white arm, tattooed with the quote "and the universe said I love you because you are love", all lowercase and in a Minecraft-like font.
A tattoo quoting from the poem, set in a font similar to Minecraft's. Gough used an image of the same tattoo when discussing the poem's impact.[5]

Landay, agreeing with Parkin, reads the poem as a reward for making it to the End and finds it to echo her own thoughts about dreams and video games. She points to its rhythmic nature to explain why the text is often called a poem, even though Persson and Gough had initially called it a story, and compares it to a prayer or meditation through its repetition, as in the closing "And the universe" lines.[3]: 140–141  Regarding the final exhortation to "Wake up", Landay writes that some interpret it as a call to do things offline, while others view it in the context of the myth of Herobrine, a supposed supernatural Minecraft mob. While Gough was not aware of the Herobrine legend, the two are combined by some in the community into a shared "mythology and genealogy". Landay views this reading as "one more thread" in the poem's metanarrative, part of Gough's commentary on the transition from game to real life,[3]: 141–142  citing his comments to Tom Chatfield: "I love the strangeness that comes when people get so lost in a game that the game becomes the world. ... So I wanted to play with that moment, where you're between two worlds, and for a short little period you're not sure which one is more real."[4]

The Irish Independent describes the End Poem as revered by the Minecraft community,[12] and RTÉ reports it to have been widely quoted by fans of the game.[17] A number of fans have tattoos of excerpts, particularly from the "and the universe said" portion,[12] which Gough has described as "beyond moving".[5]

[edit]

In a December 2022 post on his Substack blog, The Egg and the Rock, Gough wrote that he had never signed any contract with Persson's Mojang AB over the poem. He recalled rather relying on an informal agreement that Mojang could use it in the existing Windows and OS X versions of the game.[14][5] Gough said he corresponded with Mojang managing director Carl Manneh about signing a formal agreement, but approached their talks as casual conversations rather than formal contract negotiations, something he considered a mistake.[14] He said these talks failed because he had misunderstood the context, and that he should have let his agent handle it.[2][5] Gough said he was paid a flat sum of €20,000 (equivalent to €25,749 in 2023) and the End Poem was implemented into the game without a contract signed.[14] He said that a month after the game's release, he was finally sent a contract to sign his rights to the poem away, but refused due to the preemptive use of the poem before he had been sent a contract, and because of his discontent with the way talks had gone.[18][2]

According to Gough, he was approached in August 2014 to sign over the poem as a "housekeeping" matter, and upon finally taking the time to read the contract, found the comprehensive buyout to be "worse than I'd even imagined". At that point unaware of the context that Mojang was being purchased by Microsoft, Gough learned of the buyout in a leaked news story, and further email exchanges followed.[2] The full legal implications of the resulting situation were unclear, and Gough wrote that he did not wish to have any legal dispute with Microsoft.[14] He refused to sign over the rights, and Microsoft bought Mojang anyway and kept using the poem.[18][2] Gough says that Persson and Manneh had paid for his time and writing experience, not permanent ownership, and that Microsoft would have needed to work out a separate deal with his agent for their use, but they did not.[19] In Gough's view, Microsoft's continued use of the poem violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a law they had lobbied for.[5] Free software commentator Glyn Moody concurred that Microsoft likely infringed on Gough's copyright.[20]

"I renounce my right to [hold copyright to the End Poem]. The universe wrote that ending, and the universe owns it. Which is to say both that nobody owns it, and we all own it. Which is to say, it lives outside of that way of looking at art."

— Gough on his decision to "formally liberate the End Poem from the corporate economy"[19]

Gough recalled his reluctance to include the line "and the universe said I love you because you are love"[b] because he did not believe it at the time; however, his thoughts changed after two psychedelic experiences with psilocybin near Apeldoorn, Netherlands.[5][18] He recalls telling "the universe" to "forget about what I want; just give me whatever you think I need", and it gave him advice about the situation with Minecraft and Microsoft, and also about the public.[19] He stated that he realised that he had been hiding from the love that fans had expressed for the poem and that he had to "complete the circuit" and "accept, and act on" that line of the poem.[5][18] As a result of his psilocybin-induced realisation, he placed the poem (specifically the version he had sent Persson) into the public domain using a CC0 dedication.[12]

Gough alleges Microsoft did not respond to inquiry from an unnamed global news organisation to comment about Gough's blog post, which Gough alleges was done to avoid the Streisand effect, and allegedly led the news organisation to "los[e] their nerve" about running a piece that would have confirmed his narrative.[21] Jez Corden of Windows Central expressed scepticism that a lack of comment would have exerted any pressure on such an organisation.[22] Sean Hollister of The Verge speculated that the obstacle for news organisations was the difficulty of verifying that Gough had never signed a contract.[23] Gough has also said that he received PayPal donations from Microsoft employees following his release of the End Poem, as well as messages of solidarity from writers and other creatives who feel "screwed over" by companies controlling their work.[24]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Formatted similarly to its usage in Minecraft, except with colours modified and names added for accessibility.
  2. ^ Misquoted in Gough's essay as "The universe loves you because you are love"[5]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Persson, Marcus [@notch] (16 October 2011). "Are YOU a talented writer (famous is a plus ;D) who wants to write a silly over-the-top out-of-nowhere text for when you win Minecraft?" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019 – via Twitter.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Pope, Conor (8 December 2022). "'I'm hurt'. Why Irish writer Julian Gough is 'liberating' the Minecraft ending he wrote". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 24 December 2022. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Landay, Lori (2016). "Minecraft: Transitional Objects and Transformational Experiences in an Imaginary World". In Wolf, Mark J. P. (ed.). Revisiting Imaginary Worlds: A Subcreation Studies Anthology. Routledge. pp. 127–147. doi:10.4324/9781315673363. ISBN 9781315673363.
  4. ^ a b c d Chatfield, Tom (9 January 2012). "Ending an endless game: an interview with Julian Gough, author of Minecraft's epic finale". Boing Boing. Happy Mutants. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Gough, Julian (7 December 2022). "I wrote a story for a friend". The Egg and the Rock. Archived from the original on 8 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023 – via Substack.
  6. ^ a b c Limer, Eric (11 November 2011). "Minecraft Now Has an Ending Sequence and Credits". The Mary Sue. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  7. ^ a b c Parker, James (22 May 2014). "Minecraft: The Most Creative Game Ever Made". The Atlantic. Atlantic Media. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  8. ^ a b Parkin, Simon (July 2013). "The Secret to a Video-Game Phenomenon". MIT Technology Review. 116 (4). EBSCOhost 88370119. Archived from the original on 4 May 2023. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  9. ^ Rosenfeld, Daniel. "Minecraft Volume Beta". C418.org. Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 20 September 2022.
  10. ^ a b Thielenhaus, Kevin (30 August 2017). "8 Weirdest Endings That Left Us Saying 'Huh?'". The Escapist. Themis Media. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  11. ^ a b c d Creswell, Jacob (26 December 2022). "Does Minecraft's Ending Actually Mean Anything". Comic Book Resources. Valnet. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
  12. ^ a b c d Moloney, Eoghan (8 December 2022). "Irishman who wrote Minecraft's revered 'End Poem' gives words away for free after declining to sign over rights to Microsoft". Irish Independent. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  13. ^ a b c Anthony, Jason (2015). "Current Key Perspectives in Video Gaming and Religion" (PDF). Gamevironments (3). University of Bremen: 7–15. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  14. ^ a b c d e Litchfield, Ted (12 December 2022). "The writer of Minecraft's ending poem wants to 'liberate it from the corporate economy'". PC Gamer. Future plc. Archived from the original on 11 February 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
  15. ^ Gough, Julian (20 May 2021). "Another Day, Another Riot, another world: Julian Gough on Toasted Heretic 30 years on". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  16. ^ Horrigan, Matthew (2022). "Nulltopia: Of Disjunct Space" (PDF). Acta Ludologica. 5 (2). University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius: 58–70. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  17. ^ McGrath, Pat (8 December 2022). "Minecraft's 'The End Poem' made freely available". RTÉ. Government of Ireland. Archived from the original on 3 February 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
  18. ^ a b c d Gault, Matthew (8 December 2022). "Guy Who Wrote Minecraft's Ending Poem Makes It Public Domain After Taking Shrooms". Vice. Vice Media. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2023.
  19. ^ a b c Philips, Tom (8 December 2022). "Minecraft's bizarre end poem never owned by Mojang or Microsoft, writer claims". Eurogamer. Gamer Network. Archived from the original on 25 February 2024. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  20. ^ Moody, Glyn (10 January 2023). "How Minecraft's 'End Poem' ended up in the public domain". Walled Culture. Archived from the original on 27 September 2024. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
  21. ^ Colbert, Isaiah (10 January 2023). "The Writer Of Minecraft's Ending Got High And Made It Free". Kotaku. G/O Media. Archived from the original on 11 November 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
  22. ^ Corden, Jez (8 January 2023). "Did Microsoft scare the media into not covering Minecraft's 'The End' copyright drama?". Windows Central. Future plc. Archived from the original on 11 February 2023. Retrieved 12 May 2023.
  23. ^ Hollister, Sean (6 January 2023). "Microsoft doesn't own the rights to Minecraft's ending—no one does, its author claims". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 30 March 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  24. ^ Shutler, Ali (10 January 2023). "Microsoft doesn't actually own the ending of Minecraft". NME. BandLab Technologies. Archived from the original on 17 December 2024. Retrieved 17 December 2024.