Talk:Lego Indiana Jones
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]it says that the sets are to be released in 2008, my brother has had them since early december 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.43.81 (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Lego Sets
I'm curious as to the reason why the Kigdom of the Crystal Skull sets are continually being removed from the page. Do they break some sort of rule?
I re-added the misiing sets, as the article was incomplete without them. It would be a great help if someone could fix that ugly table leftover thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.17.35 (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Temple of Doom sets
[edit]SOMEONE ASK THE LEGO GUYS TO BRING OUT SOME TEMPLE OF DOOM SETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.215.29.115 (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Please note this is not a Forum. User 50 (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
There is going to be At least 1 Temple of doom set in 2009, depicting the scene where the chinese gangsters chase Indy, Willie and Short Round. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.106.166 (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
It has been released recently.Maddogfilms (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Reference to Nazi Controversy
[edit]I believe this is unsourced and unverifiable. The only sources I can find are "spam" and the text on this page is a copyvio from another site. I'm going to remove it again. Please discuss before adding it back. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 19:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I put it back but I got rit of the mild controversy part because I don't think there was any controversy at all.Maddogfilms (talk) 10:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Actually never mind.Maddogfilms (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
New 2009 sets.
[edit]I would like to tell people to kindly stop adding the new sets, they are not confirmed or denied from an official statment (other than pictures- which are not considered). It is not suitable for inclusion into the article until it is actually revealed by Lego. Thanks, User 50 (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Shaghai Chase and Fight on the Flyingwing
[edit]Could people please stop removing Shanghai Chase and Fight on the Flying Wing because they at least been officially confirmed. 7:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddogfilms (talk • contribs)
-Okay add it back, but it still needs an official source. User 50 03:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
I thought it was an official source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddogfilms (talk • contribs) 09:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Well it's out now so I guess there is no need for a sorce now.Maddogfilms (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lego Indiana Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513144554/http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/promos/200804_legoindianajones/index.html to http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/promos/200804_legoindianajones/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)