Talk:Jak (Jak and Daxter)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jak (Jak and Daxter) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Jak" Jak and Daxter – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
Separate article
[edit]Article separated from previous designation (List of Jak and Daxter characters#Jak). Sources are verifiable with independent, cross-verified, third party reliable sources. Notability is likewise indicated with recognition aside the game series from Guinness World Records, IGN, and GameInformer magazine. Comparative to other articles that have their own articles, Jak is just as notable and verifiable if not more so. I'll try to take charge of this article, as well as Daxter (Jak and Daxter), List of Jak and Daxter characters (needs a lot of work), etc. Please only use this talk page for discussions about improvement to the article (which was not done in the previous messages that I archived). Jacedc (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not nearly enough prose from the sources you have cited to justify a split from the list of characters article. It's an admirable effort, but you have not made any further improvements to either of the aforementioned articles for a long time. Haleth (talk) 05:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jak (Jak and Daxter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamepro.com/article/news/218244/top-story-guinness-top-50-video-game-characters-of-all-time/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jak (Jak and Daxter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141209191332/http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/Jak-and-Daxter-Series/Jak-X-Combat-Racing-Interview/td-p/14318148 to http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/Jak-and-Daxter-Series/Jak-X-Combat-Racing-Interview/td-p/14318148
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)