Talk:Dorfromantik

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dorfromantik/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PresN (talk · contribs) 22:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 10:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Will review this. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 21.3% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable.
• No previous GA reviews.

General comments

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • "or an animal which wanders a forest" → "or an animal that wanders a forest"
  • "was the last time in their life they knew" → "was the last time in their lives they knew"
  • "The game continued to receive attention, and was" – remove and
  • "as soon as the game released" → "as soon as the game was released"
  • "as well as fund development" → "as well as fund the development"
  • I've done minor improvements to grammar. See Special:Diff/1242920912.
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Per MOS:LEADLENGTH, articles with less than 2,500 words should have one or two paragraphs. The current lede, however, summarises the article well, so it's up to you whether you want to trim it a bit.
  • Maybe change "Board game adaptations" to "Legacy"?
  • The article complies with the rest of the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED. Overall, the article has appropriate sections, and there are no biased words in the article.
• Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
  • No referencing issues.
  • All references are reliable/acceptable. Good job on archiving them.
  • Spotchecked Ref 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 32, 39–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • Could possibly change "strategy/puzzle" to "strategy-puzzle" or "strategy and puzzle".
  • Wikilink creative mode.
  • The rest of the article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
• Checking images.
  • Optional: Add alt text to the infobox image.
  • Images are properly licensed.

Final comments

@PresN: Nice job on the article. I'll leave the review on hold for a week. Once the issues get addressed, I'll promote the article. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@Vacant0: All done; I'd prefer to leave the lede as-is rather than try to condense down to 2 paragraphs. --PresN 01:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Promoting. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.