Talk:Classic Game Room

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gameplay of Pokémon (4 participants)
Lisette Titre-Montgomery (4 participants)
Party royale game (3 participants)
List of Minecraft characters (7 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (5 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants; relisted)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

References

Can someone please clean up the references, it look ridiculous. (Kamrat (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

CGR spinoff section

I would like to make changes to the CGR spin off section of the Classic Game Room page. The page has become too cluttered. Since there are multiple contributors for the channels and will be more as the channels continue to grow, I propose that a simple section showing each current channel along with when it was launched and a description about the type of content found there would be most helpful to fans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CGREditor (talk • contribs) 12:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CGR Spin-Offs

Instead Of Completely Removing The Spin-Off Section I Have Made It A Bit Less Cluttered Than The Last Version Of It. Comment Added By (TheFabFour99) February 20th 2012 14:10

How about adding some reliable sources? The article currently does not have a single reliable secondary source (interviews with Bussler are primary sources), and if no significant coverage in secondary sources can be shown to exist, it could be deleted for a lack of notability. Adding unsourced sections does not improve the article. Huon (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Reliable Source Is Wikipedia Before Someone Went And Change The Spin-Off Section, You Just Want To Be A Pain Because You Know That's True Information You Just Had To Be Annoying And Go Deleting It. You're Such A Joke Don't Do Things Just To Piss Someone Off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.33.219 (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh And You Might Want To Delete Everything Else On The Page Cause They Don't Have References, But You Won't Cause You Just Want To Screw The Little Guy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.33.219 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't think secondary sources can be found, deletion would indeed be the way to go. I have thus proposed the article for deletion. If you disagree, you can just remove that tag from the article, but I would ask you to also add some secondary sources. Until then, primary sources, while not establishing notability, are better than no sources at all. As an aside, Wikipedia does not consider itself a reliable source, and I strongly advise you against doing so. Huon (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Classic Game Room. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120426080110/http://loadedcartridge.blogspot.com/2010/09/with-apologies-to-classic-game-room.html to http://loadedcartridge.blogspot.com/2010/09/with-apologies-to-classic-game-room.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

The show has received criticism from many commenters for being inaccurate among other things. The Mo-Ja'al (talk) 07:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the Article from Past to Present Tense

Hello! I was wondering if it would be appropriate to change the article from past to present tense? CGR has resumed production on 6/23/2023 (in a limited capacity) according to a news update posted by Mark.

https://classicgameroom.com/news/ Supertennisdude (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]