Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 55
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | → | Archive 60 |
Surnames_of_Shivalli_Madhwa_Brahmins
Being a Shivalli Brahmin myself, I can vouch that most of these names do exist. I am pasting a link here of my source. http://shivallibrahmins.com/history/%EF%BB%BFfamily-names-history-of-shivalli-brahmin-community -IndiPirate (talk) 23:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Notability, not existence. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Warrior-1 MMA
We were in the middle of a corporate restructuring and until now I was unaware this page existed. I am the new CIO of W-1 MMA and I would like the chance to fix what ever was incorrect on the wiki article. Please restore it for us. -70.54.222.122 (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there! The article was deleted because of a 'lack of notability'. Do you know of any secondary sources that could be added to the page? Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Gianfelice Rocca.jpg
Per OTRS 2011102610004229. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610004229}} and move to commons. Thanks in advance! -Béria Lima msg 13:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
International Cities of Peace
Per OTRS 2011102610008476. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610008476}} in the talk page. Thanks in advance! -Béria Lima msg 13:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Ryan M. Lance
Per OTRS 2011102610022629. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610022629}} in the talk page. Thanks in advance! - Béria Lima msg 13:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Pyromania.ogg, File:DiaryOfAnUnbornChild.ogg
- File:Pyromania.ogg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- File:DiaryOfAnUnbornChild.ogg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Can I have my amusing little files back please for my own personal enjoyemnt? Willothewisp (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Both files were deleted more than 5 years ago. Files/pages on Wikipedia are to exist solely for the purpose of contributing to the encylopedia, and not for personal amusement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
capital cup national undergraduate mooting tournament
- Capital Cup National Undergraduate Mooting Tournament · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This event is completely non-profit and is notable because it is among the first of its kind in Canada since it's not for professional law students. The article isn't "advertising" anything... it's informative and is meant as a reference point for people interested in mooting in general. It has also been reviewed by two other users who've helped with adding links etc. to make it fit Wikipedia's standards. -EricOntario (talk) 08:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- The author of this article has clearly a conflict of interest in this, seeing his personal attack on User talk:Night of the Big Wind#Capital Cup Speedy Deletion [redacted link to linkedin page]. Secondly, the tournament had only one edition yet. Thirdly, the tournament has only 68 hits on internet (was 107), including fora, the own website, facebook, linkedin and twitter. And 0 (zero) hits on Google News. Completely not notable and worth the speedy deletion for being an advertisement. Night of the Big Wind talk 09:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Frank Addante
This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.) Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc.}} This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.)
Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.42.158 (talk • contribs)
- Not done The current status of the deleting admin means zero in the case of deletions. First, this deletion occurred more than 2 years ago. Second, the article was horrifically self-promotional. A registered user would be fine creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, trying to meet Wikipedia requirements, but they should have it reviewed before making it a live article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Ricky Little
He played for Partick Thistle in the First Division, and is captain of Scotland's oldest club - http://www.ptfc.co.uk/team/ricky_little -Salty1984 (talk) 02:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Juan Pablo Camacho
The article was deleted on February with the reason "Expired PROD, concern was: Is being the first person of a given nationality to be born in the Antarctic notable?", I not only feel that the subject is notable, but also reason given did not cite any guidelines or supply a proper excuse, I feel I could improve the article and expand upon it if it could be moved into my userspace for reconstruction, I have potential references, User:Phoenix B 1of3/Juan Pablo Camacho would be my preferred location. -– Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Phoenix B 1of3/Juan Pablo Camacho.. Based on the current article, they certainly do not meet notability guidelines, and it's an unreferenced WP:BLP. I have, however, userfied this on your request (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Melanie Fontana
We can substatiate ALL information in the Melanie Fontana biography that was WRONGLY removed for "unsighted" sources??
Please repost. Questions? Write (Redacted)
Melanie Fontana management 70.188.174.198 (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Malformed Request - please use
{{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}}
(replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).. To top it off there are two concerns that must be addresses: #1) conflict of interest...and #2) the biographies of living persons requires valid, third part references for any biography of a living person, and none of the references in the article met that requirement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Bay Windows
Please userfy this page so that I can determine whether it may be improved sufficiently to be reinstated, thanks. -AV3000 (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:AV3000/Bay Windows. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:English Roman Catholic Religious Sisters
This was deleted after some discussion, but it followed a discussion which focused only on the English, of which so far there was only one entry. The categorization of that article is now incorrect, and was based on "general knowledge". Would any other field accept such reasoning? Additionally, there are other national categorizations of Religious Sisters by nationality. Are the English to be the gap in this representation? Daniel the Monk (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: The existence or absence of Article X CAN NOT justify Article Y. Also, note that REFUND will not override the consensus of a deletion discussion; you need to go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Scenario testing
CopyVio is backward. As an editor of the page over several revisions I can guarantee that http://www.testinginterviewquestions.com/interview/10052/ copied the page and not the other way around. Look at the edit history. The external website added it 7/31/2006. -Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC
- Done You're right about the time stamps but the tag also mentioned "Software Testing: Principles and Practice" page 118. Restored so any doubts can be sorted out.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- )
Please undelete this article, and/or send me a copy for my notes. This is a bio of a private person who is a descendant of the Louis line of France and the Hapsbourg, and the title falls to her. If nothing else, I would like a copy of the posting; I didn't print it out. I will deal with this somewhere else. Thanks -24.67.147.67 (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- It was Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- ), deleted as result of AFD. Peter E. James (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Nope, still not quite; the deleted article includes the title.In any case, Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- It was Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- ), deleted as result of AFD. Peter E. James (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Pat Pedraza
Please undelete as the information is all still current and active -76.95.117.89 (talk) 02:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Article was deleted via stickyprod. You need to provide sources before an undeletion request will be entertained. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
File:index.jpeg
reasoning -Mjh1998 (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Has still no licensing info and is now redundant to File:Wokinghighschool.jpg on Commons with OTRS pending, so deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Melanie Fontana (2nd)
reasoning -70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
We don't know of ANY conflicts of interest in the Wiki posted biography of Melanie Fontana We are turning this over to others to take care of for her. PLEASE repost or send on to us a screen shot of the page so we can review what you are referring to.
thank you.
Janis Fontana manager 70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Also, I can identify the conflict of interest: You're her manager, and thus you have a stake in whether or not she does well. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Can some admin please e-mail this person (jfontana57@cox.net or melfontanamusic@yahoo.com) a copy of the deleted text. I don't have the ability to do this. And yes, the IP has admitted to a COI on my talk page. Skier Dude (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Meet The Browns (TV Series)
I've gotten permission from the company tbs to use the image but the image uploading page was too complicated and i didn't know where to click when you have permission to use an image. -Shadd21 (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done This image is licensed under a non-free license & has a valid Fair Use Rationale. There is no "permission" necessary. Skier Dude (talk) 02:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Campaign reformation movement
The page was deleted for not stating it's importance WHEN The page actually stated its importance as being a page on a group that has a heavy influence in the Occupy Detroit Movement. Even when another and I contested the deletion stating it's importance, the page was still deleted. It made me susceptible that no one had actually read the page or the talk page. I understand if the page were put up for speedy deletion just to see if Those that have put effort into creating it would defend it, but we were deleted for an invalid purpose. Please put the page back up so society can understand the group's goals and intentions. -Mudeater101 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for you to announce your great cause. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done As above. WP:NOTTHEM arguments don't go well in undeletion discussions either (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:12, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm not trying to preach out as if Wikipedia were a "soapbox", I posted the page so people could understand the group. If you suspect it to be written in a biased way, then suggest where I should edit the page, not automatically delete the page. Mudeater101 (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Being Bold, Not giving a Fuck. Mudeater101 (talk) 18:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:Articles using divbox template
Deleted because it was empty (C1 speedy), however it is populated by Template:Divbox when there is misuse of the template to assist in cleanup. From the template documentation: "This template will automatically add inappropriate uses to category:articles using divbox template for cleanup." I'm guessing there's probably a template or category for such categories as this one that was not applied to protect it form mistaken deletion (It's been a while since I've been really active). I came across this, figured it was a mistake, so here is the undeletion request. Cheers. -Ned Scott 05:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - all set. You may have been thinking of {{emptycat}} :) Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Keddie Chyorny (cartoonist)
Keddie Chyorny illustrated for animation Ekstravert Devushka. His fans have made several pages for him but they get deleted. I am representing him now. He is culturally relevant. Greg has a page. What does one have to do to have legitimacy. I see people that have done far less who have current pages. Can you please reconsider allowing his article to be published? -67.61.58.140 (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hello there! There has not been a page under the name Keddie Chyorny (cartoonist). Is there some other title that it could be? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I know that three seperate pages have been set up, all deleted by editors for some reason. I was just going to make another one but I saw this forum, so I'm trying this first. Should I just make another page?
wyandotte art fair
significance -Jimbob1122 (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
This event was deleted due to promotion. this page was not put on wikipedia for any promotional purpose. It is significant to the area of detroit and southeast michigan, due to the fact that it is the largest art fair of its kind in the area and is 51 years old. Many communities really this site for information for many subjects and events. so we think this would be a great spot to put information on the fair here about the history and what types art is celebrated here.
Thank you for your consideration,
James Roberts
- Not done The article was deleted because it had two edits: one was to create it, the second was by the same person who then completely blanked it. The article itself was unreferenced (other than its own website, which does not count), showed not signs of notability ... in other words, did not meet Wikipedia requirements. If you wish to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT of something that might pass our requirements for en encylopedia article, then please feel free to try (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- And if Jimbob is referring to Wyandotte art fair · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions], that article was deleted as blatant spam. On reviewing the deleted text, it is also a copyright violation, so it will not be restored. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Fracture (fanzine)
This article was deleted with the reason "It's an old article, but is the subject notable?". I would suggest that it is notable since Fracture Fanzine was the largest punk fanzine the UK has ever produced and was particular dominant during the late 1990s and early 2000s, producing 25 issues with a distribution of over 5000 for each issue. It is listed in the article titled 'Punk zine' amongst other notable punk fanzines of the past 30 years. It is also referenced in the article 'Fanzine' as a significant fanzine in the early 2000s -Remains (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 13:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Hadouken (software)
interested in information about this software, can think of no reason this should have been deleted, it is linked to from 'Comparison of BitTorrent clients' -71.59.251.26 (talk) 12:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 13:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Security Now
I think this page was deleted at some point, and replaced (maybe by accident in the process the AfD mentioned on the page?). There's links to it in various summaries of edits in the main article, and I'm quite sure I've been on that Talk-page in the past. I don't know what happened, but it seems the page was accidentally deleted. If so, can it please be restored? -DanielPharos (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick response! I've restored the content to former glory, thanks again! --DanielPharos (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
yubbe
i don't know but i think some one deleted it for envy reasons... i didn't violated copy right or anything else. it was simple page talking about a town in Somalia - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingo11 (talk • contribs)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. The article in question has not been deleted - edited, yes, but not deleted. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
article based on a real surrealist and visual artist -Artsurrexpress (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Brendan Gallagher
Article was first created on November 14, 2010, but was deleted. It has now been re-created and I request that its edit history also be restored. -Dolovis (talk) 04:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Question: The first three revisions were deleted as G8 (copyright violation) so they're not going to be restored. The last 7 appear to be a fight over the redirect, no substance. I'm not seeing that there's really anything worthwhile restoring in those 7 prior revisions. Is there something specific that needs to be restored?Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the public logs, the article was created on November 14, 2010. I apologize if I am mistaken on this point and it was only a redirect. Dolovis (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done No problem :) nothing worthwhile to restore... Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the public logs, the article was created on November 14, 2010. I apologize if I am mistaken on this point and it was only a redirect. Dolovis (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
New York Angels
The article is a straightforward, factual article that had been uncontroversially in place and edited for several years -Yorker (talk) 07:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done, also, can another admin take a good look prodder's contribs and especially his user page. I'm about to leave for work. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
50/50 Twin
According to WP:Proposed deletion this article must be undeleted automatically on request. Article was deleted by PROD on 12 May 2008. Although first article may have been written too early in his career, this artist has now released 6 albums. Whether or not he has now achieved sufficient notability should be decided through AfD. -Ei1sos (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done A 3-year old PROD? If he's now notable, please feel free to write a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Steven Ericsson-Zenith
"Request of subject" is not a valid reason to delete this article. -140.221.233.180 (talk) 21:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted based on a community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Steven_Ericsson-Zenith. There were more valid arguments other than "request of subject". (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
ground level
Thanks to the assist of Wiki contributors, I am happy to keep the page now, as it reflects the appropriate look / read of a wiki page - please cancel my deletion request - thank you, HoloGraphica Nov 18, 2011 -HoloGraphica (talk) 06:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - AFD was withdrawn and closed. GB fan 12:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Selena Gomez in Cyrillic
Considered as multilingual name in Cyrillic. This was used in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Bulgarian, and the Turkic and Mongolic languages of Russia, and in Mongolian. -Namiin Azhar (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Alternate. This would likely to transliterate. -Namiin Azhar (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 September 30#ເຊລີນ້າ ໂກເມຊ, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Taelus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 12:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Nfur
This redirect was deleted per G6 without any reasoning given as to why it fits said criterion. The deleting admin is currently not active, so I can't ask them personally. I could undelete it myself but since I created it, I don't want to use the tools in this case. Regards SoWhy 12:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC) -SoWhy 12:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:06, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Eric Bittner
I created the new article Eric R. Bittner today and then noticed the deletion of Eric Bittner-article in December 2005. Since then, he has published a book on quantum dynamics, thereby passing the notability criterion. I suggest to restore the "Eric Bittner" article as history-only, and to replace it with a redirect to the new article "Eric R. Bittner". -Chris Howard (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- The Eric Bittner article was deleted by AFD and wouldn't ordinarily be subject to undeletion via this process. Unless there's something in the new article incorporated from the old one, and therefore calling for attribution, why not simply create the redirect as a new article? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- No problem from my side if that conforms better to the rules. Had just thought that it would be more respectful to the original editors to re-create the history of that earlier version. In any case, no, I have not used anything from the old one (and it is not available to me). --Chris Howard (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- The admin who had closed the AFD discussion is currently inactive, and as there is no need to raise it to the level of a WP:DRV, I take back the request for undeletion. I have created it afresh as redirect now. --Chris Howard (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- No problem from my side if that conforms better to the rules. Had just thought that it would be more respectful to the original editors to re-create the history of that earlier version. In any case, no, I have not used anything from the old one (and it is not available to me). --Chris Howard (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Leroy Ryals
It was deleted because of a lack of source, I added in a source to make it legitimate. -Poseya67 (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Australian_Intervarsity_Choral_Societies_Association
- Talk:Australian_Intervarsity_Choral_Societies_Association · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Article has been restored as a redirect, and restoration of the talk page is needed to present the AfD history. -Unscintillating (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Brain Drain versus Brain Circulation
I have checked the links provided, but they deal with medical aspects of the brain, not the social scientific aspect of brain drain versus brain circulation. These are two completely different issues. The only available discussion of the topic on the Internet is a commentary I made on an Internet discussion forum. -141.156.199.216 (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Then perhaps it's not notable enough at this point to warrant an article. All articles must be supported by third party reliable sources. We cannot accept copyright violations or blogs/forums as references (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:53, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Kids React
It has lots of good references, but I did not add them. Please put back Kids React. -|=ANTAG£JAPANR0X (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids React, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hut 8.5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Red Foundry
It does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, as was listed as the reason for its deletion. I would like to request a review of the page to contest the speedy deletion claim. If the Wikipedia community determines that the deletion was not incorrect or in error, please send me a copy of the page in its most recent un-deleted form. Thank you. -Bkedzorski (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done E-mailed text with note. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Julius seelye bixler colby.png
the content was non-free and the explanation was clear - the person pictured is dead. -Nickline4 (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done restored so that fair use rationale for where it is actually used can be added. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
-AR-
Why has the my page been taken down the page is very important as this is a new band. that has had a high demand for information about the band -Robdeboer (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Wikipedia is not a billboard. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Burning Sensation in Throat
The article is fully reliable as the content of this article can be found in any Internal Medicine book -Ciclone (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- You could have removed the prod tag from the article yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Prod removed, now up for AFD. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:27, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
CHORUS+
I'd like to improve the article, but it was deleted before i had the chance. Please sent me a copy, so i can edit it in my user space -Grsjst (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Grsjst/CHORUS+.. Please make sure that it does not continue to violate policy very quickly (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Brent Ashley
Subject is now notable as he is currently playing bass for Orgy, Static-X and Wayne Static's solo project band (see 'Pighammer'. He also played bass on several Murderdolls albums. He is already listed in the personnel section for several of these bands (including the Murderdolls, where he is in the album credits).
Suggesting that the article be created as a stub as he is/was part of several notable bands. -75.70.221.14 (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted 3 years ago, as WP:CSD#A7. It was written only in Spanish, and its only "references" were MySpace (not a permitted ref) and links inside Wikipedia. If he now meets the notability guidelines specific under WP:MUSIC, then yes, someone who has an account is quite able to draft an appropriate WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or Article Incubator piece about him. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:27, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
File:App-V Architecture.png
i created this file and I own the copyright of the image -Mayankjohri (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done The file has not been deleted (yet) - you will need to add proper rationale to the file itself, as noted on the file page, which should resolve the issues (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Endometriosis Foundation of America
reasoning -24.46.139.168 (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The second deletion, a G11, likewise can't be undone here, for identical reasons. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:00, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Barbecana
page was deleted for meeting speedy deltion criteria. Don't understand why since similar pages (deltek) have not been deleted. It is also our intention to expland the article and describe techniques for schedule risk assesment to meet the requirements of the US DoD. -Rjowenusa (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Also, Article X CAN NOT be used to justify Article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Buffy articles for userfication
I would like to request that content which I worked a lot on, which has since been deleted for reasons mainly of notability is userfied with full links to historical edits to my talk page. I hope to use some of the most notable and useful material from within these old articles for trans-wiking to the Buffy wikia.
Pages are not accessible, but likely are to administrators?:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buffyverse_chronology&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buffyverse_chronology_(2)&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buffyverse_chronology_(3)&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buffyverse_rare_promos&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buffy_Season_6_UPN_promos&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forgotten_Memories_(Buffyverse)&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%22Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer%22_and_Philosophy:_Fear_and_Trembling_in_Sunnydale&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%22Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer%22_(BFI_TV_Clasics_S.)&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Night_Terrors_(Buffy_novel)&action=edit&redlink=1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hoopy_the_bear_(Buffyverse)&action=edit&redlink=1
Also there are now redirects at some articles that were previously much bigger article but the history is not accessible to me, could these also be userfied with original content no longer seen in the 'history'?
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cherub_(Buffyverse)&redirect=no
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vangelis_(Buffyverse)&oldid=95088434
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Consanguinity_(Buffyverse)&direction=prev&oldid=95088356
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Consanguinity_(Buffyverse)&direction=prev&oldid=95088356
Please let me know if this is possible? I can be reached at my talk page Paxomen (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Guess that can be done. You know how to move the stuff correctly over there, do you? --Tikiwont (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done All userfied, including a few redirects. Please let me knwo once they can be delted agian or mark them with {{db-user}}. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I recently found that the National Agents Alliance Wiki page had been removed and wanted to follow up to see why this happened. I have included a number of third-party links below in an effort to show why the page should not have been removed. If there are any other edits that need to be made in order to allow this page to be reinstated, please let me know. We wanted to provide factual content that was not one-sided and if we need to do a better job of this, please help us do so. Many of the links provided are from trusted news sources that should only add credibility to the content provided about National Agents Alliance. We want to make every effort to follow the guidelines set by Wikipedia. -Gbrunick (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Deletion notes below:
Not notable. No secondary sources. No newspaper or magazine articles (except for one article about the founder in a local business publication, ref'd in article). The only mentions I can find online are either on company web sites, on web sites of MLM participants, or on scam web site forum pages. Jojalozzo 16:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles about us below: http://www.thetimesnews.com/articles/agents-40835-raleigh-national.html http://www.thetimesnews.com/search/?q=national+agents+alliance&fistype=site&x=0&y=0 The Business Jounal http://bizjournals.com/triad/stories/2006/10/09/daily38.html http://bizjournals.com/triad/stories/2006/09/18/story13.html http://ei.ncsu.edu/?people=andy-albright http://ei.ncsu.edu/get-involved/entrepreneurs-lecture-series/ http://news.yahoo.com/national-agents-alliance-ceo-andy-albright-named-triad-070409673.html http://www.triangleew.org/speaker/andy-albright http://www.mccollpartners.com/transactions/national-agents-alliance.html http://www.newdirections.org/newsNAA.asp http://archive-news.net/feed-the-hunger-banquet-hosted-by-national-agents-alliance/53480/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5Jw9RX8iJY http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/11/12/prweb8956369.DTL http://www.prlog.org/11094622-national-agents-alliances-albrights-help-loaves-and-fishes-provide-families-proper-thanksgiving.html
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Rabih Najjar
the article Rabih Najjar is a biography of a living person which the creator didn't provide a good reliable source. And following the Wikipedia rule established on April 3, 2010, a proposed deletion process for unsourced biographies was established, requiring all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010 to have at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement about the subject. the article was nominated to deletion, but we football leb have worked very hard and were able to provide the article with the sources needed, still the article was deleted. and since we asked the admin who deleted the article to recheck the progress of the article from day one and to reconsider his decision and we didn't get a reply for him yet,we decided to request for an undeletion here. please note that: first the article was nominated for deletion based on :Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Per WP:NFOOTY never played on a team recognized as in a fully professional league..., later on, after investigating the nominator admitted on his talk page that the "Lebanese premier league" is a fully professional league so he removed the prod. so after proving that the Lebanese premier league is a fully professional league(and now Lebanon is playing in the qualifications for the world cup) and after adding all the sources needed to support our statement on this biography, the article was deleted. please if there is anyone who could discuss this matter with us, we would be more than thankful. counting on your help -Football leb (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabih Najjar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hak5
I am requesting that you reconsider the request to delete the Hak5 article. They consistently show up at hacking conferences and are very active in the hacking scene. They have also had coverage in the general news. See their about page; http://hak5.org/about -184.175.17.22 (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hak5 (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Wizardman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Cleo of Alpha Chi
this page was an important documentation of a literary society which is not exclusively important to trinity but to many non-Trinity persons as well. -75.105.10.88 (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
75.105.10.88 (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Live At the Brattle Theater
I wish to have this article undeleted because it was a fast and easy way to find the track listing for the album and also for the various notes about the album that I am unable to find otherwise. I am not sure why it was deleted in the first place. -173.70.18.179 (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
LOLI Database
A quick search indicates that this may have some notability. Also, "creepiness" is not a valid deletion reason. - Feinoha Talk, My master 23:23, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Jessie Stricchiola
see http://daggle.com/closed-unfriendly-world-wikipedia-2853 it's all there -Dannysullivan (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Stricchiola, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mkativerata (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:39, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Alpha Sigma Chi
Many other fraternity and sororities are included on WikiPages, why can Alpha Sigma Chi not have a page? -99.233.4.147 (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Phantomsteve (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
MC-S
- MC-S · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] contribs) deleted "MC-S" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: also provides dubious and potentially misleading medical information, although I recognize that this is not a criterion for speedy deletion)}}
No reasoning given. -121.45.184.86 (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Copyright violations will not be restored. The additional problem - the article was horrific spam, and as noted in the deletion rationale it provided dubious health claims. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Buried Beds
Now meets notability criteria for musicians and ensembles[2][3][4][5][6]. I'm sure there are many more references, but I don't feel the need to look them up at this point. -99.225.158.236 (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Subject article was deleted more than 3 years ago - any info would be significantly out of date, and possibly inappropriate in a new article. Someone is welcome to draft something that might meet Wikipedia requirements. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
UTS Writers' Anthology
The reason given for deletion of this page was that not enough references that proved it was notable were online. I fail to see how this means it is not notable. The deletion request was raised by one person and given the okay by one other person - this doesn't provide consensus on the issue. I would point you to the university web page: http://www.fass.uts.edu.au/anthology/index.html. It's also been mentioned on The Australian as recently as a few months ago (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/literary-journals-provide-quirky-proof-of-prints-durability/story-e6frg8nf-1226098301581) and is annually launched as part of the Sydney Writers' Festival. ( -92.24.106.159 (talk) 00:31, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not done It was deleted 2 years ago due to having copyright problems. Copyright violations put this project at serious risk, and copyright problems will not be undeleted. If you believe it is notable, then someone with an account can create a draft article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3
I dont know if i fixed the image or not(im not that good at editing) is it still a candidate for delectation? -Shadd21 (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- The tag no longer applies, but the reason for use in the rationale is inadequate. Why do we need a screenshot in the article, please explain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Because i was replacing an image that was already in the article Shadd21 (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well that is not a valid reason in itself. I hope you have a better reason to use this image! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
nat powers
I have now found my references from other sources to add. I had forgotten to add them at the time I was busy! :-) -Poeticalson (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done you have 10 days to add your sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- ^ http://shivallibrahmins.com/history/%EF%BB%BFfamily-names-history-of-shivalli-brahmin-community
- ^ http://www.npr.org/2011/11/23/142689792/buried-beds-a-sweetly-soaring-roar
- ^ http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashville/our-critics-picks/Content?oid=1192558
- ^ http://www.fingertipsmusic.com/?p=137
- ^ http://www.fingertipsmusic.com/?p=2603
- ^ http://www.biconews.com/archives/17910-Buried-Beds.html