Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 50

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 45←Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50Archive 51Archive 52→Archive 55

Derek Powazek

Spotted at User:DoriSmith/ArticleIdeas#People. Deletion was 6 years ago. May be notable according to [1], [2], [3]. If this is undeleted, I should be able to add these refs although know nothing about the person and don't expect to do a lot else. -Trevj (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Normally I wouldn't have any problem restoring an article deleted so long ago as the arguments in that "votes for deletion" discussion were almost entirely based on personal opinion (ie "vanity") and the nomination was started by an editor later blocked as a "troll". However, the subject is a living person and the article had no sources and was not written from a neutral point of view. The best thing to do is to allow a neutral editor to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for looking into this. But do your comments preclude incubation of the deleted article to WP:Article Incubator/Derek Powazek, in order to save some work? I would seek sources, add material to counter bias per WP:NPOV and not include any unsourced material, per WP:BLP. Is the content completely unsuitable for this purpose? Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The entire text was Working the web since 1995, Derek Powazek is the creator of many award-winning websites, a couple of which still exist. Derek is the author of Design for Community, San Francisco Stories, and has contributed to others. Derek is a writer and performer, leading the storytelling organization Fray. Derek currently works as the Senior Designer for Technorati. He lives in San Francisco with his wife, two nutty Chihuahuas, a grumpy cat, and a house full of plants named Fred. I think you could compose a better article if you started from scratch. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you I agree. --Trevj (talk) 07:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

VYou

not promotional, the site launched in 2010. Please check it out at: www.vyou.com -Bijal1031 (talk) 13:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Max Friberg

Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 15:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Done by Djsasso. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Moshe Kupferman

I'm helping out the Wikipedia:GLAM/IMJ folks. They had one of their new articles deleted. Sorry, I don't remember the exact links on the page, but should be similar to Michal Na'aman. They usually have two links to works by the artist in their museum. A third link to the 'the Information Center for Israeli Art at the Israel Museum', which gives information on the artist. The GLAM/IMJ folks are adding artists that the Israel Museum Information Center has info on. Bgwhite (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2011 (UTC) -Bgwhite (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Diggy Simmons

Article at 3rd AfD - Would like to see full edit history for article and talk page. -Ei1sos (talk) 21:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Zoey Deutch

This article was correctly deleted via a deletion debate but has been recreated as the issues in debate have been addressed. Request restoration of the deleted revisions so as to have access to old content that may assist in improving the current iteration of the article. -Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Done revisions restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Discount Home Shoppers Club, Inc.

The PROD reason was that the subject was not notable. One of the two independent sources used in the article was a dead link. I have found an archived version of the page using the Wayback Machine, and other independent, reliable sources covering the subject in a non-trivial manner, including some which were published before the deletion date. I believe that the subject would be notable under GNG and WEB. Sources: [4][5][6] (significant coverage) and [7][8][9] (5-6 sentences coverage). -Joshua Issac (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Banzai-Tron

Could this page be userfied or mailed to me so I can host it off site? Thanks. -Mathewignash (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Pan Yayıncılık

the editor who deleteed the said entry was not competent in music/musicology (he claims to be a php programmer) and therefore is not in a position to assess the importance of a scholarly relevant source of information for foreign academic researchers -Denischetwynd (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. One does not have to be "competent in musicology" to see that an article which says only that the company is a publishing house based in Istanbul which specializes in music and musicology does not make a credible claim of importance or significance enough to justify an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a business listing directory. You are welcome to resubmit the article if you can establish notability by citing references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Have a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ, and check with Slakr (talk), the deleting admin, before you repost it. JohnCD (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

file:galdikas.jpg

reasoning -Paulmafija (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

What is your problem? The file has not been deleted. If you have a question about licensing it, ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. JohnCD (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Dog Registry of America, Inc

as far as notability (among other things) Dog Registry of America Inc. has been in business for 25 years, it's name has received service mark status many years ago, among other dog classifications registered is; service dogs, on September 22, 2008 the Board of Animal Services Commissioners granted recognition of the Dog Registry of America, Inc. -Pakleader (talk) 23:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Notability is a technical term in Wikipedia, and needs to be demonstrated by references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; unless these are added to the article, it may be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion. See the WP:FAQ/Organizations and WP:Notability (organizations and companies for more advice. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Austex/Text of Articles

For the temporary purposes only of allowing me to re-review the article texts behind paywalls, and then to to take advantage of Wikipedia' process for "web archiving" for articles behind paywalls. Once they have been copied by me (they took me many days to create originally and were instantly deleted without discussion) the page can be re-deleted. Or even an email of the page to me would be fine. All I need is access to the material I originally wrote and that is now permanently gone. (Will teach me not to make my own backup!) -Austex • Talk 23:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done - emailed to you. JohnCD (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. That's exactly what I needed. Have a good day. Austex • Talk 13:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

John Ratey MD

John Ratey · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] Please reinstate the biography page for John Joseph Ratey M.D.

Dr. Ratey has touched millions of lives through his writing, teaching and clinical work and should have his full profile reinstated in Wikipedia. Dr. Ratey is one of the most extraordinary human beings you will meet, he is known around the world, an invaluable resource and advocate promoting the health, well being and enabling individuals to reach their full potential. You have many books and articles that Dr. Ratey has written in Wikipedia, it makes no sense to delete the biography of such an important clinician and human being. Please reinstate the page immediately.

John J Ratey, MD, is an Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, Research Synthesizer, Speaker, and Author, as well a Clinical Psychiatrist maintaining a private practice in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He has lectured and published 60 peer reviewed articles on the topics of Aggression, Autism, ADHD, and other issues in neuropsychiatry.

Dr. Ratey has authored A User¹s Guide to the Brain(2000) and co-authored Shadow Syndromes(1997) with Catherine Johnson, PhD. From 1994 to 2005 he co-authored Driven to Distraction(1994), Answers to Distraction (1995) and Delivered from Distraction (2005) with Edward Hallowell, MD, all published by Pantheon/Random House. Additionally, he has edited several books including The Neuropsychiatry of Personality Disorders (1994), published by Blackwell Scientific.

Most recently, Dr Ratey has penned, Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain published by Little Brown. In Spark, Dr. Ratey guides the reader to an understanding of neurobiology and inspires the reader to reach for their potential, and embrace exercise that is crucial for the brain and body to operate at peak performance. Spark is fueling a movement to re-engineer school practices and medical recommendations to establish curriculum, lifestyles and corporate practices based on scientific principles. Providing the scientific foundation and research data, Dr Ratey has been drafted into the groundswell of those whose mission it is to revitalize schools, combat the obesity crisis, stave off the encroaching epidemic of Sedentarism, by returning to evolutionary principles of physical exercise and proper diet thereby combating syndrome X, the underlying causation of much chronic disease.

"Dr. Ratey's work is going to save physical education, by reforming it. Exercise and the youth of this generation will be the vanguard that will lead the nation back to health." Phil Lawler, Architect of the Naperville PE Project.

Each year since 1995, Dr. Ratey has been selected by his peers as one of the Best Doctors in America. In his dedication to the changing the world, Dr. Ratey has founded The Ratey Institute whose mission is to broadcast life changing science and establish the best practice policies first in our school and then other organizations to reclaim human health

Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain, released in 2008, is the culmination of years of experience with the brain body connection, new research data, and the synthesis of biological sciences. Spark is revolutionizing how we see the human species. A call to return to our evolutionary roots; to get in sync with our metabolic design honed through eons of survival to optimize mental and physical health. Dr. Ratey is the spark that will set your old paradigms on fire, which will clear your mind to see a new vision for mankind, and inflame a passion of commitment to create a healthy future for our posterity.

Thank you, Alison Gale Levy M.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.24.170 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 19 September 2011

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Philafrenzy (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. Notability, in Wikipedia terms, requires to be demonstrated by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. You are welcome to expand the article to state Dr. Ratey's achievements, but please take care to avoid promotional language and "peacock terms" - Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view, plain facts backed up by references. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

College dating

The page was created for a school project. It was deleted for being indistinct from Dating, but if it is restored, I will make it distinct within a day. -AndrewMozdy (talk) 04:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Red Silent Tides

There is evidence that this album in fact was released and in fact does exist. I am posting a hyperlink to a different site for further evidence, [10] and [11]. -SpellBlast Of The Elvenking (talk) 06:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add your references to the article, and see WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Ulster Scout County (The Scout Association).png

per http://www.scouting-ni.org.uk/ulster-badge-p-1196.html , this is in fact the badge in use and should not have been removed from article -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Jnv bagudi balasore

Dear sir , i wish i need more time to write this topic/page/article on my school -Rkmallik (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Radio NRG

Supposedly promoting a website only, it was based on fact and there was no bias written. -82.46.96.222 (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Article deleted under criterion A7. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Dirk "Derry" Kabcenell

Derry was in charge of the Oracle's product development for many years, and is responsible for innovations that are the heart of much of today's online industries. Thanks in no small part to Derry's contributions, Oracle has thrived in the business world to the point of now owning Java, another core technology of the Internet. I think Derry's insights and dedication to the high-tech industry merits at least these two small paragraphs in Wikipedia -- which are likely stored (or will someday be stored) in an Oracle database. -Ahall613 (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Dilip Rogger

Dilip Rogger is the first fastest Indian in two wheels. He has brought proud for our country. It would be helpful if we find more information about him in Wikipedia. He is doing a great job and he deserves to be mentioned in Wikipedia. Kindly accept the requst and do the needful. -117.202.85.215 (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Mugshots Grill & Bar

in my user joyhirdes i have resubmitted article with additions and wish to have it edited and posted to wikipedia in its entirety ... can you help me? -Joyhirdes (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done If anything, this one was even worse than the last one, and like the last one has been deleted, since it was not an article but a shameless and unabashed advertisement. Wikipedia is not a venue for you to advertise your company. Continued efforts like this are likely to damage your company's reputation. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Folkdirect.com

Sufficient time was not given to implement the required article and other third-party source additions -90.178.66.175 (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

This article was deleted by AFD consensus and therefore may not be restored by this process. You could raise the issue at WP:DRV, but you would be better advised to make the necessary improvements in a userspace draft before proceeding further. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

CedEnough

reasoning -ShaneTLJ (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

We weren't done editing the biography and sources. I work for CedEnough so it is all reliable, we just wanted it on here until we can piece together which sources to use for which part. Can you please put it back on?

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. You should also read WP:COI; company employees are the very definition of not reliable. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

National Atheist Party

Article was originally deleted due ti its lack of external sources so more external links were added to show credibility. The party is very recent and has achieved 527 status necessary for the registration process. How can an entity achieve recognition if you erase the entry ? The party held its first national convention and has more than 5,000 members. What criteria do you need in order to keep the page up ? I also find Bella the Ball's use of religious imagery "strike this one with a bolt of lightning" disturbingly reminiscent of religious bias when dealing with n atheist page. Her use of irony "come back when you elect a candidate" also very disturbing as if notability was only a result of winning an election. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding request placed by Flegrain (talk · contribs) 16:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

This article was deleted by AFD consensus and therefore may not be restored by this process. You may, of course, take the matter to WP:DRV, but you would be better advised to review the relevant notability requirements, as discussed in the AFD, particularly WP:ORG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The original poster has since re-created the article under the name National atheist party, had it speedily deleted as a recreation of deleted material after an AfD, and been blocked for trying to circumvent the deletion review process in order to promote their noble cause. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Abdul Hakeem Palh

it is about living people -ahakeem 18:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Russavia/Strike

was in userspace, need it back -Russavia Let's dialogue 01:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

IISD

wish to update -Jmanaigre (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page and think it would be best if we discussed there first... L.tak (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Not done Given the amount of copyrighted material, this will need a re-write rather than a restore. Skier Dude (talk) 20:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Celoxis

Sorry I haven't gone through the wiki policies on creating the article. Now I have read them and will follow them whole creating any article. -61.8.140.170 (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celoxis, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mailer Diablo (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Abdullah al-Qasemi

person does exist -Al-Musta'rib (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


Reason for deletion: person was claimed to be nonexistent.

I would like to point out that this author does exist, has had a lot of his books published, and even has been the subject of a doctoral thesis (see Vom Fundamentalisten zum Atheisten, by Jürgen Wasella). Another way to verify his existence and notability is to search for عبد ألله القصيمي on the international bookshop http://www.neelwafurat.com : one will find that they sell quite a lot of his books.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Gabbe (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Andy Kubiszewski

Reasoning for deletion was stated that Andy Kubiszewksi had not proven to have done enough credible work outside of the band Stabbing Westward. Andy had scored music for 5 films and over 25 TV series on numerous networks. He has also written the theme songs on 7 of those TV shows and has licensed songs in at least 60 projects including TV commercials, TV shows, films and video games. He is currently the composer on the show entitled Storage Wars on Discovery, as well as Ice Road Truckers, Ax Men and Swords. Storage Wars is the highest rated show currently airing on cable TV and he will also be scoring the spin off show Storage Wars Dallas. He also recently won 3 BMI Awards for his high volume of reported songs and score currently airing on television. -Dannycooper89 (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

NewsWire NZ

Take a look at the website yourselves, guys. NewsWire NZ is a legitimate news outlet produced by the largest journalism school in New Zealand, the Whitiriea NZ Media Training Centre in Wellington, NZ. If you Google NewsWire NZ you'll see it consistently ranks at the top of the page. Take a look: www.NewsWire.co.nz We are averaging just under 400,000 page visits a year. Our students have posted nearly 2000 news packages on the site since it launched in 2008. Mainstream media in New Zealand regularly take content from the site to use it. Given what has happened with my first attempt to create a presence on Wikipedia, I'm guessing our web-savvy students will be taking a keen interest in how this pans out. Jim Tucker, Journalism Programme Manager, Whitireia NZ Media Training Centre, Wellington. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newswirenz (talk • contribs)

Adjiedj Bakas

Dear editor, I understand that my profile has been deleted on both the English and Dutch sites. I don't understand this. I'm a wellknown trendwatcher in Holland, sold over 400.000 books and am more than 300 times annually in the media, have more than 7.000 followers on Twitter and will host an own tv-show from december 2011 on, to be watched by 4.5 million people. How can anyone delete the profile without any communication with me? Can this please be undeleted? Thanks, greetz, Adjiedj Bakas -Privacy63 (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done This is an encyclopedia, not a place for profiles. None of the claims in the article seem to be verified by actual sources, and since you appear to be a living person, encyclopedic articles cannot exist without such sources. If you have been involved at all in the creation of the article, beware of WP:COI and WP:PROMO. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

A New Type of VTOL Aircraft

Please help me to understand why this short article was deleted.

Although it is a new idea, it has some background:

1) I made a presentation of this new aircraft concept to the January 2010 meeting of the American Helicopter society in San Francisco. Unfortunately, proceedings are not published.

2) A patent was been applied for on this new aircraft concept two years ago, but now days patent applications take a long time to produce results; I have not yet gotten the first response back from the patent office.

3) A toy used to exist which consisted of a stick with a propeller at each end and a rubber band between the propellers to turn the propellers in opposite directions. When the rubber band was wound up and the toy was released it flew at high speed. In a sense I could say that there have been many thousands of prototypes made.

So this is not an unknown or irrational concept.

This was my second submission of the same article. I tried to make the article more like reporting than soap-boxing. Did I fail in this effort? If so, how could I have said things to make them sound more objective?

Yes, the article I submitted was quite short. I could work to make it much longer if that is the main problem. Would that help?

I saw something about too many caps in the title. I thought that "VTOL" was well understood by most people as meaning "Vertical Take Off and Landing". Was I mistaken? Would any of the phrases below be better titles? If not, please make some suggestions.

a) The Lawrence Tiltplane

b) The Tiltplane

c) A New Vertical Take Off and Landing Aircraft

Sincerely, John Lawrence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlawren3 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 23 September 2011

 Not done. The business of an encyclopedia is to summarise material already published in reliable sources. It is not a noticeboard for publication of anything new. One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery." Also, in writing about your own discovery you have, from our point of view, a WP:Conflict of interest: Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising or promotion of any kind. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hansel and Gretel in 3D

OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011092410000481 for release under CC-BY-SA-3.0 for content by The Institute, shown as one of the production companies on the website: [12]. -– Adrignola talk 15:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

  • The reason for deletion at the previous AfD was that the project had not started filming and so failed WP:NFF; that was over a year ago, but I do not see in the references for this new article any reliable source confirming that filming has started - all the accessible references are dated July, 2010, and IMDb says only that the project is in development. Also I note this edit summary saying "looks like the Michael Bay project is dead." I will ask the article author if he has any up to date sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

David Wrone

David Wrone is cited by four articles, one article even dedicates a paragraph to him:

(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UWSP_Albertson_Center_for_Learning_Resources

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

  • Section: Other published theories
  • David Wrone's The Zapruder Film (2003) concludes that the shot that killed JFK came from in front of the limousine, and that JFK's throat and back wounds were caused by an in-and-through shot originating from the grassy knoll. Three shots were fired from three different angles, none of them from Lee Harvey Oswald's window at the Texas School Book Depository. Wrone is a professor of history (emeritus) at the University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point. ISBN 0-7006-1291-2.

(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Posner

(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Sagatelyan

So I think an article on David Wrone - which I entered to Wikipedia - would be relevant and interesting for readers, especially for people interested in one (of only two!) historians who broke The Silence of the Historians (David W. Mantik, 2000) about the JFK assassinations.

The dates about him I had gotten from himself by e-mail after I asked him for that. This, I think, should not be a reason to delete the article. Please restore the article. ~~ -Thalimed (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done, but please read the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy:

"any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source... The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."

Articles about living persons are automatically deleted after ten days unless referenced. I have restored this, and reset the timer, so that you have ten days to provide references. I'm afraid information "gotten from himself by e-mail" is not good enough: it must already have been published in a reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you JohnDC for restoring the article. I entered the reference "Spartacus Schoolnet: David Wrone", where the essential parts of the information can be found. I found it there myself and then contacted David Wrone for some more information. Will that be OK? Thalimed (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
P.S. (Meanwhile I sent my e-mail correspondence with David Wrone to Spartacus Schoolnet, so their article about David Wrone will soon be more complete, I think.) Thalimed (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
That is enough, just, to remove the BLPprod notice, and I have taken it off; but if Spartacus Schoolnet simply publish what you send them they cannot be considered a reliable source for Wikipedia's purposes, which implies some degree of editorial control and fact-checking. What is really needed is someone independent of Wrone writing about him. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Oh, no, Spartacus Schoolnet will not simply publish what I sent them, that's not what they do. - I added references of two independent well-known JFK researchers (one of them even a historian). I hope this will suffice for the moment, won't it? --Thalimed (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Rituparna Bhattacharjee

Kindly visit the pages from where the facts have been collected. Kindly do not delete the name of Rituparna Bhattacharjee because she has been recognised as 'the youngest female writer' of Bengali literature. In the following pages you may verify the truth.

http://photos.merinews.com/newPhotoLanding.jsp?imageID=14099 http://www.merinews.com/article/rituparna-bhattacharjee-turned-a-writer-at-eleven/128938.shtml http://photos.merinews.com/newPhotoLanding.jsp?imageID=14099 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_in_literature


There are nearly all newspapers in both English and Bengali which reviewed her book 'BHUTIYA'. kindly include the book and recognise the youngest female author in your Wikipaedia page. Regards Ratan Bhattacharjee

The Bawdies

not my article, went looking for it tonight and found the redlink, notable enough in Japan I think I can fix the issues -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The PROD reason was "no indication of meeting WP:BAND. Only source does not back up claim of comparison to Beatles." JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Phyllis Zagano

I noticed I was listed among syndicated columnists and was trying to add information to my ;listing--not sure why I was deleted--I am a rather well known academic -Zagano (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. Writing about oneself is strongly discouraged here, for reasons explained at Wikipedia:Autobiography; and the article gave no indication that you meet the notability standard of WP:Notability (academics). More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Lana Del Rey

Please undelete this page because Lana Del Rey is a legitimate artist that I am a fan of. I don't know her personally. She hasn't released anything yet, but has a record coming out in October followed by a full album to be released at an unspecified date. A song of hers was played on the NPR show All Songs Considered within a few days of you deleting this page. Please undelete this page because I feel that you may have deleted this page hastily. Thank you. -LoneMinnow (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. Sorry, but see WP:MUSICBIO for what a musical performer needs to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons

List is more helpful than individual articles, and is of the same value as a list of characters, technology, or warships. All of these lists exists. -76.113.99.134 (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. This was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons (2nd nomination) so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly closed, or you have new information, you should first approach user Fram (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can consider going to WP:Deletion review, but note that this has already been there once - see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 6. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Phi Kappa Chi

Notable Fraternity -129.62.200.175 (talk) 15:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


Page was originally deleted because it was flagged as a "non notable fraternity". This is untrue. It is the largest fraternity at Baylor University, is competitive in intramural sports, sing, and float every year, and quite frankly stands for principles like sobriety and abstinence that most fraternities overlook.

Popularity is not notability. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. None of the points you mention confer Notability in Wikipedia's sense, so I have nominated the article for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion/Phi Kappa Chi. You are welcome to comment there, but first please read Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines#Student life and Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

CR Narayanan

reasoning -Gokulchandola (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done, no reasoning provided. lifebaka++ 08:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Anna Bond

I would like to take up this article, which will be about an upcoming Kannada film. It is a notable item and the media coverage has gained significant traction. Thanks. -Niri M / ನಿರಿ 07:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user EncMstr (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. Since release is not until September 2012, you may not be able to meet the requirement of WP:NFF for reliable sources to confirm that principal photography has started: if not, ask me and I will move it to the WP:Article Incubator where you can work on it until WP:NFF is met. JohnCD (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt (and a detailed) response, JohnCD. I'm afraid you might have to move it to the incubator for a while since the principal photography has not yet commenced. As per recent news, it should begin by the second week of next month, so it can be moved back later. Sorry, I was unaware of WP:NFF. Thank you again for your time. Cheers. - Niri M / ನಿರಿ 09:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 Done - incubated to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Anna Bond. JohnCD (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Shideboss

reasoning -Shideboss (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

1.shideboss is the page name 2. reason because he is one of the many celebrities that are no on wikipedia and i am trying to rase awarness of him.as he is my uncle as well also i am not happy of the fact its been deleted and no one has told me why.

Claire Rushbrook

Prod-ed as not notable, but a very recognisable face on British TV. WP:ENT defines notability as "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". A quick look at her imdb page will demonstrate how she meets that criteria. -Rob Sinden (talk) 12:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. January (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

My Healthy Home

Sorry, I'm a bit new at this. But I did spend a lot of time researching in order to put up an article about a well known expert in home environmental matters. I was going to add a recent public acknowledgement by Green America when I noticed the page was deleted. Please undelete or provide the guidelines that have been unmet. Thanks! -Jimejamm (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Kenya Kongonis Cricket Club

reasoning -Kimemia Maina (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I believe the criteria by which this article was declared 'not notable' are plainly scandalous. If being one of the oldest institutions in Kenyan cricket and running, by a country mile, the most productive youth set up in Kenyan cricket doesn't merit notability by Wikipedia then arguably there is not a single facet of Kenyan cricket that is notable enough to have a wikipedia article.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenya Kongonis Cricket Club, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. January (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

JPBS Cover page

it is a coverpage.I want to use as fair use to explain it on journal wiki page -Himanshu18in (talk) 03:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I assume you're talking about the article, rather than the file you created, as the latter has yet to be deleted. Anyway:
Not done and will not be done. The page consisted only of a header and an external link, meeting speedy criterion A1. Restoring it would not help you write an actual article.
Now, to address a separate concern, Wikipedia articles do not have cover pages. If you want to write an article about the Journal of Pharmacy & BioAllied Sciences, feel free, but please do not attempt to create a cover page for it again. Thank you. lifebaka++ 15:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Iyris Technologies

I am creating this for my company.So please don't delete it. -Infoitechno (talk) 07:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Please also note that creating an article on your own company or organisation is strongly discouraged. Please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for further guidance. January (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Fotomuseum Winterthur

OTRS permission received in 2011092710010311 from the individual who created the page, writing in from an email associated with http://www.fotomuseum.ch. The act of editing is agreement to the terms of use, signifying release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and the GFDL. -– Adrignola talk 15:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Alfred Lyall (traveller)

OTRS permission received from webmaster in OTRS ticket 2011092410010077 for release of content at http://www.jjhc.info/lyallalfred1865.htm under CC-BY-SA-3.0. -– Adrignola talk 16:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Voddie Baucham

This article was deleted in 2007. Since then he has been on CNN. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f14z3cnNzzo&feature=player_embedded. National speaker, currently serves as Pastor of Preaching at Grace Family Baptist Church in Spring, TX. Has several books What He Must Be... If He Wants To Marry My Daughter,Family Driven Faith,The Ever Loving Truth,The Supremacy of Christ in a Post Modern World.204.246.67.231 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC) -204.246.67.231 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan

I am requesting the undeletion of my page Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan. I have read WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS and WP:BIO and this article should be undeleted for the following reasons:

He is a 2008 grammy winner with an actual statue - not just certificate of contribution to a grammy winning album. He was nominated again in 2010 in the Album of the year category. He is at the top of his field and is regularly requested as a studio engineer by the the biggest artists in the world including Katy Perry, Justin Bieber, Mary J. Blige and Jennifer Lopez. He is endorsed by two of the biggest music-industry software companies (Waves and Celemony: see interviews). In 2011 he was shown on international television recording contestants in the recording studio on American Idol season 10.

I have since edited the page to make it more concise, it is at: User:BrittyGirl/Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan

Thanks!! -BrittyGirl (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

 Not done This article was deleted by AFD consensus and therefore may not be restored by this process. You could raise the issue at WP:DRV, but I think it unlikely that consensus will support restoration of the article unless O'Ryan has won or been nominated for a craft-specific award like this one, or unless you can cite more detailed independent coverage than credit lists. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Monsoon Group of Las Vegas

this article was created about a Las Vegas nightlife group that has significant relevance and sited 3rd party sources, though I respect an administrator's reasoning as self promotional, ANY article sounds or appears promotional, these articles and my future article on Las Vegas nightlife groups will sound or appear promotional as they are for wiki's intended purpose is to be INFORMATIONAL. Thank you. -Wiki BioInfo (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

No, promotional does not always equal informational. See also puffery. In any case, articles deleted as G11 (blatant advertisement) won't be undeleted through this process. Please read m:Neutral point of view and its local incarnation. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

BWilkins what separates a company or persons' accomplishments and achievements form 'puffery'? In a newly advancing industry such as nightlife there are some significant milestones that are significant such as the unique organization and services that the company in question represents. I assume that you care less, but there is a difference from the company in the article than other 'nightlife management groups'. In fact it's the only concise nightlife group in the US. Which is the nightlife industry is significant and deems encyclopedic and important to those within the industry. Things such as 'the first' of it's kind or developments within a certain industry should have no issues. I understand and respect that there is much exploitation and abuse as I have read it myself. And it is only by discussion like these and by members of the Wiki community, which I am new to, can police and monitor misuse. That being said, I will continue to argue this point and share the significance of the company's development and it's significance to the nightclub and bar and nightlife industry. Although I do not compare this company to the likes of Dupont, but when a company or individual develops or revolutionizes a product or an industry I feel that is significant. Having the opportunity to edit the Monsoon Group article and be more direct and pointing out the significance and feats may to some be puffery or deemed as self promotional or promotional in general. From my understanding this is a discussion and I respect your point of view, but I also must defend my article and future ones to come. I am new and novice, at best, and will continue to contribute with these subjects amongst others. My point is that when something is new or unfamiliar to you it is not to be discounted to your opinion, yes I understand that new bands and businesses are here for the exact reasons that you accuse my article of being, but it is the significance that the business has to the industry and the fact it is heavily involved in many notable aspects within the industry is why it is encyclopedic. If I were writing about a new engine that had a unique technology or system, i may not understand the significance, but I would read into the new business as promotional etc. Wiki BioInfo (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

That's not the issue here. An article could be about something notable, and if it were written like a commercial admins would *still* delete it as promotional. The problem isn't that it's new, it's the tone in which the article was written (which is why, just going by whatever I can deduce from the logs as I am not an admin, I pointed you at the NPOV policies).
To be on Wikipedia (which is, after all, an encyclopedia), an article has to fulfill three main criteria:
  1. Is the subject demonstrably notable through reliable sources?
  2. Is the article written from an unbiased viewpoint?
  3. Does the article report what the sources say?
By default, most G11 candidates I have seen fail all three (They only reference their own website, include a fair amount of puffery, and they're written in prose that induces diabetes on sight).
Please note that a G11 deletion does not mean the article is forbidden from appearing on Wikipedia. All it means is that the article needs to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia policies, and that can easily be done by going through WP:Articles for creation and asking for help on IRC ( #wikipedia-en-help on freenode; see WP:IRC for more information). —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Mecannibals

I wish to repost this article on another wiki. -Mathewignash (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Iyris Technologies

I am creating a page for the company.I contact the deleted administrators about the deletion of my page.When i recreate the page with the same name Iyris Technologies then i will clear those problems and the recreation page will definitely meet your terms and conditions. So please don't delete it.Allow me to recreate. -IyrisTech (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Hydra_(software)

if you remove hydra software entry also remove all wikipedia entry from examples at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack they are also software used to dictionary attacks -213.30.189.66 (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_50&oldid=1142568410"