Jump to content

User talk:United States Man/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10


Please comment on Talk:Origin of the Romanians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Origin of the Romanians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Refs

Just thought I'd respond to that edit you made in my sandbox a while back -- the authors are the local NWS offices because most, if not all, of the summaries provided are by the WFOs; so is the information. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 02:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

That is about the equivalent of me giving you information to write a book. Although I gave you the info, you still wrote the book and are the author. Although the NWS may give the NCDC information, NCDC still compiles everything and (although I'm not sure) possibly does their own research. Since the NCDC does not list an author, there should be no author listed in WP references. United States Man (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
More like the equivalent of me writing a book and it being published on Google as an eBook. Sure, it's published there (Google; NCDC) but the information still came from the author (me; local WFOs). TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I have given my reasoning. If you choose to disregard that, perhaps bring it up with the rest of the project or with Cyclonebiskit seeing that he enacted the change. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 22:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Have a read of this and see if it answers your query.Jason Rees (talk) 23:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
To solve your other little problem - tell me (here or on the IRC Channel #wiki-hurricanes) how you would cite this advisory archive up assuming it was permanent.

Re:Units

Well, "long" is quite subjective. Does "miles per hour" seem long to you? To me, it does, but you do realize that the MOS says usually, not that it has to be spelled out. It's never been an issue at FAC in my 6 years here YE Pacific Hurricane 05:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

Please comment on Talk:Sasanian Empire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sasanian Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Admin

If you wanna go for Admin then id suggest that you really be sure, that you want go for it rather than doing it on a whim for example. I say this since as TAMs RFA proved the whole process can be very brutal - especially if you are under 18, like i think you maybe. Also think about what you would like to do with the mop as its known and maybe get some decent expierence in getting things to GA inside and outside of the Met projects. Also you should try and build your relationships with other editors up slightly maybe including by poping in to the wiki-hurricanes irc room once in a while, where you will find people like myself and Hink at times.Jason Rees (talk) 07:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: adminship

Hey there! I think it's great that you want to become an admin, and I'm a bit honored you came to me for some advice. You've been here long enough that it wouldn't seem like you're rushing, which is good, and you've had over 12,000 edits, which shows you're going to stick around. It seems like over the past month, you've become more active in AFD, which is encouraging. If you keep that up, you'll have an admin activity you can show you'll do.

I do see some edit summaries that could be potentially controversial, and would love if you could explain them further.

  • [1] - for this edit, you never contacted SharkGuy05 either on the talk page or on the user talk page. Communication is a key facet of being an administrator. Comments like "for some reason you think your version is always the best" aren't helpful in an edit summary. If it is a recurring trend for the other user, then your job as a prospective admin would be to open a dialogue. What's worse is that you seem to have gotten into a bit of an edit war with this user, still without any attempt at a discussion outside of the edit summaries. This is worrisome as it only happened two weeks ago.
  • [2] - on the other hand, you did reach out to TAWX14 for these series of edits/reverts
  • [3] - did anything further come of this? A final warning is pretty severe
  • This is another example of some admin activities that you might want to mention. Although it was ultimately proven false, you were diplomatic in your apology, and your research was diligent.

I didn't look through your entire editing history (I wouldn't be able to reply for a few days if that was the case!), but it seems in general you could have a path to adminship. My biggest recommendation is toning down edit summaries and communicating with other users more. Don't forget, reverts between two users affects the entire project that the article is in, and if you bring it up on the talk page, other users might want to chime in on the debate. When in doubt, bring it up on the talk page of the article instead of between the two users. This next one might sound like an unusual request, but take it with a grain of salt - if there are any users that you find just really grinds your gears, just reach out to them and collaborating more! I find that when two people are really intensely debating on an article (Via edit summary or talk page), it just means that the two people are really passionate about the article, which is a good thing for Wikipedia. And if that could just be turned from semi-animosity into a working collaboration, so much more gets done. I've done that a few times in the hurricane project - I may get into some heated debates with some people, but those are the same people who I'd love working with on an article to get stuff done.

In general, I wouldn't go for RFA particularly soon. I really feel that first one could be disqualifying for most people, as silly as it may seem, but that's how RFA is nowadays. Oh, and another thing - try taking on more of a leadership role. Initiate discussions and follow through with them. I'm not sure if this is a prerequisite for RFA, but it certainly helped when I got the tools. People that do good things are likely to be rewarded, so keep that in mind. Good luck with editing, and let me know if you have any questions! :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Also, glad you came around on this :P --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Glad to review! Btw, have you considered coming on the WPTC IRC channel? Even though obstensibly it's for hurricanes, we talk about weather in general, and many editors are on there who also edit other projects. I find it great to talk to people instantaneously. Not even for making offline decisions (which we never do), but it's a great way to foster wiki relationships, and a reminder that the person on the other end is a human. Come on by next time you're bored. I honestly think that's a primary factor why the WPTC is one of the most successful projects on wiki. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 25–28, 2012 North American storm complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KALB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sasanian Empire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sasanian Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

Please comment on Talk:Katyn massacre

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Katyn massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for being a big fan of the weather! That's what I am too! Mozo182 (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Format correction at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boland (baseball)

Just to let you know that I made a format correction on your last edit, which had for some reason resulted in most of the page being displayed with strike-through text, based on my assumption that you had intended to strike some of your own comments but not others'. [4] If I haven't gotten it right, of course, please make the appropriate corrections and accept my apologies. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes in January 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Numbers (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Numbers (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

Please comment on Talk:Firewall (physics)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Firewall (physics). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:First Republic of Austria

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:First Republic of Austria. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

Please comment on Talk:Opium Wars

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Opium Wars. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Table in process?

Any word yet on that weather record table for the 2014 cold wave page? If the articles end up being merged, it may become close to necessary rather than simply a good idea. If the sheer number of U.S. records alone are an issue, I can tackle those for you. (And btw, I agree completely with you about Facebook.) - Tenebris 22:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.91.170.20 (talk)

Please comment on Talk:Brazilian Expeditionary Force

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brazilian Expeditionary Force. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Duck Dynasty

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Duck Dynasty. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

Please comment on Talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Serbia women's national beach handball team

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Serbia women's national beach handball team. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

Please comment on Talk:Mr Whoppit

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mr Whoppit. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Tornado report 12/02/14

Hey man! Just to say that we had a tornado report by nws. But it was confirmed as strong winds. You changed the article to another one that said the same thing but without any references. That is why I questioned your changes.

Anyway, I changed again saying it was a report (which it really was) but later was ruled out as strong winds. I`ve add another reference as well.

Just to be fair here, if you change anything please add the reference or something. Just saying "no tornado" really appeared as vandalism to me, but I was wrong about that.

Peace man and keep up the good job!!

-- Vigilant2014 (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

RFA

Please don't be offended from the nomination. I will try again in a few months. Thank you for your comments. Presbitow (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BeerXML

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BeerXML. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Changing Article Title

Hi, you recently asked me to change the title of an article but I have no idea how it is done. FilmScotland (talk) 02:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Puerto Rico

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Puerto Rico. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

Please comment on Talk:British Isles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:British Isles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Nugent

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ted Nugent. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3. United States WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suicide of Phoebe Prince

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide of Phoebe Prince. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Religion in China

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Religion in China. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

Please comment on Talk:Investigative Project on Terrorism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Investigative Project on Terrorism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Practical Boat Owner

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Practical Boat Owner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

Please comment on Template talk:Europe topic

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Europe topic. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

Please comment on Talk:Fenelon Township

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fenelon Township. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

NCDC

Hi USM, I noticed earlier that the NCDC storm events database has been updated to include December 2013. As a result i was wondering if you could go through it and see if the 2013/2014 cold waves were seperate events or not. I would do it but im not sure what im looking for :) Regards.Jason Rees (talk) 03:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Belated thanks

I know this is late but I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your participation at my RfA. I was very inspired by the many that supported me and it’s that feeling of friendship and camaraderie that keeps me coming back to the project. So, thank you for your support and for your continued sense of fairness and compassion in all areas of WP. I look forward to the opportunity to work together in the days to come. Best wishes, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Russia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

Please comment on Talk:False flag

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:False flag. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sunflower Student Movement

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sunflower Student Movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bell of Batoche

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bell of Batoche. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

Please comment on Talk:Frederick, Maryland

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frederick, Maryland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bliss (image)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bliss (image). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kars

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kars. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gun control

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun control. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Re:Tables

The tables have to be in a single table and include the dates per the MOS of tables. It has to be in one table for text readers for visually impaired persons. Splitting it into separate tables screws up the bot. Would have been nice to drop me a message to inform me that there were going to be further changes to the table though. I highly disagree with adding another column as damage is easy to just put in the summary. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

"Unconstructive"? Not true

Myself and others have been listing the next week's race on the 2014 Nascar Sprint page for several months now, and there has never been any objection to it. It's not "unconstructive" -- if it was unconstructive, someone would have objected to it months ago. And besides, even if I myself don't list the next race, someone else will just come along and do it anyway. Are you going to unneededly revert them as well? Johnsmith2116 (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

P.S. -- Not only did you delete the next race, but you also deleted the race from two days ago. I and others don't understand this. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

You say it looks tacky. First of all, I'm not the one who makes the race report, others do the report and they have done so for months. Second, it's been standard to list the next race -- if it was a problem, someone would have complained a long time ago, they wouldn't suddenly start complaining about it now all of a sudden out of nowhere. And third, you're the only one saying it looks "tacky", which just means that's your own personal opinion, not a statement of fact. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

For MONTHS now, not just a few weeks as you're trying to claim, the NEXT race had been listed on there by others and myself, and there was NEVER any objection to it. But hey, fine, I won't put it on there anymore, because I know there are more important things in life than having a petty argument with hard-headed people over the internet. But just keep something in mind -- when SOMEONE ELSE lists the next race on there and rightfully so (just as I have done), and then you revert them the same as you did with me, you will then have to go through all this again with them, trying to explain away your reasoning for reverting their perfectly good and constructive edit. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from April to May 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crawford, Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Please comment on Talk:Unified Modeling Language

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Unified Modeling Language. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsmith2116 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 4 May 2014‎

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's United States ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Washington, D.C. Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Canada Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Minas Gerais Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Nepal Czar (submissions) and Indiana Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Black mamba

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Black mamba. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

Please comment on Talk:Fedor Emelianenko

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fedor Emelianenko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

December 2013 North American ice storm

Greetings United States Man! I am currently working on the article December 2013 North American ice storm, do you mind helping out in expanding and copy-editing? Regards, ///EuroCarGT 02:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Abusive reverting, from same user, again, like last time. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Angela Merkel

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Angela Merkel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

No EF5 damage in eastern Moore?

Yeah from the preliminary 2013 survey, but not anymore. As of 2014, several homes were upgraded from EF4 to EF5 in central and eastern Moore. Please actually read the sources before spreading outdated info. Second link contains the final survey map, which shows every EF5 damage point in Moore marked by purple triangles (you have to view if full-size.) The foundation in the picture was located off of S Olde Bridge Rd (discussed on page 9 of the first link)

https://ams.confex.com/ams/94Annual/webprogram/Paper241554.html

https://ams.confex.com/ams/94Annual/webprogram/Handout/Paper241554/828_sls_ortega_et_al_moore_tornado.pdf

Sharkguy05 (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Sharkguy05

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

Please comment on Talk:Ion Antonescu

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ion Antonescu. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

Sorry about the caps on my edit summary

Sorry for the caps on my edit summary, but I have been dealing with many different IP editors changing it to the next day, which is crystalballing. So yeah. No hard feelings. Dustin (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Also, on the "no sense" part, I kind of get what you are saying, but at the same time, couldn't it easily be fixed along with some other edit on something else? 1800z isn't very late to me, so I think that it is at least better to show only what is known, because in that situation, there are still six hours until the next day. Finally, you could easily change it back with the rest of the stuff, which is why I don't think this should be an issue. Personally, I think there should be some sort of edit notice for the page saying how to do the time updates. (An edit notice like the one you would get if editing my user page, for example) Thank you for supplying me with your reasoning, though. Dustin (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sean Bean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legends (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Honorary degree

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Honorary degree. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mmddyy28

Hello United States Man, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mmddyy28, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. the panda ₯’ 00:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

1981 WCHA Men's Ice Hockey Tournament

I put the (lack of) tournament awards on the page as a placeholder so that it's apparent that no awards were given rather than the information not being available.PensRule11385 (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Andrea Betzner

I am getting so many messages from your automated systems, that I can't respond to them all. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. I only have a few living bios so far. I think I significantly improved on the German wikipedia article about her. I would like to do more, but I can't answer all your messages and notification.

Can you take that ugly notice off the page. you really should make it much smaller.

RC711 (talk) 03:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Team Penske, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turner Motorsports (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Operation Defensive Shield

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Operation Defensive Shield. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello

The post you edited the Dolph A bad news Barrett is somewhat confirmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadianrandom (talk • contribs) 03:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Vjmlhds. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Money in the Bank (2014) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vjmlhds 17:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Double-standard

When ZappaOMati reveals the box on the weekend for the pole winner, no one reverts it. I myself revealed it this time. So, I did the same thing he did, and yet it got reverted. Let's try to get along and not do things out of spite. Thanks. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to June 16–18, 2014 tornado outbreak sequence: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Also, when you reverted the IP user, you did not give any indication of what was wrong. That not being blatant vandalism, you should have either left an edit summary or a warning on that user's talk page describing the problem. Twinkle makes the warning process very simple, so it should not take much extra time. Otherwise, some may accuse you of failing to assume good faith. This is still but a suggestion, though, and what you do is up to you. Thank you. Dustin (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Please comment on Talk:Chip Berlet

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chip Berlet. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Capitalization of warnings from the United States National Weather Service

It is really frustrating when you don't look through my contributions to see how I was handling the situation. You didn't provide any actual webpage evidence, so I reverted you. I know you are also editing in good faith, but please don't take it too hard. See http://weather.gov: It appears that every warning from the National Weather Service is formally capitalized, with informal exceptions which do not occur with actual warnings. I would also suggest that you see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Title Capitalization for Watches and Warnings. Sorry if I was a rough in my edit summary towards you; I had to go through a very bad, not-so-well ending discussion following the earlier reverts. Thank you again, though. Please at least consider discussing this for awhile here or on he article talk page first; the change to caps occurred a long enough time ago that changing it back is what I believe should require a discussion. Please don't be mad or something; I am just trying to nicely suggest that we try to go over this for a bit at least. Regarding watches, although they do not occur here with the article in question, you can see the official watches from the Storm Prediction Center. Here is an example: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/watch/2014/ww0351.html Thank you, and sorry again for my bad edit summary. Dustin (talk) 14:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to Florida 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:United_States_Man/Archive_4&oldid=1159211194"