User talk:Stronkgod

Welcome!

Hello, Stronkgod, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2007 Greensburg tornado, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TornadoLGS (talk) 03:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2007 Elie tornado have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 15:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tornado outbreak of May 4–6, 2007, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edits also appear to be adding trivia about another unrelated tornado; such information is irrelevant to this article and should not be added, especially without a source. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Multiple-vortex tornado, you may be blocked from editing. All information must be attributed to a source, including alternative names. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2007 Greensburg tornado. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. The widest tornado in Kansas was an F5 near Reserve in 1896 (2.25 miles). If you plan on adding any extraordinary claims like that, please be sure to have a reliable source. Departure– (talk) 02:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try my best, even though it may be hard. Stronkgod (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Alright, so I appreciate your good-faith contributions, but you should seriously slow down. You recently changed the image on 2021 Western Kentucky tornado to a copyvio - images uploaded to Commons must be free images, and the one you uploaded was clearly ripped from online without even removing the in-image watermark with information on licensing. This is the whole reason we use non-free images on Wikipedia. Also, don't do what you did at 2013 Moore tornado changing the name of the tornado without consensus, a good reason, or at the very least an edit summary. Also, while not disallowed, you should at the very least click through to image pages before adding them to articles, as you've added a likely copyvio image to Tornadoes of 2024 recently. Also, avoid edits like this one that disrupt the flow of a page. I hope all of this isn't going to demotivate you from editing - your contributions are appreciated. However, as I said, you really should slow down and make sure your edits comply with copyright policy and the Manual of Style. At the very least, please start using an edit summary - some of your edits appear similar to vandalism / disruptive editing, and other editors might not be so quick to assume good faith, so a quick sentence describing what you changed can really help others identify your intentions when editing. Departure– (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if i get it, i am quite good at faith contributions, but i have some mistakes, am i right? Stronkgod (talk) 11:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading copyright media

Please stop uploading media without permission! Images uploaded to Commons must be free - after I've previously informed you, you've uploaded three non-free images under an invalid license to Commons. Any further may get you barred from adding to Commons and I say we cut this out now. Not all image on the web are free; you can't upload files from Reddit to Wikipedia without proper permission. If you want to contribute more constructively, there's a million damage photos on the NOAA Damage Assessment Toolkit that are all free and in the public domain. Departure– (talk) 13:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so i should use the damage photos from the NOAA dama assessment toolkit? Stronkgod (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]