User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 25

Archive 20

←

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

→

Archive 29

Deletion Process

Hello Praxidicae,

thank you for taking the time to respond to my questions, as I mentioned to you, I am NOT being paid, I really would like to know what can I edit on the article to make it accepeted. I have the media stories, medical journals, what else is needed? Thank you.Andrecanada (talk) 16:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

So what's your connection to her, then Andrecanada? PRAXIDICAE💕 16:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for asking Praxdicae,

I am her husband, and I promised you that no profit is being made from this horrifc accident. is that a cause for the deletion ? Andrecanada (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

The warning also includes WP:COI which I suggest you read. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

ok, I saw all the way on te bottom, I have no problem disclosing it, It is no secret that I am a huge burn advocate since my wifes accident, if I add a disclaimer. would that make the article approved? also, two users just message me, offering to write the article, since they follow her story and felt compelled after seeing the deletion request, what do you advise? i want to follow the rules. Thank you for your time and knowledge. Andrecanada Andrecanada (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

No because it still doesn't mean she's notable and this is still a case of WP:BLP1E. You disclosing is a matter of policy, it just means you won't be blocked for an undisclosed COI. It isn't insulation against other actions or guarantee of an article. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Praxie, i see that you edit some parts of the article, fine, but why continue to suggest deletion? now the only info there is the medical facts. how can we come to an agreement ? Andrecanada (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I've already adequately explained why. I suggest you stick to one account or tell whomever you are editing alongside with to cease disruptively removing the tag before you both wind up blocked. Also my name is not Praxie. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I dont know the other person editng the account, I have not remove any tags, Praxdicae. Lets see what the discussion decides. Thank you. Andrecanada (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Looks like User:Andrecanada has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 18:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

may i know why my page is gonna deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahaad_Bhat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiputta (talk • contribs) 17:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Seeking for a mentor

Hello, Praxidicae! By chance I came across very good reviews about you and about your work on Wikipedia. I am a fairly experienced user of the Russian-language Wikipedia, I have the status of "auto-confirmed participants, loading, rolling back, patrolling" participants. I really want to develop in the English-language Wikipedia, to be useful, to implement interesting and necessary articles from Kazakhstan here. I am at a studio for learning English, so creating articles, and most importantly, challenging the verdicts of administrators is very difficult for me. I would really like to find an English-speaking friend and mentor. I am a very diligent and responsible student. I am ready to help with articles, search for the blind, learn, correct my mistakes. Now I need help to improve the articles of two Kazakhstanis that the country is proud of. They have put Kazakhstan on the world's innovation card. Perhaps you could take your time and share some tips and tricks. The administrator who transferred my articles to Draft, unfortunately, did not respond to my message. Thanks in advance! And I apologize for the disturbance. Deviloper (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Neonatal nursing reverts

Hi - @Praxidicae: Can you help me identify copyvios and npov issues in Eflake123's recent edits to the Neonatal_nursing article? Trying to help a student learn how to successfully contribute. Wholesale reverts aren't really helpful or recommended. Thanks for your attention to this article. I think there's some goof stuff in the student's edits if we take the time to work with them rather than revert. DarthVetter (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Please Review The Eagle Online

hello Praxidicae, please sir, you recently deleted an artilce i created not knowing the time i took to create it , if you are in Nigeria you will know that these are all reliable news source . i gave good cituation , make a review by doing a google search of the online news site. thanks Kenpmi (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I gave you the opportunity to work on it in draft, you chose to ignore that. So now it'll either be speedily deleted or i'll afd it. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Once was enough

Hi, Prax. Once was enough for me. Bishonen | tålk 16:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC).

I mean hey, I vote for an indef. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Praxie! ROTFLOL! Yes, your name shall henceforth be Praxie. Who's Arturo? Bishie | tålk 17:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC).

Arturo is our benevolent LTA. He's more just LT, less A. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Waris Ali Shah

Hi, please check Talk:Waris Ali Shah before reverting. Thank you. Dove's talk (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

How about you check it and actually read my edit summaries. I don't plan on reverting you until it's blacklisted but I will be filing an SPI shortly. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Have a look

Hi Prax, please take sometime and have a look at Pawandeep Rajan and Arunita Kanjilal. Do you find something unusual? ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 18:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Why

Good day Praxidicae, why didn’t you afd the articles I recently created rather than moving them to draft for improvement stating they need more citations. I found nothing wrong with the article and at least you should have given other editors to contribute their thought either the article should be keep or delete. --Gabriel601 (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Because I was giving you the opportunity to work on them in draft space, should you move them back, I will indeed AFD them and they will be deleted. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I reached out to you politely and you are responding to me like a threat without given me a Good reason why you moved the article which passes WP:GNG. If anyone should be getting you upset here on Wikipedia or outside of Wikipedia I think you need to calm down and fix it than talking to people rudely who reached out to you in a polite manner. What opportunity are you giving me ? Theirs nothing wrong with the article and your reason wasn’t a good reason article has to be shifted to draft. No reason why article should be deleted and you are sounded that as a threat to me that if I move it back to main space, you will afd and they will be deleted like you got every other editor in control of you. That is too bad you have to change your manner. You can go ahead and AFD while I put it back on mainspace for other editor contribution. --Gabriel601 (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@Gabriel601 (talk page stalker) May I suggest that instead of having an argument you submit the drafts as they are now for a WP:AFC review, or improve them first and then do it. That means that others will look and offer constructive advice. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh thank you @Timtrent but I already move the page to main space before you just told me this. I think he should AFD it as he said and give his reason why it should be AFD--Gabriel601 (talk) 22:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@Gabriel601 What will happen will happen. Your move has a WP:POINT feel about it, but you must do what you must do. I have, however, left you a helpful note on another of your drafts, so far unsubmitted. It would be helpful if you took notice of it, please.

Arguments on Wikipedia serve no purpose, save to raise blood pressure. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Timtrent I also left a note on my talk page. I appreciate your advice on being no argument it saves health and that is why I don’t edit much on Wikipedia. I’m not always active because I do value my health. I will be leaving the article you commented for now till when it’s sounds right to be improve to suit Wikipedia article but the politician is a Good article.--Gabriel601 (talk) 23:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Gabriel601, I don’t appreciate you acting as though you are the victim here and also, I believe you are trying too hard to make Praxidicae look like a villain. please stop already. Take a look at your article creations every single creation of yours has been promotional in nature thus vindicating Praxidicae and indicative of the fact that she is very much apt. The difference between Praxi & I, is that she is all encompassing, nigh all knowing, but you see, as for me, Nigeria related articles are my forte and I can unequivocally say all the articles you created are all promotional articles on non notable persons. I’m literally the most renowned editor dealing with Nigeria related articles in the history of the English Wikipedia so please respectfully do simmer down, as all the sources you used are all unreliable pieces from reliable sources, the rest are press releases or mere announcements, God's honest truth if you keep creating promotional articles I would be left with no other choice than to file an official report. It is in your best interest to change for the best forthwith. Furthermore if you can explain why you are a sleeper spa promo account that would be great. Celestina007 (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

We conflicted, and I am not sure of the solution

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azaan Sami Khan. You redirected Azaan Sami Khan and I was sending to AfD. I am unsure how to solve this. I have no strong feelings either way, buty you have the toolkit to solve it whereas I do not, so your help will be key. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

It gets more 'amusing' because Ishq E Laa received the AfD nomination. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I was wondering what happened, you can restore the template there since they'll probably just revert me anyway. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I'll have a crack at it. Wish me luck 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I think I have sorted it out. I really didn't feel strongly about your redirect. It is now "correctly" at AfD. By which I mean it is correctly set up for folk to discuss. I'm out of breath now! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I thought I had seen this one. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hasan Diker

We'll see if it is speedied on G11. In a few hours, if it is still there, I will check the references for the lack of significant coverage and write an AFD. He would have been better off to take the advice of five previous reviewers, two of whom draftified it, and three of whom declined it, that it needed work. It would be all right in draft space, but he really wants it where it doesn't belong, in article space. Oh well. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, well. That is sort of a victory for justice and the Wikipedia way, or whatever. Sort of. The G11 was declined with the comment that the draft is a mess, which is true, but I don't exactly understand it is a G11 denial, but the submitter was blocked for never listening, which is a variety of not here constructively. So now I have tagged the draft as the work of a blocked editor and have requested that, if it is resubmitted, a reviewer should report the submitter for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hair Care Article

Hey, I appreciate your feedback and I was wondering what "rs" means? I was also wondering what about the history section I added was not neutral as I provided lots of detail and other necessary sources throughout the article that seemed needed. I'd really like to expand this section as I think it could use some revisions to spiffy it up. Thank you, and please get back to me when you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhutchison5 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Draft review

Hi there, you left me a message this morning for an article I created on George Weinstein. I made the changes to it that you were looking for and added a citation where you posted the . Then I submitted it for review. I'm not sure how this works exactly as I haven't created many pages, but I figured I would let you know since you contacted me about it. I'm not sure if the page will now have too many citations, for such a brief article. If you think the article needs anything else please let me know, but I added a ==Books== section and put 2 of the isbns there, and then relocated one of the sources which lists the other ones. Let me know if there's anything else I should edit. Thank you Raleigh80Z90Faema69 (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Bro Paul Brown

You just redirected Bro Paul Brown's wiki page into The Waterboys' page. Why? Grammy Award winning artist, Bro Paul Brown, satisfies wiki's notability policies sufficently for him to have his own page.Johnalexwood (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alexey Bokov

Hello, you requested a speedy deletion of the article Alexey Bokov. It's not abundantly clear to me that the content is self-promoting, and it is actively being edited so I declined the speedy. I would have no objection if you wanted to run it through AFD or another process.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Regarding the page of Mahadevi Varma

Hello Sir/Madam, I would like to ask what was the purpose behind reverting the edit I made on the page named Mahadevi Varma, Early Life section? I think we should be responsible to publish accurate history instead of falsified versions. I guess I have cited enough proofs to prove my point regarding her caste identity. So what's the issue in there? I am very eager to know why a false claim(With literally NO PROOF/NO VALID PROOF Cited) is being favored instead of what history is meant to be? Would be waiting for your reply, No Harsh feelings once again. -Kunwar Raj Prasad Singh Srivastava — Preceding unsigned comment added by RajPrasadSingh (talk • contribs) 04:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Early Modern Art Draft revision

Hello! I would like for you to review (in your own time) Draft:Early Modern Art. I have made several modifications to the original draft and would like to move it to mainspace. Thank you! mjf9089 (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker), Maye Fernandez, I’m afraid you aren’t going to get a response from Praxidicae, she is a very busy person and secondly her talk page isn’t the AFC talk-page(where you ought to have gone) but let me say this, if you are unsure of the state of your article then submitting (or resubmitting) it via the WP:AFC is the only route to follow. If it isn’t mainspace worthy, it may be sent to AFD. Celestina007 (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

  i will do that, thank you! mjf9089 (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Usha Narayane:Seeking advice

Hi! I’m the creator of the Usha Narayane page that you recently declined. I am (Redacted) seeking help on how you would suggest I approve it. What sources do you believe unreliable? Just looking for some help, I’d love for her story to be one known by Wikipedia! Thanks Dcohn25 (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC) Doing a little trimming. Primefac (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Dcohn25, You are more than welcome to visit the WP:TEAHOUSE and seek advice or guidance there. Praxidicae is currently busy with the busier parts of this project. Celestina007 (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Seeking help

Can an article with speedy deletion tag be moved back to draftspace? Johnel X (talk) 02:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Johnel X: The {{help}} templates should be used on your own user talk page, not some other user's.

If you are the creator of the article, you may not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself and should not try to move the page to draft space. Your option is to click on the button to contest the deletion.

Anyone else can remove the speedy deletion tag and, if needed, move the page to draft. To move the page to draft without removing the speedy tag would be pointless. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch ! Johnel X (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Libs of TikTok

Heyo. I was just trying to figure out if this was an WP:AN3 issue, or an WP:ARE one. Though as with the EW notice, you go there first! Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Honestly this might be an WP:AN and ArbCom issue based on the total of all their edits which seem to ignore our policies on RS and neutrality in favor of pushing their political agenda (and some Qanonsense) PRAXIDICAE💕 21:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Given the article is subject to multiple discretionary sanctions (American politics, GENSEX, and BLP), I suspect an ARE request may be the most expedient. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Sideswipe9th Looks like TNT 3rr blocked them, but edits like this in particular make me think an indefinite block or outright ban (either topic or site wide) is probably appropriate. I don't think I can/should file a request while they're 3rr blocked and can't respond at ANI but I'm assuming they'll pick right up where they left off when the block expires, at which time I'll request. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

I know I've seen blocked users contributing at ANI in the past, though an editor usually has to copy/paste their replies from their own talk page to the noticeboard. I think though an arbitration enforcement request is probably going to be more effective here than an ANI one. Content like that diff you just linked is definitely covered under GENSEX. I'll do some checking/reading here, and get back to you shortly. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

So I did some reading of the editor's recent contributions, and felt as though it definitely met the requirements for filing at ARE. I wasn't able to find any conclusive info on whether or not it was appropriate to file while the editor is blocked for edit warring. However I filed a request with a note that I'll happily withdraw it if it's too early. The thread is here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Dyldyl9 Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

David Leavitt (politician)

I was looking at your CSD sockpuppet tag on the article - neither of the two main editors of the article appear to be listed on the confirmed/suspected sock puppet listing. Am I missing something here? -- Tawker (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

they’re confirmed and globally locked as the master as indicated per the red notice stating the global lock. Hence why it’s also been deleted. PRAXIDICAE💕 02:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks - alas someone else got to it, all good. Have a good evening Tawker (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Revert of correct edits

Hi,
you reverted seven consecutive edits of mine that were absolutely in accordance with WP:AIRPORTS. (Route removal with english source stated.)
Would be great if you could explain your reverts, if not I'll re-edit the articles so that the information is displayed correctly.
Best regards,
Der HON (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

You need to provide a wP:RS. Period. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

The sources stated are valid specialised press articles in English language and more than reliable. Would you please specify what exactly is wrong with them in your opinion so I can try to find better fitting ones? Der HON (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

References

Hello @Praxidicae thank you for reviewing the references on the draft I've been working on. As I am interested in learning more about the guidelines and best practices, could you please elaborate on what "rs" refers to and where on wiki I could learn more about it? I'm hoping to submit this current draft shortly so I can hopefully move on to working on a couple of other designers and design institutions that I noticed don't have Wikipedia entries during this process -- so I'm interested in learning all I can so as not to repeat the same mistakes. Thanks again, SleepyWhippet (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae Ah, I see! I'm a bit confused tho, I thought for sure Forbes would be considered a reliable source as it is on this list in green. Could you please elaborate? SleepyWhippet (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Forbes contributor pieces are not reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh wow, I didn't catch that distinction at all. Thank you so much, learned something! SleepyWhippet (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Self-redirect

The round-robin page swap you did here -- [1] -- seems to have gone wrong, and ended up creating a self-linked redirect. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Reverted article Manisha Ganguly

Hi, I notice you just reverted an article which I reviewed and found to meet notability criteria. It would help if you could explain why you decided to revert it to draftspace, because it seemed like a decent start class article to me. You didn't seem to put any justification for this in the edit, so if you could explain your reasoning that would be useful. --Jwslubbock (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I notice you have explained your reasoning here, but could you perhaps be a bit more specific? The article in question has 32 sources including Reuters, Forbes, Westminster University, and the subject has clearly won a number of awards. This is already more reliable sources than are usually required. If you could give a fuller explanation of your reasoning, I would appreciate it. --Jwslubbock (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Leading Change Network

Both you and another user seem to have nominated Leading Change Network for AFD at exactly the same time, creating two nomination pages. I put yours up for speedy deletion via WP:CSD#G6 since there's no reason to have both open. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Question:

Why did you remove this section? We are having a discussion.

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Platform_(shopping_center)

Thank you for answering me: --2601:205:C002:D1E0:8409:C13F:8C3:19A0 (talk) 23:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Because it's irrelevant to Wikipedia. PRAXIDICAE💕 23:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

How it is irrelevant to Wikipedia? We are discussing about "what if 2020 was a person." 2601:205:C002:D1E0:8409:C13F:8C3:19A0 (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

What does it have to do with the article in question or editing Wikipedia? Answer: it has nothing to do with either. Take it to social media. PRAXIDICAE💕 23:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

How is this thing you reverted nonsense? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1087511644&oldid=1087511582&title=Talk:Platform_(shopping_center) 2601:205:C002:D1E0:6815:8BB9:913C:F388 (talk) 09:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

IP, Wikipedia's talkpages are not chatboards, they're only for discussing improvements to the relevant article. Bishonen | tålk 14:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC).

You're fast!

When the Phantom moves, lightning stands still. Bishonen | tålk 14:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC).

Speedy Deletion of Atomic Shrimp

Hiya, Why has the page: Atomic Shrimp been nominated, he is important as he provides education others using his YouTube channel, also has helped many people, learn and cope during the COVID-19 pandemic. Why is he being taken down? Cheers Davey A. Davey Ashe (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Because he isn't notable. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Page moved

As a heads-up, I moved pro-abortion rights violence to Draft:Pro-abortion rights violence for incubation. On another note, WP:CSD says that [i]f an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used; it's highly atypical to re-insert a CSD tag after another editor (like me) removes it in good faith. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 19:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm aware and I'm also aware of the previous contents and that it could have used an administrators review. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

The previous content (that was deleted in 2017) almost certainly did not contain coverage of Jane's Revenge, etc. and therefore had at least one substantial difference. It ultimately might not be accepted as notable at AfC (the sources currently present are eh), but that's enough of a difference to not CSD the article as being a duplicate. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

And yet that ignores the substance of the afd. But there’s no point in continuing this discussion. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

The last sentence on your userpage is hard to read, because of the background

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3APraxidicae&type=revision&diff=1087048812&oldid=1050574064

I like it though 129.21.190.45 (talk) 15:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

That might be the point :) CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 16:15, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

I was actually just too lazy to fix it...if someone wants to make it easier... PRAXIDICAE💕 17:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

"Rainbow High" DAB

Until 2020, I never wanted to do this! This RSPM is really spinning my head. For the sake of CWW, I could have revamped the actual article itself which talks about a book. I discovered that and I was like "How on earth a whole WP doesn't have the 2020 Rainbow High article version?" That made invoke that RSPM. Now that you've invoked a DAB on that article title, I can't see a smooth ending with this.... Intrisit (talk) 18:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Badehmasare

has an open UTRS ticket. Copied over for your review. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

They're globally locked and I wouldn't support an unblock based on what I remember. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Indeed. He gave me a translation. Was he G-locked for all of that, or is their am LTA lurking behind this user name? Best. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Execution of Nathaniel Woods

You are right that the article should say what the source says. In addition, I believe there's a tag-team being used on me with either sockpuppets or meatpuppets - two users are reverting that change together, and also both reverted a change on a different article that I made. The one you reverted? That user is 7 days old, but already using advanced wikipedia terminology. I haven't dealt with a situation like this before, so if you have any advice, I would listen to it and appreciate it. Thanks. Wes sideman (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Why do not you understand?

Pages that are usually registered in Persian or Kurdish languages And are formed based on translation And are not tagged Dear user, please observe Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novinmirzaei (talk • contribs) 18:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

What do you not understand that no project accepts spammy non-notable individuals and/or their resumes? PRAXIDICAE💕 18:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

• Tagging translated pages is a complete mistake.

Thanks.thank you.NOOOOOOOOOVIN (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

No, misusing Wikipedia to promote non-notable individuals is the complete mistake. I've left further information on your talk page. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Notability

Is this woman wiki-notable? I see about 40 hits in GNews, all of which satisfy the definition of churnalism, except these two profiles. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

RSP says that [Entrepreneur's] coverage tends toward churnalism and may include improperly disclosed paid pieces. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about report

Apparently I have to notify you when I report you for edit-warring, which I am hereby doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.55.24 (talk) 21:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nonsense Praxidicae did not yet Violate 3RR, there has to be fout reverts in a 24 hour period there is only 3 reverts, No Violation yet. Chip3004 (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Bite Ninja deletion.

Hi- is there any chance you could help me with a few Wikipedia items? It seems that I've failed at following the guidelines on my most recent contributions, but this was totally unintentional. I realize this might be impossible and you have a million other things to do, but I'd greatly appreciate some assistance! Semonative (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Semonative

If you get the chance - please let me know on how to proceed. I will make any adjustments necessary for this article to fit within your guidelines. I appreciate the help! Semonative (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Semonative

I thoroughly explained to you what you need to do in the help chat earlier and you've failed to even do as much as disclose your status. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblock request from Badehmasare --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Reconciliation Place

Hi there

You have reverted all edits. Please advise what is not acceptable and the amendment needed to accept the revision. The revision provides extensive factual and referenced information on the subject. 111.220.86.42 (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.220.86.42 (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

The National Outreach article

Hi! Good evening. I know you're not the admin who deleted the article I wrote about The National Outreach, but you nominated it for deletion. Do you mind going into somewhat detail about why you nominated it for deletion? OfTheUsername (talk) 02:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Additionally, if you can give some little help or advice on how to write a new article for the topic. OfTheUsername (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

"This doesn't belong"

Well, sorry. The duck test easily showed me that this was another sock. I was able to zap both this sock and its product, so I went ahead and did so. These actions of mine are of course visible in the relevant logs for those who know where to look, but I assumed that sock-recrudescence was something worth noting in more obvious connection with the sockmaster. Any mistakes so far? (I've seldom found myself dealing with socks in recent years, so I wouldn't be surprised if there were mistakes.) This sock and his actions are in the past. The investigation archive seems the place for a note of them: Even if this particular part of the investigation only took place in my head, it could be useful as part of a larger, continuing investigation. But if the archive isn't the right place, then where is? -- Hoary (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

you csn add it as a new case but shouldnt be editing the archives PRAXIDICAE💕 00:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Uh-huh. How's this? -- Hoary (talk) 01:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) TBH, it's missing some pieces. If you have WP:TWINKLE, it fills it all out for you and nicely formatted. I heartily recommend it. Best, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

OK then, I'll install Twinkle before attempting anything similar. Not being a "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin", I'll avoid commenting on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zaner25 there; but here, thanks to Deepfriedokra and Jack Frost for your help. Praxidicae, you could simply have moved what I wrote or asked/told me to do so. But no biggie: I have trouble remaining annoyed for more than a few seconds with somebody who displays such an excellent user page. -- Hoary (talk) 03:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

List of drinks that that use the word martini

List of drinks that that use the word martini is not about Martini (cocktail).

This is a LIST of drinks mainly about drinks that claim to be martinis, but merely use the halo effect and possibly the martini glass but don't have similar ingredients, so not the topic for Martini (cocktail).

The concept:

List of drinks that that use the word martini but are not Martini (cocktail)

0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 01:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

we dont have list of words. PRAXIDICAE💕 01:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Only lists of subjects that have articles. What about Choclatinis? Do they count? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Mules

Hi Praxidicae. I think you just slipped past 3RR at 2000 Mules. Could you self-revert? I'm sure someone else will restore the "falsely" soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I honestly hadn't realized. I just reverted myself, I honestly wish we could admin-protect certain sections because the edit warring over this is getting really old. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Ugh if only. We should put it on the media wiki wishlist so it can be ignored for years. Thanks for the revert. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I feel like realistically that'd be too easy to game but a filter in extreme cases (like this article, which has a variety of ECP returning editors) would do the trick to prevent removal of established consensus (and you know, facts.) PRAXIDICAE💕 21:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Was Talk page stalking to see if you had any twitter hate, glad to see none but yes, it would be amazing to have certain immutable facts locked against drive-by vandalism.Slywriter (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Praxidicae,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 812 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 848 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion-PanaBIOS

As a tourist and traveler, moving around the world has been a major challenge in recent times due to COVID-19. With many strict entry requirements demanded by various governments, I discovered PanaBIOS platform due to most African governments requiring travelers to upload their health records onto their platform.

This drove my curiosity to find out more about their modus operandi and surprisingly, the platform is backed by the African Union and UNDP. I thought it wise to write about them to assist the many tourist and travelers out there with the hopes of meeting the restrictions of these African governments.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quodprod (talk • contribs) 18:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, I just wanted to point out about the edit warning that you put up on my page. I'm not going to argue or anything but I wanted to let you that I'm trying my hardest to get my point across about getting this section deleted on the page. I know that it's really annoying to try and keep editing this page but I've been told by a friend to delete this section as she works for this school and she's been deeply upset by this ordeal. I've asked for semi-protection on the page but it's obviously not going the way that I anticipated. All that I can say is that I'm really, really sorry for you to do this, I'll continue doing my other Wikipedia work instead. SarahTHunter (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your desire to remove it may be good but it isn't in the interest of Wikipedia to remove sourced information just because it's negative. Your friend doesn't get to dictate what reliable sources say and what our articles say, and neither do you. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay. I'm just going to leave this page just as it is. It's made me upset too. SarahTHunter (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Praxidicae, for info, in case you hadn't seen it. Wikipedia:Help_desk#Vandalism_help_request_from_SarahTHunter - X201 (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Request on 17:26:43, 23 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Gawitt

• Gawitt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Greg Isaacs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Gawitt (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello!

Please take another look at the citations for the Greg Isaacs page, which includes sources such as: Dateline NBC, WBIR-TV, WATE-TV, the Knoxville News Sentinel, Psychology Today, People Magazine, CourtTV, Oxygen and other well-known, verifiable, credible sources that list Isaacs specifically as a source - not opinion pieces penned by him.

Also, this is written as straightforward fact with few adjectives, adverbs of other modifiers, with careful attention paid to keeping with a Wikipedia biography template that numerous other attorneys have used for their respective profiles. I would appreciate any useful feedback there.

It's a raging advertisement and poorly sourced, that hasn't changed. Further, what's your connection. Gawitt? PRAXIDICAE💕 17:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

This submission includes numerous links to other Wikipedia pages referencing cases he was directly involved in, such as the Gatlinburg Wildfires, and Lillied murders. Isaacs has been a source and/or covered by many credible news outlets for his work - which are also cited, like the Rasch page noted below.

Multiple pages for other entries of attorneys were used to help inform this article, for example:

Stephen N. Zack

Paul Zukerberg

Mark Rasch

Each of those were used as examples to inform the writing of this article.

Thanks for any relevant feedback to improve this to meet the standards of a Wikipedia entry. Just trying to do good work and inform the world over here. Thank you!

Finally, the connection is I live in Knoxville, and have deep experience in both journalism and criminal investigation. I know the landscape of Tennessee courts and criminal defense quite well. His noteworthiness rises to the level of a Wikipedia page. Gawitt (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Familiarize yourself with WP:OSE. Gawitt, please explain how this image is your own work. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Just trying to get good information out there. Dude is a noted attorney in our region, has plenty of coverage and public notability, and is worthy of a page.

The photo is original content. Happy to replace it with something else if it's deemed too advertorial.

Thanks for the helpful feedback! Gawitt (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

You need to read our WP:COI policy and disclose appropriately, Gawitt. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Very familiar with COI, thank you again for the helpful feedback! Gawitt (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

And yet, you've failed to disclose which is a policy violation. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

He's in the community and I thought him worthy of an article. That's all there is to disclose.

This is a total aside, but I believe he's worked on BLM efforts, but that's hard to verify. Probably pro bono stuff - that typically doesn't get press.

Thanks for your civil, rational and well-reasoned approach to this issue and your helpful feedback. Gawitt (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Streamlined the page a bit, removed some sections. Give it another look, please. Gawitt (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Gawitt Until you properly disclose your conflict of interest, I will not be assisting you in any manner. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I wasnt trolling lol

I wasnt vandalizing anything. In fact, I’m trying to learn how to edit pages. I’m trying to make my own, and just learn :| Operator Shogun (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Bullshit, you wrote that Meryl Streep died, repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Meryl Streep? I havent been to their page Operator Shogun (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Glenn Close, whatever, I'm done dealing with a troll in denial. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok Operator Shogun (talk) 22:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Am I allowed to edit info if its not correct tho? Will I get in trouble Operator Shogun (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

i’ll take it as a yes i can. ty and good day friend Operator Shogun (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

No, you cannot edit and add information that's not correct, that's vandalism, as you know, so I suggest you stop trolling before you get blocked. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

i mean can i edit the info if the written version (already published before my edits) is incorrect Operator Shogun (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

sorry to intrude. have a good day 👍 Operator Shogun (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I need Assistance.

Hi there 👋, I am a new Wikipedian and I actually joined some time back. I have a concern because I have been following the Trap Industry for sometime now. I wanted to write articles about Trap artists and there is this one who is like somewhat locally notable but I have some information to back him up. I know it might sound a bit confusing but I really need your help to humanly guide me through this writing. I read most wiki how-tos but still I didn't find what I wanted. - To be clear I was asking if possible to help me out on writing about these Artists. Pvidsga (talk) 20:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

You're not notable, you've been repeatedly blocked and I won't be helping you. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Dispute regarding List of wars involving Turkey

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding Unable to reach consensus. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#List_of_wars_involving_Turkey_discussion".The discussion is about the topic Topic.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

5.151.88.4 (talk) 13:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Iamthecreativeeditor

Thanks for your message about checkuser-blocked accounts. In fact I know there are numerous blocked accounts which appear to be this person, and on the basis of what I can see (including deleted editing) I would certainly not unblock. However, it is quite possible that there's been more than one editor, doing paid editing on behalf of the same paymaster, rather than all the accounts being the same person, so my intention is to give the editor an opportunity to come clean, and then, if they give plausible answers, consult a CU. If they don't give plausible answers then I won't take up a checkuser's time. There's no question of going ahead with unblocking by myself. JBW (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME

Please don't be annoyed. I moved it because of what happed to the guy. He's been accused of obtaining money from a failed government check program and he got into trouble for it. The indictment calls him "Jason Lawrence Geiger" and the powerranger show calls him "Jason", too. That's why I moved the page. Climber1228 (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I literally do not care about the gossip, move it back or this goes to ANI. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

It’s already moved back, as I requested. CreecregofLife (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, CreecregofLife. And let me make something clear, Climber1228 I could care less about the article subject matter but if you move it again without a clear established consensus, I will take this to ANI. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

You’re very welcome! I still can’t believe they did what they did and claimed to have any authority CreecregofLife (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hmmmm

This article you tagged for G11 was created in its initial edit with a protection (sock) template already in place. I can't seem to trace it back to any previous article attempts though. Does it ring any bells? Note also Chhunny Noem. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Ponyo that's actually on my list to dig into when I get home. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I'm poking about as well. Maybe I'll be able to save you the trouble.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Ponyo I find newly created pages with protection tags already in place but no traceable previous creation come up surprisingly frequently. I am pretty sure that at least sometimes, and perhaps usually, this is because a new editor thinks that putting a protection template in place will prevent anyone else from editing it, thus achieving WP:OWNERSHIP. It is also possible that sometimes it's due to an editor using a copy of an existing article as a template to edit to make a new one. I've certainly known that to be the reason for new articles appearing ready made with totally inappropriate tags, though I don't specifically remember whether I've known it for protection tags. JBW (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I've sent it as well, JBW, but in this case it was specifically a sock protection template as opposed to a generic one, which is more unusual.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

shooting of blake

I can't find the discussion relating to the knife, can you send me the link to that discussion? Zeon26 (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

CTRL F the talk page and archive PRAXIDICAE💕 13:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

can't find it. Zeon26 (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Great

Hi, PRAXIDICAE💕 Please i would love to improve on this page Philkeyz (singer) you moved to draftspace, please i want to seek advice on how to go about it, looking at the reliable sources provided and some depth of events carried out by the subject, i think the subject partially strike notability in the Nigeria music industry, please you can help me suggest what i could do within the wikipedia guidelines that can qualify the page for submission. Thanks and God bless. Celeboyz (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

50 Cent

My issue is that 50 Cent is a record executive, and my edit that included record executive keeps being taken down. 50 Cent is the founder and CEO of G-Unit Records. No one is giving a good reason to take my edit down, so that is why I continue to add my edit. If by all means my edit is wrong, I need to be informed so I can do better, but not telling me what is wrong with my edit is not right. WPUNJ (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @WPUNJ: As explained in the edit summary, you need to provide a citation that says your assertion is true. We cannot accept content just because you think it is true. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, because it's not covered in the article, so stop adding it or you're going to wind up blocked for edit warring, even if you're right. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I understand I need a citation for my edit, but where are the citations for him being a businessman, a rapper, an actor, etc. Why do I exactly need to add a citation when all the other edits don't have one? WPUNJ (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @WPUNJ: If the information is already in the article and sourced, it can be in an infobox or the lede without being cited. Your assertion wasn't already in the article and sourced. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

my mistake

I accidentally reverted a troll on the 2000 mule page. I agree with you mate! Sorry for the misunderstanding. Cheers2601:280:CB02:17F5:2D93:3E0F:9404:BC7F (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Just some commentary

"I forgot about all those left-wing conspiracists who believe healthcare and living wages are a basic right. So evil. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)"

Not just evil, evil that walks around in broad daylight. Can you believe they say these things in front of children? Won't anyone think about the children?

This post brought to you by the letter S, for sarcasm.

2600:6C4E:1200:1E85:50F4:402B:442D:1A1F (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Reverted article Manisha Ganguly

Hi, I notice you moved this article I edited to drafts. The article has a lot of clear independent links and meets the notability criteria. Care to explain? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorde23 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I notice you have not responded to this message, so I am going to go ahead and publish this article again. --Jwslubbock (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Tempus Labs

Dear Praxidicae:

I'm an unpaid/uncompensated user. I'm not getting *anything* for my submission. I'm not sure how I can *prove* that but there it is. The second thing is, this is a pretty major company with hundreds of employees, a billion dollars in funding, and referenced by the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and others. I don't understand how those sources are not legitimate. Further, there's nothing in the copy (that I can see) that sounds like advertising or marketing. Can you suggest specific edits so that my article can be published?

Thanks, I appreciate whatever help you can provide.

Bob Bsaldeen (talk) 13:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Bsaldeen This also covers conflicts of interest, which you very clearly have and need to disclose. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

What conflict of interest is that? I'm not trying to be difficult---I'm familiar with the company, not sure why they aren't mentioned in a Wikipedia article. They are really doing some cool stuff with cancer. Bsaldeen (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Bsaldeen, well for starters, what is your connection to Eric Lefkofsky? PRAXIDICAE💕 13:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

He is a friend, nothing more. I'm really not getting a dime for this. The article is neutral, and there are legit sources for this company. Bsaldeen (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

A company existing and being "legitimate" does not make it notable, further you've been editing with an undisclosed WP:COI for years and you need to disclose that. Please actually read the relevant policies linked on your talk page instead of just slapping a template on your userpage (which is incorrect.) PRAXIDICAE💕 14:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not being compensated! I'm retired. Not sure how to prove that. I deleted the "paid" template, sorry I thought that was what was required. Bsaldeen (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Again, read WP:COI. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I added a "connected" template. Bsaldeen (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Wrong revert

You have reverted my proper edit on the article Billy Gibbons where I corrected the nonexistant word "bicep" to the correct singular "biceps". I will correct it again and I would ask you to refrain from trying to revert it again until you learn more about that word. Thank you. --Arny (talk) 17:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

There are many sources and grammar experts who disagree. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Our own Wikipedia says this:

"The English form bicep [sic], attested from 1939, is a back formation derived from misinterpreting the s of biceps as the English plural marker -s."

And it IS true and obvious. The word "bicep" is a distortion. No more proper a word than "irregardles".

Arny (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Not sure what I think of this discussion here: this source is worded so that they have not pluralised "bicep" in the text. However, the definition says "left biceps" on one of it's definitions by Jack McCallum so presumably Arny did proper edits there. I can't think why there is some disagreement on if that word should have an s or not by looking at the first response on this section. Strange one. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Just checking in

Dear sweet friend,

This is Arturo checking in to wish you good health and to express my gratitude for our friendship. --Praxie is the ßest (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC) @Drmies and TonyBallioni:

Thanks my friend. We’re preparing for a new baby! How are you? PRAXIDICAE💕 21:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Wow, I am so excited for you and your partner! Congratulations!

I am well and health is good too. I spent few days in Vegas because I'm legal to gamble now 😉. --DeepIy admire Praxie (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

OMG congrats and Mazel tov Prax! Wishing nothing but health and happiness for the new arrival! Bkissin (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! PRAXIDICAE💕 14:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

HT

Sometimes it isn't clear what speedy deletion criterion should apply, but AFD is always available when speedy might be available. G1? G3? Send to a bit bucket anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Big Four (Scotland Yard)

Just about to add another reference—it was Big Five in the UK popular press.--AntientNestor (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hi @PRAXIDICAE, i just responded to your query on undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic and made it known publicly that i didn’t receive or expecting any compensation for my edits. Please i would really like if you could please respond to me and give me go ahead order to continue editing, thank you so much for your kindness and the hardworking you’re doing. LynRuch (talk) 13:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

@LynRuch what is your connection to Q Marsden? PRAXIDICAE💕 13:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Praxidicae he’s a notable artist and I’m a very big fan of his because his music was featured in Insecure created by Issa Rae and Larry Willmore. He’s not connected to me in any way @Praxidicae

i forgot to say happy new month, happy new month to you @Praxidicae LynRuch (talk) 13:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your help last night

All's well that ends well. When I remarked on battleground attitude I hadn't realised exactly how right I was! Doug Weller talk 14:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You'll have to tell me which battleground attitude we're talking about...there are so many ;) PRAXIDICAE💕 15:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

oh...THAT one. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Yep. And today[2]. Fun. Doug Weller talk 16:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I figured out who the master account was yesterday but like most things involving castes, it's pointless to bother. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Probably, although some of my Admin colleagues who edit in the area might be interested. Doug Weller talk 16:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Request move draft intro article page

Request to you for help me to move Draft:Soufia Taloni intro Soufia Taloni i hope will solved this problem and be merge to new page thank you 160.105.57.175 (talk) 19:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

No. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Revert Sheru Photography

Hi, I notice you moved this article on QD deletions I edited to drafts. The article has a lot of clear independent links and meets the notability criteria. Care to explain? Thanks. RupaliPal03 (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Care to explain why you're socking? PRAXIDICAE💕 20:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect undisclosed paid tag

I see you added an incorrect undisclosed paid tag to my article, which just is completely unfounded. Do we need a third person for resolution? Being new here, I'm unaware of the process. Also, can I simply undo the edit seeing as it's incorrect? Rafffan (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

• Rafffan, I find it hard to believe that you do not have a conflict of interest here. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

  It's ok if you don't believe it and feel like dropping in to comment without providing any reasoning.

  There's no conflict of interest.

  But the reception I've received here at Wikipedia in the past month has put me off anyway...

  It would be great if, when someone is new here, others would provide friendly guidance instead of unfair accusations. Rafffan (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Volley & Drop serve

Praxidicae: Thank you for fixing my error where I enclosed the Volley serve and Drop serve titles with quotes. I unintentionally forgot to remove the quotes after doing a global search. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Clarification

Hello Praxidicae, could you clarify what you mean here by "I don't appreciate threats"? Which threats are you referring to? Phlsph7 (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) "Please don't make me ask you again!" ooh, tough guy! Praxidicae is not forced to respond to you after already explaining themselves. You may not like their assessment, and there may very well be other users who have a different viewpoint, since Wikipedia operates on consensus. Bkissin (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bkissin and thanks for trying to clarify the issue. The expression "Please don't make me ask you again..." does not contain any threats so I think it's unlikely that this is what Praxidicae meant. I apologize in case I gave the impression that I tried to force Praxidicae to respond. Phlsph7 (talk) 20:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

That is exactly what it sounded like. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

It's not my intention to sound threatening to you so I'll try to avoid this expression with you in the future. Phlsph7 (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello dear manager

Please do not edit the pages yourself. By the way, I was right. But do not edit war. Thanks.NOOOOOOOOOVIN (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Don't leave nonsense warnings. You're really fixing to get blocked, aren't you? PRAXIDICAE💕 15:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Clayton Alexander

Are you sure about this. The Wiki article has existed since Feb 2016. It's probably too old to really qualify for speedy deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Chaminade Reverts

Hi,

I am speaking to you from the offices of Chaminade High School. I am unsure as to why our edits are being reverted despite correct information being shown, such as the addition of "Marianist" to our religious affiliations, and the addition of the graduation years for some of the notable alumni. Is there something we're doing wrong?

Thanks72.69.221.233 (talk) 23:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:COI and cease editing the article directly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	For toughing it out, once again. Girth Summit (blether) 22:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Tyler Brooker, Lisa Schettner, Ed Sadler

I think there may be a bigger issue than just an over-eager editor on Ed Sadler. Looking through Ryzen2014 edits lead me to the other two pages which seems include SPAs/SP and an editor purporting to be Tyler Brooker who questioned Ryzen2014 on why credit for a song was removed which Ryzen2014 immediately wiped from his page. Anyway, if you get a chance take a look at the three because not sure if this is SPI, COIN, ANI or BLP territory... or just seeing things that can be left alone. Slywriter (talk) 02:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Revert of Anthonie Palamedesz page

WTF Mimentalist (talk) 13:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

About the recent socks

Hey! I've noticed your page has recieved a sudden influx of attention from some socks. Is there anywhere I could report these accounts for quick action? For example, they just moved the Praxidice article page for the second time. Would WP:AIV be enough or is there somewhere else I should report these? Aidan9382 _(talk) 17:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping an eye out - I'd prefer if they're left alone til an admin/oser can get to them so there's less logs. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The problem with this application of DENY is that it prevents crowd-sourcing counter-vandalism at your talk page. In a perfect world, W?F would use some of that $35M annual profit to investigate and sue those responsible. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The problem with this is a little beansy but I'll just leave it at less logs the better because it then requires OSers to oversight AIV and CSD logs :/ PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Praxidicae,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15621 articles, as of 14:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration Notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Issues with the Operation of ANI and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Carter00000 (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Question on your opinion on how good I do on making contributions?

On a scale from 1 to 10, (1 being the least good and 10 being the most good) how good do you believe I do on making contributions?

AmericanEditor350 (talk) 04:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Changes on Naa Gbewaa Article

You keep removing edits which are valid and authentic on the Naa Gbewaa page. Ghanaian books uses Naa Gbewaa not Na Gbewa. As named after the Naa Gbewaa interchange in the city of Tamale.

Similarly, Gbewaa birthed numerous children: Yennega, Shitobu, Tohagu, Zirile, Gmantambo, etc which are removed by you. These are mentioned on several sources including Tufts University pages on the Dagomba.

You should revert the changes. Ihikky (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I won't be doing that. We require verifiable, reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Some serious stuff

Why you remove my whole draft without any warning? I need good reason because it not seems good to me. Is it legal?

Link: [3] LängeBreitoben (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I explained clearly in my edit summary, why don't you read it? PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I read then I came here LängeBreitoben (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

What is unclear about it? Also you said multiple times this is your second account, what is your first? PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Firstly, read your own talk page what people are staying about you. LängeBreitoben (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

They all say I'm wonderful and a treasure, thank you for noticing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

You are doing this to everyone on Wikipedia. LängeBreitoben (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it is my second account. LängeBreitoben (talk) 17:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @LängeBreitoben - you say this is your "second account". Does this mean that you are operating two accounts simultaneously? firefly ( t · c ) 18:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi Praxidicae! I was wondering if you could elaborate more on why you feel The Phillips Academy Poll violates A7 and G11. Though I'm not sure why User:Vergilreader keeps moving the page unilaterally, I also don't quite agree with your assessment that the page ought to be deleted. Can't wait to hear back! Randyshawn (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps if you were actually curious about the reasoning, you would've asked me before inappropriately removing the tags placed on a page created by a sock and also on an article you have a vested interest in. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I certainly mean no disrespect, as you seem well versed in Wikipedia an all. However, I wonder why you assume I am a sock? WP:AFG. All that being said, I am genuinely curious about your reasoning. Randyshawn (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

How is it that you came across this page, as a brand new editor? PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

You are implying several things:

1. That I am a sock of the user who keeps moving the page.
2. That I have a conflict of interest.
3. That the page violates A7 and G11.

With regards to (1) it is just not so—but then, I'm not sure what I can say that will convince you otherwise.

With regards to (2) I am someone with an interest it, among other things, politics and polling. This struck my interest. As I am not a sock of the other account, I did not intend to push this into the mainspace without going through AFC.

With regards to (3), which is the actual question up for debate here, I would love to hear your side.

All that aside, you clearly have some valid concerns, that I just wish to clear up. I have no reason to be angry with you, and I hope we can continue in a civil manner. Randyshawn (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I've outlined my side at the relevant AFD and filing. And yes, I do believe you're a sock. Whether you are the previous user that is blocked or WP:MEAT, I don't know, or care. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry for Vandalizing wikipedia

I Promise I'll never do it again TheHsl2.0 (talk) 22:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

somehow, I very much doubt that to be true. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Vanadlism by User:BetaWizard6742

Hi @Praxidicae:. Kindly look at the activities of user BetaWizard6742. They are vandalising several pages, with this, this, this and many others without having rights of page movers, reviewer. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 23:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Improving the draft

Hi @Praxidicae: Thank you so much for your valuable feedback on my draft. Link [4]. Can you please help me and give me more details on which lines of the draft are not neutral and which sources are unreliable? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkk27 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Alon Shtruzman

I think there's some misunderstanding about latest changes to the page which were reverted. As far as concerns about promotional content among changes, those could have been singled out instead of removing rest of the information, which is accurate. GooseChase1 (talk) 11:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Yoga and Consciousness

Hi Praxidicae. Nice to meet you. Hope you are doing well. Thanks for reviewing this article and giving your suggestions. However, the references given were notable,independent,reliable,neutral with substantial coverage of topic. Could you please share your observations. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 12:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

They are none of these things - you are attributing medical and scientific opinions from unreliable sources in a completely non-neutral way. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response and observations. However if you point them I will remove them. I didnt edit anything from my side. Gardenkur (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

So you didn't edit the article yourself? Because that's concerning. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

I edited myself. I meant I didnt add anything extra. If you show me the area of concerns I will remove them and will take care in future. Gardenkur (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Also with your good experience can I get help on one more article titled "Yogic Psychology" once I finish drafting. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

I strongly recommend you read the warning I gave you about psuedo science. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Thanks again for this suggestion. Will surely do. Have a nice day.Gardenkur (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Request restoration of page on Kamla Nath Sharma

Hi @Praxidicae, Thank you for your reply. I have contested the nomination for deletion of page on Kamla Nath Sharma on the following ground - After pruning and redrafting of several paras, only the material which is substantiated by published evidence has been retained, when compared with the original text of the page existing since more than a decade. The published work or the awards won, and organizations served have to be mentioned, which cannot or should not be considered 'promotion' category. This was earlier brought for 'speedy deletion' and on my request put as a draft for re-editing. The article has been written to mention a person, over 75 years old, who has worked as an engineer, as a writer in Hindi Literature and a researcher and writer from Sanskrit vedic texts - all three different fields. It has been reviewed several times earlier also, with no suggestion to delete. For an engineer references from third sources are difficult, may not be so for a scientist. It was agreed. The wise editors could help me in just deleting the material, which they still think appears as promotional. The other explanations I had given previously also regarding any violations etc. If still the editors are not convinced and insist on deleting it, I think that would be kind of injustice to the old man under reference. Regards. 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae, I had contested the deletion of the article on Kamla Nath Sharma and gave explanation of why the page on this gentleman who has done substantial work in three different fields in last 50 years or so, demonstrated by published work, should not be deleted. Hope, the review is under your kind consideration. Regards. Aaditya.Bahuguna (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Aaditya.Bahuguna (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration request declined

The recent request for Arbitration to which you were listed as a party has been declined, as the Committee felt it was premature. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 15:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)