User talk:Love on the Brain

Black Barbies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black Barbies. Since you had some involvement with the Black Barbies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kellymoat (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dollhouse - Single cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dollhouse - Single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Love on the Brain. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! SST flyer 12:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez song)

I have restored this article. Since this single was certified Gold by the RIAA, it is sufficient for WP:NSONGS. Thanks for your contributions! SST flyer 13:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, thank you. Have a good day. Love on the Brain (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have removed the single cover from your sandbox. Such non-free images should not be used in drafts. SST flyer 13:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new articles

Please do not create namespaces where the disambiguating word, i.e. "song", is capitalised, just to be the creator of the article. Just copy what you have created in your sandbox into the already-existing namespace; this is what every other editor does. It is not required that you "move" your sandbox page into a namespace to preserve your edits; you will still be shown in the edit history as having actually made the content. You just created Just Say (KDA Song), which is incorrect capitalisation, whereas the correct page, Just Say (KDA song), already exists as a redirect. This is incorrect Wikipedia naming policy, and considering you have already created several articles, I think you know this, and that this page will now have to be moved over into the correct namespace and the original redirect deleted in order to do so. It appears you've already requested such a move, and now this seems like an underhanded tactic to rewrite an article's history to have yourself as creating a namespace that you originally did not. Please don't do this in future. I assure you, other editors will take issue with this tactic too. Ss 112 18:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm creating articles under a wrong title, it's because I'm working to my articles in my sandbox, and I can't move them to a correct title, because the titles are taken by a REDIRECT, so I'm giving it a provisional title until an administrator will change to the correct title, so I still can keep the credit "as the page creator" because It's important for me (I know it's personal thing), anyway, i'm still new, i still got things to learn. - MUST BE Love on the Brain. 19:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, you don't have to move the actual article from your sandbox, whether it's a matter of personal "pride" or not. Most editors simply copy the content they have created in their sandbox and replace the redirect on the page. You are still shown in the edit history as creating the content, just not the initial redirect. I'm saying this because you're going to run into more issues with editors if you're intent on creating more move tasks for administrators to do every time you want to create an article in your sandbox because you didn't create the redirect first. Ss 112 05:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I won't do that in the future. - MUST BE Love on the Brain. 05:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'd recommend that you change your user name because someone looking for Love on the Brain might accidentally end up finding your user page instead. — Calvin999 18:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No way, it's my favorite song... That's why I want it as my user name. - MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're not supposed to have a user name which is the same as an article name in mainspace for the aforementioned reasons. — Calvin999 12:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should chill out, nobody is mistaking my user page for that article. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 12:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: Back to this topic, how can I change my username? — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 09:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to ask an administrator. — Calvin999 09:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me one. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 09:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Looking at the articles you've created, I notice most of them are stubs, maybe not being classified as such, but they are. For future reference; citations are important, and sections such as 'critical reception', 'composition', 'promotion', and 'background' can really improve articles. This is all in good faith, I just wanted you to know that making a cohesive, well-written article is better than multiple haphazard ones. If you need help, please contact me on my talk page. Aleccat 18:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleccat (talk • contribs)

File:Tove Lo - True Disaster single cover.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tove Lo - True Disaster single cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tove Lo - True Disaster single cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tove Lo - True Disaster single cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still creating alternate namespaces when redirects already exist

Why did you create Not on Drugs (song)? Not on Drugs already exists. Please recreate the content at Not on Drugs. I have redirected the content you created at Not on Drugs (song), as this practice of creating some new, unnecessary namespace yourself in order to be the page creator has to stop. You have been warned and still aren't getting the message. Any future instances of this will be reverted and reported. Ss 112 04:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy now? It's just your warning, there's not an article on Wikipedia that says it's wrong. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 12:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Something does not need to be explicitly disallowed for it to be wrong to do. Thankfully, it is not a common thing on Wikipedia, and this is probably why it is not part of the site's policies. I have already indicated to you that (other) editors would notice that the article should have been created at an already existing namespace/redirect and would then ask for it to be moved, causing it to become an administrator's issue to be moved when it could have just been created by you at the already existing redirect and saved them the trouble. Perhaps administrators don't consider these types of moves difficult, but then it comes down to it still being disingenuous and improper to do, as you know a less disambiguated namespace already exists and are actively disregarding that and trying to get around it, instead of being unaware. Ss 112 13:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not on Drugs

Hi. I have noticed that you just created the Not on Drugs article. I have been working on it since august and I have redacted all the sections on it (i'm finishing the live performances section right now). I was just waiting to put all the information until I have finished it, but it seems you came first. I just want to put all the work I have done on the article, I hope you don't mind. Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind. The article looks so good now, it can also be nominated as good article. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of requesting pages be moved...

Instead of requesting pages you create in your sandbox be moved, how about you actually just copy what you've done in your sandbox and paste it over the redirect? This is enough for most other editors to do but you appear not to want to create content at an article somebody else created. You are still intent on being a page's creator and there is no good reason for it. Please stop creating tasks for administrators to do because you're intent on being seen as the page creator. I'm pretty sure with all this posting to WP:RM/TR, you're going to be seen as an editor who is unwilling to work with others, in the sense that you do not want to create content at a page or over a redirect you did not create yourself. You are still seen as the creator of content if you paste over a redirect. I don't know why you still do it, so if you think having a few page creations under your belt (when all you did was create it in your sandbox and an administrator had to replace the redirect's history for you) makes you an esteemed contributor to Wikipedia without ever actually having collaborated with others or working with them on content, it doesn't. (Again, there not being a policy strictly forbidding what you're doing doesn't make it the right thing to do.) Ss 112 11:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) Seen at 9:46PM 29/12/2016 — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it's a fair game, a lot of people did that. I just want you to ignore what I'm doing and to respect my opinion. I just want the credit for the articles I'm creating. Why do you mind so much, it's frustring. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving credit for the articles you're creating, by making the edit creating content over the redirect. Also, I've told you that no, "a lot of people" don't do what you're doing. You don't appear to have been on Wikipedia for a long time, and in the 10 years I've been around, most people don't request their sandbox be moved. They copy the content out of their sandbox and paste it over the redirect, which you are very capable of doing yourself. It's probably frustrating to people who created the redirects for all the Banks songs you're now requesting be moved out of your sandbox, but you obviously don't care about other editors creating redirects first, since you're effectively requesting the fact they did ever create them be erased. If another editor raises this issue with you and you continue to effectively say you don't care, it's going to become disruptive and ignorant on your part. Ss 112 04:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I might stop doing this, if you give me a good reason why these users are anticipating the articles with a redirect. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 07:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dollhouse

Thank you for sourcing the edit. --Aleccat 20:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleccat (talk • contribs)

Your GA nomination of Not on Drugs

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Not on Drugs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Banks - Better.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banks - Better.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Not on Drugs

The article Not on Drugs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Not on Drugs for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Not on Drugs

The article Not on Drugs you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Not on Drugs for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of non-free images in userspace

You cannot use non-free images in your userspace, they can only be used in article space, you can't use them even in article talk. You can add them after the article is moved to mainspace. Fuortu (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Love on the Brain

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Thank you for all you did for this project in 2016, Love on the Brain.
May your house be safe,
and may you
and those having the privilege of your company
enjoy good health in a

Happy New Year 2017!

Kind regards,
Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pass on!

Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages.

Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

Move request for Not Afraid Anymore

Hello,

This request has been completed successfully.

Thanks! -- Dane ^talk 21:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Side to Side (feat. Nicki Minaj) -Remixes-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Side to Side (feat. Nicki Minaj) -Remixes-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Anca Pop - Ring Around screenshot.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Anca Pop - Ring Around screenshot.PNG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All Your Fault: Pt. 1

Please read notices on pages you edit. You added two reviews on All Your Fault: Pt. 1 from US university student newspapers. Just because they have Wikipedia articles, does not make them qualified subjects to give music reviews. There was notice reading: "Do not add reviews from student publications like The Heights or Maine Campus. They are written by students with no credentials." The opinions of students who have no credentials writing for their university's newspaper, whether it has a long history or not, are not relevant on Wikipedia. Ss 112 13:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you do is underestimating them for being students, lol. Their reviews are still reliable for our Wikipedia. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 13:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No they're not. You appear not to know WP policy. You need to read WP:RSSELF. Generally, sources are needed that were written by "writers [that] are professional journalists or professionals in the field on which they write". It also talks about established authors. Students studying for a degree are not established authors with experience in the field or that have articles written in third-party publications. They have no experience; they are essentially amateurs with a blog offering their opinion when it's not relevant. Ss 112 13:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also consult MOS:ALBUM#Critical reception: "Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)." Therefore no student publications. Ss 112 13:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://blacksquirrelradio.com/review-bebe-rexhas-all-your-fault-pt-1-puts-her-in-line-for-pops-newest-princess/ is Black Squirrel Radio, which is a college radio station again run by students, so that rules that out. The second (http://www.albumconfessions.com/2017/02/all-your-fault-pt-1-by-bebe-rexha-ep.html) appears to be a blog hosted by Blogger, so that is also not reliable. I do think there are not many third-party publications that published reviews of the EP, for whatever reason. Ss 112 14:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anca Pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mo Bounce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fact (magazine). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Life (G-Eazy and Kehlani song)

Are you seriously still requesting pages be moved from your sandbox to replace a redirect you could have just created content over? No user wants to look in the history and see that a page was moved out of a user's sandbox. You don't have any objections to other users creating content over your redirects if you don't create them first yourself, so stop overwriting other users' redirects if you expect nobody to do it to you. This is a major double standard, as I'm sure you wouldn't like it done to you if a user created content in their sandbox for First Time (Kygo song) then requested it be moved over the top of your redirect. This "it's a personal preference" thing isn't an excuse. Ss 112 18:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't know why you bothered to create a redirect for Digital Distortion. When it's ready, the page will just be moved out of the draft namespace (Draft:Digital Distortion) and back over the top of your redirect, deleting it. So it was entirely pointless for you to do. Ss 112 18:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I thought you'd ignore me, unfortunately you didn't. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 18:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not going to ignore when users deliberately and persistently have their articles moved over the top of others' redirects just to take any attribution away from them (and not just over mine, either). Others (including a user who moved one of your pages) have now noticed you've done this, and if you continue in doing so, you may officially be asked not to do so. I don't think it's very honest of you to do this on a collaborative project. Ss 112 19:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I previously aked you to give me a reason why users redirects the titles like that, so they just appear as the page creator without doing anything. In this case, I should've stay on the italian wikipedia where they don't do that so the page creator is the one who really worked on the article. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for every user who does it, but I know myself and at least one other user (Another Believer, as we have spoken about it) do it so that users searching for that title in the search box are directed to a more general topic (the artist or the parent album) before an article is created for it. Having that redirect replaced doesn't really help anybody else other than the person who wants their draft or sandbox creation moved, so there isn't any real reason to do it. It is logged in the page history that that user was the first to add content to the article, which is still important. Wikipedias in other languages have different guidelines/practices regarding the creation of articles and some don't find it helpful to have redirects. Ss 112 22:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty much the reason why you created a bunch of redirects for the songs on Halsey's album Hopeless Fountain Kingdom—to redirect to a more general topic. Surely you don't intend to create articles for every single song on her album? It's likely they wouldn't be considered notable anyway, and I'm pretty sure you're aware of this, so I don't think that was your intention anyway. Ss 112 22:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Liar (Selena Gomez song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad Liar (Selena Gomez song). Since you had some involvement with the Bad Liar (Selena Gomez song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . Thryduulf (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Influence (song)

If you plan to make Influence (song) into a full article, please copy your content to the already existing redirect instead of requesting that your sandbox be moved and giving admins another job to do. If you request it, I will oppose its move on these grounds because you have been asked not to do so. As I pointed out last time, the user Steel1943, who moved one of your articles after you requested it and realised you had a history of doing so, disapproved of you doing this, so I don't think it's right or honest, as you only do this if others have created redirects for articles you're interested in creating. You create plenty of redirects yourself and would absolutely not have any objections if others were to create content at those, so please do the widely accepted, honest thing and just copy your own content into the mainspace. Thank you. Ss 112 14:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that, so everybody will be happy. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 15:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Liar is the original title, so why do you want it to be deleted? — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 05:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, once a template is up, you don't delete them. But, to answer the question as why I want it deleted -- too many duplicates.Kellymoat (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, delete the duplications, but not the original. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 07:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Kellymoat (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I won't restore the article again, but soon as this song will chart... I will get it back. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 16:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste move

Do not perform cut-and-paste moves, as you did at Digital Distortion. You copied the content from Draft:Digital Distortion and added some slightly new information. This is never the right way to move pages or content. If you do this again, you will be reported to an administrator. Ss 112 23:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I didn't do it on purpose, I was just too lazy to request a move since I'm using a mobile to edit. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 03:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then you shouldn't have edited at all.--Jennica✿ / ^talk 09:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but someone had to restore the article... not like that...but — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 09:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tove-Lo-True-Disaster-The-Remixes-EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tove-Lo-True-Disaster-The-Remixes-EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Selena Gomez - Bad Liar single cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Selena Gomez - Bad Liar single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sorry Not Sorry (Official Single Cover) by Demi Lovato.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sorry Not Sorry (Official Single Cover) by Demi Lovato.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DJ Khaled-Wild Thoughts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DJ Khaled-Wild Thoughts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Joyride (Tinashe album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Joyride (Tinashe album), Love on the Brain!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This doesn't meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG - perhaps WP:TOOSOON.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reputation (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Reputation (Taylor Swift song), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 08:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Tove Lo - Fire Fade.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Tove Lo - Fire Fade.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HalseyStrangers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HalseyStrangers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited To the Hilt (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crowded Places, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V (magazine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fuck with Myself

The article Fuck with Myself has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to comply with my expectations of “no rude/explicit/abusive language” and therefore should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Little Jackie (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, what's wrong with this article? It's 100% notable. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 11:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faking It (Calvin Harris song) artwork

Hi User:Love on the Brain, Can you upload the artwork for Faking It (Calvin Harris song) please? If you can, here's what it looks like [1], cheers. Theo (edits) 17:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lemon (N.E.R.D. and Rihanna song)

Sorry, but looks like someone already created the proper space, Lemon (N.E.R.D and Rihanna song). N.E.R.D doesn't have a full stop at the end and never has. Ss 112 01:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New York City (Jessie J song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on New York City (Jessie J song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

9th of October listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9th of October. Since you had some involvement with the 9th of October redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e minist 10:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Love on the Brain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve End Game (Taylor Swift song)

Hi, I'm Nikolaiho. Love on the Brain, thanks for creating End Game (Taylor Swift song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

NikolaiHo^☎️ 02:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve End Game (Taylor Swift song)

Hi, I'm Nikolaiho. Love on the Brain, thanks for creating End Game (Taylor Swift song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add categories

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

NikolaiHo^☎️ 02:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I've left a message for you on Talk:The Struggle. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion templates

Read the template: "Do not remove this template from pages you have created yourself." Also see WP:Speedy deletion. Any further removals will result in you being warned. Ss112 14:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you weren't supposed to request its deletion. Billboard confirmed its tracklist, and you make tons of redirects and when I make a redirect, you have to complain about something. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 15:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've redirected the article to the book. Even if you correct it to the film, that article says nothing about the track listing of the album. It doesn't matter if the song exists, the base article needs to say something about the title otherwise in most cases you shouldn't be making the redirect. This isn't a matter of "oh but you create redirects too". Yes, thank you, many editors do. This is about there not being anything at the article you're redirecting to about the page you just made. Ss112 16:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I Want (Bebe Rexha song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What I Want (Bebe Rexha song). Since you had some involvement with the What I Want (Bebe Rexha song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Richhoncho (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trainwreck (Banks song)

The article Trainwreck (Banks song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Trainwreck (Banks song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 02:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology and comment

I just want to apologize for taking some of your comments on the "Trainwreck" GAN too seriously and personally. I just wanted to wish you luck on your current and future projects, and please feel free to ask me for any advice about the GAN process. Aoba47 (talk) 23:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, I just want you to know that I didn't mean to be rude and I'm sorry that you found me rude, it wasn't my intention, I just tried to express my point of view because I think the article is long enough and it needs just some fixes. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 18:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daddy Issues (album)

Hello, Love on the Brain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daddy Issues".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't create redirects if they're not covered at the target article

Because they can and will be speedily deleted for not being a valid search term. Alternatively, find a reliable source and create the content about what you're redirecting at the target article. Otherwise, if I were you, I wouldn't waste my time. Ss112 22:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've done it once again at Flames (David Guetta and Sia song). Stop it. Hayman30 (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This. I've actually done a Google search upon nomination but I couldn't find anything. And as Ss112 noted, I do not necessarily have the responsibility to add a source for you, so what you've wrote in the summary is absolutely absurd, you implied as if I'm the wrong guy. Stop doing this in the future. Hayman30 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ariana Grande disography, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was a source who confirmed that it was true. What's wrong with that edit? — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT remove the single. Influential media like Billboard called it "the latest single (The single being "Jason's Song (Gave It Away)" - You removed this and replaced it with another song[2] .... –Davey2010^Talk 20:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice that I removed Jason's Song from singles section. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may not remove WP:Speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself—read the template. Also, if you looked at the article you sourced, you will see they even state the title is fan speculation and has not been confirmed by Grande herself whatsoever. Don't restore it until it's confirmed. You have been reverted, so discuss it on the talk page per WP:BRD. Or better yet, just don't create article titles until they're confirmed to try to get the jump on everybody. Thank you. Ss112 16:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From the mtv.co.uk source you cited: "Rumours that Ariana's new single would be called 'No Tears Left to Cry' began surfacing last week and now it seems like the living legend herself has confirmed them. The 'Tattooed Heart' star took to her Insta Story last night to post a teardrop emoji." WOW! Stop the presses! A teardrop emoji is confirmation of a song being titled "No Tears Left to Cry"! Read: the source states they are RUMOURS from her fans. Ss112 16:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Back to You (Selena Gomez song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Back to You (Selena Gomez song). Since you had some involvement with the Back to You (Selena Gomez song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hayman30 (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessie J - Queen.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie J - Queen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anca Pop

Hello, Love on the Brain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anca Pop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 08:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was supposed to be kept as a draft until she was notable. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 09:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to have the page undeleted, follow the instructions in the note above to request it be restored. Primefac (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inside Out (Camila Cabello song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inside Out (Camila Cabello song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Out (Camila Cabello song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Banks-gemini-feed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banks-gemini-feed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ciara - Dose artwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ciara - Dose artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Did Something Bad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Did Something Bad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Did Something Bad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating speculative redirects

You have already been asked on this very talk page to not make redirects based on mere speculation that are not supported by any source and not mentioned at the target article. Beyoncé posting a few pictures of roses and people going "her next project must be called Roses" is WP:OR at its most blatant. You cannot be the first to make every redirect you want (and this is no guarantee anybody will make an article at your redirect), so please stop trying by creating redirects based on pop stan speculation. Thank you. Ss112 22:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I always redirect so early is to avoid you to steal the redirects that I want to make, for example "Blow That Smoke" you could've leave this redirects to me, especially because Tove Lo is my #1 muse, but no. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was not about Tove Lo's new song, it was about you creating a redirect for Beyoncé's album when she literally had said nothing about the title and it was only fans speculating. Anybody is allowed to create a redirect, and anybody is allowed to create an article. Nobody has claim over creating something just because they're a fan of that artist. If you're going to level accusations at somebody of trying to "steal" redirects, then the same could be said of you—that you "steal" redirects that other editors might want to make...whatever "stealing" here means. I don't agree with your "logic". But I sincerely doubt you have plans to make articles for each redirect you make. Ss112 22:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I usually have plans to make articles for my redirects, and I know Wikipedia is not a competition to act like that, but I'm just a little selfish, that's just the way I am. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 22:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Love on the Brain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Blue Lips (short film)

Thanks for creating Blue Lips (short film).

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article is a good start, but you should try to find some critics' reviews of the film and incorporate that information into a "Reception" section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Touch (Bebe Rexha song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Touch (Bebe Rexha song). Since you had some involvement with the Touch (Bebe Rexha song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gimme (Banks song)

Hi. Thanks for recreating Gimme (Banks song), however, you called the New Zealand Hot Singles Chart the "Heatseekers" chart when listing it on the article. The NZ Heatseekers chart went defunct in mid-2018 and was replaced by the "Hot Singles" chart. They are not the same thing and have different names. Thanks. Ss112 21:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for letting me know that. It’a been a while since I don’t make articles, and I had no clue that they changed the title of their extended chart, at least next time I will know that. 14:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2020 and you're still making redirects that are not mentioned at the target article

If I notice you doing this again, I will be nominating your redirects for deletion at WP:RFD, no matter what they are. This contravenes WP:V. You should not be creating redirects that are based on unsourced speculation, and even if it's been confirmed somewhere, it's still unsourced until you add it to the article per WP:BURDEN. If you're going to be a regular editor on Wikipedia, it's time for you to learn that this not acceptable to do. I am frustrated because I first told you this years ago, and several times since but you appear to have learned nothing. At the time you created those Tove Lo redirects, there was no mention of it at her discography article until a user added it days later. @Ad Orientem: I know I just have, but can you please inform this user it is not acceptable to create redirects that are not mentioned at the target article? As I mentioned, I asked this user to stop doing this years ago. I assume they're not going to listen to another editor, so I'm hoping an admin telling them may make it more concrete. It's now over a year later after I last said this to them, and they have returned just to create redirects that aren't mentioned at the target article. Ss112 22:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note No need for administrator action at present You have raised your concerns with another editor. If the problem(s) persist and you are not able to resolve them then proceed to the next step in dispute resolution. @ Love on the Brain: Please do not ignore concerns raised by other editors, even if you disagree with them. If you believe the concerns are legitimate then acknowledge them and let them know you will try to avoid the problematic editing in the future. If you disagree or are unsure, discuss the matter. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: AO, as I pointed out, I have raised this very concern with this editor multiple times. You can also see previous threads on this very talk page about it: #Don't create redirects if they're not covered at the target article, #Stop creating speculative redirects. I didn't just tag you for the very first time I've raised this. This editor has even had redirects they made taken to WP:RFD by other editors like Hayman30. I'm quite sure you know I'm aware of what WP:DR says, and it also says "If discussion with the editor fails to resolve the issue, you may ask an administrator to evaluate the conduct of the user". You tell editors to be wary of going to ANI over things, so I tag you instead of going there and dragging up more drama. Discussion with the editor obviously failed because they were wishy-washy on it previously (and even told me they create speculative redirects to "avoid [me] steal[ing] the redirects that [they] want to make", which sounds like WP:OWNership, despite the fact this editor has not contributed regularly since 2018, and they were complaining in that instance about me making a redirect for Blow That Smoke, which I actually subsequently made the article for), and have obviously continued doing it. Hence my tag of you to assess their conduct as the problems have persisted. Ss112 23:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was complaining about that Blow That Smoke redirect back then because I was immature, I grew up since then and I honestly don't care about this stuff anymore, I understand that I was supposed to provide the info in the singles section before adding the redirect and I understand my mistake, what can I say, it's not that easy to make this using a phone, but I'll be back to contribute on Tove Lo's articles and stuff as soon as I fix my Wi-Fi without being so thirsty to have my name on her articles. Please stop being frustrated about my past mistakes, I know I did something like this recently, but I didn't do it on purpose and I didn't want to irritate you so much to write all this long statement of my mistakes. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 23:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying and acknowledging that it was a mistake. Ss112 00:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And for my next mission... Peace in the Middle East. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tove Lo - Fire Fade.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tove Lo - Fire Fade.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iggy-azalea-switch-annita.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iggy-azalea-switch-annita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HalseyBadAtLove.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HalseyBadAtLove.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]