Jump to content

User talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive 2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 2005←Archive 2010Archive 2011Archive 2012Archive 2013Archive 2014Archive 2015

January 2012

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Talk:K. Balachander. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large.

As per our discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Support_inclusion. Sitush (talk) 12:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

And your message isn't even correct. No one is suggesting that we will remove "non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification". Yes, we may remove the names of non-notable relatives (that falls under WP:BLPPRIVACY), but not their existence, or the other things you listed. If that's what you think is benig proposed, you're misunderstanding the point that caste is "special". WP:BLP already sets special standards for ethnicity and religion, and nothing that WT:INDIA decides can possibly ovverride that. The only question is whether or not caste falls under those special provisions (and thus requires notability and self-declaration) or whether it simply falls under more general WP:BLP provisions (and thus must just be well-sourced). Your message appears to be a scare tactic designed to make people oppose something that was never actually proposed. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I didn't want to labour the point but, well, what the heck. There is what I would hope is a typo in the message, where it says "by few editors" but I think was intended to say "by a few editors". That single letter makes a huge difference to the meaning. I make typos like that all the time, but it is a very good example of why keeping notifications short and sweet is A Good Thing. - Sitush (talk) 01:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
@Qwyrxian - Well i myself suggested that "non-notable spouse's and children's and....." be removed just on the same reasons of being non-notability related, privacy, etc. And ofcourse on talk-pages i did not say that they will also be removed just now. I said they "will also be removed after discussions". I HAVE heard of that Consensus policy. The policy is good for problem solving. But i feel that consensus should be taken on a much wider range and should involve people who are related to it. Long back i suppose there was some discussion on how non-Indian editors are ditched (as per them) or interfere extensively (as per Indian editors) in India-related articles. I dont mind non-Indians contributing in articles as well as the discussions. But it is not wise to draw consensus from a discussion which has majority of non-Indians. Thats why article name change issues of Ganga and Gandhi always keep rising again and again. Non-Indian editors will never get the right feel of what caste is & what it does in a society by just reading or researching about it. Hence the scare-tactic msg on talk-pages to invite Indian editors. (Although it also seems to not work for my intended purpose but has only Sitush's attraction.) Didnt you people ever wonder if we have only 5-10 Indian editors? Why dont they discuss things on India Portal? What keeps them away? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
There were a lot more than 5-10 people at the recent Mumbai Wikiconference, and I know of at least 20 who told me that they could not get to it because it would entail 30+ plus hours train journeys within the country, ie: they live there but are too distant from Mumbai. - Sitush (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
So why dont they discuss things on India Portal? What keeps them away? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I have no idea but I am pretty sure it is not related to those who do contribute there, nor is it related to a lack of publicity - most India-related articles have a link to the WT:IN project. To be honest, I think that you will find most projects/portals are the same: the number who participate actively is much smaller than the number who "sign up", and those people are in turn only a fraction of the number who contribute to actual articles. I really would not try to build some sort of conspiracy theory around this, although it might be a subject worth raising at WT:INB in its own right.
There was recently an attempt to use a specific India-related "welcome" template but it seems to have died away, almost certainly in large part because the people who were aggressively promoting it had a rather extreme anti-western agenda. People get suspicious when someone starts taking pot shots at others and this became clear when the group were finally persuaded that the matter needed to be discussed at WT:INB. - Sitush (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Help with a film

I've been working on Papadu for a few days - a complete rewrite of the thing. I've just added a short Popular culture section because there was a movie produced in 2006 called Sardar Papanna. I can't find out much about the thing, there doesn't appear to be an article for it, and the news stories that I can find appear to be wrong (they say that he lived during the Nizam's reign, for example). I get the impression that you are into films - do you know anything about this one? It looks like it may have been a flop but perhaps it is just that it was not overdubbed for non-Telugu audiences etc. - Sitush (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

BTW, this says that the film was released on the 18th & that this was Papadu's birthday. Do people really hype things up in such silly ways? No-one knows what year Papadu was born, let alone the month and day! They do not even know where he was born, although there are some vague guesses at Tarikonda. I rather get the impression that the film was not in fact released on the 18th after all of this blurb. Are there actually any reliable sources for Telugu cinema? I know that One India is terribly unreliable for everything, not just cinema. - Sitush (talk) 14:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Huussshhh!!!! I am into films, but not Telegu. This hour or so that i used in answering this problem is the max connection i have had with telegu in my whole life. But even after that i dont bring any good news. Here's what i found.... (1) A film named Sardar Papanna was produced. Sample poster can be found here. Its in Telegu. But it reads సర్దార్ పాపన్న which is the Telugu script for "Sardar Papanna". (2) A list of Telugu films produced in 2006 shows its release date as 25th August 2006, which also matches with the release date on Krishna_(actor)#Filmography. I dont know how reliable telugucinema.com is. Thats all!
But have asked Vensatry for help. He hopefully would add something good. And God! All Bios linked with this are horrible. Such famous filmy people with no reference links; not even IMDB!! How is your stomach? Must be churning like hell. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 18:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid that if you play the game of "connections" with Indian films then you'll be aware that the problem of sourcing is not limited to one film or even one genre. I'd guess 80-90% of the linked bios, for example, are well below par. The initial problem is determining a reliable source because in my (limited) experience, there are few that pass muster & there is a phenomenal amount of plagiarism, misreporting and hype. Anyway, thanks for your efforts - I'll take a look at the website you linked and will see what Vensatry can come up with. It doesn't need to be much, although if someone can create a decent article about the film then that would be nice. - Sitush (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Lets wait for Vensatry. I tried. But with the info available i cant even create a stub for that film. I usually prefer atleast one good link for that. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Vensatry's talk page.
Message added 10:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Commander (Ping me) 10:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaag Milkha Bhaag

Per the AFD discussion, the article has been removed from mainspace and userfied to you at User:Animeshkulkarni/Bhaag Milkha Bhaag. Feel free to ask for input when you think you might have it ready again for mainspace. Be sure to apply WP:NF with an eye on WP:NFF. Best regards, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 10:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Source information needed for File:Jagjit-singh portrait.jpg

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Jagjit-singh portrait.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Op nayyar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Op nayyar.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Hemant Kumar middle age.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hemant Kumar middle age.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Source information needed for File:Roshan music director.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roshan music director.jpg. However, the file description needs source information before it's okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a detailed description of who the original author is and where you got it. Please be specific, and include a link to the source if you can.
  2. Be sure to save the page.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hi, I'm fond of kittens and thought I would give one to you. Keep caring about things Indian. :)

AshLin (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Your cooperation in INCOTM in developing the main text of the article Prem Chand would be awesome. Google books is the way to go, with Reftag for easy creation of citations. AshLin (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Usne Kaha Tha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asit Sen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaja Gamini.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gaja Gamini.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Mehul Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lahoo Ke Do Rang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit

The previous free image was not a good one. That's why I added this one. --smaro! 09:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarojit (talk • contribs)

Indic scripts

I really don't know; I was just writing what I have seen most often and what I thought was changing due to the RfC. Film titles are usually Romanized and it is fairly clear how to pronounce, but IPAs could not hurt. The Hindi-Urdu title usually appears in the film or on the DVD box so that is verifiable. The trouble with bios is that people come in and add 1,2,3,4 various languages scripts of their choice, and who knows if they are accurate. Then they get reverted, re-added, etc, and that needs to stop. So we decided to replace them with IPAs (as far as I know). BollyJeff || talk 14:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You are correct - that was the outcome of the recent RfC. - Sitush (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Ohkay!!!! For IPAs on titles some non-indian should comment. Sitush, can you go through few titles on Template:FilmfareAwardBestMovie, Template:FilmfareAwardBestTamilMovie, etc. and confidently read them? And if you can read film titles like Repati Pourulu why would there be difficulty in reading Vangapandu Prasada Rao or Gajapathinagaram? And what about the english translation of titles? Should we ourselves translate them? Thats a really tricky thing to do. Would want you to try Jhanak Jhanak Payal Baaje :-) -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
IMO you should use the official English title if it has one, else show the meaning, not necessarily the literal. For example I have seen a DVD for Kandukondain Kandukondain titled I Have Found It, though I doubt that is the literal translation. I am not Indian, and you are correct that it could be just as hard to pronounce film titles and proper names. But as stated before scripts are only problematic on Bios right now, so a solution was desired for them. BollyJeff || talk 15:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the RfC applies to everything, imo - geographic etc included. It doesn't say that IPA must be used everywhere but it does say that scripts should not be used anywhere. I really wouldn't bother trying to challenge it because it is so recent. I do appreciate that there may be a bit of an issue with rendition of film and book titles but haven't got enough experience of that area except to point out the obvious: the scripts are even more problematic than any possible other version. This is English Wikipedia, not hi-WP, ml-WP etc.

I never get involved in phonetics and I never bother trying to read them myself: I live in a visual world but not a hearing world, and I have done so since birth. - Sitush (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Bhaag Milkha Bhaag

I have added sufficient info from your user article to the original one and redirected it. If you want the one in your space deleted, you may blank the space and place {{Db-g7}} there, for an admin to delete it. Regards. X.One SOS 17:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done! Thanks for the easy tip. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Braincricket's talk page.
Message added 09:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Braincricket (talk) 09:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIG Star Entertainment Awards.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

X.One SOS 16:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry

Animesh, I'm very sorry for not having replied to your message earlier, I just really didn't notice it for some reason. Wonderful, wonderful work on the Sadhana Shivdasani article, and thank you for the positive feedback. Shahid • Talk2me 16:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Opinion

Could you spare a minute here to share your thoughts on the matter? X.One SOS 16:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha! It took a minute to find where the start is. But will surely try & comment on it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Am so sorry! The discussion over there seems more of personal chats than on the actual issue. Plus its so lengthy! I doubt i would cope with it to comment. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

RE:DYK

Thanks buddy, will keep in mind. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 10:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

2012 Karnataka video clip controversy

Would you like to help me expand the article? I will attempt to chronologically list all the news stories around this event and place them at Talk:2012 Karnataka video clip controversy/Research. Would appreciate if you could chip in by gathering links to news reports. Thank you! — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 12:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

To steal Andy's words, Any unsourced assertion that a particular living person is of a particular caste is a violation of WP:BLP policy, and should be deleted on sight. I entirely agree with him and would like to inform you that uninvolved admins may impose discretionary sanctions on editors violating the provisions of said policy. Please, consider this a warning, made pursuant to the requirements of this ruling of the Arbitration Committee. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking efforts of repeating it. But be informed that i have never been involved in caste articles or lists or caste mentions in biographies. I do sidetrack it mostly. Any such involvement you might find in history would be meager. But i surely discuss it over talk pages. And that i mostly do because decisions taken there affect all articles and mainly, are not taken by a proper spectrum of people. So dont worry about me; i wont be causing any vandalisms. And also dont presume any threats from huge comments i post in discussions. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

BLP

AK, please read the policy and stop flogging this dead horse of yours. You are wasting your time and that of everyone else. If you do not like the way that things are done then your options are either to get the policy changed (which cannot be done by the India project) or go edit elsewhere. Honestly, if you carry on as you are doing in these conversations about caste then I can see someone turning up and sticking a block notice here for being generally disruptive and/or clearly lacking competence. - Sitush (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Will wait for that. Till then you have to bear with me. I atleast am talking on the issue and not going on mass-cleanups unlike you all do. And dont talk about competence. Your views on indian caste systems are all tertiary ones based on the writings of some second hand views of non-indians. And nor should you talk about the disruption. There is a reason why you get so many hate-messages on you talk pages that admins have to keep deleting. Try to think of that. You might actually be wrong here. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
What I contribute is in accordance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. If you do not like them then you can always contribute somewhere else, but as long as you are contributing here then you need to follow them. - Sitush (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you better-label your "Views needed" on India Noticeboard post?

Greetings, you have a new section on the India Noticeboard labeled "Views needed" or similar; could you modify the title of your post to something clearer like: "Views needed at RFC: Dates in titles"? Just something so that folks who see your title in the Table of Contents don't need to go down and read that section to find out if it's something they have a "view" on. Not being prickly, I've just got a real focus on explicitly-clear Talk page titles. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Done! Will try & not be vague from hence. Thanks! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Mukesh Mathur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anil Biswas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Move

Your thoughts would be appreciated here. X.One SOS 14:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Join the community!

Hi, since you are a member of WikiProject India, do consider joining the WikiProject India Mailing List (https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-in-en) which provides communication for the community.

For other lists which may be of interest to you, see http://wiki.wikimedia.in/Mailing_Lists.

Be sure to update yourself at Geographical distribution of Indian Wikipedians in case not already done. (You'll need to create a user id for editing it). Regards, Joyson Prabhu Holla at me! 15:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Detachment of wall paintings DYK

Hi, I put links to both the Latin and a published translation at the DYK nomination; please go back and look at it again? Yngvadottir (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Done! Good Job! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey look!

First thing ti say to you right away is a big THANK YOU|| for appreciating my work on Chandramukhi. This is surprise me when I read this article from Hindustan Times here's the article [1]. Looks like some professional had been read my work in wiki. Thank you again!! (Ason27 (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC))

DYK img

Hi Animesh,

Thanks for reviewing my hook. I just realised that there are photographs of the Duke's plant in Chembur on Commons (taken during a recent photowalk) - can I add it to the hook? Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 08:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh! Thats a nice creative piece of architecture. Sure! Go on! Add it. I will approve it then. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
But the image you will propose for the Hook should also be in the article. Currently both images are different. So choose one of them. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks buddy! Iv changed the picture on the article and added it to the hook - since its a 100x100 on the hook, I thought the closeup would be better. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 09:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Done! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Aah (film)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikieditindia's talk page.
Message added 08:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikieditindia (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikieditindia's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikieditindia (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

For adding a vital plot summary in the article Gangavataran. SupernovaExplosion Talk 18:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Gangavataran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Request clarification on your action

Hi Animesh Kulkarni,

I added to external links of 3 pages: Hindustani Classical Music, Raga, and Tala with links to http://www.atulnene.com/hcmprimer.html and http://urtalk.kpoint.in/kapsule/gcc-066a675a-74c2-4f57-8d7b-6b1e82c0583b. These are purely informational in nature and not commercial at all. All the information is free and already in public domain and nothing is being sold on these two sites. Kindly clarify why you deleted them during your edit ? After your response, I will make appropriate changes and update the links.

Tukamhane (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 01:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lynch7 01:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

RIK

Hi, I appreciate your concern about WP:BITE, referred to in your recent ANI thread. However, despite the limited number of edits under the Ror Is King name, it is evident that they are not a "newcomer" and this has been so from the outset of their involvement with this project when they were challenging stuff at ANI around November 2011. Whether they previously edited as an IP or have edited other versions of Wikipedia, their knowledge of policy etc and their ability to cite it has been apparent from the very beginning. It is, of course, also possible that they are having their strings pulled by others, off stage, but whatever the situation may be, a newcomer in the sense of WP:BITE is one thing that they are not. There have been various speculations regarding what is going on but without firm evidence it would be wrong to repeat them. No doubt things will become more clear in due course. - Sitush (talk) 10:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

What i actually meant was "Dont bite anyone", not just new-comers. But didnt find any fancy gif for that. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I see. It would be nice if we could somehow do that but we seem to get a lot of WP:IDHT and we cannot let such situations run for ever: it becomes disruptive, it impedes progress and it discourages involvement. This particular situation re: Tod has been running for a fortnight or so now, which is probably long enough. RIK tried at ANI last year (regarding something else) and failed; they're trying again and will fail simply because it is a content dispute. Their complaint last time was about an admin and myself; now they are complaining about other admins and myself. I can't help it if - generally speaking - I work within the rules and others do not. - Sitush (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I won't embarrass you at ANI. Have you actually checked the article history? I left RIK's content in for 2 or 3 days after they refused to provide the sources & while I waited for copies from WP:RX. - Sitush (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Duke's

Regarding the merge proposal, please see my response on the Duke's talk page. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 10:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Just replying there. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Asin

Please discuss your differences in talk:Asin before further edits to Asin. I also notified talk user:122.164.187.45. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Is that IP gonna talk? I though he is just some fan who will give up after few reverts. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk page templates for redirect

No talk page templates for redirect unless there is a specific reason. Example, the redirect is about a single subject which points to a section of an article about many things combined, or some such attenuating circumstance. Otherwise usually not. AshLin (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Deletion requires not just care but wisdom. If you want to bring people's attention to pages for second opinions, that's a good thing to do but it should be done on the talk page. AshLin (talk) 10:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Indic Script In Lead

I did not know about the consensus But thanks for informing me about it. Though I don't support the consensus completely, I have removed it. I personally think for few days we should mention about the consensus while deleting Indic scripts in tyhe edit summary. See edit summary here.
I think if they are giving stress on IPA, they should delete {{lang-bn|xxxxx}} or {{lang-hi|xxxxx}} first --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

BTW, I am not completely against the consensus too, if you see my user page, you'll notice I have not used Indic scripts in infobox or lead of my profile. But, personally I am not going to delete those from any article too. ---Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
To avoid fragmented discussion I have ported reply in my talk page. What I have posted there: I am not very sure about {{lang-hi|xxxxx}} but {{lang-bn|xxxxxx}} is a very common practice. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay! I will keep replying here. But we cant go on checking for all languages. Either all are in or all are out. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 18:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Another point, may be sensitive- is this initiative applicable internationally or only for Indian languages?
Also note, almost all of the articles I have referred are well written and NOT stubs, so, you can't say, there are no editors there or they have not got time!--Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
No! The consensus was built limited for WikiProject India. Examples of many other projects were given there too. But to stop the mess that takes toll of editors, this was the only solution found. For example, go through the history of Rajnikanth. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
What do you think of this. See the use of Devnagari script and the IPA (or whatever) there? That's the problem, we are going to face, wrong IPA scripting. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Aahh!! That wasnt IPA. That was just Hindi words written in roman script. So its definitely wrong. But even with IPA we are gonna have problems. It takes awefully long time to write those. Atleast till we are new with it. I have tried only a couple of them. But the advantage is that non-indians would be able to pronounce the indian words in fairly better way. We also have to rely there on people being able to read IPAs. I usually cant. :) -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I definitely can't! - Sitush (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, it takes long time to write and longer time to read (if anyone reads, I personally generally don't read).
BTW, manually deleting those Indian words from lead may be very time taking. They can create a bot for it which will delete all the Lang-Ind templates or Indian alphabets from the leads of articles, exactly the same way some bots repair broken link, remove dead links etc. Or they already have any such bot? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 05:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
No one will be investing time in just removal of these scripts. If by chance you are doing something on that article, remove it. Few registered editors and mostly IPs would psych out if we initiate a drive for this. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Are you adding any note while removing Indian languages like-
'''Ritwik (Kumar) Ghatak''' <!--PLEASE DON'T ADD NAME WRITTEN IN BENGALI HERE--> ({{Audio|Ritwik_Ghatak.ogg|''Rittik (Kumar) Ghôţok''}}; 4 November 1925{{ndash}} 6 February 1976) was a...., you can also see Lead section of [{Panipuri]] article, you need to go to edit mode to see the notes. I am not very sure if it is allowed to add a note like that, but in that article, in every 2-3 days, someone was entering another name in his or her mother tongue. So, I aded it there.--Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 06:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
That's fine & good to add this kinda note. I havent been in much dispute over this topic. But will do this if such thing happens. Thanks! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Himalay Ki Godmein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mukesh
Jis Desh Men Ganga Behti Hai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mukesh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Karthikndr's talk page.
Message added 13:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 13:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Something's happening

What's with the recent spree of assessing so many articles? Do you have reviewer rights, btw? X.One SOS 16:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Are you not aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2012? Do i need some rights for this? No one said that before. It was an open invitation for all. No entrance exam! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Also they say here.... "Any member of the India WikiProject is free to add a rating to an article if they wish. However, the Assessment Team (from this department) may overrule the rating of an article if they see fit." -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
This is getting confusing. I thought we needed reviewer rights to assess articles. And that major contributors could not assess their own articles. Now, its topsy-turvy, eh? And, yes, I did not know about that assessment thing. An open invitation? For all WP India members? I see no reason as to why I should not join, if so. X.One SOS 16:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Any reviewer can give upto class B. And any person part of that project is reviewer. And i haven't contributed majorly to any of the articles where someone would oppose the assessments i give. I have contributed in only Start class! You are welcome to join. Choose some category & get started. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Believe me, you'd do a wonderful job in marketing. :D X.One SOS 16:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Reviewer rights are not necessary as of now for anyone to assess articles as a result of the community's decision to remove pending-changes protection from articles. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)I am also little bit confused, More than 200 assessment in just few hours, and almost 500 assessment in one day.. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 17:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
500???????????? Definitely not. I am not gonna count them. I already declared that. There are very good chances that its gonna be an embarrassingly high number! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Congrats! Finally it is proved that man is better and can work faster than bots. he he he he! :-D See you have beat a bot. Can you beat cluebot too, who makes 100 edits in every 10 minutes. It is just a friendly joke. Please don't mind! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 17:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
That bot was just the lousiest one you picked to compare. But thanks for taking efforts. :) -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Tabulation

I saw your edits on SLB's page for tabulation of awards. I believe earlier format was better as it was segregated award-wise. Though tabulation helps you sorts for various other things as well but I don't think its appropriate. I understand you are putting lot of efforts in doing so but still. What say? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I dont know. The original format looked dull to me. This sortable thing is so fun to compare. :) Also the table will turn a bit short now. Few enteries in it are wrong. Lets see what others say. And its okay. I dont mind reverting it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
With the current format, most of the stuff gets repeated and adds no value to the content. Anyway, thats my opinion. You might want to take other's opinion on it. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 18:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Info is all so condensed this way. Anyways... will revert it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey..I'm sorry if your efforts have gone vain. I did not mean to do that. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh no! Its okay. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 19:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok. You said few entries are wrong in the data. Would you mind correcting them if know you what are those? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Am not sure abt it. Isnt the Best Movie award received by Producer? He wasnt producer for Khamoshi & Devdas. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I believe so. He shouldnt be mentioned. But I need to check for the sources. Will get back to you on this. Thanks for noticing. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 20:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I checked for filmfare awards. Best movie is not given to director, though best critic movie is given to both producer and director. You may want to change it on SLB's page accordingly. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 00:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay! will do that. Thanks! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Barn star to you

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your many assessment in Tag and Assess 2012 - many thanks and keep up the good show.

Ssriram mt (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)ssriram_mt

Congrats ;) Thanks. - VivvtTalk 00:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012

Hi Animesh, try using semi-automated AWB if you have not already - the guide is here. Thanks again for the good show.Ssriram mt (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)ssriram_mt

I am not getting that AWB thing much. From all the guides. Plus i doubt something fancy like that would be able to distinguish if the article should belong to Assam or Kerala. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Karthikndr's talk page.
Message added 13:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 13:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Finally its  Done. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 13:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

59th NFA

I would have been more than surprised if Anand Bhate had not got National Film Award for Best Male Playback Singer for Balgandharva this time. Kudos to him!! Absolutely brilliant rendition and rare mastery on vocals in this generation. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I am listening those songs since noon! :) & am also waiting for you to finish 59th National Film Awards. Balgandharva and Deool won many awards this time, i heard. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes. If not Anand Bhate (would have been worst), I had expected Rahul Deshpande to win for "Ravi Mee". But none the less, Best one won. Deool won National Film Award for Best Feature Film and National Film Award for Best Actor for Girish Kulkarni. He is a surprise win this time. Won Best actor and Best dialogue for Deool. I am not sure whether you have seen that movie or not. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
No! I havent seen that movie. I though it would be just like all social-drama political-irony movies which Marathi industry makes. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes. It is. "social-drama political-irony"...LOL Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Its moved out of the theater though. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 15:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Naah! Thats ok. Didnt have intentions to watch. Will anyways be soon aired on TV. :) -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok. You may want to update Balgandharva page for the NFAs. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Yeah! Have to. There isnt much traffic of IPs & other editors there. So no rush. Am kinda sloooowwww today.-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
You can go and add too. I dont own it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 Done. Dont be lazy...Just kidding. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 12:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tag and Assess 2012 - Awards

Indian service award (gold)
For your efforts in Tag and Assess 2012 - many thanks and wish you achieve many more in the project.

Ssriram mt (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)ssriram_mt

Hi Animesh, have been reading a few articles on wiki where certain users have challenged the use of Indic scripts in India ralted articles. I would like to reinstate this need, as using Indic scripts is important
- to ensure correct pronounciation
- IPAs are not understood by most Indians, & the use of Indic scripts, specially for namesof people, communities of places is paramount in understanding them correctly
- Since there are so many Indian names with similar pronounciations & which can not be represented using IPA (primarity because the source laungauges is Latin & Not Sanskrit), feel that use of Indic Scripts should be open to all India articles (atleast).
Can we start a vote & pls help me understand how to initiate one. The current discussion seems to be closed already, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DeltaQuad/Archives/2012/January#Native_languages_in_lead

Since I am new, need some help in Initiating / reopening the vote. I would offcourse vote in favour of using Indic scripts in India related articles.

Ambar 07:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambar wiki (talk • contribs)

Hello Ambar wiki! There are more vandalisms in having indic scripts than its advantages you mentioned above. Scroll up on my talk page and you will read another discussion. Plus i really dont think that indic scripts even help all Indians, forget foreigners. If i am not able to read Bengali, IPA or a sound file are the only options i have to correctly read Ritwik Ghatak as Rittik Ghotok. Apart from the link of DeltaQuad's talk page, also go through the original discussion present in INB's archive. If at all you wish to reopen a discussion for this, Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics is the place to start. But i am sure you will only receive links to these discussions. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Serial Plots

Please read WP:FILMPLOT a little further to where it says:

As WP:PSTS says, "...a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge... Do not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source.

All of the sections I removed were stuffed full of analysis, synthetic, interpretive and evaluative claims. Stuffed full. Please do not revert those, that would be a clear violation of WP:OR, which is one of the cornerstone policies of Wikipedia and overrides guidelines like FILMPLOT. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I frankly dont find any analysis or sythesis done there. Could you point it out please? They are just too elaborate giving many useless details. Cut them down, dont delete. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Really? Anyway, I was looking at the plot text you restored to Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?. Most of it is a direct copyright violation of [2] so can't be included in the article. You'll also notice that on Feb 2nd. I left a message on the article's talk page asking for the plot section to be improved with references and cut down to fit the requirements of WP:PLOT particularly on length and tone. Guess how much reaction that got from the active editors of that article? Nothing. The problem is, I have no way to know what, if anything, in the plot description is accurate since none of it comes from reliable sources, which is exactly the reason why WP:OR and WP:V exist. There is no exception to these policies, even if guideline writers try to get around them. The entire plot section you restored is fan writing with no way for any reader to verify its accuracy, neutrality or relevance. We are trying to build an encyclopedia, not a fan blog. If we can find some way for a short, relevant plot section to be included, I'm all for it. What we had most recently was not that. The editors of the article need to discuss this on the talk page. Sparthorse (talk) 11:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
If its a copy vio, you should delete it. But you will seriously not find any reliable source for the serial's plot. I dont watch these serials. But i will dig in some fan sites and cut down the plot to minimum words and keep it there. But still you will have to assume good faith and accept that this is the real story of that show. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Assessment

Hi Animesh, I just wanted to know how do you do the assessment? Do you use any tool or a software or a script that can update (lets say "Importance") many articles at once or you do it manually by hitting the talk page and then editing it. I just started doing today but found it a little tiresome. Any good idea?-Msrag (talk) 08:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello! You may use a software called AWB that helps in assessing somehow. You need to take permission for it. But thats just a formality. You will find details about that on its page. Help is also available in Guide (Part 3). Users VasuVR (talk), Karthikndr (talk) and the drive co-ordinator Ssriram_mt (talk) are using this. They can help you more. But i do it manually for, 1. I didnt understand that damn AWB! 2. I am assuming that AWB doesnt do full assessment that you will be able to do if done manually. Its like you choose a few pages that you think are Stubs & Low importance. You write these codes and then AWB replaces those on these talk pages. But then it wont obviously see if the article has image or it belongs to Kerala or should be included in WikiProject Education and like wise. If you sort out a certain list which will have all these parameters, you have already done it manually. So i didnt see any point in using AWB. You will have to revisit your assessments. But you can give it a shot. I tried. Logged in, tried to figure it out & logged off! :) -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Aah.. I see the AWB thing. Not sure if I'll be comfortable either as per the points you highlighted. Manual way is the easiest but takes a little time. But anyways, Thanks for your response. And BTW, who keeps the track of counts of assessments done by a user. I mean how do we count it? Do we update it manually in that table on the project page or it gets updated automatically? -Msrag (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
It is time consuming and i have lost my speed too. Will have to buckle up. No! Dont keep the count. Ssriram_mt is keeping it. He says its easy to count. But i dont know how. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks again. -Msrag (talk) 11:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

New contributor could benefit from your assistance

Sdeepak scor has recently got Shudra - The Rising through WP:AFC after a bit of a tussle. Both the article and the new contributor could use some help but movie stuff is not really something at which I am much good. (not much good at anything, some would say!) Anyway, I wonder if you or one of your stalkers might be interested in collaborating with them to improve the article and also their knowledge of Wikipedia processes etc? - Sitush (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Film Award for Best Feature Film in Hindi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vijay Anand
Saanch Ko Aanch Nahin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Shailendra Singh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for your continued efforts in bringing out some fantastic formatting in the layout of various award pages. —Vensatry (Ping me) 18:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank You Vensatry! I will be sharing this star with Vivvt who has been creating basic yearly articles which allow me to copy-paste. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Re A barnstar for you!

Thanks. It came bang on the time where I finished all the main NFA articles. I appreciate. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 20:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Truly awesome stamina. Keep up the great work assessing articles.

AshLin (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 15:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry for the late reply. Lynch7 15:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012 - Awards

Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your efforts in Tag and Assess 2012 - many thanks and wish you achieve many more in the project. A special word of thanks for guiding the freshers of the project.

Ssriram mt (talk) 04:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Afd

Do you mind commenting in this? The first one was "kept" at default due to zero response. Secret of success (talk) 12:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Sterling Cineplex DYK

Thanks for your comments. Iv tried to solve the issues you raised and have responded on the template. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 09:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Great! Will be going through all references now. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Do you know how to add mumbai's map to it? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
No, Iv done it for airports, but for those its like marking a city on the India map. Im hoping to get an image of the place soon - but cant guarantee that. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 13:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The infobox has provisions for both map & image. I can never add those maps. Never understood it. If you know how to, add one showing mumbai's loaction. I added the coordinates. But i am passing the DYK anyways. These additions can keep on happening. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

My Proded leagues.

Hey mate. Thank you for your interest in these articles I had on prod. Anyway first off I did search these tournaments. I mean I am considered the admin of the Indian Football articles, do you think I would not look them up. Anyway I will take this article by article. The Kerala Football League had 4 links now. 1 does not work, 1 leads to a homepage of a website off topic, 1 leads to a CUP not the LEAGUE (Note I am thinking of creating the Kerala State Football Cup article because that is what the link is referring to. Also the fourth one is just Ancheri saying the need for a league, there is no proof that the league existed. When I first searched the league I got some hooks but they were all focused on DISTRICT leagues not the STATE leagues and going by W:NFOOTY the league would need to be at least a top state league and not a district league. That is why I PROD that article. The Street League, I just read that article. There is nothing there and from what I know, a street league is not notable, specially one that is not even licensed by the All India Football Federation which again violates NFOOTY because it needs to be part of the AIFF and be contested by Adults in order to be notable. The Agartala League I searched and again, like Kerala, is only a knock-out competition and again could be considered a district league, it is no where near being a top state league which proves its non-notability. Now as for the Subroto Cup Football Tournament if you look here [3] the Subroto Cup is not administered by the AIFF. It is also not a national cup. That is why it failed notability in my eyes. Anyway, now thats out of the way, I hope you see now why I put these for deletion. Yes I probably should have put a better reason but they do not pass at all. My job as the main editor of Indian Football pages is to edit, make the pages perfect, and to get rid of clutter that was made before I joined. I will not reprod them yet. Feel free to message me again if you have more questions. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I am surely no expert in this field. In fact i also dont know how many players there are in a football team! You seem just better than me. But thats the reason why i was so surprised to see the tags on Subroto Cup Football Tournament and Kerala State Football League. Lets go case by case.
  • KSFL's 4th reference of Ancheri was added by me yesterday. Ancheri in that interview says "It is high time that the state association had drawn up a plan to revive the state league, which is virtually non-existent." Which means a certian KSFL exists. A thing can be revived only if it exists. If & when i get time, i will try & search more on this. I have no say on WP:NFOOTY. You and other editors sort that out.
  • Subroto Cup Football Tournament: The cup might not be administered by AIFF but it surely is popular. National newspaper care to publish its result every year and that makes it notable enough to stay.
  • The Street League & Agartala League: There is nothing there? Ofcourse there is nothing there because no one added it. That is not the reason to delete. It is a reason to add something there. Frankly, i did not even care to search for these two topics seeing the first two articles. I just plainly deproded them.
I am not sure on how you are judging notability of these articles. I have hence raised this issue at the WP:INB here where someone more competent than me can answer and help you. You might wanna ask for help to some other people before blindly deleting article. Please note that i have no knowledge of this feild and hence i might be completely wrong here. But you see, google had a say on these and hence i feel they deserve to stay. Also note that once deproded, the articles cannot be Proded again. You will have to go through WP:AfD for their deletion. If you are not sure about deletion i would suggest you always go through that channel. That way editors of that field notice it and decide more wisely on it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay mate after discussion on the Indian Football Forum (indianfootballnetwork.com/forum) it has been decided to delete all of these leagues (except for Subroto Cup) for the following...

Kerala Football League: The article is a lie and there has never been a Kerala State League. There have been knock-out tournaments but never leagues. Street League: Not a league and unlike what the article said this organization not league was started after 2004. Agartala League: Fails W:NFOOTY as it is not the top state league of its state.

Hopefully you agree with this. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 05:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

What is indianfootballnetwork.com/forum? Its not part of Wikipedia. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Indian Football Network is a website created in 2011 for all Indian Football fans to discuss various topics. It is based on BigSoccer which is a world wide football forum. Ever sense its creating I believe that the forum contains the smartest Indian Football fans in the world as we talk about subjects using sources and knowledge unlike on other websites like goal.com and sportskeeda where we just see users on there same regionalist stuff like for example "Goa should separate from India" and all that. Every member from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/India task force is on this forum. If you want to join there should be something at the top right. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Whatever this forum is, it is not a right forum to discuss anything related to wikipedia. You may ofcourse discuss anything and everything there. But that is just for the sake of discussion. You do know WP:Afd, right? That is the way to decide on deletion of articles here. Or else my colony had long back decided to delete few political parties' articles as they are mostly useless. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

I am familier with Afd but I rather not put the articles on deletion again till we both reach a consensus on this. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 19:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh! Am sorry if thats what you got from all this. All i want you to do is have a proper discussion with people who usually are involved in these articles. AfD is the right process for this. Go ahead! I guess i will have least contribution over there. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 20:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Its cool, I will post this on the WikiProject: Football soon. Thanks. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 23:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Kahaani

No Animesh, that image you removed from Kahaani's plot wasn't unnecessary. We (me and other few editors) have discussed it to add random images related to the plot and theme of the film targeting it to be a GA in coming months. Image of Durga Puja adds meaning to the plot as Vidya kills the terrorist on the last day of Durga Puja and Amitabh narrating the importance of goddess Durga to destroy evil slightly hinting towards Vidya. And audiences too get a feeling of the same. Your say? --Msrag (talk) 12:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Well in that case you may revert my deletion. The GA reviewer would comment on it if he needs to. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Yea, right. We can remove it then.--Msrag (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: IPL Centuries

No prose was probably the reason for the prod. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

More than DYK, it has a good FL potential, though Iv got my plate full at the moment. Why dont you take it up - the IPL is well covered by the press, so references shouldnt be an issue. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
There is always a first time :) The table looks incomplete though - the venue column is missing. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force.
Message added 11:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have just recommended you as a Co-Volunteer co-ordinator for WikiProject India/Film. Have you words and let us know if you are interested. Thank you :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Redirects

Thanks for that, I should have checked myself, but I hadn't realised he/she had been quite so busy. All gone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Commentary requires sources

I have reverted your entries to Aruna Irani. Commentary and analysis requires a third party source to make those descriptions. see WP:OR. Content about living people also requires sources.

See also this article about meaningless superlatives-- The Red Pen of Doom 21:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Whats the reason for reverting my deletion of indic scripts? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
It wasnt "the deletion of indic scripts." It was that you reintroduced lots of inappropriate personal commentary and unsourced contested information of a personal nature, such as naming her families ethnic background etc. -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
You should then revert those edits. I specifically made seperate edits. I still do not agree with all of your deletion and will hence add back many of the things, in small bits so that you can see them carefully. Hoping you see them and not blindly reverting them. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I will most certianly remove them if you do not provide adequate sources. WP:V WP:OR WP:BLP allow (and BLP demands) such actions on my part. -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Add "with open eyes" to that sentence. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 21:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Talk:Ahalya#1st_paragraph.
Message added 18:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for your comments. I have temporarily moved the sentence to the article considering the ongoing FAC. I don't reviewers complaining about a short 1st para :) --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Redtigerxyz Talk 18:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wp:RSN.
Message added 08:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I thought you might be interested. Secret of success (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for late response. Havent been very active recently. The site seems fishy. Couldnt even find it's "About Us" section. But frankly never came across it on any articles. Is it being widely used in South-Indian cinema? But the site doesnt seem new. Just did a random search and found an article of 2005. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Would you mind stating it in WP:RSN? Secret of success (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I can.... but Subhash K. Jha is writing about Dum Maro Dum (film) on it? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Subhash K. Jha's writings are used in many websites, including Bollywood Hungama. His presence does not give the site a special status. Other than for his reviews, I don't we can rely on anything else from there. Anyway, I got a satisfactory answer. Secret of success (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

For assessing the article of Abhay and Rani Bang Abhijeet Safai 05:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

And the Barnstar goes to.....!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I award you this barnstar for your excellent and tireless participation in India and also in Indian Cinema taskforce. Sorry for much delayed appreciation, but you do deserve more than this. Keep up your work :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! It definitely is not delayed but surely untimely. I have been less active in recent few days. Hence gave me a feeling i usually get when i see a January release film win many awards in next Jan's ceremony and wonder "Isn't that film too old to win?!" -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Your comments in Swami Vivekananda Talk

I have tried to answer your question in Talk:Swami_Vivekananda#More_comments. Best, --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Replied again! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 20:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
And I have tried to answer your IPA in Lead related question here. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 21:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Football?

A wee bit, but not as much as to help with articles. BTW will you be attending this? Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 08:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Issue seems to be the same as most other WP:India articles - no proper referencing and news/advert type language. I dont think most of these articles are notable, but then Im not the right person for this - you could leave a message on the India noticeboard. Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 08:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Jessie (character)

It was a full-fledged article about a fictional character. Some idiot forced it to become a redirect page, and to avoid any conflict, i made it a disambiguation page. so tell me: should it be revived as a character page or stay a disambiguation page? it will not be deleted. reply on my talkpage. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Sir, you are right. But Jessie can be considered as popular as becoming actress Trisha Krishnan's new nickname and identity. I think the popularity of the character in the film Vinnai Thaandi Varuvaaya compelled the director to use her name in the film's remakes (Ye Maaya Chesave and Ekk Deewana Tha) as well. It also was an article connecting all the three films based on the same story. In that case can it stay? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Lights, camera, action!

The Indian film award
Its great to see that Indian film articles are getting some support from knowledgeable buffs who work tirelessly to take it to heights and highlight its excellence. Keep it up! Secret of success 15:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
That was totally unexpected! Thanks a lot!! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your questions

AK, a friendly suggestion to you is that you don't fall into the trap of thinking that other editors are "biased", a "gang" of some sort, or pro this or anti that (as in pro-Ganges and anti-Ganga). Most of us here don't necessarily have strong views on content but do have strong views on sourcing, neutrality and in giving coverage to topics or ideas that is appropriate for an encyclopedia. Fowler, for example, is a classic example of an editor who will go out of his way to balance articles (just take a look at List of Doon School alumni before and after his edits). YK, on the other hand, is a classic example of an editor who has a POV and is willing to do anything to get his POV into the article whether or not it is due, well sourced, or neutral, and he has no interests on wikipedia other than this. I don't know whether or not you hold the same opinions as YK, but you do have other interests and are far more useful as an encyclopedia builder than is YK, so I urge you to stop thinking in terms of pro and anti but rather to focus on content, whether a particular addition to an article is well sourced, is representative of where scholarly belief is, and whether it is important enough (again, by looking at where it figures in academic works) to be featured in a particular article. I hope you take this in the right spirit because I mean this well! Regards, --regentspark (comment) 14:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I have no such biases, yet. But will surely form them looking at the biases other people have. You yourself are seeing how discussion on Ganges is now going. Did i have a bias here while proposing or he had a bias while rejecting? I dont mind ppl rejecting like this. They can obviously have opposite views. But these reply from both didnt seem like unprejudiced. And didnt reply to this immediately as i was waiting for the discussion on Ganges. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Indian Cinema task force Volunteer

Since you have agreed to volunteer in coordinating the task force, the community has decided to elect you for the same. Myself along with you will be the coordinators and will be working together. The volunteer coordinator will have the following responsibilities:

  • Do whatever needs doing in the Indian Cinema task force, or getting it done alongwith others.
  • Do everything that needs doing in the task force, or getting it done alongwith others.
  • Look after the interests of the task force community in general and the articles in specific.
  • Represent the views of the task force wherever representation/participation is sought; to get & put forward the community's viewpoint.
  • Innovate and bring forth new initiatives, continue existing ones and retire defunct ones.
  • Maintain the task force infrastructure of pages.
  • Community development - recruitment, motivation, empowerment.
  • Join the mailing list for Wikipedians working on India related content on English Wikipedia (wikimedia-in-en [at] lists [dot] wikimedia [dot] org)

The Volunteer coordinator is a volunteer from the community and is answerable to the community. He enjoys the informal recognition and full support of the community. However, he is open to recall by the community, should the community so decide. Let Around The Globe/Ashlin/me for further queries. Cheers! —Vensatry (Ping me) 03:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Enrolled on the mailing list. Rest action points i presume i am already doing! That was quite convenient. Will start actively taking up other things too. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you much for the assist

When I found that Lakshmi Putrudu had been taken to AFD simply because the article had not been updated, and finding numerous sources available, I began to improve it so that it would not be deleted simply because it needed work that had not yet been done. I was quite pleased to see that you had yourself visited the article to help out. Thank you very much for your efforts. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


As the article has now gone through a 10x expansion, care to suggest a suitable DYK? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012

Hi, with contributors like you, Tag and Assess 2012 has reached mid stage. To speed up the activities, certain special awards have been announced. Please join back and let us take the drive to completion. Thanks again for your contribution.Ssriram mt (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

59th National Film Awards

Would you mind reviewing/commenting on it? Aim is to push the article as WP:FL or "In the news". Thanks. - VivvtTalk 21:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure! Will do that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Afd

Please take a look at this. Secret of success 13:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Spotcheck

I have seen in FACs that a certain "spotcheck" must be done for all candidates before the article can be passed to FA status. Can you explain to me what spotchecking is? And could you carry out a spotcheck for Ra.One, like unofficially? Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Wuuups! Dear, i am less experienced than you! Maybe SoS can do that. I guess its just random checks of references. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Spotchecking consists of checking the reliability of sources in articles and copyright problems including WP:PARAPHRASE. I shall do so for the article. Just to note, the number of unreliable/questionable sources for Ra.One have already been listed in the FAC by me. If they are fixed, I think all other sources are of superior quality and no issues there. For copyright violations, I shall check thoroughly. Secret of success 04:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Twinkle

Hi Animesh, i feel you now have sufficient experience here on wiki, Please consider using wp:TWINKLE (if not yet used) follow the link, its easy to use and will save a lot of your time in tagging the articles and other imp stuff. Do let me know if you need a help/suggestion/comments thanks regards-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh! Thanks for the advice. But me and technology are No-No! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Indian populations

I've come here having noticed you posting to AshLin's talkpage. FYI the main source for populations is the government census site at www.censusindia.gov.in - they're still working on the data from the 2011 census and have only got it for the big cities, for smaller places you have to go to www.censusindia.gov.in/PopulationFinder/Population_Finder.aspx which only has the 2001 data. There's a bit of a knack to using it - one thing is that they have separate searches for villages and urban areas and sometimes you have to try both kinds to find your place. Often the Wikipedia spelling is different to the government spelling, and so you end up using the drop-down box at the bottom to go through the state-district-subdistrict hierarchy. Someone is going to have fun updating all the village articles when the 2011census results finally come out...
I've added 2001 data to Kaipuzha - there were 1,565 households in the town so that figure of 713 in the church seems plausible. FWIW, I think it was probably right that the church didn't get its own article. It's in a grey area, but just from skimming Google I think you would have really struggled to get the references to build it into a meaningful article, and you've got to imagine what a WP:GA on the topic would look like when you start an article. Maybe there's some good paper histories of it somewhere but for the time being I think it would be much better to develop the Religion section of the town article instead. Not least because that would allow you to cover the relationship between the churches and the convents, which at first glance looks the more interesting aspect of Christianity in the town. FlagSteward (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for noticing and taking these many efforts. The church article had already been deleted till i woke up and hence i didn't contact the users AshLin mentioned. Just kept a mental note that these are the ppl to contact in future. 1565 households is a good number. If 713 was to be believed, ~45% of village's followers was a fairly good number too. But anyways... the article didn't have much to stand on its own. Except that this church is 200yr old. But having all related info at Kaipuzha itself is better. Thanks for adding that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
AS i see that the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. George's Forane Church is deleted , (but all is not lost) Now you can request the closing admin (or I guess any admin) to transfer the contents of the deleted page into your sandbox for improving it, I am glad that you are trying for sources, if sufficient sources are there , you can back it up , improve the article and put it again . -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
From the AFD it seems like there wasn't much worth rescuing, and I would concentrate on working within the Religion section of the existing Kaipuzha article, it's not as though it's too full right now. I share the doubts about exactly what it was that was founded in 1813. In particular it bothers me that there seems to be almost no mentions of this church from colonial-era documents (at least, not online). You wouldn't expect it to be as well documented as a church in London, but you would expect something. There's a few convent references but nothing about the church - and given the size of the place you maybe wouldn't expect there to be a non-convent church. I suspect that whatever it was that was founded in 1813 was convent-related, I guess the decision to build a shiny new forane church in 1983 was maybe connected with a loss of convent influence for some reason. I'm speculating, but my gut feel says that the 19th-century history is convent history rather than church history. The fact that something is 200 years old is not a reason for notability in itself, it just means that there should be lots of sources referring to it, and it's those sources that make something notable.FlagSteward (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

New Article

Hi Animesh, can you have a look at this article once? Thanks --sarvajna (talk) 08:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Talk:Lakshya_(film).
Message added 15:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roshan220195 (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

User_talk:Titodutta#Swami_Vivekananda_IPA

Yogesh is under Topic Ban, so I have create discussion thread here User_talk:Titodutta#Swami_Vivekananda_IPA --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 12:54, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

His topic ban means he cant discuss it anywhere on wikipedia; even user talk pages and sandboxes. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
I talk page owner explicitly allow him to write in my talk page! And, BTW, you can post too!--Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
I dont think it works that way. Moreover i think he has said all thats needed to be said in the case of IPA. And so have i. Others should comment on it; on Vivekananda as well as other such similar pages. WP:INB seems right place for a generic discusion. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
What he or you have said, I do not agree to that! And it is better create another topic to drift another one! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Okay! As YK cant reply anywhere, i guess i should reply on Talk:Swami Vivekananda itself to keep all discussion at one place. See ya there. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

sanjeev kumar image

hello, the image i uploaded of Sanjeev Kumar does not have sufficient rationale info - u say that. but i am not experienced at editing images. can someone else pls get the job done? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Article for improvement???

Came across this article when working on some other ones. I thought it might interest you. So why dont you take it up for the improvement? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 02:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Thats a fairly nice article. I can check somethings only in it. But after some hazzel someone will go and put a COI note on it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 03:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
How did you get THIS? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Thats the same image I had asked Q about. I will send an email to OTRS with the blogger's mail. Lets see. Thats the best image I got ever. I hope nobody deletes it by then. If it fails then I will have to upload any of these (one, two or three) but thats the last option. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 03:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
3?!?!?!? Thats Abhishek Bachchan. Whats wrong with people? The caption calls him Jaya Bachchan and you wanna upload it as Girish Kulkarni?!?!?!? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 04:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
LOL. No. Scroll thru the images. Second last image shows GK. But insignificant image. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 04:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
On a lighter note, can we add our name on the list as well? --sarvajna (talk) 08:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Of course we can! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Check out File:Girish Kulkarni at Masala Premier.jpg Thanks. - VivvtTalk 11:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Thats awesome! Easier than that email and permission stuff. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

me and technology are No-No

Sorry for the late reply i had to start a new section as the last one was already archived, I am glad to see that inspite of the meaning of this heading, you have installed the assessment bar which I presume has reduced your load in assessment, Installing wp:TWINKLE is exactly similar, and would help you in ways that you could never have imagined all said, just give it a try once you can always get back to old ways if you feel it is not your piece of cake. cheers-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 23:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

you may be wondering why i am advocating it, the reason is "Tag and assess 2012" we have assessment bar for assssing but people forget to tag the article appropriately for improvements, which is mainly due to a long list of tags that cannot be memorized, twinkle gives all options for tagging in just 2 clicks -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Aah... i didnt know that. I will try and look into it. I am just lazy to read those all instructions. But will do it soon. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Agree that the documentation at times is lengthy/boring/fruitless fortunately you will not need to refer the docs for twinkle, except for the installing step (which is just copy/paste). Not much to learn here by the way and it stays hiding until u needs it :)-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
  • You are welcome, glad that you accepted my advice and finally installed it. it saves us from pain of remembering uncountable number of wikipedia Maintenance Tags etc. Such tools in the hands of good editors like yourself will definitely help the wiki community.cheers-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 17:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Userboxes for Project

I have also created few userboxes related to our project:

Code Result
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 1}}
This user is a member of Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 2}}
This user has made assessments under the contest, Tag & Assess 2012 India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 3}}
This user is a coordinator of Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 200+}}
This user has made 200+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 400+}}
This user has made 400+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 600+}}
This user has made 600+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 1000+}}
This user has made 1000+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 2000+}}
This user has made 2000+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 3000+}}
This user has made 3000+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage
{{Template:User India Assessment Tag & Assess 2012 4000+}}
This user has made 4000+ assessments for Tag & Assess 2012 contest India
 Usage

Hope that you might like it. Thank you and Happy assessments! Yasht101 09:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Geet Ramayan

Which category would this fall into? This is not an album but a radio broadcast and was spanned over a year. Do you have any idea? And ya... Is it a single word or two different as for the current article. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 20:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Originally it was a poetry book by GaDiMa, later composed by Bapuji and the aired on AIR (Pune). This looks like the cover of the book. The book was hardly famous. It got fame only after being composed into songs and aired. But now its mostly known as some album. Add both Category:Indian radio programs‎ and Category:Albums by Indian artists. Also Category:Hindustani classical music albums should go, i guess. I first though it was one word. Few album covers show it as one word. Even GaDiMa's official site uses one word. But thats only while writing in Marathi. Elsewhere its always split like the current title. Also other book references use two separate word. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Ya. I saw that image a minute later I posted message on your talk page. So lets keep it separate. Btw, are you sure it was a book? Whatever interviews I have heard/read/seen, it was always mentioned that GDM and SP found it challenging and equally interesting to write/compose a song before it went on air in a short span of time. Rather some of the songs were finished few minutes before the actual on-air time. I know there is a book but I believe that was made later on. Do you have references for this? I will start working on it soon. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 21:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
That could be the case. I have no proper references. Maybe what i read referred to some initial poems that GDM wrote. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Can you help me out on converting Marathi words into Romanized script? like (Gaa Baalaano, Shree Ramayan --> Gā Bālāno, Shrī Rāmāyan), I could not find Romanized script for some of the characters.Thanks. - VivvtTalk 03:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Do you wanna do that for all songs? I can keep writing those over here as and when i do. I will start from 1 as you already have of 56th. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Songs

WARNING: I could be wrong!

  • "Swaye Shreeramprabhu Aikati" - "Svaye Shrīrāmprabhu Aikatī"
(Q: Shouldn't श्रीरामप्रभु be one word? Check lyrics here in Marathi.)
  • Aahh... Could be...Rather Yes.
Song is better known as "Kuśa Lava Rāmāyan Gātī"
Google results - "Swaye Shri Ram Prabhu Aikati" (960), "Kush Lava Ramayan Gaati" (46,000)
  • "Saryu Tiravari Ayodhya" - "Saryū Tīravarī Ayodhyā"
  • "Uga Ka Kaalij Majhe Ule" - "Ugā Kā Kālij Mājhe Ule"
  • "Udas Ka Tu?" - "Udās Kā Tū?"
(Q: Isn't this song more popular as "Ladake Kausalle Rani" ("Lādake Kausalye Rāni")?
  • Took a reference of GDM site as got two different lines for the same song as title.
I know the song as LKR and not UKT. Will have to search and see on google which gives more correct results.
  • Google results - "Udas Ka Tu" (1030), "Ladake Kausalye Rani" (7), "Ladake Kausalle Rani" (3) and "Laadke Kausalye Rani" (0)
Oh wow! Thats a HUGE margin. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 16:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I win
  • "Dashratha, Ghe He Paayasdan" - "Daśarathā, Ghe He Pāyasadān"
  • "Ram Janmala Ga Sakhi" - "Rām Janmalā Ga Sakhī"
  • "Saawala Ga Ramchandra" - "Sāvalā Ga Rāmcandra"
  • "Jyeshtha Tujha Putra Mala" - "Jyeṣṭha Tujhā Putra Malā"
  • "Maar Hi Traatika Ramachandra" - "Mār Hi Trāṭikā Rāmcandrā"
  • "Chala Raghava Chala" - "Calā Rāghavā Calā"
  • "Aaj Mee Shaapmukta Jaahale" - "Āj Mī Śāpmucta Jāhale"
Do you expect me to write in Marathi as well to get clear insight about what the actual word is? like Traatika and not Taatika? And do not take reference of current page. I have started developing the article here, so some of the words are wrong in the original article.
Ppl say we "dont need" indic scripts. So no! & sorry about "traatika". The lyrics site as well as GDM said "Taatika". Thats why i wrote it so. But just heard the song. "Traatika" is right. I got ur new link. Am using that itself. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok. That should be fine. I will add indic script for the time being in the article to get the idea. Will delete once done. Its mere a copy-paste for me. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Thats fine! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Btw, why no Indic scripts?? Take a look at some of the FLs (List of National Treasures of Japan (writings: Japanese books), List of National Treasures of Japan (writings: others), List of National Treasures of Japan (writings: Chinese books)). They do have Japanese scripts. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 17:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
  • "Swayamvar Jhale Seeteche" - "Svayamvar Jhāle Sītece"
  • "Vhaayache Raam Ayodhyapati" - "Vhāyace Rām Āyodhyāpati"
  • "Modu Naka Vachanaas" - "Modu Nakā Vacanās"
  • "Nako Re Jau Ramraya" - "Nako Re Jāu Rāmarāyā"
  • "Ramavin Rajyapadi Kon Baisato?" - "Rāmāviṇ Rājyapadī Koṇ Baisato?"
  • "Jethe Raghav Tethe Seeta" - "Jethe Rāghav Tethe Sītā"
  • "Thamb Sumanta, Thambavi Re Rath" - "Thāmb Sumantā, Thāmbavi Re Rath"
  • "Nakos Nauke Parat Phiru" - "Nakos Nauke Parat Phirū"
  • "Yaa Ithe Lakshmana Baandh Kuti" - "Yā Ithe, Lakṣmaṇā, Bāndh Kutī"
  • "Bolale Ituke Maj Shreeram" - "Bolale Ituke Maj Shrīrām"
  • "Daatala Chohikade Andhar" - "Dāṭalā Cohikade Andhār"
  • "Maata Na Tu Vairini" - "Mātā Na Tū, Vairiṇī"
  • "Chaapbaan Ghya Kari" - "Cāpabāṇ Ghyā Karī"
  • "Paradhin Aahe Jagti Putra Manvacha" - "Parādhīn Āhe Jagatī Putra Mānavāchā"
  • "Taat Gele, Maay Geli" - "Tāt Gele, Māya Gelī"
  • "Kon Tu, Kuthla Rajkumar?" - "Koṇ Tū, Kuṭhalā Rājakumār?"
  • "Sood Ghe Tyacha Lankapati" - "Sūḍ Ghe Tyācā Lankāpati"
  • "Maj Aanun Dya To" - "Maj Āṇun Dyā To"
  • "Yaachaka Thaambu Nako Daaraat" - "Yāckā, Thāmbu Nako Dārāta"
  • "Kothe Seeta Janak Nandini" - "Koṭhe Sītā Janakanandinī?"
  • "Hi Tichya Venitil Phule" - "Hī Ticyā Veṇitil Phule"
  • "Palavili Raavane Seeta" - "Palavilī Rāvaṇe Sītā"
  • "Dhanya Mee Shabari Shreerama" - "Dhanya Mī Śabarī Shrīrāmā"
  • "सन्मित्र राघवांचा सुग्रीव आज झाला" - "Sanmitra Rāghavānchā Sugrīv Aāj Jhālā"
  • "वालीवध ना, खलनिर्दालन" - "Vālīvadh Nā, Khalnidrālan"
  • "असा हा एकच श्रीहनुमान्" - "Asā Hā Ekaca Shrīhanumān"
  • "हीच ती रामांची स्वामिनी" - "Hīca Tī Rāmāchī Swāminī"
  • "नको करूंस वल्गना" - "Nako Karūs Valganā"
  • "मज सांग अवस्था दूता" - "Maj Sāng Avasthā Dūtā"
  • "पेटवी लंका हनुमंत" - "Peṭavi Lankā Hanumant"
  • "सेतू बांधा रे सागरीं" - "Setū Bāndhā Re Sāgarī"
  • "रघुवरा, बोलत कां नाहीं?" - "Raghuvarā, Bolat Kā Nāhī"
  • "सुग्रीवा, हें साहस असलें" - "Sugrīvā He Sāhas Asale"
  • "रावणास सांग अंगदा" - "Rāvaṇās Sāng Angadā"
  • "नभा भेदुनी नाद चालले" - "Nabhā Bhedunī Nād Chālale"
  • "लंकेवर काळ कठिण" - "Lankevar Kāḷ Kaṭhin"
  • "आज कां निष्फळ होती बाण?" - "Āj Kā Niṣphaḷ Hotī Bāṇ"
  • "लीनते, चारुते, सीते" - "Līnate, Cārūte, Sīte"
  • "लोकसाक्ष शुद्धी झाली" - "Lokasākṣa Shuddhī Jhālī"
  • "त्रिवार जयजयकार, रामा" - "Trīvār Jayajayakār Rāmā"
  • "प्रभो, मज एकच वर द्यावा" - "Prabho, Maj Ekac Var Dyāvā"
  • "डोहाळे पुरवा रघुकुलतिलका" - "Dohāḷe Puravā Raghukulatilakā"
  • "मज सांग लक्ष्मणा" - "Maj Sāng Lakṣmaṇā"
  • "गा बाळांनो, श्रीरामायण" - "Gā Bāḷāno, Shrīrāmāyaṇ"

Devon ke Dev - Mahadev page

Why have you deleted all the episodes in that page? We were compling it so well everyday? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harikrishnan04 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Hari!
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We do not write stories of all 117 episodes. The show will surely make 300+ episodes. We dont need all that. Instead we should write only small summary of what is happening in the series. Please go through this section, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Television#Plot_section. Also delete that whole episode-by-episode plot and write only summary of what has happened till now. Remember to limit your words there too. Or else it will again be deleted. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
There can be a sperate page of list of episodes which would contain the summary of every episode, check this out [4] --sarvajna (talk) 08:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Yeah! That can be done. But they being not notable will be deleted. See the various AfDs currently going on. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sanya episodes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kya Mast Hai Life episodes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kartika episodes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Navya episodes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Episodes. Frankly speaking, the main article Devon Ke Dev – Mahadev also will have to give some fight to stay in AfD. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Just added two more AfDs. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of C.I.D. episodes (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of C.I.D. Special Bureau episodes (2nd nomination). §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Tagging the vandals

Please don't forget to tag the vandals by twinkle (after a revert [5]) [6] this discourages them to continue malpractices (and/or helps in blocking them).keep up the good work. Also Consider requesting Rollback rights at wp:RFP/R cheers -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 09:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

That's good. Dint know that. Baby steps! Let me know TW properly first. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Of course, just thought of dropping a line. Whenever you revert a vandalism by pressing revert vandalism,soon after the revert the talk page of the defaulting user opens (in edit mode) where you can write your comment, Generally its better just to use the default warning templates using the Twinkle link on the top when you are on a user page.(the options of twinkle change depending on the page you are in e.g. article page or talk page or user page. ) (apology for the nagging, I just felt it was imp to let you know), regards-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 10:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Oh no! This isnt nagging. Or else i wouldnt have cared to look in it. Thanks! Keep dropping such tips. These are better than sitting whole afternoon and reading some guide. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012

Thanks a lot for making rapid progress with fresh assessments - with contributors like you, we have brought the fresh assessments under 5,000. Keep up the good work mate. Ssriram mt (talk) 03:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Comment

Could you comment here? Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please understand that vandalism is something that is undoubtedly destructive to Wikipedia. Stuff like this should be given a second thought. I do understand that the user failed to give out a proper reason for the revert but that does not make it follow the definition of vandalism. This is bound to become a serious issue, if you continue, given that good faith is necessary. I would suggest that you use either the good faith roll-back or the ordinary one, but try giving out a summary of it. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Ohhh! I am still new with TW. I wasnt aware then that i dont get to comment in the summary. Will make sure to use more features. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lakshmi Putrudu

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Your thoughts

Please take a look here and comment. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions. Onkar 01:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A request

Greetings,

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Please have a look at wiki page for bofors and update it with any missing/new info, if possible: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_scandal I would also like to request you to help in improving coverage on such similar articles, if possible. This would create very useful awareness about the facts of real corruption cases in India and how they are handled/mishandled. Hopefully, this would help in ultimately leading to a day when corruption at high places (if exposed) is punished. Thanks. Onkar 01:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onkarr (talk • contribs)

Witty

Ha! How I wish wiki had a 'like' feature like facebook #Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollywood Hungama. Fanofbollywood (talk) 22:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah! They should add some feature. Would make editors enjoy just like social networking sites. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Dekha Ek Khwaab

Does the tagh means that we will have to add references as I have already summarized the plot! --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 07:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Is possible you can also summarize the plot more! --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 07:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

No! The notability tag means you have to prove that the show is notable. Please go through Wp:Notability. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Life OK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bidaai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Regarding article of Jitendra Joshi

Thanks for adding the table. He is one of my favorite actors! :--Abhijeet Safai (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah! he is nice. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Skier Dude's talk page.

Done

 Done as per your request! Thank you for your notification.--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 03:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Here goes the next meetup, this weekend (Saturday). Hope to see you there! Sign in here. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your help at the Language Reference Desk with the Hindi. 184.147.123.69 (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Warning users

You used level 1 warning while the IP already had a level 2. You should have used level 3 warning if other warnings are given in the same month. Take care of it. You are doing great. Keep it up! Yasht101 06:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I thought we should give warnings category wise. Like Vandalism 1.... 2, Removing maintenance tags 1...2...3.... Anyways! Am fed up of these IPs. Will give 1, 2 ,3 and 4 from now onwards.
BTW, do they automatically get blocked by some admin after receiving 4th warning? Or do i have to post complain somewhere? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Not automatically. When you click on TW, 1st option will be ARV
Click on ARV and then report them :) Yasht101 06:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Sudeep Sahir

Hi Animeshkulkarni, is the page Sudeep Sahir's references ok now? ZZ47 (talk) 02:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank You Dear!

Thank you so much! It was my pleasure, it is and it would be! --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 03:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: BLP PRODs

Just to let you know, if someone removes the PROD tag, do not restore it. Articles should be PRODed only ONCE. If it is taken off and you still want the article deleted, take it to AfD. Thank you. Secret of success (talk) 06:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Thats done when the PROD tag is removed for contesting the deletion. But when some IP removes PROD tag along with other all maintenance tags, why take it to AfD? That's vandal. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
You may restore the maintenance tag but not the PROD one, in that cast. Secret of success (talk) 06:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Fine!
But what about this particular case, do we remove the tag now that we have some fan-forum discussing this subject? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Recent AfDs

This refers to your recent AfDs relating to television characters - individual and lists, episodes lists etc. I feel the need for a policy on this, especially related to Indian Television, where articles keep sprouting out, probably started by PR folk. For example, I read a comment on one of the afds that episode lists for example should be only considered where the soap has completed atleast 5 years on air. Should we start an RfC specifically for Indian Television? Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 08:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

I would love to have some clear and strict lines on all these articles related to TV serials. But i dont know where to have such RfC. Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian television is dead. WP:INB wont be very interested in this matter. I am also not happy with the WP:TVSHOW's loose stand on shows being notable if they are aired on national network. What show isn't aired there? My experience with bigger forums is not very pleasant. I dont blame them much. But they really dont understand what the real situation with Indian shows is. So i dont expect much from other wider discussions. But if you suggest, i am in for making a rule book. Also note that biographies are also popping out like crazy.
I dont recall who made that comment of 5yr+ list. I don't mind having list of episodes for shows of even 50-60 episodes. But thats when the show has a format where every episode has a different theme. Like List of Sarabhai vs Sarabhai episodes. But you cant have list of episodes where one story is dragged and pulled and stretched for ages. You cant have a episode list of Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Some policy is definitely needed. So the options to me are to start a discussion at WP:INB, WP:Notability or WP:RfC. What do you think? Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 07:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Sure! Lets start in our home ground first at WP:INB. Going to a global discussion at WP:Notability wont be useful much at this stage. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox

Can we move the media list over to a sandbox attached to your user page? Span (talk) 21:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Help

Do you know hot add an clickable image map to Wiki articles?--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 09:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

uumm... no! sorry! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 09:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Sneha Kapoor

Hi Animesh Kulkarni, I saw that you've reverted recreation of the deleted article Sneha Kapoor. Please have a look at the current text. I've removed most of the peacock terms in the new editor's sandbox and added some references that establish the notability of the subject. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 12:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Hi, With contributors like you Tag and Assess 2012 is closing in on 80% completion. There are a few more worklists that remain - appreciate if can you take up a few of those. Lets work together to take it to completion. Happy assessing. Ssriram mt (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from wikipedia page. Satyamev Jayate (TV show) is a great show, but I saw in people comments that after watching this they think males are responsible for girl birth. In show also Amir interpret that males are responsible for girl birth. So if you do not know the facts please don't remove that again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DV manish (talk • contribs) 10:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for suggestion

Hi animesh, Thanks DV manish (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of non-free images

An administrator says: "Thanks for uploading File:Soni and Chicky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media)...."--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 07:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

& whats your point?§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Editor review

--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 12:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

hi, Namaskar,, :D :D I am so glad that you have clean the article in well manner.owe you brother :).but i think the list of incomplete movie have also been removed.Those list supposed to be there.pls help and keep guiding me, once again thnksMajorcaptain (talk) 15:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Shaheer Sheikh

You placed a BLP prod on this article on april 30, but you apparently didn't realize that the references has been accidentally removed by an editor a few days earlier on April 27, at [7].

I spotted it as reviewing administrator, because, though I do not know Bollywood, the career seemed extensive enough so that , if true, there would have been references. I removed the prod, restored them, and added another from Google News. DGG ( talk ) 22:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
this is for you for helping and humble behavior for newcomers like me. Rpaigu (talk) 07:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

hi, ive been come across your note on my talk page.no,do not feel sorry. If i do any poor editing,that must be restored. but anyway I've seen some of the actress articles in which their birth date has been provided through IMDB. Despite being that this(Divya Bharti) actress has died a long ago.also all the newspapers or news channels may had removed those all contents related to her.so providing citation for a line to line is rarely possible.next thing is that at the time of her death current Mumbai DCP arup patnaik had made some of the statement i've also added that with references but no matter :) I'm not much known about bollywood.Divya Bharti's complete biography is provided on her official website.now the question is how to add citations and references if we are adding something form her official website.Is it possible to use one reference more than once or twice. it would be more better if you tell me me personally by posting on my talk page.please do not recommend wiki's shortcuts,cos m too lazy to read rather than decode me in you words.i'll be happy to read you long long note on talk page :D :D ,in conclusion i beg your pardon if i've used any either bad words or bad way to express my views.thank youRpaigu (talk) 07:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Your Edits

You recently summarized Bade Achhe Lagte Hain extensively..thank you for that but with that you have also removed some of the needed references! I am adding some of them and thought of dropping you a message before doing so. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 04:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for all those who are working together to better the soap opera articles! Thank you for your great contributions....hoping to see more Jagadhatri(২০১২) 04:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


Help

User:Harsh 2580 put a plot template in Bade Achhe Lagte Hain unnecessarily and after being reverted he wrote on my talk page as this: "I am assured that you have pea-brain. Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas doesn't cite anywhere that the plot must be 700-800 words. And please don't judge on what I know and what I don't. I can assess your knowledge of editing though. Please go on and keep piling the plot until you are satisfied.HARSH TALK 09:00, 14 May 2012" and humiliating, embarrassing and threatening an user may result to block the user from editing (See this, to be satisfied: Wikipedia:Harassment), and WP:PLOT and WP:FILMPLOT says: "Plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words". Hope you can understand. and Bade Achhe Lagte Hain is so, so the tag is not required. When replying, please leave me a Tb template. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 09:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

He's continuously threatening me saying "We'll see" and so one. He's humiliating me. HELP! --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 09:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


Jitendra Joshi


Summarizing Plot(s)

Hi Animesh! Wishing you a very good morning! Thank you that you summarized the plot of Bade Achhe Lagte Hain, and I am requesting you that can you please summarize the plot of Saas Bina Sasural, but without deleting the essential and the turning points of the serial, and check the references too. When replying, please leave me a Tb template. Thank you in advance. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 03:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you..that you summarized the plot of Saas Bina Sasural. Thanks....--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 16:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

I will surely start such kind of articles in my sandbox from next time. I was not known that help can be asked in the sandbox also. In fact I still dont know how and where to ask for help. But I will learn it slowly. :) Thanks Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Death Note

Hi, Animesh. Death section of page Divya Bharti is not showing. It gets visible when you go for editing the page but doesn't appear after saving it.can you fix the problem? thank you Rpaigu (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

It's My Birthday!

My B'day Cake
Today is my birthday and I thought of sharing it with you!! Arnesh(২০১২) 06:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Audio File

Hi, want to know how to upload audio files here. can you post that on my talk page ? thank you. Rpaigu (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyvios

Do you have a list of problem articles for TV series as far as copyvios go -- not looking for POV spam stuff, just articles where copyvios get reinserted. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 04:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

There don't seem to be any problems as of now with copyvios. The ones those were noticed were removed and are not back again. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Pavitra Rishta, I had removed some and tagged for further copyvio check, but the copyvio check tags were repeatedly removed and the vios added back. I've protected now, but I'm guessing there's more like that. —SpacemanSpiff 08:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Silk Purse Award
I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Silk Purse Award in appreciation for your superb improvements to the Jitendra Joshi (Marathi actor) article, essentially changing what was seen as a sow's ear into a terrific silk purse. Far too often well-meaning editors nominate something for deletion without understanding how or where to look for suitable sources. Also far too often others might look at an article's current state and opine negatively, becuase issues had not yet been addressed by someone else. Thank you for your fine work in showing the errors inherent in not being diligent and in underscoring that we are a community trying to work together. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Saas Bina Sasural

I understand that why you deleted the trivia in Saas Bina Sasural but Wikipedia says: "Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases. It may be possible to integrate some items into the article text. Some facts may belong in existing sections, while others may warrant a new section. Integrate trivia items into the body of the article if appropriate. Otherwise, see if the trivia section contains sources for a particular aspect of the subject of the article, and then consider using the section items as basis for a different article discussing that aspect. Items that duplicate material elsewhere in the article, have no support from reliable sources, or lack real importance can be removed in most cases.

Research may be necessary to give each fact some context or to add references. Any speculative or factually incorrect entries should be removed; entries outside the scope of the article should be moved to other articles; and entries such as "how-to" material or tangential/irrelevant facts may fall outside Wikipedia's scope and should be removed altogether."

When replying please leave me a Tb template. --Arnesh(২০১২) 18:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

This section describes what should be done with sections in any article called "trivia" or by similar other names. But when i removed that para and wrote "trivia" in edit summary what i meant was that the section is trivial i.e. of little importance. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
OK! Then it's fine.--Arnesh(২০১২) 04:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Can you kindly do not change the Mohammed Iqbal Khan image this is the official team editing the page

Can you kindly do not edit and remove the Mohammed Iqbal Khan images, we are the official team and are managing the page please do not do mischief find other pages to mess around thank you www.miqbalkhan.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladyzaib (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Animesh can you kindly not remove the image from Mohammed Iqbal Khan

I am not sure what you are trying to do but please leave the image alone and stop removing it we are the official team and have asked by Iqbal Khan to add the image, it may be fun for you but kindly stop being malicious and leave the image alone we are just doing our job thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladyzaib (talk • contribs) 21:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please note that your so-called "official" status is completely irrelevant as is your statement that you are "doing our job". You have no ownership or special rights over the article and engaging in an edit war like this will get you blocked. The image you uploaded has been tagged as a copyright violation and will be deleted so adding it to the article is pointless really. Please read WP:3RR and WP:COI. QU TalkQu 21:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply to Copyvio

How i have violated just tell me that and are you a admin here Prajyot123 (talk) 10:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Okay Animeskulkarni as as i get time i will write it in my own words right now i am quite busy i will get time tommorrow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyot123 (talk • contribs) 10:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Animesh Now you can recheck the article Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke i have written the plot and the word limit is also correct now Prajyot Singh (talk) 12:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I don't do that crap of updating everyday and thanks for the final edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajyot123 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot i was in a hurry and i know that and thanks a lot for all the support you gave me Prajyot Singh (talk) 14:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Madhubala2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Madhubala2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

No source info?

Hey...you keep adding no source information tag to this image File:Madhubala2.jpg. What exactly do you want? The weblink to the source is given. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

The bot is looking for source information that isn't hidden inside a {{navbox}} template. There are standard templates such as {{non-free media rationale}} or {{information}} which are designed to present this information in a way that both humans and bots can read; there's no reason to use an unstructured template such as {{navbox}}. --Carnildo (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied in my talk page!

I have replied in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 07:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Help

How can one italicize the name of an article like Bade Achhe Lagte Hain's article title or name is italicized in the same way Byah Hamari Bahu Ka's title or name must be italicized. When replying please leave me a Tb template, like this {{Tb|username}} --Arnesh(২০১২) 07:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Joshi's Museum of Miniature Railway

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply to File:Malini Awasthi.jpg listed for deletion

Hi again Animesh please help me regarding this picture method Prajyot Singh (talk) 14:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Yes Prajyot Singh (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that there is an important discussion currently at the talk page of the article Shahrukh Khan. Since you have been involved in a prior dispute related to this, your views are welcomed here. With (hopeful) consensus, we can initiate a neutrality-aimed change in the said article. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Malini Awasthi.jpg

Thanks for the note- deleted. J Milburn (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Rahulmothiya's talk page.
Message added 14:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rahul Mothiya ( Talk ) 14:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Socratic barnstar

The Socratic Barnstar
For this pearl of wisdom. —SpacemanSpiff 20:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! :) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

LOL

DBigXray has given you a LOLipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

For your comment at Haweli Ek Paheli --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 21:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Wow! This is nice. Thanks! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Indic Scripts

Posted reply in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 15:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Please watch these...

Hi Animesh!!....from tomorrow I am going to take a Wikibreak, for nearly one moth, and I want you to watch (watchlist) some pages, which I have given a special space in my Watchlist. I have worked a lot to better these article. Some of these are protected, but vandalism still occurred by new users, so they were either indefinetly blocked or case(s) against them are ongoing. The protection of one article is gonna end n June 9, the second on June 10 and the other just after three weeks. Nearly all of them are soap opera articles. Recently an user (Dadjan) was blocked indefinetely for continuous didruptive edit on Bade Achhe Lagte Hain, so after the protection ends he may be back with a sockpuppet account or an IP address so please be aware. Anoter one (i.e. Byah Hamari Bahu Ka) is on a brand new serial so that may be extensively edited by IP address users or others, so please check on them too. One more things is that Yuvraj Uday Veer Singh (a character of Dekha Ek Khwaab) is not the male protagonist of the show. If anyone adds that just revert that edit, many users engaged in edit war regarding that so a case is ongoing against them, especially Seherali. The list articles are as follows:

You can find more article (created by me) here. Whenever replying please leave me a Tb template, like this: {{Tb|username}}. Please do not take any strict action until I come back, thank you for your cooperation. --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 10:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio cleanup

You have now been active on copyvio cleanup for a while, but it's a huge daunting task. Do you want to coordinate a small sub-project on the India group for that? Maybe we have a target of one category at a time, starting with something that's less patrolled but high on web copyvios like TV actors etc. I was thinking of doing something like this a while back, as I'm probably the only one from the India project who is active on CCIs, but always got sidetracked. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 17:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Sure... No problem. Would love that. So which category to start with? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Typically, most copyvios tend to be around film/tv, religion (especially around the sadhus and swamijis) and politicians. However, sometimes individual contributors take it to a separate level, e.g. Jpullokaran has messed up the entire set of articles around Thrissur with copyvios while Vrghs jacob has flooded government stuff with copyvios. A small category under film/tv may serve as a good starting point though as those are easier to find out (many blogs pick up the listings from the producers and makes our job easier). A starting point could be contributions from one of our anti-Bollywood Hungama sockmasters Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinujadhav. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 20:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess 2012

Thank You
With the help of contributors like you, the Tag and Assess 2012 project has achieved the planned objectives. Close to 65,000 articles have been assessed and 19,000 articles have been added to the scope of the project. Please do watch out for the post tag and assess activities. Thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

New to editing. Help needed

Hi Animesh

This is my first day of editing. Hence, wasn't able to understand what was going wrong with my editing of the Kunal Karan Kapoor page and also why the changes were disappearing. I now understand that one has to maintain neutral tone etc and cannot include subjective stuff.

But now the page has been reverted to a very very old version with incomplete info and not to the one that I had began editing the first time earlier today

A request:

Either kindly revert to the version of the page that i had began editing for the first time today or

Can u plz just edit my changes, removing the stuff that u believe is subjective and letting other stuff remain including the language and grammatical corrections

As i said, the current page displayed for Kunal Karan Kapoor is unfortunately not the one that i had seen earlier today and decided to edit. This is some very basic version which has most of the info wiped out

Looking fwd to yr support and help

Thanks Yashi Yashi Kp (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashi Kp (talk • contribs) 15:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Pittsburgh Irish Festival wiki-project tags

Hi, could you please review the 2 tags you placed at Talk:Pittsburgh Irish Festival? I don't quite see the relevance of the article to either project. Just double-check please, maybe leave a note at the article talk page if you confirm they should be there. Thanks! Zad68 19:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/No_Dada_No_KKR#No_Dada_No_KKR

Just a courtesy note to tell you I replied to you at the AfD. --Dweller (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: INCINE

Oh that's absolutely fine.. I was not at all serious about it... No worries and have a sip of Glenfiddich (if you do so). --Msrag (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


Highbeam Research

Hi. Not sure if you have applied for this or not but in a recent article on a 2004 independent Filipino movie I found this to be an incredible resource and found lots of Filipino newspaper articles not picked up by google. I strongly recommend this for anyone who edits articles on films and cinema personalities to get this asap as it wil be an invaluable research tool and will often turn up detailed articles which will not appear in google. You can gain access to the full articles by applying for it at Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications. For sure it'll have tons on Indian actors and films which so far you've been unable to access on google. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

FYI

FYI... It is WikiProject Biography and not WikiProject Biographies. Several things around here don't recognize "Biographies". "Biography" is also the name of the template and not one of its redirects. Bgwhite (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Aaha! Thanks for the note. But whats the difference? Template is same, categories it adds are same. Also if you can answer; why are few templates so sensitive with use of exact words. Like "WikiProject Albums" works, but "WikiProject Album" doesn't. Also "WP India" works but "WP Biographies" doesn't. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Ummm! "WP Biography" works. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
There is official template name, for example WikiProject Biography. All others are just redirects. WP Biography is a redirect that points to WikiProject Biography. There is something about "Biographies" that makes it act weird for some reason. It is best to use the proper template name, but alot of them are long and it is easier to just use the redirect. I personally have a AutoHotkey script on my windows machine. The script makes so I just press ctrl+c and WikiProject Cricket is added. My script is here. It is very, very simple to use. Download AutoHotkey here.

Help on finding Hindi Voice actors

Hello, Over the past few months, I've been trying to find some Hindi voice-dubbing artists of famous actors from foreign films, but I am having a hard time searching, since there is currently no Hindi dubbing database on the internet. Since you are an Indian Wikipedian and one of the present volunteer coordination participants on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force, Can you try to see if you can help me find these following Hindi voice artists? Here's what I want to find:

  • Who is the Hindi voice actor that dubbed over Adam Sandler's role as Michael Newman in the film, Click?
  • Who is the Hindi voice actor that dubbed over Mark Hamill's role as Luke Skywalker in the original Star Wars films from IV-VI?
  • Who is the Hindi voice actor that dubbed over Martin Jarvis's role as Sir Cosmo Duff-Gordon in Titanic? I know Namrata Sawhney gave Hindi voice to Kate Winslet's role as Rose DeWitt Bukater/Dawson in the movie, but who voiced Martin Jarvis's role as Gordon?

Once you find that certain artist, you can make a Wikipedia page about a certain Hindi voice artist, like how I did for some, but as long as you could possibly know a Hindi Dubbing Director, or might have already know the info about the Hindi voice actors of foreign films. Also, I am aware that some foreign films were dubbed in Hindi many years later, after their original theatrical release.

Plus, when it comes to finding these Hindi voice artists, you can add their date of birth and where they were born from as well.

I'm not Indian and I know this seems like a pretty big job, But if you are interested into Indian dubbing industries and can try to take this favor, Please try leave a talk message on my talk board and see if you can do anything about it. I've asked other people who are Indian Wikipedians and that are also involved in the Dubbing Industry, but I got no info from them yet. But, please leave me a message, when you can. Thanks.

You can also check out this List of Indian dubbing artists as well.

--BlueMario1016 (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Keep it up the great job...! Joset 20:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly agree with Joset. Been seeing alot of edits of yours and you are doing a great job. Bgwhite (talk) 23:46, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks both of you! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Thaynk You

Thanynk You. Your warning has been received and will be processed accordingly. In the meanwhile, please post all complaints on my complaints page. BLEAKGH - БЛЕАКЬ - بــلــكــغ - בּלכּג - 뱍가 - ᚷᚲᛇᛚᛒ 12:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Working Man's Barnstar
For having 10,000 edits to Wikipedia, you surely deserve this. I never gave you one so far, so this is the best occasion than anything else. Keep it up!! Thanks. - VivvtTalk 13:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Aaha!! Thanks a lot! Well.... for the 10K edits i should give credit to the Tag & Assess drive. Because of that my article edits look less than talk page edits giving impression that i am very talkative; which nevertheless is true. Also i can not forget all those dumb IPs and SPAs which i have been reverting since last 2 months on Indian TV show articles. Without their immense support this would not have been possible. Thanks! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Sounds like a Lifetime achievement speech LOL... just kidding :D Thanks. - VivvtTalk 19:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

AfD

This guys is crazy at AfDs. Look at this one here. He's put Delete and Keep together. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Pffft, that is nothing. My wife changes her mind hourly. Bgwhite (talk) 06:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah! Have tried talking with him. But seems he doesn't respond to it. Anyways... not a completely out of control case.
@Bgwhite: Well.... nothing to say. But to not dishearten you i would say that you are not alone. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
We;;, I think noone changes their mind as often as me. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Archiving talk pages

FYI... There is a bot that will automatically archive talk pages. The code is at the top of my talk page. Edit my page and it is the User:MiszaBot/config template. I have it set to save anything that is 30 days or older. It is probably best not to archive anything under 14 days old as the conversation may start up again or need to reference something. Bgwhite (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh yes! I know of such bot. But i archive when the page becomes big and i am bored of doing any other editing. Can you suggest any such moody bot? :) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Animesh, I am so sorry to bug you I seriously need some help and since I saw the film buff, I am trying to update this page and I am so new at this wiki stuff seriously confused could you please double check that I have done it right:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Iqbal_Khan, I was trying to add the photo, and also details on some show and a new film, are we allowed to add twitter details or not..please help really appreciate it tons god bless... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iffattejani (talk • contribs) 16:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Don the character

Hi, here is an article: Don (character) based on the lead from Bollywood's popular Don series. But one guy made it a redirect, claiming the character has no notability. U see bollywood films? U think the character is notable enough to have a separate article? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree with that guy. For having a separate article on a character, the character should be such notable that third-party sources should have commented on it. And note; comments should be on the character and not the actors playing it. If you can find such sources, you can call in notable. In today's situation you can start working on the paragraph "Don" in the article Don (film series). When it grows big and seems notable to separate, you can separate it out. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I mean the guy who says Don ko pakadna mushkil hi nahi, namumkin hai. Anyone who has seen his films can contribute to it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

useless reviews

there is some useless review site inserting their own reviews into wiki like in the article on Rowdy Rathore film. one line of the reviews section reads "film critics Pratik Borade gave Rowdy Rathore 4 out of 5 star, says, "Rowdy Rathore released today to Rock you, Entertain you, Superb Masala Movie. a total paisa vasul Movie, excellent action scene from Akshay. It's Akshay`s smashing comeback film as an action star. A Big Hug to Prabhudeva, Akshay and Sonakshi... The girl playing Chinki is so........ cute, don't miss to watch it. go to theater and enjoy it. "[32]". this is a useless review. kindly see that it is deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.217.185 (talk) 18:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Panipuri

Titodutta has invited you a for a plate of spicy Panipuri! Panipuri promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can give someone else a plate of Panipuri to spread Wikilove too!


To share a plate of Panipuri, simply add {{subst:Panipuri}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Sanaya Irani

Just thought I would ask for your opinion. I made some edits to Sanaya's page on 9th June, adding references, removing fan made information (I have only seen "Television's Barbie Doll" on forums during Google searches) and rewriting sections so that they sound better and make more sense. This has appeared to anger one fan (as I can only presume from his contributions), Saurabhkr wiki. Against my better judgement, after waiting a few days and posting on his talk page, I reverted back to the original version. This user had copied and pasted most of what I had written back on to the page anyway. Have I done the right thing?

Coolcool2012 (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Update - he has reverted the page (as expected) and has written this on my talk page. I understand neutrality may be an issue, but that is because I have not found any references to back any negative comments (such as " She was noticed in the film but didn't got popularity and success "). Maybe it does exist, but he should cite something... Anyway, I will probably leave her article for the time being to avoid an edit war with a serious fan.
Coolcool2012 (talk) 10:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Someone cleaned it before i reached there. I did other minor cleaning. But will keep an eye on this article. Thanks for the note. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks anyway, I get confused about how to deal with these types of editors! Coolcool2012 (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Opinion

Would you mind weighing in your opinion here. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 11:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Despite our disagreement, I nearly spat beer on my monitor while reading your "horse guy and mini fish" comment. Well played! kelapstick(bainuu) 11:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
And for the record, I don't take issue with your bringing it to ANI for closure (although maybe AN would have been more appropriate, but I am not sure), whatever the closure, I just felt it was better someone uninvolved do it. Crossing the Ts and dotting the Lower Case Js, as it were. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the star. At the end of the day one should know that Wikipedia doesn't literally kill you. In case of disagreement, remove it from your watchlist.
Hmm.... AN would have been a better place. Never mind! Had never started any topic in either of the ANs. Also thanks for introducing this term of Ts & Js. Never heard that! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Ts and Js is from Wayne's World 2.--kelapstick(bainuu) 21:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I thought Saint Matthew wrote that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

←It's all come full circle now, back to AfD! :D --kelapstick(bainuu) 07:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Box office of don 2 film

Don 2 was made in a budget of Rs 70 crs It collected a net profit of Rs 113 crs from India in Hindi , Tamil and Telugu versions ( this information is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_2#Domestic URL ) Then it made a profit of $11700000 ( Rs 58.5 crs ) from the overseas market ( this information is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bollywood_highest-grossing_films_in_overseas_markets URL ) So don 2 made a profit of Rs 171.5 crs over the budget of Rs 70 crs So don 2 grossed Rs 241.5 crs in India and overseas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashlalwani1993 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for all of your tireless contributions to Wikipedia. Hat's Up. :) Bharathiya (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the star! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Message

I redirected the Parichay - Naye Zindagi Kay Sapno Ka to Parichay (TV series) so off course then the speedy deletion notice, Thank you Fineuser (talk · contribs) 11:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

There is no need of redirect either. Hence the CSD tag. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

INCINE notification

Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Silk Smitha

Hello, we have the page Silk Smitha but she was an actress who is death and we don't have the Silk Smitha (character) That's the character of Vidya Balan.of The Dirty Picture Fineuser (talk · contribs) 12:52,23 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah! I know. But we don't need an article on that. We have those two articles which are sufficient enough. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Silk Smitha is not about the character of Vidya Balan so Silk (actress) has relationship with the silk (character).This is the character of film other silk is about an actress. Fineuser (talk · contribs) 05:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Mughal-e-Azam

Currently, the said article is rated as Stub/Start/C in its talk page. Could you take a look at it and see if a re-assessment is possible? Thanks! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 09:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

SIIMA

(I have listed 1st SIIMA award winners in first SIIMA awards section, I have explained it clearly in my edit summary, please dont vandalise this page, this is not content forking Paansing (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

We don't require two pages for one and same thing. Hence the articles are redirected. Do not revert them again. Or we might have to delete it completely and also get you blocked for vandalizing again and again. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

already discussed on the discussion page

Rv - I have listed 1st SIIMA award winners, this is not content forking, use brains, I have already discussed SIIMA awards section talks about what is SIIMA awards 1st SIIMA awards talks about winners, check IIFA awards and National Film Award articles Paansing (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

we need two pages

next year, 2nd SIIMA awards where on earth you will include, cant u understand what I am saying?? Paansing (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Make up your mind and say everything in one go! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Hi there. I see a lot of activity going on in WT:INCINE, which is growing day by day, only to make our expectations sky-high, especially with the signpost notification. As it stands, I am screwing up a big chunk of my work to take a peep in here, so I might not be as active as I used to be. Keep up the good work, and note that you have a right to remove stuff from your talk page as and when you like as long as you follow WP:REMOVED (you know what I mean). Secret of success (talk) 14:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Great to see you back. Was surprised to see your comment on the Sock investigation. Was just checking your contributions to know when you actually revived. Well... take your time. No rush! Its a year-long project. If you are finding it difficult to edit articles you can just stick to commenting on them. All our experienced editors seem busy in editing articles. One ring-master would be good to have. No! I didn't not understand the reference. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi aminesh, i hope I am doing this right, I am actually seeking help I am so new to this and I hope I have done it correctly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Iqbal_Khan I just wanted to update this page he is my favourite actor wanted to add a pic and also details on his film and current show just to bring it upto date could you pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee help n check that its okay and I have not broken any rules thanks so much all the best god bless u(Iffattejani (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC))

Indian film songs articles

If you get a chance, please express your opinion here. - VivvtTalk 17:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

FA Expansion of Kahaani

Hi Animesh, can you please have a look here and voice your opinions about the same. ...Msrag talk2me 12:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

I have protected the article N. R. Narayana Murthy again, and I am attempting to mediate a resolution on the talk page of the article. Since you have been involved in editing this article, I ask you to join the discussion so that a consensus can form. I'm sending this notice to all recent editors. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thanks so much for updating the mohammed iqbal khan page all the best and god bless u keep up the good work Iffattejani (talk) 09:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

thank you

thanks so much for the updating the mohammed iqbal khan page bless u bro..keep up the good work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iffattejani (talk • contribs) 09:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
Message added 18:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Can you take a look? —SpacemanSpiff 18:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sangeet Sharada

Hello! Your submission of Sangeet Sharada at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

FAC

Remember you reviewed Ra.One at the first FAC? Could you do that again? The process has stalled badly and is in dire need of more opinions right now, so I hope you can put your opinion out. Thanks! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Aa ha! The article has considerably changed since i last scrolled through it. Will have to re-read it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Award articles/templates by Noor119848

Hello Animeshkulkarni. I notice you've started a couple deletion discussions for articles and templates created by User:Noor119848. I don't know if you're aware, but that user (using that account and others, including User:Noormohammed satya) has created dozens of new, and for the most part unsourced, articles on Indian movie and television awards. If (unlike me) you have some familiarity with this subject area then I'd invite you to examine the other articles as well:

Possibly some or all of these also fail our notability and sourcing policies as well. I have a suspicion that the accounts were operated by a vandal known for adding false information to Indian TV and movie articles (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noormohammed satya) so perhaps even the claims in the sourced articles should be checked against the sources themselves. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh i see! I wasn't aware that they are proven socks. With their superb interest in Indian TV show article i am sure they are linked with some production company and hence are simply glorifying themselves. There are many such SPAs here. I will surely try and clean them. They will come up again. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
It's only a suspicion; SPI hasn't confirmed anything yet. But regardless, if you have some knowledge of Indian TV and movies it would be helpful if you could check over the contributions to make sure they don't contain falsehoods or self-promotion. Possibly more of the articles will need to be deleted due to non-notability, copyright violations, or inadequate sourcing. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Just so you are aware

I have mentioned one of your edits in a discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:User_pages#Recent_change. I think it was a correct edit, and I don't think that anyone would consider it incorrect, but I thought you might want to be aware. -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I could not go through the whole discussion there. Hence did not reply there. (Did not want "we-just-said-that" comment.)
The reason why i removed the redirect was because i assume that semi-automatic applications like Twinkle, Huggle, etc. create some problem here. While editors want to issue warnings to the User on his User talk:Engology, many of them had issued it on the article talk page Talk:Engology including the welcome note. They could very well look before they leapt. But i don't blame them completely as they are all used to not having such problems. And i also thought the user actually wasn't aware of what they were doing. Hence i removed that redirect. Let them enjoy the God granted user page of their own! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
yes it is now 2 long discussions about whether it is or is not appropriate for a user page to be redirected to article space and if we can agree on that, whether it is worthwhile to "codify" that agreement in the guideline. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Simplicity is the best policy. Keep both pages separate. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Drpremrajpushpakaran

On similar lines, there is this user User talk:Drpremrajpushpakaran who creates his own article User:Drpremrajpushpakaran/sandbox in sandbox. The article-space article has been previously deleted. Do we keep such articles? The User doesn't do anything else than self-promotion. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

as far as keeping "draft" articles in user space its covered here WP:STALEDRAFT. i would put the {userspace draft} tag on it and notify the user and then in a month or so if there has been no attempt to improve it with third party references nominate it for WP:MFD. -- The Red Pen of Doom 10:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
it didnt look like he had been formally told about the way wikipedia views conflict of interest, so i left the {subst:uw-coi} notice on his talk page. -- The Red Pen of Doom 10:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Okay! Thats good. Thanks. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
it appears that User talk:RHaworth is familiar with this case and has expedited the matter. i had not realized the user has multiple times re-re-re-created the article!-- The Red Pen of Doom 11:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
wow. you can say one thing for that guy, he is persistent! he has recreated it at least twice more since we started talking. -- The Red Pen of Doom 07:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah! "Men get such hardons from putting their names on things. You guys don't grow up. It's like you need to pee on everything."
He is also on Commons uploading his image. File:Dr prem raj p.jpg. Hey... i guess the old AFD article was not created by this user. I don't know who did. Maybe someone somewhere is still duplicating this stuff. Can you please check that? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
i dont have admin rights to see deleted histories, but you could ask an admin to temporarily recreate the first version in one of your user subpages while you do some sleuthing. if the version is not slanderous, they will frequently do that. and then when you have found what you needed, you can have it deleted again. -- The Red Pen of Doom 08:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh! I was since ages under an impression that you were an admin. Did not bother to check. Will ask RHaworth then. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drpremrajpushpakaran - if you have any additional evidence. -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force

. —Vensatry (Ping me) 10:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sangeet Sharada

Graeme Bartlett (talk 00:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Sorry for the category goof up on my sandbox. I'd forgotten that I'd pasted the Pratigya article there to work on it. Thanks for hiding the categories! Coolcool2012(talk to me) 16:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Rachel_Chatterjee

Hi Animesh:
I've taken care of two tags (BLP and Peacock) that you have added to the article Rachel_Chatterjee. Please look at this diff and evaluate your tags again. If needed, please add them back and leave me a note so that I can address other concerns. Thanks. EngineerFromVega★ 10:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Good job! But have added few citation needed tags. I could not open two links. Maybe my server problem. Hence have also tagged them as dead. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Great. Somehow, one of the link is dead, but another one you tagged as dead is still alive. I've removed the dead link now.
By the way, thanks very much for looking at this article. I came across it while fixing some disambiguation links and found it in a bad state. It looks a bit better now. EngineerFromVega★ 13:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah! It worked now. It was not responding then. Maybe some server problem.
Oh no! Thank you for cleaning it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series)

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I challenged your WP:CSD A10 on List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series). The article is more then a year old and contains significant content not present at the other page, thus it is not eligible under criteria A10. You may want to look at Wikipedia:Merging. Monty845 13:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry! But i don't see you in the [Special:ListUsers/sysop|Admins list]]. And if you are not one, removing the tag is not the way to contest it. Click on the "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" button which takes you to the article's talk page and then express your concerns there. Please revert your removal of the tag. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Any editor other then the articles creator may contest a speedy deletion tag by removing it. From the top of WP:CSD "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. Only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so." You are of course free to start a WP:AFD if you still think the article should be deleted A10, but I don't think it will end in that result. Monty845 14:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
You could still use the talk page to state your reason. I dont mind you talking with me on my talk page. But then how will other editors come to know of what is happening? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
The concept of Speedy Deletion is that it is for use in situations where there is nothing to discuss; For articles that so clearly need to be deleted that no one who understands Wikipedia policy could reasonably argue against deletion; in other words, uncontroversial deletion. Thus, any editor may remove a speedy deletion tag if they disagree, with the exception of the article author. At which point, if there is still a need to discuss whether the article should be deleted, the matter can be raised for a full discussion at WP:AFD. Monty845 14:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
All i am saying is say whatever you want to say on the article's talk page. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

"Blogs are not reliable messages"

These blogs are sources, who have first hand knowledge of the person and his village. You cannot edit out the book which was the third reference

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For showing great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 12:21, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:28, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Vishal Deshraj

I believe that I am editing very finely and Iam requesting you to stop including my name in sock puppetry case. I can also block you from editing. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Be my guest! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
And you can always defend yourself at the case. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I am block you now. Your include my name in sock puppetry case when I tell you that I were editing very finely and very goodly. You want my block to be your guest. so Iam blocked from editing you AnimeshKulkarni. §§VishalDeshraj (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varun Kashyap (talk • contribs) 16:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Help on Kerala

Sir, This place is near Pathanamthitta city and somewhere near Aranmula village. So I guess this Kadammanitta which falls in the new village called padayani village should fall in the Kozhencherry Taluk of Pathanamthitta district. http://pathanamthitta.gov.in/Administration1.htm . Always at your service. Thank you. --Bharathiya (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Rajesh Khanna photo

I was just about to post on the India noticeboard asking for a photo. Thanks for putting it up! Lynch7 09:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I tried searching his free images on commons. But did not find any. So uploaded this one. It can be deleted when free image is available. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
& we now have two images!!! File:Rajesh khanna in Anand movie.jpg §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Its a non-free image again; should be deleted. Lynch7 10:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Both are non-free. We will have to nominate them and then see which one should remain. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Just nominate the one you don't like :P Lynch7 10:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
That would be the one that i did not upload because i am ready to defend my image even against a current free-image of Khanna. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry for interrupting you guys,but i think both the non-free images only should get delete when we find even a single free image from commons.So keep these till we find a new one.Thank You -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 16:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Image of rajesh khanna

Anand is not the only film of Rajesh Khanna. There are many more handsome looking Khanna's images available. In 169-1975 section - images from films like Aap Ki Kasam, Prem Kahani or Mehboob Ki Mehendi can be put and for 1979-1991 section - images from Kudrat or Rajput or Souten can be put.Onceshook1 (talk) 10:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

We've got no free images; I don't think putting up more non-free images is advisable - they'd get deleted. Lynch7 10:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Spellings

I am changing the spellings as per telugu transliteration. looks like @User:DRAGON BOOSTER is using tamil spellings. He cant distinguish between Ta, Tha, sa and Sha. Can you please help.Nagarjuna198 (talk)

Sorry! I don't know Tamil as well as Telugu. Whatever are your opinions of right spellings you can put on the article's talk page along with reliable sources supporting it. Thats the way to decide which is the right spelling. Check what newspapers, films poster, DVD covers, films website, other reliable websites, etc. are using. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
check Shubh Vivah and Shubham is spelling in telugu as well as sanskrit word and you can see the transliteration for శుభ లగ్న౦.
What spelling other works use does not matter. What spelling this particular work uses matters. Or else we would not have Diwana (1968 film) and Deewana (1992 film) or Hum Kisise Kum Nahin and Hum Kisise Kum Naheen and so on. With your logic "Vivah" should also have two As per Ek Vivaah... Aisa Bhi. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
In telugu movie name is written as శుభ లగ్న౦ which transliterates to Shubha Lagnam. However there are some sources which write english spellings as "Subha lagnam" and some "Shubha Lagnam". Since there is conflict in sources, I decided to go with original Telugu spelling's(శుభ లగ్న౦) transliteration. Nagarjuna198 (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 20:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I've added a few free images to Commons:Category:Rajesh Khanna, there are more available at BH, so if you find any that meets our OTRS ticket requirements, feel free to upload. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 20:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
I actually had planned to challenge that on grounds that no free equivalent showing Khanna in his young age is available referring WP:NFCC#1. And he is known as an actor only from his young age. What do you say? Should i do that? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Filmographies

Hi, I am sure you are aware of WP:NLIST. Do you have any idea whether some exception to it has been created for filmographies? Particularly in relation to India, where actors seem to have a phenomenal output, there are often long lists of unsourced and unlinked films. I rather think that these should be pruned per NLIST even though that means they are no longer a definitive filmography but rather a selected one.

We really should not rely much on IMDb but, of course, IMDb does usually appear in the External Links section & so anyone who is really interested in seeing a (purported) full list can still get to it. - Sitush (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)General consensus at AfD seems to fly in the face of NLIST on stuff related to films, fiction etc. —SpacemanSpiff 04:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I should have been more specific, sorry. I was referring to embedded lists. Dara Singh has somewhere over 100 titles listed, very few of which are linked and the vast majority of which were "B-grade". That assessment comes from an interview in the dreaded ToI with Mumtaz: she says that she began acting with him around 1963 (11 years after his debut) and that he was sometime doing 30 movies a year - I cannot see many of those ever being notable, and I've seen similar stuff elsewhere. - Sitush (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict)For such "hardworking" personalities we usually have a small list of notable works on their own article but we also keep a separate article that has all works. Eg: Rajnikanth#Notable_filmography and Rajinikanth filmography. Similar is the case for Hollywood; Meryl_Streep#Selected_filmography and Meryl Streep filmography. Ofcourse this will be seen only in well-maintained articles. For "not-so-hardworking" personalities we include all works, notable or not, on their own article. As to your IMDb's point i agree. Our workforce needs to buckle up & start adding inline citations to all entries from reliable sources. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 04:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh! For B grade films.... that did not cross my mind now. Well.... Most of the stuff on actor's article has to be kept under the pressure of fans. You remove, they add it back. (Some fans keeps updating the date of release of future films in these tables; ofcourse unsourced. They even come up with exact date of 2013. They also insist on adding if the film is currently in pre-production, filming, editing or casting stage. Glad they don't know all stages of film making.) Back to your point; it needs to be sourced, no matter what. If the sourced list is still long, we can create a separate article. I doubt that will happen. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Hm. So combining your point with SpacemanSpiff's, a separate article listing mostly unsourced, unlinked B-grade movies would be ok? Wow. This is a weird world and that is another reason to add to my growing list of why I really, really should stop wasting my time on Wikipedia and go do something useful with my life. I really cannot see me being around come December. - Sitush (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Ah. Seen your addendum now. I should prune things at Dara Singh, then. Alas, there is currently a debate regarding how much more I can do on that for a few hours. - Sitush (talk) 05:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Its better to visit such articles after the fan-fever has gone. Give it 1-2 weeks. Just cut down extreme hyperboles and peacock feathers. That's the reason i did not debate much with User talk:Yaara dildaara and revert their edits. Also don't go near Rajesh Khanna now. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
If I come across much more of this crap then I won't be around in a couple of weeks! Honestly, this place is just going really wrong, really fast. I know that there has been a perceived long-term decline but there are suddenly a host of regulars in the India sphere who are mulling the idea of moving on. Given how poor the sphere is in the first place, the crazy WMF expansion plans and terrible implementations such as the IEP, if a few such as I walk away then Indic content on Wikipedia really will become a mess. While no-one is indispensable etc, there really isn't much depth here: there are us few regulars (most of whom have large edit counts and a certain mutual respect even in disagreements) and a tidal wave of trouble from which, very occasionally, a surprising piece of flotsam emerges. Is Wikipedia broken? Probably not but the Indic aspect of it may very well soon be. - Sitush (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh no! Don't loose hope and give up now. It principally sound wrong, but we have to lower our standards. Not for ever. But at least to get started. Its like we are teaching people. We can not directly start with differential and integration when these people cant do simple multiplication-division. Start with basics like formatting and no-trivia and then move to bigger BLP issues of extra-marital affairs, controversies, religion and caste. It sounds wrong, but it might work. I haven't been much successful yet but it might work. When we go with our brooms and clean everything it annoys them and hence they close their eyes and do not see how a real encyclopedia can be beautiful.
If you are really frustrated, go and edit something different for a while. Keep an eye on your regular articles. Keep coming in 4-5 days and revert all non-sense to the latest version of yours. I will now start cleaning Dara Singh's filmography. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I've just had 4/5 days off and it was a nightmare caching up on a 1600 page watchlist. Btw, we are using dmy dates at Singh's article (template at top). - Sitush (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Seen what you are doing and appreciate it greatly. Some of the stuff was in my sights but I am wary of trigger-happy admins seeing a 3RR breach where none exists, as happened to Sodabottle. That encyclopedia of films looks to be very useful. - Sitush (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah! That Gulzar and others' Encyclopedia is a nicely written book. It doesn't simply write about films one by one. But it has era-wise description. Even going by ages it does not simply write about the whole product film, but notes changes that happened by time in music, lyrics, screenwriting, censorship, influences, etc. It also has small biographies of artists. Its real encyclopedia. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:12, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I am back

Hi Animesh..you may be remembering "Jagadhatri"! Yes, I am back after 2 months with a brand new name Tamravidhir...just informing!! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 10:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Glad to see you! I noticed that yesterday itself when you redirected your User pages. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry I lost some data!--Tamravidhir(২০১২) 10:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I missed Wiki like hell...by the way what happened in these days!? Curious...... --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 10:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Well! Nothing much. But you would be glad to know that many socks are now blocked or are being blocked. See these SPIs.
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Hamza, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vibhas Kashyap/Archive, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noormohammed satya/Archive. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey that's thumbs up Great! Even I, before going offline made an admin to block a vandal indefinetly....and that has worked...that was what made me to change my name for the fear that may turn against me..use my personal info..so I had my user page deleted..i rv my personal details and changed my name!! Phew!! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hamza is likely Akshata Sen. I blocked a lot, but stopped after that as it was getting too annoying to do anything without CUs checking for sleepers. Normally a few socks in play at a time, it's an incredible waste of time. —SpacemanSpiff 11:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit conflict!! ::::::Hey I was do collecting evidences against User:Noor119848 as I noticed his sock puppet - "User:Noormohammed satya" long back...and User:Mr Hamza is insane! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Peer review 59th National Film Awards

With not significant response received for the PR, what do you think would be the next step? I tried contacting couple of reviewers other than INB, who had worked on academy award FLs but did not get any reply at all. So now shall we push it for FL (Does not matter for me even if it fails!) or inform at WP:INB? - Vivvt • (Talk) 13:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Put it for FL. Someone will have to review it then. We did our best from the PR. Anything remaining there? They said rephrase sentences. But which? Everyone will have some sort of phrasing in mind. How are we to guess that and strike bingo? Put it now and it will start in a month or so. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I don't think anything is remaining but then we are the editors so we may not find anything. Article has already started giving me a limbo feeling!! Lets push it for FL. Que Sera, Sera... - Vivvt • (Talk) 14:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
That alt on the article is funny. Why would somebody add like that??? - Vivvt • (Talk) 14:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Right! I said that in the PR. People should say more than "improve it". But i guess no one even read that.
Hey! Alt is supposed to be for the people who can't see image. That way the alt should describe the image. See WP:ALT. For Denmark's flag they give example of "alt=A red flag divided into four by a white cross slightly offset to the left." §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Btw, i cant see that alt coming up when i move the pointer on it. I mean for Chatterjee's and Logo's image. But i can see it on gallery's all images. Whats wrong? Can you see it? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I know what does alt do and I can see it as well. - Vivvt • (Talk) 14:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Desi Girlz

Really? If it's true it needs clean up though, and at least some refs. Never heard of it myself and can't find any refs. —SpacemanSpiff 05:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Even i couldn't find any. Seems to be editors way of fulfilling their fantasy. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The tale of two lost....

Books will not last forever but they do keep us happy for the short time they stay with us..
Books will not last forever but they do keep us happy for the short time they stay with us..

History...it is not just a piece of a past written on papers..but it is a thing which is to inspire the next generations for years to come..it is a thing to feel...thing to love and admire at. Literary history, political history, economical and social history, architectural history, archaeological history and more...so please do your bit to promote history..as the ambitions related to it are going low....

Let the glory of the Taj never fade!
Let the glory of the Taj never fade!

Heritage....is not just a piece of masonry...but our culture, mannerisms, ideologies, food habits, religion and more....so please do your bit to conserve it....

Just an initiative led by me - a history buff and heritage lover - to promote the diverse culture of India, which is diminishing its glory amidst foreign cultures....

Go, spread this message to others...but the choice lies upon you

Yours faithfully --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Help required

Hey Animesh, I saw that the article of upper krishna project was in a pathetic state with no single ref, I am trying to improve it but I could only find 2 links with some good information(although its a very ambitious project,I grew up reading about it). My question is can we use the data/tables from KBJNL in the article without altering it? KBJNL is a nodal agency created to implement this project.--sarvajna (talk) 18:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

We have to use the data/tables from that source without altering it. But i know that you this very well. So please tell me where have i not understood you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I just wanted to confirm, moreover KBJNL is a govt agency created to implement this project so I just wanted to know your opinion once -sarvajna (talk) 01:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh! So you wanted to know if the source can be considered as reliable because it sort of becomes self-published? Well... these are just numbers and government data would be considered as reliable here even though it is self published. But in case there is another source, say some newspaper or something contradicting it, or Maharashtra government putting some different figures then too we should put all figures clearly stating which source says what. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
can you assess UKP ?--sarvajna (talk) 12:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello, When we nominate articles for afd from a same Album or Film, can't we add those to a single page; so it would be easy for users to vote. And when we sure about notability issue, for articles like Tera Deedar Hua, Paisa paisa, Dil Jale; won't the wp:PROD process more appropriate and easy than Afd. Thabnk you! -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 16:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh yes! We can do that. I should have done it that way. But i simply used Twinkle and it does not give such option. Lazy me!!
And yes! PROD would be easy too. But recently i have had experiences with fans, SPAs, etc. and PRODs are just easily dePRODed by these SPAs and IPs. I simply waste my 2-3 days hoping it works and then some ip comes and removes it without even giving reason. Even if we are not aware of any logical reason that this IP has, we sure know that someone out there doesn't want this article to be deleted for whatsoever reason. Hence i have started going for the final kill. But i suppose that too doesn't always work. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hmmm, then its better to just merge if needed and Redirect (clear cases). -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 09:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Practically yes! That would be a time saver. But i don't like that also. That way we will have plenty useless random Hindi lines redirecting to various Hindi film articles. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)Why cant you revert dePROD by anon? It would anyway restore the same time. I am loosing hope on AfD and RfD anyway.
Quoting from WP:PROD, "You are encouraged, but not required, to also: Explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion" and "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a proposed deletion tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith". and blah blah. All in all, AfD is/was the best solution. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I had gone thru this so I know it does not help. - Vivvt • (Talk) 12:53, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
See! They redirected this. As if someone is gonna type "Beautiful" and then start bracket and then type "Bombay Rockers song" and then close the bracket. And all of this has to be EXACTLY like this. Even if bracket is square, it won't work. Even if apostrophe is added after Rockers (which grammatically should be added), it won't work. Even if song's S is capital, it won't work. They don't call Admins cranky for no reason. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Merger close

Any plans to take a look at this? Secret of success (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

One support, one weak support, one neutral and two opposes. I don't know how to close it. I am also waiting on following mergers for lack of opinions or no clear consensus.
You can of course ask some Admin to close them atleast as "No Consensus" if needed. I don't find myself fit for that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Well, the admin will only close the discussion, and someone else has to merge the content (a notice will be left on top depicting the consensus). Secret of success (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh right! It did not strike me before. I guess that's the reason why Merger proposals don't get listed anywhere in any alerts. Then Admins will have to merge the articles if there is such consensus.
I don't mind actually merging if the result is so deduced by someone else. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Ok then. I'll do it. Do you know the name of the template which is used to close merger discussions? Secret of success (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Is there any specific template for that? Don't know. I have been doing it this way. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:50, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
As it was mostly uncontroversial, I've done it. Please do the needful. Secret of success (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done. So now only Talk:Goa_(film)#Merger_proposal is left. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Lonely....

Can you please suggest a good article which I can edit?..now - at this moment - I don't have any...Vibhijain gave me List of Chief Ministers of West Bengal, DBigXray gave me Bhood..and I am done with them...please suggest some or at least one! Thank you so much! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 13:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes..please check this out - Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Collaborations of the month/Nominations and check out for my nominees...Thanks.... --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 14:01, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Hahahah! Sad to know that you feel lonely. But good to know that you can now work on some articles. If interested, in continuation of cleaning of TV serials, you can start cleaning TV actors. They are filled with all sorts of gossips. Even if famous and truly notable, their articles are all mess. Or else there is one big task that all Film editors have to start soon. Refer the discussion "Filmographies" just above here User_talk:Animeshkulkarni#Filmographies. All entries of filmographies need to be sourced. Especially for actors who have worked in lesser known and B-grade films.
Thanks for the INCOTM link. But such collaborations don't suit me. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Stree

Hi, I see that this film was an entry made by India to the Oscars in 1961. I could not find any online source on the fact. If possible can you come up with some offline sources. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Check your Wikipedia email:

  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 00:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Divya Bharti

Please check references whether those are reliable or not. The overall coverage is pretty thorough.It would be so nice if you tell the other requirements so that i could wrote it in GA level. Thank You 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 09:18, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied you at Talk:Divya_Bharti#Unreliable_and_fake_sources. That's a horrible article. Have you introduced all those fake sources? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Actually,i didn't developed the article so,confused what sources to add.One of the major problem is she died a long long ago,so finding proper sources is definitely big hurdle.Of course it's not even a C-class article i agree and It is failed once.Can you tell me any link or tool or related stuffs that could help to find 15-20 years back news or something.For now don't revert it to this version because again there will be big problem to rewrite.It is written with some good grammar. I can only request you to wait till find some working sources. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 14:15, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry! No way am i wasting my time again in cleaning that article. I have restored it to a cleaner and better non-POVy non-Peacocky version. Anyone is free to add missing data back, but with proper references. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate your hard work.I'm trying to find sources but failing again and again.Wont add newspaper related stuff,since i dont consider them as reliable for cinema articles.Do tell if you came to know from where to find sources for those who are died a long ago.Thank You.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 07:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
If there are no sources, we can't do anything about that. Also there is a fairly good chance that those things didn't actually happen and hence there are no sources for it. Also somethings are so trivial and gossipy, even if sourced they will be removed for not being encyclopedic. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I found some sources but confused whether to add or not.Those are from her official website.But as she died its again problem if those are referable --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 08:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
If in doubt, you can always post on talk divya bharti and request their views before adding. --DBigXray 11:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Which website? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
this one.Website claims that its a official website of her. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS☣ 08:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Doesn't seem like its her "official website" to me. Will try and find out more. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Agree with Animesh this is obviously a fan made website(see page bottom). however the Stardust interviews etc can be used as a reference from a mirror source (WP:Mirror) provided, the website has not changed the articles before publishing. That site is not very reliable consider looking for other sources wherever applicable.--DBigXray 11:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Reply

No it was not that I was indulging in glorification of Rajesh Khanna. I had only mentioned the missing fact which particular user terms it glorification! I had put the reference of http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/shabana-azmi-rajesh-khanna-picture-of-contradictions/1/209125.html Here Shabana herself acknowledges that they had together as a pair 7 successful films. They formed a great pair onscreen in eighties - http://entertainment.in.msn.com/gallery.aspx?cp-documentid=4155691&page=7. Surprising that even with references, some people start bullying and remove facts!Shabana acted with many actors but that were not successful at box office. Naseruddin Shah and Rajesh Khanna were the only actors with whom she had successful on screen pairing in more than a film.Onceshook1 (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Tamravidhir's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tamravidhir(২০১২) 17:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi I have edited sanjeeda shaikh wikipedia page because the edit version of yours lacked information. You have removed the list and information of her TV endorsements from the page. If my style and format is not valid then I request you add the information of the TV ads in her page as you are aware of the format but please dont totally delete the endorsement information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.76.122.71 (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Help needed

I recently cleaned up soaps' articles extensively, added information and references. But I am unable to summarize the plot of Bade Achhe Lagte Hain. I would request you to do so but I would also suggest to read the plot once and then do it as all mentioned things are needed but without repeated or excessive things. When replying please leave me a Tb template. Thank you so much! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 10:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

More Languages

Not sure but Am i correct here , yes i know i am being too WP:BOLD but I guess that will be good for the Wikipedia as people are looking for editors who can translate little things when needed. :) --DBigXray 20:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

That's okay! But wrong. Have corrected it now. I can read Sanskrit, anyone who knows Devanagari can i suppose. But i don't understand it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, but Western Editors are not aware of this fact above about Sanskrit which we take as an obvious assumption. Glad that you did not revert me ;) --DBigXray 13:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please reply

Did you overlook my last message? If then here it is again. Please reply.

"I recently cleaned up soaps' articles extensively, added information and references. But I am unable to summarize the plot of Bade Achhe Lagte Hain. I would request you to do so but I would also suggest to read the plot once and then do it as all mentioned things are needed but without repeated or excessive things. When replying please leave me a Tb template. Thank you so much! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 10:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)"

Thank you. --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry i missed it! I don't think i will ever read that huge essay. Sorry for not being of any help. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:) this happens when we have such a long talk page time for Archiving ;)
Saw your SPI's good work. the last one was amusing, liked the way you bluntly placed the truth. --DBigXray 15:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Mumtaz

Nick name of Mumtaz is Mumu as can be seen on numerous sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.78.161 (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Nickname of Mumtaz is undoubtedly Mumu as can be verifed by various articles in the print media as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.78.161 (talk) 09:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

A great and grand success....

Moment of Joy!
What brought me to Wikipedia was the lack of information in the article of Meera. In mid-April 2012, after spending nearly 3 and a half months, I planned to add to those article which are seldom edited by others. Those included the Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad, articles related to it and soap opera articles. Soap operas are ongoing so I have to edit them daily but the article on the Nawabs is a piece of history...and I took up the work alone. Later, in May some editors helped me to fix typos and grammatical errors, but soon withdrew back their help. But, by God's grace I finished with the work today on 4 August 2012 and would love to share this success with you! My condition was same as the flying man in the pic, trying to catch a several things at the same time before it's too late. I don't know whether he succeeds or not, bu I did succeed! However, I still have to add some references and summarize the plots of soap opera articles in the soap opera articles. If you want, then you can help. Thank you for all who helped me all these days...thank you again! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Review of the following needed
list
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Thank you! --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 11:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

inre Paisa Paisa

Your points about the term being abiguous were well made, and I had absolutely no expectation that the AFD would close as no consensus. That deed being done, I would have no issue with it being renominated in a month or two. In the meantime, I moved the article to a more precise title Paisa Paisa (2009 song) to address your concerns about other uses of the term by films, musical artists, or game shows... and then set up a proper dab page at Paisa Paisa (disambiguation). I do not expect any new artcles, and would be surprised if any came forward... except maybe for the game show. But at least now anyone wondering how and where the term is used will know. Rather than await a second AFD, I think a bold redirect of the surviving Paisa Paisa (2009 song) to the De Dana Dan article at its theme song section would likely not find any opposition, and the dab page will send readers to whatever other articles exist with the term Paisa Paisa set in context. Shall I be bold and see what shakes out of the trees? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Let's see. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you MichaelQSchmidt for your help in adding a DAB page, Although you were dealing with a foreign language phrase your comments at the AFD are sensible and I fully agree with them. @Animesh people do expect to get a content for such things. The song Paisa paisa may be non notable by wiki standards, (Although notability for Indian/bollywood songs is not yet defined) but it is clearly a popular song. so Michael's solution was indeed appreciable.--DBigXray 22:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The way I determine, when a DAb page serves the readers it is not always limited to only those topics with articles. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Panipat

Hi AK. Looks like the discussion was closed. Re your question, an interview article of the DNA sort essentially just quotes the author and. in that sense, is not independent. I don't remember the Indian Express article but suspect it was along the same lines. Ideally, we would like to see several independent sources discuss the book before it is worth writing up an article. --regentspark (comment) 21:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

for copyediting article created by me. Rayabhari (talk) 12:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

For this feat hope you keep contributing and add-up several digits. Cheers DBigXray 13:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force.
Message added 14:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Made changes as you suggested.Feel free to comment :) TheStrikeΣagle 14:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

RFA

Hi,

Please do not move the comments of other editors between sections in RFAs, as you did here. This comment was intended to be humourous, and was placed in the support section deliberately. If you believe that a comment is in the wrong section in future, please ask the person who left it rather than moving it yourself. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Well... seems i wont be nominated in any of the comedy awards this year. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
LOL I can give you one for the one above. :o) --DBigXray 13:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Am cool now. Will ask for it if i need one when some admin asks me to read some huge essay. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Please help me

Animesh I came on Wikipedia to make it a better encyclopedia and my work is near end. I may not be much active for the coming weeks and the coming month. My edit count per day is going to drop. I have worked day and night to reach my goal which is not far away. I am done. I may hardly sit on the net and log in here and remove vandalism and update soap opera articles. But when I will not be there what will happen? I am saying this as there is no one else who keep vandalism away from those articles. I am alone and if I will not be there it is gone. I have asked many users for help but in vain. I hope a yes from you. If you are interested in watching (watch listing) the following articles, track vandals and try to update them then please reply on my talk page. Don't make me sad and neither do it just for the sake of making me happy. The list of the articles is as follows (the list may be a little big) but only some of them are edited regularly):

list
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
  1. Samta (India)
  2. Kathgola
  3. Motijhil
  4. Jafarganj Cemetery
  5. Khushbagh
  6. Hazarduari Palace
  7. Chawk Masjid
  8. Fauti Masjid
  9. Nizamat Imambara
  10. Wasif Manzil
  11. Namak Haram Deorhi
  12. Madina Mosque
  13. Clock Tower of Murshidabad
  14. Madan Mohan Jiu Temple
  15. Metropolitan Building
  16. Sarat Chandra Kuthi
  17. Shobhabazar Rajbari
  18. Nashipur Rajbari
  19. Nashipur Akhara
  20. Tourism in West Bengal
  21. Tourist attractions in West Bengal
  22. Jahan Kosha Cannon
  23. Bachhawali Tope
  24. Mansur Ali Khan
  25. Mubarak Ali Khan (Nawab of Bengal)
  26. Zain-ud-Din Ali Khan
  27. Sahibzadi Shajar Ara Begum
  28. Sarat Chandra
  29. Samta
  30. Samata
  31. Metropolitan Building
  32. Motijheel (disambiguation)
  33. Chawk Mosque (disambiguation)
  34. Template:Tourist attractions in Kolkata
  35. Template:Tourist attractions in Murshidabad
  36. Category:Tourist attractions in Murshidabad

Others are:

I have also asked Vyom25 and DBigXray for the same. Thank you --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 07:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Would you like to comment here - Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Vidyasagar Setu, Kolkata, India --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 07:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
I have added them in my watchlist. So will keep an eye on them whenever possible. For the FP; i don't understand much about pictures and hence won't comment on it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for my immature replies & stubbornness when you were trying to notify me about wikipedia's rules. At that time I was new here and all my first edits were rougue and immature, once again, I'm really sorry for the silly replies and I kindly request you to forgive me. PS. Due to my username change, you might have previously known me as Pearz25
Farah Desai Khan** (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

विकिपरियोजना भारतीय टेलीविजन

I saw your Hindi language userbox and thought that you might want to join us and our wikiproject on the Hindi Wikipedia. On the English wikipedia you have put tons of good work into Indian television related articles, and it would be great if you could do the same for the Hindi Wikipedia!:) our articles are in very poor condition and could use some help -even if its a few edits once in a while. I really hope that you will join us.
--Farah Desai Khan** (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Thats okay! Better late than never.
But now i don't edit TV serial related articles. Just biographies maybe. Although i speak, read and write Hindi i wouldn't bother myself with typing it. That's quite cumbersome. But thanks for the offer. Am sure there are better editors on Hindi Wikipedia who would help. Good Luck with the new project.
And btw, isn't television called दूरदर्शन in Hindi? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I guess दूरदर्शन is the proper word, but टेलीविजन is more used and accepted in the Hindi wiki, -maybe because nobody has challenged it yet. Our biographies on actors and actresses are also in poor condition, and we don't have much of them in hindi. As for typing, I also thought it would be a bummer, but I use this, it really helps, you can download it onto your computer and you can set it to automatically convert Latin to Devanagari, maybe you could try it. Anyway there are editors on the English wiki that edit Indian television articles, but their language, grammar and syntax is poor and I believe it would be better for them to edit in hindi, even if you don't join our project, I would really really appreciate it if you direct them to it :) --Farah Desai Khan** (talk) 21:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

GAN review needed

I recently nominated Nawabs of Bengal & Murshidabad for GA but the review has still not started. We still have time. I would like you to edit the article and drive it to the path of GA. Please help me, it will be so kind of you. It will also add one number to the total number of GA article Wikipedia has. Please help me! If replying please leave me a talk-back template. I have asked some other editors for the same. Thank you ! Tamravidhir(২০১২) 12:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

NFA

With only 9 articles left for cleaning out of 90 NFA articles, get started with 4 of these. I will work on rest 5 and we are done with NFAs till 60th NFA. You know from where to copy the format template. I've sent you an excel for better reference. - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm done for articles from my side!! - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm done for all NFA articles. Can you believe this? . Thanks for your help. - Vivvt • (Talk) 02:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Indian Cinema Task Force in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on the Indian Cinema Task Force for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Help

I want to join assessment team for Maharashtra related articles. Sujitkumartalk 08:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Sujit for your interest in assessment related activities, but as i have seen your edits I feel that you are a new editor who needs some more experinece about the policies here. I am sure you will make a good contributor. May i also suggest you to seek WP:Adoption by an admin or an experienced user, he will help you a lot and guide you about how things go around here. This will make the process easier for you. regards--DBigXray 10:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for Help.--Sujitkumartalk 11:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry i was away from Wiki then. But i suppose you have been answered well by DBigXray. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1839 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

I think that you were previously interested in AFC. Right now, it is backlogged and needs help, perhaps, I thought that you might be doing few reviews :) TheSpecialUser TSU 06:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I wasn't interested in reviewing. But do i alone review a certain article (like GA review) or will other editors be meddling and re-reviewing my review? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
It is just like GA but much easy. Most of the submissions are clear decline. There won't be anyone who'll review your review. TheSpecialUser TSU 08:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
That would be a relief. Will keep this AFC option in mind. But can't get to it just now. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Masti, Estonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Masti
Masti (2007 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Masti

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

They are disambiguation notices on the top of the article and they are supposed to be linked to disambiguation pages. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Lol

Not sure if you meant it as a joke, but you really tickled my psychic energy with this one. Keep up the humorous editing. :) Secret of success (talk) 14:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

New messages

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Identification and description.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tamravidhir(২০১২) 14:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Animesh, thanks a lot for your welcome message. I'm really interested in Indian Film biographies and saw your extensive work. Nice to know you and hope we will work well together. :) Regards IndianBio (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I'm not exactly new. I have been editing the Ranveer Singh page a long time through IP and have just created the account today. I do know about policies since I started and users have been publishing this and that policies in my talk page :( Well, hope to have a better time with an account and not editing through IP, which can be pretty tedious I see. IndianBio (talk) 09:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Animeshkulkarni. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —SpacemanSpiff 14:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I know you didn't request it, but it's easier than Twinkle and you show a need for it. Use it per policy! If you don't want it, let me know and I'll remove it. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Extra thanks for giving these rights without asking for. As of now i don't know how i will use them. Twinkle was all very fine. Lets see. Will discover something. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering, if WP:AGF is a fundamental principle here, why don't all editors have Admin privileges by default? And as and when angels start falling they can loose their powers. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, rollback is good when you come across vandalism on your watchlist, and you don't have to go click on the diff to actually revert, it's generally useful on a lot of the actor/actress articles of which I'm sure you have a lot on your watchlist. I also just saw that you don't have a custom skin, you can install WP:US/S to make some activity easier -- some are available only on vector, some only on monobook and some on all skins. As for your other question, WT:RfA and its archives. —SpacemanSpiff 18:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Just curious to know what makes these rights different than Twinkle for roll-backing? - Vivvt • (Talk) 16:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I personally found nothing yet. Twinkle + Popups = Rockback. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 16:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Pankaj Biswas

Got your message. Please be assured that the previous version that I reverted back had nothing to do with Kapoor, and everything to do with Biswas. Some anonymous contributor had previously blanked the page prior to my edit. GhanaDa (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Who is Pankaj Biswas? We never had any article on that title. You directly moved Kapur to Biswas for no reason. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pankaj Biswas

Hello Animeshkulkarni. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pankaj Biswas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Whatever! Its gone now. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Sonam Kapoor

I would like to just say that this was not exactly a fair edit. The other user GrewalJ (talk · contribs) is right, that DP of Kapoor is way back from 2007, and as per WP:BIO, the most recent high-resolution image must be used. Although I do agree the article had become an imagepedia after his edit. I personally removed some of the images since as per MOS:IMAGE, they should not be used for decorative purposes even if they are free. Cheers and happy editing and lets not get into edit wars over this silly thing. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure! Put a satellite picture taken by NASA in her infobox because it is high resolution and latest. Why should her face be clearly seen there? People can zoom in and see her. And thank god for the "latest" pic. Or else no one would recognize her.
And i dont edit war. If you revert my edit and add even Shakti Kapoor's image over there, i wont care. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
You do know the silliness of what you just wrote right? File:Sonam graces IIJW 2012 finale.jpg is indeed of quite high resolution and combined with the fact that its recent also. One of the perks of using a high-resolution image is that because it is expected reader's will zoom in on an image and check it out. Why do you think commons exist as a separate repository? So that our readers can check out the actual version. Like it or not, consensus has always been for the recent most high-resolution picture for any character, person, cat etc. I was just explaining it to you, it's upto you to take it or leave it. Cheers again, —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
So lets say that you tried and i left it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Indian Television Academy Awards

I noticed that practically every article related to the ITA Awards was created or primarily edited by Noormohammed satya and his many socks (and in some cases Vibhas Kashyap & co. as well), so have therefore nominated them for deletion on the grounds that they're probably non-notable and promotional in nature. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Television Academy Awards. As you have shown an interest in these articles in the past (even if it's only basic maintenance) perhaps you have the knowledge required to judge which of them, if any, cover genuinely notable topics. I had an honest go at finding secondary sources but couldn't separate out the promotional cruft from genuine unbiased news coverage (if there is any). —Psychonaut (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Commented. Thanks for the note. Don't expect much of a turnout with delete or keep or whatever opinions. Also i don't think any socks/SPAs would show. They just don't bother. After deletion they simply recreate the article in some days. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: FLC

The nomination has been archived For trimming, see ref #75 of the Rajinikanth article. —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay! Thanks. Will try to trim. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Commenting on other editors

Please try to refrain from commenting about other editors in derogatory terms. Continuing to do so will restrict your ability to edit. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Am fine with that. Much better than such autocracy. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Once again I have no idea what you're talking about. Just be advised that insulting other editors will lead to you being blocked. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Thats what i said, i am fine with that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Nonconstructive on Raksha Bandhan

Respected Sir,

I am not a good writer or I was not trying to mislead people by my post. if you think my view is Nonconstructive on Raksha Bandhan. Then it's ok.

Thanks & Regards,

You can reply me about my thoughts on the topic.

Chirag Patel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.98.21.221 (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Copyedit of National Award

Yeah, trying in bits and pieces. Not of the best quality, but a new set of eyes is always beneficial!--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of the India corruption article

The list of individuals charged with corruption article was deleted here. I agree with the deletion but I also think that there needs to be a way for people to quickly understand all corruption issues in India and find the people involved, whether the people involved are corruption fighters, investigators, the accused, or all of these. I made a proposal for this here What do you think of that? Could you comment on that talk page? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Ravananugraha.
Message added 05:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Redtigerxyz Talk 05:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Please check again. If all comments are addressed, put a green tick. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhuri Dixit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Deswa

Hi Animesh, is there any chance of you taking a look at recent goings-on with Deswa. I have just restored to an old version because recent contributions seem to contradict prior sourced content etc. I am wondering if this is either a hijack by PR people or perhaps an instance of two movies having the same title. Either way, it is not really something that I know much about and mine is a fleeting visit (I've been off-wiki for a while with a crisis of conscience, and am likely to be again very shortly!). Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your old revision is right. There could be some other movie too. But i couldn't find anything like that. All refs are about this film itself. (Crisis of conscience and other stuffs. I am seeing lot of those lately. Whatever be the reason, many editors are getting away from editing. Is this viral?) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Possibly. The atmosphere is changing and those intent on doing good are under much more pressure, imo. Sitush (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Patangrao Kadam

Hi, I just created an article about a notable person named Patangrao Kadam....can you help me in improving / expanding the article here--> Patangrao Kadam....thanks--Adamstraw99 (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Sure! Will dig in Hindi and Marathi sources. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

your comments at editor retention

Hi! Although the editor retention project doesn't handle individual cases, some of its members (meaning specifically me) may be willing to try to work with editors that have had a bad time and are thinking of quitting. If you would want to ask the fella in question to drop me a note at my talk page, I will see if I can help him. Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the hand. Will talk with him and see if he is still interested and then let you know. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Deswa concerns

Dear Animesh Kulkarni Sir. How are you doing ? I understand that you dont know that Deswa is not released yet. I am the director and one of the producers of the film. We released it in 9 theaters in Bihar, so as to make it eligible for National Award. Deswa is not a regular bhojpuri film. It is first bhojpuri film to go to several International Film Festivals. We have a hindi version also. We are struggling to release the film. But this page is damaging our prospects, as you you have written negative about it. As a film enthusiast you would also know that revealing the suspense of the film in the synopsis is not in favour of the film.

I would request you to kindly remove the part where you have revealed the naxal suspense and also dont use term as lukewarm and low-key because its not your prerogative to decide the fate of the film and performance of the actors without seeing the film which is not even released all over. If you are in any other doubt please call me on 09819943282.

Nitin Chandra

Nitinchandra25 (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Dear Sir. The change in Deswa page still reveals that the guy who was kidnapped is a Naxalite, that is the main suspense of the film. In the Reception section, the quote is misleading for those who are waiting for the film. Also, this is first bhojpuri film to be selected in various International film festivals like South Asian Film Festival Goa, Ahemdabad International Film Festival, Habitat World Film Festival, New Delhi and Govt of Bihar selected this film as one of the top 8 films in last 50 years of Bhojpuri Cinema. Kindly mention this also, so that our efforts will be appreciated. Kindly go through the youtube links to see the promos and also there are more than 200 media articles about the film. Kindly put those also on Deswa page. Nitinchandra25 (talk) 04:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sachin Kundalkar

Hello! Your submission of Sachin Kundalkar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Vivvt • (Talk) 01:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

What a name!

With due respect to William Shakespeare, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet". - (Act II, Scene II).

Wow, Sir, what a name...I really like your new username..simply superb...Hat's upto you...Thank you..and thank you for your tireless contributions to Wikipedia..Keep it up...--Bharathiya (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 12:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

59th National Film Awards

Hi, Dharmadhyaksha / AnimeshKulkarni, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article on the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Thanks for taking it up. We were awaiting GOCE member to work on the article for long time. - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Also i am sure that other members of WP:INCINE wouldn't hesitate to contact you if need be. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 04:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
No worries; guidance and corrections are always welcome. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, I'd like to ask what the convention is on Indian articles for awards with two names. I'd like to use both in section titles thus: "Swarna Kamal (Golden Lotus Award)" - so only one version needs to remain in the prose. Secondly, should I give preference to the official title Swarna Kamal or the English title Golden Lotus Award in prose? Or perhaps I shouldn't change this. I've consulted the MOS but can't find a relevant policy. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

There is no fixed convention as such. Other Indian film awards (eg Filmfare Awards) use only one title, which is English as they don't have any Indic titles. For other non-filmy Indian awards, like Padma Bhushan, there is no English title and hence only Indic title is used.
This is the first time anyone is really reviewing this article. Hence we dont have any rule. But media and the actual awards use the Hindi titles. English titles are mere translations. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 04:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you; I think it's probably best to leave this alone - but if I see any variants I'll standardise on the dominant version and leave section titles as they are. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm declaring the copy-edit done; please feel free to contact me about any issues arising from it. Thanks again for your help above, and good luck with the FLC nomination. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

I have got no reply for the copyright issues from Directorate of Film Festivals. This leaves with only one option of re-writing the citations. - Vivvt • (Talk) 06:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm assuming that you will be working on it with me. - Vivvt • (Talk) 07:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sachin Kundalkar

Yngvadottir (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

GR

Shall we get the GR started in order to have DYK on 24th Oct? - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Of course! Was planning on listening on this weekend. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 03:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Great. Lets plan for DYK first and then will take it forward sometime later. Current brief in each row is pretty bad, I feel. (59th-CE-After-Effect :P)- Vivvt • (Talk) 03:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
No one allowed me to listen on this weekend. They kept dragging me away to various places.
We are NOT doing ce on that for DYK. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 03:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
LOL. I was busy completing Mokashi this weekend. Got more details than I had already (...and took lot of my time grasping it).It should be done in a day or so. Will push that for DYK and then will turn to GR. - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Done with PM. - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

After GR, are you planning for anything else? - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Nothing specific. Have got Satish Rajwade and Amruta Subhash waiting in user space for something hook-y. Do you have hooks on them? Do you have anything else on mind?
Btw, if you are interested and have time and info, Sai Tamhankar was created yesterday. Paanch din ladki in? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
We might have something for Subhash but not for Rajwade. Sai again same. Good to have her article but may not find any DYK. Planning for article expansion for Sukumar Ray documentary. Might even get a DYK. Lets see. I have that documentary with me, so will watch it sometime and will expand accordingly. - Vivvt • (Talk) 07:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
There is a possible DYK on Sukumar Ray and this Oct 30 marks beginning his 125th birth anniversary year. I wish to push this DYK on 30th. Do you wanna work on that with me? - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't think i can. I know nothing about him or documentary. You carry on! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Not a problem. I'm actually done with the article and pushed it for DYK. - Vivvt • (Talk) 05:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey

I had seen a comment by you on India Talk page recently and thought that User:Dharmadhyaksha is some new guy, I wanted to search something in your talk page's archive and got to know that you now have a brand new user name. Its is very good username. I was looking for some kind of link to any discussion about the reliability of tabloids like "Mumbai Mirror" or "Pune Mirror". I remember seeing some kind of discussion on your talk page. Can you let me know whether there was any discussion on Reliable source notice board or somewhere?--sarvajna (talk) 06:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard - This is it! TheSpecialUser TSU 06:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliments on new name.
I can't recall my participation in any discussion about Mumbai & Pune Mirror in particular. We surely were discussing Times of India at Sitush's talk page. Maybe you read that. They all are from same publishing house.
And if i may; what matter is it that needs you to hunt this down? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks TSU, I know about Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard but wanted to know if there was any such discussion. Dharmadhyaksha I just wanted to update the article Darshan (actor) mostly about his wife beating episode for which he was arrested. Bangalore Mirror covered more(as per my friend) about this incident than ToI. Now if I don't see something in ToI but only in Bangalore Mirror should I consider it as RS or just some sensational news.--sarvajna (talk) 08:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) We may be able to simplify this. I vaguely recall the Darshan story. He was arrested but the crux of the matter is whether he was found guilty. Was he? - Sitush (talk) 09:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
No because his wife withdrew her complaint and instead gave a reason that she broke her arm in an accident and burns on her body were due to a cooking accident. --sarvajna (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Then it has no place in the article. - Sitush (talk) 09:28, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
I understand the point you are trying to make however this is not some minor incident, significant coverage was given and the person's wife had given a statement about violence only to retract it later. There were other incidents like the actor's fans going on rampage among other things. It is a noteable incident. --sarvajna (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, but it is controversial and it amounted to nothing because the claim was withdrawn. Highlighting something that effectively amounted to nothing other than a popular frenzy is contrary to BLP and also undue weight. Some might even call it muckraking. At least, that is how I usually see such situations handled. You could always query this interpretation at WP:BLPN but until this is determined, the question of the reliability etc of local rags is somewhat irrelevant. - Sitush (talk) 09:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

I never heard of the case myself. (I don't mean it is trivial. Its just that i don't follow South Indian film stars.) But as Sarvajna says if the incident was much talked about, there would be refs in notable newspapers of it. If his wife had officially registered a complaint with Police or other authorities and then retracted it, both things can go in the biography. Make sure that it goes in a single sentence so as to not give any undue weightage by stretching it beyond limits and also not giving half impression in case people are reading only single sentences. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

It is a one year old news, we were discussing about domestic violence and saw that there is nothing written about Darshan on wikipedia, a simple google search for "Darshan wife beating" will give you good number of links.--sarvajna (talk) 16:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Did you want to include this example in the article Domestic violence? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Not really, nothing has been proven yet also forgot to mention although the actor's wife wanted to withdrew the complaint the Judge did not allow that. The actor is on bail as far as I know. I just wanted to update the page of the actor with this detail. --sarvajna (talk) 10:07, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
So if the case is already filed and he is on bail, i wouldn't object this inclusion on his article. What say Sitush? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to see some recent sources that say this, not stuff from six months ago etc. As with Wikipedia articles, newspapers often report the start of an alleged scandal etc but then lose interest and don't report the outcome unless it prolongs the issue. So, they might report that he was bailed but not that it was later rescinded. There is also the issue of the incredibly lengthy and complex legal process in India, which makes tracking stuff difficult. This really is dodgy territory and I would encourage you to take it to the BLP noticeboard. I wouldn't have a problem if there was a report saying that he had been found guilty, but until then I think the general rule is that we err on the side of caution for the reasons that I have stated. - Sitush (talk) 10:23, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussion of author Babasaheb Purandare at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard

There is a discussion at the RS Noticeboard as to whether Purandare qualifies as a WP:RS for the article Shivaji. Discussion posted here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Raja_Shivachhatrapati_by_Babasaheb_Purandare_in_the_article_Shivaji_.28Indian_history_bio.29. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Abosheshey

I have seen those edits (and now the DYK nomination too). Best of luck, good work! --Tito Dutta ✉ 20:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

MAdhuri Awards

Hello. I did reply to some of your concerns and have some query which i listed in the PR page. Can you just re-visti once? Thanks —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your comments, they really helped me in better understanding about the notability issue you raised. Thanks for your patience and time. ^__^ —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
You are welcome! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

References

For references, do you know how I get A,B,C,D,E, basically, the same reference, but it isn't 1,2, just 1 A,B,C,D,E. Thanks! It's for Norbert Murphy.--Lucky102 (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

CSD Notification

The image File:Asoka handagama.jpg looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification?SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry! I had manually tagged it and hence forgot to notify the uploader. I was using IE8 that time. Done now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, now deleted. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
This users many uploads are copyvios. Now tagging them. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, but all (I looked at) have Non-free rationales. Poorly filled out, to be sure, but I'm on uncertain ground here. Does a non-free image with a non-free rationae qualify for CSD, or does it require review at Wikipedia:Non-free content review? --SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Oops, my bad, you are posting them at FfD, rather than CSD. Sorry.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
There are some CSD worthy too. Hence mentioned it here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Lucky102's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Lucky102 (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK'S

Are you allowed to nominate more than one DYK at the same time?--Lucky102 (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I am unaware of any such rule. Also i can't imagine why something like this would be there. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but what do you mean?--Lucky102 (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Nominate as many DYKs as you can. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Do I need to ask the creator of the page so that I can nominate it.--Lucky102 (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
No! You don't need to. But after nominating just inform them. Just in case reviewing raises some question, they could easily help you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lanka Dahan

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Good job! - Vivvt • (Talk) 12:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Vivvt! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Please contribute to the Bigg Boss 6 article by providing non-copyvio summaries for the show. Since i'm unable to provide non-copyvio content, i think you should take the initiative to use your advanced english skills to replace the masses of copyvio with wiki-suitable content. thank you. :) --I'mTitanniumchat 13:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry. I don't know anything about the show and hence can't edit. Also i do not wish to write trivial he-coughed-she-sneezed articles. You can rephrase the content from where you are copying and then add it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
alright. That's not hard. Please stop targeting me, i insist. --I'mTitanniumchat 06:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Where did i target you? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Just to Cheer you up

Not sure why you were targeted by the IP user, don't forget Jab Haathi Chale Bazaar Toh Kutte Bhonke Hazaar --sarvajna (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Haha! Right! Thanks for that. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Abosheshey

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of M. S. Shinde

Hello! Your submission of M. S. Shinde at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

hi

Please remove the averages from the US versions then come to the indian one. :))
Here you go:
1. [8]
2. [9]
3. [10]
4. [11]
5. [12]
6. [13]
7. [14]
8. [15]
-- I'm Titanium  chat 15:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Why? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
The useless mathematics is featured on the articles i've suggested. Remove them from there too. Averages are a part of Dancing with the stars pages. So it would be only fair wthat you completely get rid of all teh useless mathematics. -- I'm Titanium  chat 06:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't know anything about those American shows. Maybe they show average scores. Maybe they use it somehow in determining elimination. As the average scores are not considered in JDJ, they are useless. No Original Research Here! Just because someone else is adding them on other articles does not mean it should be added here too. As it is not relevant, it will be deleted. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:38, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
No they dont use it to determine elimination in Dancing with the stars too. It's not even consistent. Some of their articles have them some don't. Out of 14 seasons only 8 have them. LOL. Why dont you place a warning there and the relevant editors will consult u with what they are used for.-- I'm Titanium  chat 06:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't have to bother myself with what the American world is doing. If its irrelevant for JDJ, it will be removed. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
And i'll keep reverting until you get opinions on this. You just cant remove something that has been gping on and adapted on all the franchise articles.
Let's take other people's take on this and then decide what to do. I didnot add the average section Me Anon did. There has got to be a reason for that. -- I'm Titanium  chat 06:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Fine! Keep it. Some other user will remove it.
And "Me Anon did it" and hence should be kept is just logical fallacy. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
WOW. You really are so confused. You just don't know what to do. Running away is no option. Try to reason and win your case. If you're that scared don't intervene in the first place. -- I'm Titanium  chat 07:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Only flawed reasoning can beat another flawed reasoning. I am not good at that. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Hello there. I saw this because of the comments by both of you on my user talk page, and I thought I would comment. I don't know enough about this specific situation to know whether we should include averages or not; however, Wikipedia policy is not crystal clear on this. If you read down near the bottom of the no original research policy, you will see that there is a section on routine calculations. This says the following:

Routine calculations do not count as original research. Basic arithmetic, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person's age, is allowed provided there is consensus among editors that the calculation is an obvious, correct, and meaningful reflection of the sources.

So, to me, this is not so much a matter of whether it counts as original research or not, as the policy allows this kind of calculation. Rather, it is a matter of whether there is a consensus to include this kind of calculation in the specific articles in question. To find this out we will need to talk about it, and possibly ask uninvolved editors for their opinion. Have you discussed this on any article talk pages? If you have, it would be very useful if you could give me a link to the discussions. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 06:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I guess User:Me Anon added them cause they were on the US version. I found them relevant so kept it. -- I'm Titanium  chat 06:42, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Mr. S for your views. But i am not interested in taking up this discussion on talk pages. If Imtitanium and other editors want to keep it, let them have it. They can also go and make pie charts, plot graphs, calculate percentages, show performance ratio and what not if they want to. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
OMG YAYYY Thank you so much. It would be an honor to have you not around. You were creeping me out with those stalking skills of yours. Goodbye. Peace.
👍 Imtitanium likes this. -- I'm Titanium  chat 07:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Don't assume you would not be seeing me at all. I will still be trying to throw out all the garbage you keep adding, not on this article now, but others for sure. If i don't initiate, other editors might not notice it. I will stay under WP:3RR rule. If editors support me, then its good. If not, some more mess in otherwise messy encyclopedia is not a big deal. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
You're just after me. Your wrath has nothing to do with your worries regarding Wikipedia. You're getting personal my friend/foe/whatever.
All i want to say is : BRING IT AAAAWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!! -- I'm Titanium  chat 12:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I've left a message about this comment at Imtitanium's talk page. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 13:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Malegaon

Wth is wrong with this article? The same spammer keeps adding his company and others come by to add all sorts of other nonsense. I've reverted a little and protected. Can you do some clean up, it's protected for two months. —SpacemanSpiff 11:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that. And its usually the same editor who comes and cleans it. & he has been coming on Wiki only for cleaning it. Maybe they are real-life rival neighbours. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Bachchan

I am a bit concerned about the huge number of edits made recently at Amitabh Bachchan. There seems to be a lot of trivia, a lot of speculation (especially concerning about his worth) and a fair few dodgy sources. There are also style issues - WP:MOSDATE etc - but there is not much point in fixing them if the statements should not be there in the first place. I know that it is a high-traffic and wel-watched article but would appreciate your opinion. - Sitush (talk) 07:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually, following some rather extreme WP:PEA stuff, I've now raised the matter on the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 08:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
No problem sir! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Barfi! (soundtrack)

Hello, as you said that i created the page Barfi! (soundtrack) and it already exist, but if I've created the page, then i have removed Detail of Soundtrack, I have created a seprate article for soundtrack, Thank You Greatuser (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Separate articles are not needed for such small content. I have tagged it with WP:CSD. If admins find it worth deleting, don't recreate it again. If it doesn't get deleted, gear up for the upcoming WP:AFD. This applies for Ek Tha Tiger (soundtrack) also. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
There are many pages having a seprate article for soundtrack such as Ra.One (soundtrack),Rockstar (soundtrack) and many more... and if this is not in detailed way then later it will be updated, Thank You Greatuser (talk) 11:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The right way to split a page is to develop it in the current article and then take it out separately. You are welcome to expand the section in the main article. When done with that, your split would be justified. As of now, its just a tracklist and few critics giving stars. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

IPS

Thanks for the support at Indian Postal Service. I can do no more because of 3RR but if the guy reinstates any of those bizarre headings again, despite our notes on his talk page and my broader response to his complaint on mine, then it will have to be reported to WP:3RRNB. That would be a shame because he is clearly enthusiastic etc, but I don't see much option because he is not listening and shows no real intent of doing so any time soon. - Sitush (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I would give him some time to get a grip of what is happening. Let him fiddle with it and then hitting rollback is also easy for us. Hopefully he understands it by then. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Don't hit rollback - it is not vandalism. I've asked DennisBrown to take a look. - Sitush (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Its such an easy tool. Doing AGF reverts once or twice is okay. Later on rollback is justified. I can explain that to the admin who comes for blocking me. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Do you want me to remove your rollback? :) Don't forget Sodabottle's block and removal of rollback when he didn't even use rollback (and he was reverting your friend Shirik88music). —SpacemanSpiff 17:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Haha! You specifically should not do that. It would show your wrong judgement in giving me those rights. And you can't argue "Humans make mistake" knowing am a human too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
"... knowing am a human too". Do you have a reliable source for that? ;) - Sitush (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Will some OTRS email do? And its a self-recognized BLP issue. Why do you want any other RS? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

India Economy Section Images

There is a voting process going on for selection of Images for Economy section of the India article. Voting ends on 15th November 2012. --Anbu121 (talk me) 22:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

write "of India" "of India" in all section headers? upon IPS

Sirji! The whole article is about the Post services of India. Why do you want to write "of India" "of India" in all section headers? India got independence on 15.08.1947. When "Independence day" is said, what is the point in writing the date in the headers? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

agreed to your good suggestion,your edit is ok G C GOYAL SENIOR POSTMASTER (GAZETTED) JALANDHAR CITY PUNJAB INDIA--59.90.184.209 (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Mashallah Song- Ek Tha Tiger

I am not following recent Hindi films or songs (to clarify Wikipedia takes all my time). Is this song so popular that it needs a separate article Mashallah Song- Ek Tha Tiger? --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Well... you aren't loosing any quality stuff. Mukesh, Hemant Kumar, Asha-Lata, RD, Gulzar and others have left enough for us to last life long. So don't worry.
There had been a discussion on stand-alone song articles at WT:INCINE but with no conclusion on what should be done. I and few others had also taken many articles to AFD, but they weren't completely deleted, only redirected because WP:Redirects are cheap. If this continues, you might find yourself at some film's page after typing any random Hindi sentence. I wasn't very happy with that decision and hence i stopped bothering myself with it. This song to me is not notable. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for M. S. Shinde

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yash Chopra

Your opinion would be appreciated here: Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Yash_Chopra_dies.

PS. Nice name. Secret of success (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Already posted by the time i read this msg. And thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for adding Sai's kosher picture to her article. Wonder how you found them so fast. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

They were at Commons since long. Had her on to-do list also. Was waiting to find something interesting about her so that some DYK could be done. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:53, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
could we do first female actor in a leading role to wear a two piece bikini? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) LOL. NO!! - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I meant in Marathi films. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Does not appeal, at least to me, when we had Sunny Leone debuting in Bollywood. - Vivvt • (Talk) 12:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Wearing two-piece isn't that happening. Maybe you could make an article on Meenakshi Shirodkar if you get RS for her first swimsuit in 1938 film Brahmachari (Marathi film). Being 1938, you can also have her images, which are in Public Domain now. Start in your user space because i don't think information for a full article will be available in 5 days. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
I suppose making film's article would be easier to reach DYK criteria. It has got quite reputed people involved like P. K. Atre and Master Vinayak. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
.brahmachari has the lead female actor wearing a one piece swim suit,[[16]], Sai Tahmankar has worn a two piece swim suit. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
I understood the difference, but i still don't find it very interesting. But that's me. May be global editors would find it amusing; they mostly have different impressions of India. It might hence be interesting for them. Go on! But hurry. Your 5 days are ending tomorrow. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

I was hoping you would add more meat and I am not familiar with the DYK process. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

I wont get any time for digging info on her. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Geet Ramayan

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Bill william compton's talk page.
Message added 11:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Bill william comptonTalk 11:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Red Hat On Head

I've noticed that you seem to be a very friendly editor and thought I'd make this request. Red Hat On Head is a promising new editor with an interest in Indian cinema. I've adopted her and am running her through my program which deals with general Wikipedia editing. I was hoping you might help her learn the ins and outs of the Indian cinema area of the project. It would be useful if you could help her learn the various policies that apply to those articles, (which articles are notable and which aren't and how much to include on prose, which actors are notable etc.) and explain the reasoning for various consensus based decisions. Ryan Vesey 17:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Sure! No problem. I can help her. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

M. S. Shinde

Hey, are you sure about the sentence saying that he edited 300,000 feet to 20,000 feet? The given source (Sholay, the Making of a Classic) does not appear to mention these numbers. The maximum length of the reel mentioned is 21,000 feet. Secret of success (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

You are right. I was wrong about 20K then. But i did change it to 21K.
Just curious, why were you reading old versions of article? Or did you read it then and now noticed the change? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Wait a minute. The DYK you gave for the article also had these wrong numbers. That means, a wrong DYK appeared on the main page! Secret of success (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Uh..actually I was doing nothing...just going through your huuuuuuge list of DYK's :). Secret of success (talk) 16:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Actually the DYK only said "edited 300,000 feet of reel down to 18,000 feet". So it wasn't wrong.
And OTHERSTUFFEXISTS!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Um, no actually it does not say "300,000 feet" anywhere. Secret of success (talk) 06:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh! Okay. So the doubt is with 300k. I took that figure from Sholay assuming good faith that it being a GA, has been passed to be correct. The dyk hook was also passed on AGF. You simply confused me with 20k, 21k and 18k. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:30, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Indian Barnstar of National Merit
For your effort to try to launch a cleanup and compiling lists by district of villages which sourced data. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Doc! But i think it won't be of much use if stubs are still to be created. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Rishiraj's photo

I have posted opinion to keep the image, you can see here --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 6

On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 (2nd nomination) you commented on the quality of the article's content. Therefore perhaps you would like to contribute to a discussion at Talk:Bigg Boss 6#Summaries concerning the quality and quantity of plot-related content. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry! Can't help. Answered to that on the AfD. Also i think i will be busy in another drive of cleaning Indian towns and villages that we plan to take. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Banned User

Banned user User:Alisha Butt, sock puppet of User:Mr Hamza is again active on wiki as 119.73.49.201 to make the same unsourced changes. I have reverted some of the edits but can something be done about this? --Neelkamala (talk) 13:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

That IP isn't active now. It edited on 22nd Oct only. And i suppose you have reverted all their edits. That's all one can do now about it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. When tagging pages for speedy deletion please be sure to to use only the clearly defined criteria. If a page does not meet a criterion, please consider PROD, BLPPROD, or AfD. For more information please see WP:NPP and WP:DELETION. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC).

Hi!

Hi! Remember me? I am Jagadhatri, now known as Tamravidhir. I like your new name. Thank for all your contributions. I need your help. 3 months back I nominated Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad for GA and now it is a GA, but I want to nominate an article for DYK but all my articles are old. Please help? --Tamravidhir (Jiva Is Shiva!) 08:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Ofcourse i remember. For DYKs you have to nominate an article that is not more than 5 days old. <<OR>> You can expand old article 5 times. <<OR>> If the article is an unsourced BLP, 2 times expansion is also allowed. Note: In expansion, only prose needs to be expanded. Expansion in tables in not counted. And for newly created article, minimum 1500 characters are required in the prose. Also all these expansions are only on the prose section and not on formatting, or references, or other hidden texts. Bottom line is, it is a tough job to expand and nominate a DYK. Easy way would be to create a new article itself. Start working in sandbox or userspace and take as much as you want in there. When the article is ready, move it to the article space. Your 5 days time limit starts after the move to the article space. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I understood everything except the word BLP. What's BLP? --Tamravidhir (Jiva Is Shiva!) 08:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
BLP is Biography of a Living Person. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you for all your help! --Tamravidhir (Jiva is Shiva!) 08:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your edits on the article of Abhay Bang. :) --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 11:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Caste in BLPs and Lists

Please see this discussion Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Caste_identification — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreejiraj (talk • contribs) 19:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


india-forums.com

Re your comments on Indian TV articles in general (at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 (2nd nomination) and elsewhere), perhaps blacklisting links to some of the more popular but utterly non-reliable user forum/social networking sites would somewhat stem the tide of poorly sourced fancruft and copyvios. It's not uncommon, for example, for users to copy and paste huge chunks of text from india-forums.com into Wikipedia articles and include a link to same, or alternatively for them to add apparently original wikitext but supported by inline references to india-forums.com. If the blacklist were to automatically reject such submissions, one of three things might happen:

  1. The user might simply give up and go away. Hooray; we don't need to deal with the copyvios and unsourced or poorly sourced material in this case.
  2. The user might strip the links to india-forums.com, leaving only the text, and resubmit the edit. This doesn't help us in the case of copyvios, but it at least makes it a bit easier to identify and then tag and/or revert unsourced material.
  3. The user might get a clue and find better sources for the material they want to post.

Partly for these reasons I've proposed a new blacklist entry at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#india-forums.com. Feel free to comment. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

This is a nice idea. I suppose that adding a blacklisted link does not allow you to save the edit. But does it send some kinda alert somewhere? Do we get some notification? Or do we simply use this search option? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Also, will some bot automatically remove these links? Or should we start manually doing that? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:01, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
If you try to submit any edit which contains a link to a site on the blacklist, it will be rejected with a message that explains the problem. (I won't reproduce the message here because it's too long; you can see it yourself if you go to your sandbox and try to add an external link to a blacklisted site, such as srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com.) I don't think there is any log kept of attempts to add blacklisted sites. Also, the blacklist extension does not automatically remove existing links to blacklisted sites; it only prevents people from adding links in the future. Existing links to blacklisted sites need to be removed manually on a case-by-case basis. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
I see! Will work on removing all links after i am back from break. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. But don't just remove the links to the forum posts; please also remove any questionable information for which such posts were serving as a reference, particularly in biographies of living persons. Zero information is preferable to misleading or false information. Personally I'd wait until the site's blacklisting is approved before removing any links, since in my experience someone usually tries to add the reference back again. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
India-forums.com has now been added to the spam blacklist so you and I and anyone else who wishes can begin cleanup of the existing links. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Okay! Will start working on them; not like a mission, but slowly and steadily. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

References made to the articles posted on India-forums.com by their reporters are also banned? So will the same be happening for other forum/fan/"news" sites such as Tellychakkar.com and Rangmunch.tv etc. That will probably lead to a lot of reduction in content on the TV pages if that's the case, because other reliable sources are few and far between. (I tended to avoid them normally anyway) Coolcool2012(talk to me) 09:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Is there any such section at India-forum that is controlled by editors? Even if there was one, that has hardly been used in references over here. Most of the contributions came from user's inputs to the forums. Tellychakkar.com's articles seems good as of now. Just as good as TOI's. (That's not a compliment to Tellychakkar.) Hence i dont find it necessary to get it blacklisted. Of course, if anyone comes across a reference that links to a forum section of this website, it should be removed. Just like how http://answers.yahoo.com/ is not used a Reliable Source, but http://news.yahoo.com/ is even though both are in Yahoo! domain.
I have used Tellychakkar many times. But i haven't come across Rangmunch.tv yet. In case you have your doubts regarding both sources, you can raise it at WP:RSN. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing that up. It's mostly rumours and useless articles anyway on there. Will do, Coolcool2012(talk to me) 12:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Copy

Hey I copied the template of Diwali on my talk page. A very happy Diwali.--sarvajna (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

No Probs! Everything is on ShareAlike license. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Vidya Balan

Hi Dharmadhyaksha. Thank you for the constructive ideas that you put forward on the Vidya Balan nomination page. They were of great help indeed. However, some of the ideas were a bit controversial (like praising Rani Mukerji and mentioning Balan's appearances in reality shows), and hence I didn't mention them. Having said that, I thank you for pointing such points out. Personally, I like both Mukerji and Balan, but I can't edit an article based on personal opinions. (Right?) Anyway, I hope you didn't take my objections the wrong way. I hope we can collaborate on an article soon. Cheers. --S.M.A.R.O.J.I.T (talk) 05:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

No probs! See ya around. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

New delayed message!

...here Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yug_(TV_Series)#Yug_.28TV_Series.29 --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Fun seeing old stuff

One of the Tribune pages that you added also has news on a young Purab Kohli and the all-girl band Sansara! It was fun looking at those news bits, it seems not too long ago!--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Yeah! Lucky to find that page. Added that to his biography also. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted references

When removing <ref>s using blacklisted links, as you did in this edit, please be sure not to leave orphaned refs behind (e.g. these). An easy way to check is to see if the page ends up in the hidden category Category:Pages with broken reference names after your edit. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 11:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay! Must have missed it. Thanks for the notice. Will check from next time.
But i don't think looking in that category is of any help. It has like thousands of pages already in it.
And i didn't know you are the owner of User:AnomieBOT. He is brilliant. Good job! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Rather than looking in the category itself, look at the bottom of the page to see if the category shows up. You might need to enable the "Show hidden categories" preference in the Appearance tab in Special:Preferences to see it, though.
And thanks! Anomie⚔ 17:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Looks like you missed some again: [17] Anomie⚔ 20:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Wuups!! Will aim for zero-error day today. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

How to create an userbox?

Could you please tell me how to create an userbox? Please reply on my talk page. Thank you. --Tamravidhir (Jiva is Shiva!) 09:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkbalk

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Talk:Black_people#Rfc:_Page_direction.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Soupforone (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your AFDs

You placed CSD tags on a couple of them... Do you just want them closed so the other consolidated one can continue? Stalwart111 05:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes! That's what i intended. But as it was done quite quickly before sorting happened and all, i thought that they can simply be deleted. I have also changed the AFD tags on those respective articles. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 Done - both have been non-admin closed so that the consolidated AFD can continue. An admin may come along and actually delete them but I did link to your consolidated one in my summary. Hope this is okay. Stalwart111 05:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
That's fine too. Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fakta Ladh Mhana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunpoint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Talk:Murugan#Merge_Kartikay.
Message added 18:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I had raised this long back in 2008. But no support, so did not merge. Actually, the current Murugan article covers all about the pan-Indian Kartikkeya as well as the Tamil Murugan. We can move the article Murugan to Kartikkeya, and at Murugan, create a new article about the Tamil Murugan, before his identification with the Sanskrit Kartikkeya-Skanda. Redtigerxyz Talk 18:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Please fix your signature

Your signature currently looks like this: 

§§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<span style="font-family:{{#if: Samarkan |Samarkan|sans-serif}};font-size:{{#if: 15px |15px|100%}};color:{{#if: red |red|black}};background-color:{{#if:  |{{{bgcolor}}}|transparent}};{{#if:  |{{{css}}}|}}">{{#if:  |{{{1}}}|Dharmadhyaksha}}</span>]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]}

Signatures should not contain parser functions. Please fix. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 20:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Don't know what a parser function exactly means. But i suppose this new sign is okay. §§dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Yes, your new sig looks good. A parser function is those bits of code like {{#if: ... }}; see details at Help:Magic words. Anomie⚔ 12:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

59th NFA

Check this out! - Vivvt • (Talk) 01:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Good luck! But i am gonna oppose it without citations. §§dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
There is nothing I can do with citation for 59th NFA for that matter. Unless you tell me the way to deal with copyright issues, I'm not gonna add those. - Vivvt • (Talk) 12:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Bollywood.
Message added 15:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Bill william comptonTalk 15:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Sam.ldite's talk page.
Message added 11:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Samkit (Talk/Contributions) 11:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Superstar Santhosh Pandit

Hello Dharmadhyaksha. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Superstar Santhosh Pandit, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a duplicate article; Santhosh Pandit is an actor who is the director/star of this film. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 07:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Ohh right! I did not read it. I thought its just the same article made by some fan. Anyways... its still PRODed. Sounds very much like a fake thing. Lets see... Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

This is your first warning. The next time you warn me like this, as you did at Talk, i will complaint to admin. Because it is not an malicious move, the spelling is wrong there. Anyone can boldly move the page because as i said so many times before it's an wrong spelling. Not "gg" it should be "Kajal Agarwal". No need for discussing this small issue in Talk page. Also i have discussed in talk page so many times, stated the reason when i am moving over redirect. That is not an Good faith edit or Vandalism. Mind it. Raghusri (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Of course anyone can boldly move any page. Someone in past has already moved Kajal Aggarwal to Kajal Bitch. But the point here is that when you have been reverted thrice by three different users, you need to discuss it out and reach consensus; not just randomly shout and not wait for the conclusion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

About Note to me

Please post such note's (Regarding "Note to User:Raghusri" in FFD discussion) to user's talk pages because it's a note (personal info about the user, it's not public issue (Private matter)) know. And post your reply to other's talk pages or simply place a Talkback template on that user's talk page if you are commenting on your own talk page. Raghusri (talk) 16:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

The note was related to the subject and hence added there.
My talk page banner clearly states "If you leave me a message: I will answer here, so please add it to your watchlist." And i am in no hurry of your replies. Reply today, tomorrow or never. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Then what should be done regarding moving comments from one place to another if it is taken into consideration per WP:Signature forgery. Moving without signature will be right then? I am also in no hurry of your replies. Leave your reply when your are free. Raghusri (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

As you have read the comment, its purpose is served. There is no need to move it anywhere else giving false impression that it actually was added there. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

kannada refs

I have added two kannada refs, not sure if its enough. There were many refs which had just a passing reference to the college. --sarvajna (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Maricha

I saw your edit. I was also under the impresion that it was the nose that was cut off but the book refrences I have used in the artcile all mention ear only. This needs to be clarified by a separate sentence in the article. Incidentally, thanks for the suggestions made in the article on Vidyasagar Setu, which is now pending GA review. I have made amends as suggested.

I see. Well then some clarification could really help. But i will still emphasis on nose and not ear. Maybe a side note like "some texts also mention ear" could be added. But that does not change the fact that the image used shows nose being cut and hence the caption is appropriate.
My suggestions? Which? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Chopra list Peer Review

Hi Sir, howzz you doing. I had asked for peer review for chopra's award list. User:Giant2008 told me to do so as he thinks that it will help in improving it a lot. please, Give your contributions.Thank You. (Pks1142 (talk) 08:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, pls continue the peer review of Chopra's article.so that it will be improved further.Pks1142 (talk) 02:42, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Please, help me regarding peer review of the list as I'm working day and night on it.Pls, give me suggestions to improve it.Pks1142 (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duniya Na Mane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Dipankan001's talk page.
Message added 08:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied. @DipankanUpgraded! Tag me! 08:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Nair

Thanks for fixing the link at Talk:Nair. It is probably the first of the many refactorings of my comments there that it was done for constructive rather than destructive reasons! - Sitush (talk) 11:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome! I have many times gone and added en wiki links also in many comments. These people never consider all the troubles page-stalkers have to go through if reference to context is not linked. Also that replying on each other's talk pages is a horrible thing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:08, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2013


Torreslfchero (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year

Wishing you a very “Happy NEW YEAR“ filled with peace,joy, prosperity and happiness.---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive_2012&oldid=1254559341"