User talk:Cplakidas/Archive 27

Archive 20

←

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

Archive 28

DYK for War of Padua

On 14 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article War of Padua, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the War of Padua, the victorious Republic of Venice executed the lord of Padua and two of his sons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/War of Padua. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, War of Padua), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

I agree with you that 50,000 people never existed. 194.88.250.91 (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abd al-Rahim

Hello Cplakidas. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abd al-Rahim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Hi Cplakidas. First of all, it goes with out saying that I defer to your knowledge of Arabic in declining this request. In my opinion, this is something that would better be taken up on the article's talk page. While the transliteration of عبد الرحيم may well more properly be Abd al-Rahim, it would appear that in English, "Abdur Rahim" is what is most commonly cited. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for the brief summary the script only let me write. There are any number of people, past or present of the name Abdul (and its variant transliterations, including "Abdur" - Abdurrahman Wahid immediately springs to mind) and so on. Could you possibly take this up at Talk:Abdur Rahim? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Al-Mustansir billah II Ali Shah

Hello,Cplakidas!

Please Can you help me edit this page Al-Mustansir billah II Ali Shah? Gragin (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Gragin, the article has been rewritten from scratch and moved to Al-Mustansir Billah II (Nizari imam). Cheers, Constantine ✍ 19:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Da'ud ibn al-Adid

On 30 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Da'ud ibn al-Adid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Da'ud, the heir apparent of the last Fatimid caliph, spent almost his entire life imprisoned by the succeeding Ayyubid dynasty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Da'ud ibn al-Adid. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Da'ud ibn al-Adid), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of the Blacks

On 31 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of the Blacks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Battle of the Blacks in August 1169, Saladin ordered his forces to attack and torch his opponents' quarters, where their wives and children had been left? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of the Blacks. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of the Blacks), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Busby and Colback

Hello Constantine! Long time no see. I was reading some articles and I saw that here we have Busby (military headdress) and Colback (hat). I'm not a specialist on the topic, but as far I as got, busby and colback are the same thing, with the second designation coming from French, and the French one from Turkish kalpak. The Portuguese dictionaries give this etymology for colback. Busby I still don't know yet. Any clues?--Renato de Carvalho Ferreira (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Renato, indeed! I hope you are doing well, especially in these times. The two do indeed appear to be the same thing. I'd say busby reflects the British POV/usage, while colback (a term I had never before encountered) the French. Nevertheless if they are the same thing, they should be merged, probably under Busby (military headdress) since this is the English WP. The OED has no idea on the origin of the word, but I guess the military headdress was named after the bushy wig of the same name. Constantine ✍ 21:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Qadi al-Fadil

On 2 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qadi al-Fadil, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Qadi al-Fadil began his career under the Fatimids, became Saladin's chief minister, and was renowned for the elegance of his epistolary writing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qadi al-Fadil. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qadi al-Fadil), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Blacks

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Blacks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

• 1Lib1Ref 2022
• Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Blacks

The article Battle of the Blacks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of the Blacks for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Blacks

The article Battle of the Blacks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of the Blacks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Baha al-Din Qaraqush

On 18 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baha al-Din Qaraqush, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Baha al-Din Qaraqush built the Cairo Citadel (pictured) on behalf of the sultan, Saladin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baha al-Din Qaraqush. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baha al-Din Qaraqush), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

St Mark's Basilica

Greetings from Venice. You were very helpful in getting the Biblioteca Marciana to FA status, and I thank you again. I currently have another FAC, St Mark's Basilica, and given your interest in Venice, I am hoping that you might have time and interest to take a look. At any rate, I hope you are well.Venicescapes (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abu Firas al-Hamdani

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abu Firas al-Hamdani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abu Firas al-Hamdani

The article Abu Firas al-Hamdani you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Abu Firas al-Hamdani for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Musta'li

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Al-Musta'li you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abu Firas al-Hamdani

The article Abu Firas al-Hamdani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Abu Firas al-Hamdani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Musta'li

The article Al-Musta'li you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Al-Musta'li for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Muqallad ibn al-Musayyab

On 7 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Al-Muqallad ibn al-Musayyab, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that al-Muqallad ibn al-Musayyab, the Uqaylid emir of Mosul, was assassinated by his own soldiers while plotting to capture Baghdad from the Buyids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Al-Muqallad ibn al-Musayyab. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Al-Muqallad ibn al-Musayyab), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qadi al-Fadil

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Qadi al-Fadil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Musta'li

The article Al-Musta'li you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Al-Musta'li for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Faux Hakim bi-Amr Allah portrait

Bismillah ar-rahman ar-rahim! :))) Hi, kali mera und hallo. I see you removed the picture captioned as "Caliph al-Hakim". I am fully trusting you on this, so if you could please offer some arguments there on the discussion page and place an appropriate caption under the file, this would hopefully stop the misidentification. Judging by the data there, the image is in use on literally dozens of wikis as a portrait of al-Hakim, from French to Romanian to Russian (they've got enough misinformation already) to... I don't even know what languages those are. Thank you, for this and for your help on Aman (Islam)! Btw, how did you notice the removal of my stub there? Have a great day, Arminden (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Arminden! I went by this, and by the fact that I have never seen this image labelled as a portrait of al-Hakim in any of the numerous books I've read on Muslim history. Constantine ✍ 16:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

To be clear, it is likely this is a high functionary, possibly even a caliph, portrayed there. I am still looking to find a source that describes this image, unfortunately the books cited in the talk page are unavailable. Constantine ✍ 16:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! It's becoming a detective story. Arminden (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

@Arminden: i found something: Figure 11 and the accompanying description, saying it is a mid-10th to mid-11th fresco, thus implicitly ruling out any specific identification. I followed up the work cited, Arts of the City Victorious, which IIRC is probably the standard work on the subject of Fatimid art at the moment, and, at least from the snippets available at Google Books, it indeed does not associate the painting with any figure. Constantine ✍ 17:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that's pretty much what was needed. I just took a quick look and found this, which is also quite explicit: maybe the figure represents a prince, but it's in a rather decorative style, "far from realistic", similar to paintings from Samarra and with "clear Persian influences". That makes a portrait unlikely, a prince is not a caliph, and it resembles art from outside the Fatimid realm. Nobody ever mentions al-Hakim. Case closed, I'd say. It is a general motif, hardly a portrait, and if it was ever meant to resemble a particular prince, he could be any among dozens or hundreds. Certainly not a good case (and not even a weak case) for establishing this image as a portrait of al-Hakim, and that's precisely what Wikipedia does: it becomes the much-copied standard for scores of other websites. I'll go ahead and remove it from all the pages it appears on by mistake. Thanks! Arminden (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Abd al-Rahim ibn Ilyas

On 15 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abd al-Rahim ibn Ilyas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Abd al-Rahim ibn Ilyas, heir apparent of the Fatimid Caliphate, was arrested after the caliph's death and died in captivity under unclear circumstances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abd al-Rahim ibn Ilyas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abd al-Rahim ibn Ilyas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qadi al-Fadil

The article Qadi al-Fadil you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Qadi al-Fadil for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qarmatian invasion of Iraq

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Qarmatian invasion of Iraq you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalid ibn Barmak

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khalid ibn Barmak you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalid ibn Barmak

The article Khalid ibn Barmak you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Khalid ibn Barmak for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

• New library collections
• Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qadi al-Fadil

The article Qadi al-Fadil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Qadi al-Fadil for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalid ibn Barmak

The article Khalid ibn Barmak you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Khalid ibn Barmak for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Nizar ibn al-Mustansir

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Nizar ibn al-Mustansir, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Musta'li

On 7 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Al-Musta'li, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the judgment of historians, the Fatimid caliph al-Musta'li "had no noteworthy life", as he was a puppet of his vizier, al-Afdal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Al-Musta'li. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Al-Musta'li), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Nizar ibn al-Mustansir scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 10, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Khalid ibn Barmak

On 24 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Khalid ibn Barmak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Khalid ibn Barmak was so close to the first Abbasid caliph, al-Saffah, that his daughter was suckled by al-Saffah's wife? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Khalid ibn Barmak. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Khalid ibn Barmak), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Battle of Trapani

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Battle of Trapani, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

May songs

Congratulations! - Thank you today for Nizar ibn al-Mustansir, "about a Fatimid prince who should have become imam and caliph at the death of his father, al-Mustansir, in 1094, but was thwarted by the machinations of the powerful vizier al-Afdal. Nizar led a revolt in Alexandria, but was ultimately defeated and killed. Given the close intertwining of religious and political leadership in the Fatimid-sponsored Isma'ili faith, this succession dispute also caused one of the major rifts in Isma'ilism, with the supporters of Nizar (among whom were the famous Assassins) breaking off to form the Nizari sect, against the supporters of the puppet caliph, al-Mu'stali."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Danke Dir, Gerda! A beautiful photo :) Constantine ✍ 06:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Gerne, - click on songs for more --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

today more pics, and should this woman have an article? - or only her sons? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: good question. In the current state it looks as if she is notable chiefly as the mother of her children, rather than independently. Now, as the mother of several notable persons, it might be argued that she is notable too as she had some influence on them, but there also needs to be something that gives her some agency. It is telling that at the moment, 'she' occurs only in the first section of the article, and concerns her descent and early life. She is a passive object in her own article. Even the references appear to be primarily about her children and mention her in passing. Constantine ✍ 11:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, - today Melody (not by me), and more pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda 🙏! Constantine ✍ 20:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Halm's book's

Greetings, Constantine. I'd like to ask you for Heinz Halm's books Das Reich des Mahdi: Der Aufstieg der Fatimiden, Die Kalifen Von Kairo: Die Fatimiden in Aegypten, 973—1074 and Kalifen und Assassinen: Ägypten und der Vordere Orient zur Zeit der ersten Kreuzzüge 1074—1171 for writing articles in Ruwiki. Do you have them in electronic form? --Werter1995 (talk) 14:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Werter1995! No, I have purchased them, and I don't think there is any complete electronic version out there. Das Reich des Mahdi has been translated into English, and there are snippets of the other two in Google Books, but that's it. But if you want specific information, I can look things up or even scan a few pages for you. Constantine ✍ 18:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

No, thanks. Just a one Russian millionaire decided to donate money to buy books for Russian Wikipedia articles. They are distributed to those who cannot get electronic editions. I originally ordered them, but my colleagues saw that you often use them in your articles. They asked to know if you have the books in an electronic version, then we wouldn't have to spend money and could wait for another order. But, as we suspected, they are not to be found electronically. So you really have to place an order. Thanks again! --Werter1995 (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

@Werter1995: Oh wow, this book donation is a very nice thing though. A bit jealous to be honest :D. A heads up, Das Reich des Mahdi may not be easy to find as it has been long out of print, I got it via ebay. Happy editing! Constantine ✍ 18:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

I luckily found already a set of three books in one shop in my country, but they are quite expensive, so I didn't want to spend the grant initially. Thank you, and good luck with your editing! --Werter1995 (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Constantine! We still have a problem with this book. May I ask you to scan or photograph some of the pages and send them by email?
№№ 37, 38, 58—60, 176, 225, 226, 229—236.
zanuda-1964@mail.ru
I would be extremely grateful! If you ever need sources from my articles, I'll be happy to provide them to you.
My articles. Удивленный1 (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Удивленный1, which volume do you need? Constantine ✍ 19:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

• 1 Volume, Das Reich des Mahdi: Der Aufstieg der Fatimiden. He wants to see the sources for the articles I've written and I can't give him any right now;) --Werter1995 (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Удивленный1:, I've sent you a link, it will be online for about a week. Constantine ✍ 17:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Удивленный1 (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Oswald Boelcke assessment

Hello, I have fixed most of the items you listed. There's still a couple of concerns unanswered, however.

Your knowledge of German language and history has been a great help in improving the article. I anticipate any further input.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Georgejdorner: you're welcome, it was a nice read. I've replied in the assessment thread, only a few outstanding issues remaining and I'll be happy to support. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 11:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, again, Other than the request for German language templates, I believe I have dealt with your concerns. I'll do the templates later; while they are cut-and-paste, they are going to take a while. You may want to wait a few days until they are done.

Again, I would like to thank you for errors corrected, comments made, and education dispensed.Georgejdorner (talk) 22:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

@Georgejdorner: no worries. Ping me when you're done, I will look it over and likely pass it then. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 16:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I am not sure I am inserting the lang templates correctly. Could you please take a look at those I have done so far?Georgejdorner (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Cplakidas: Ready for assessment finale.Georgejdorner (talk) 03:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Cplakidas: So...one more time.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Greetings Cplakidas

I have included a list for some articles that still have no pages. Hence, I would like to ask if you can please have a look at it and help to turn all the reds to blues if possible. Regards. Alas2022 (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For German translation, and for incisive editorial commentary. Georgejdorner (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Georgejdorner, much appreciated! Constantine ✍ 19:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qarmatian invasion of Iraq

The article Qarmatian invasion of Iraq you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Qarmatian invasion of Iraq for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Cplakidas,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 813 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 848 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Qarmatian invasion of Iraq

On 30 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qarmatian invasion of Iraq, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Qarmatian invasion of Iraq, the Abbasid Caliphate raised an army of more than 40,000 men to protect Baghdad, but did not engage the few thousand Qarmatians in battle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qarmatian invasion of Iraq. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qarmatian invasion of Iraq), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

• New library partner - SPIE
• 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

G-Aerosports

Hello and thank you for your contributions, especially covering Greek topics. I would like to ask you to check (if you could) the article G-Aerosports, regarding a Greek arircraft maker. There seems to be a "strange" effort for its deletion, so I would like to request your contribution on the deletion discussion page. Sincerely, thank you in advance Skartsis (talk) 06:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Battle of Lalakaon

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Battle of Lalakaon, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Taormina (902)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Taormina (902) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Cplakidas,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15516 articles, as of 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Taormina (902)

The article Siege of Taormina (902) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Taormina (902) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Erwin Böhme

Hello,

You probably recall Oswald Boelcke's best friend from your A Class review on Boelcke. I have just nominated Erwin Böhme for A Class, and I believe this prior experience would be invaluable in improving the Erwin Böhme article. I find your editing tips most helpful. And you did seem to enjoy reviewing Boelcke.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

• Alas, Boelcke's FAN just tanked for lack of reviewers, and Böhme's ACR looks headed the same way. Can you please bring your erudition to bear on the ACR of tragic Erwin Böhme?Georgejdorner (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Greek MPs 1869–1872

A tag has been placed on Category:Greek MPs 1869–1872 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hellenic parliament resulting from the 1869 election

According to the registry, which is the source that's used in most of these articles about Greek MPs, the parliament that resulted from the 1869 election was in session from 1869 to 1871. It dissolved in December 1871, and there were new elections in January 1872. --Antondimak (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Historians of the Byzantine Empire

Category:Historians of the Byzantine Empire has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#Category:Historians of the Byzantine Empire. – Fayenatic London 09:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

• New library partners
  • SAGE Journals
  • Elsevier ScienceDirect
  • University of Chicago Press
  • Information Processing Society of Japan
• Feedback requested on this newsletter
• 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Cplakidas,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Cplakidas,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Old news

Hi Cplakidas--I just ran into Mese (Constantinople). If you happen to have those sources laying around, could you add footnotes for them? Thanks! Drmies (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between April and June 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 07:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jawdhar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jawdhar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:41, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jawdhar

The article Jawdhar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jawdhar for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick. Thanks Iazyges! Any suggestions, beyond the scope of a GAN? I don't at the moment intend to take this article further, so anything you noticed that might be good to change/add would be very helpful! Constantine ✍ 19:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

No problem! Not at present, the article seems very well formed. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Request for Review

Hello,

I hope you are doing well. Could you please review this draft? Thank you so much for your help in advance.Scholartop (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

• New instant-access collections:
  • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
  • Project MUSE
  • Taylor & Francis
  • ASHA
  • Loeb
• Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between July and September 2022. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Reichswehr

"Reichswehr", like "Wehrmacht" (but not "Reichsheer" or "Reichsmarine"), has long since been adopted from the German as an English word. It's in every online dictionary I checked -- and in my 1987 10 kg Webster's Unabridged -- so I don't think it's correct to be putting it into the lang template in the Reichswehr article (especially since it occurs 113 times...). GHStPaulMN (talk) 21:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks GHStPaulMN, noted :). Constantine ✍ 12:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Al-Jarjara'i family has been nominated for merging

Category:Al-Jarjara'i family has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

"Fifty Years' War" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fifty Years' War and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Fifty Years' War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Battle of the Defile scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 17 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 17, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2020): "The Battle of the Defile was one of the largest and most important battles of the late Umayyad period. Along with the Battle of Marj Ardabil a few months earlier (and arguably the Battle of Tours a year later), it marked the end of Umayyad expansion. The casualties suffered also helped undermine the Umayyad regime, increasing disaffection in Khurasan and removing many of the regime's most loyal forces from the metropolitan regions to the frontier, thus paving the way for the Abbasid Revolution. We are also fortunate to have one of the most complete accounts of a battle preserved in al-Tabari, and we can reconstruct events with more detail than usual for the period."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi

On 12 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi was the first theologian to introduce concepts from Neoplatonism into Isma'ili doctrine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Banu Abi'l-Shawarib has been nominated for merging

Category:Banu Abi'l-Shawarib has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Cplakidas,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Years of the 18th century in Greece

A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 18th century in Greece indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Encyclopaedia Islamica Online

Hi Constantine! Don't you have access to Encyclopaedia Islamica Online via the Wikipedia library? We as a whole Russian Wikipedia cannot access the BRILL website... Werter1995 (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Werter1995 I have access via the University of Vienna. Ping me if you need something. Constantine ✍ 16:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Cplakidas:, I created the same article on Russian Wikipedia as you did on English Wikipedia, Ibn Shirzad. To finish this article I need an article from Enciclopaedia Islamica. Url. Thank. Werter1995 (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

By the way, I found a pdf version of Halm's latest book, Kalifen und Assassinen: Ägypten und der Vordere Orient zur Zeit der ersten Kreuzzüge 1074—1171, which I asked you about at the time. I can send it to you if any of your colleagues need it. Werter1995 (talk) 20:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Werter1995: Will write up the article in English with the Islamica article, which is fairly comprehensive. If you have a pdf of Halm's book, I'd gladly have it; I have a physical copy, but it is a pain to carry around :D Constantine ✍ 17:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Cplakidas:, email me via wikimail, it won't let me attach the pdf file.
I will also have The Buwayhid dynasty of Baghdad by Mafizullah Kabir (see Mu'izz_al-Dawla#Sourses) in a couple of days. I can send it to you if you don't have it. Werter1995 (talk) 18:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Werter1995 (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks. Constantine ✍ 18:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Al-Muti

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Al-Muti, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Pan-Arab colors, Fatimid Dynasty

Thanks for your edits to the flag families article and for the additional sources. The one you linked regarding white as the color of the Fatimid dynasty did not clearly disprove the other sources, and there are many more claiming green was the color. I tried but was unable to find a secondary source that proved white, and not green, was the color of the dynasty. I've made some changes to the article to reflect this, but kept your source. Happy to discuss further, but if you disagree with this decision perhaps we should move it to the article's talk page so others can weigh in. Thanks again for your contribution.  Not A  Witty Fish 15:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi NotAWittyFish I have added some additional sources. In short, this is a fairly common (and commonly repeated) misconception, which is puzzling because the contemporary historical sources are unanimous that the Fatimids, like most Alids, used white as their color. This has been debated at Talk:Fatimid Caliphate as well. AFAIK, from some 19th-century sources I encountered a while back, this association of green with the Fatimids began sometime in the late Ottoman period. Constantine ✍ 21:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Iraklis Mitsopoulos

your excuse for removing information
that someone attended the same institution as other famous people is not notable, unless they had a connection because of it. Plus other corrections (e.g. Aigio is not in Patras) and cleanup

• I disagree with the changes you made to the page Iraklis Mitsopoulos.  First of all the school he attended in Germany is the specific University Xavier Landerer attended. Why attend the University of Munich?  Xavier was also a botanist and most certainty motivated Mitsopoulos to attended the same institution.  I believe this is significant information to historians and researchers.<br><br>
  
  Another reason I added prominent figures is to help researchers and academics clarify, which prominent professors or researchers were at the institution at that time.  Clarifying this information will help academics and researchers find any research the individual may have participated in while he was at the institution.  Nikolaos Ch. Nikolaidis completed a doctoral dissertation I put all that information on Wikipedia and there you can see every faculty member that was associated with that institution is listed as a committee that reviews the students research.  From this specific dissertation every faculty member at the institution is associated with each individual student that studies at the educational institution at the time.~~~~
  
  *Secondly, it takes a really long time to find the faculty that were at that school at that time.

  Tzim78 (talk) 17:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Tzim78! I understand it is a laborious effort, but it is not relevant to the person in question. People being at the same institution at the same time is coincidence; it only become relevant if they interacted. To take a somewhat extreme example, there is the well-known trivia that Hitler, Freud, Trotsky, and Tito were all in Vienna at about the same time. Apart from this being mildly ironic, so what? They did not know or influence one another at the time. On Mitsopoulos or any other scientist specifically, if a famous scientist was their teacher, or they were/became friends while at the same university, then this is WP:NOTABLE. Anything else is not. This is simply the way encyclopedia articles are written.

More importantly, there is a policy in place, WP:No original research, which prohibits us, as editors, from adding material that we have researched ourselves or draw or imply our own conclusions. What you are doing is precisely that. If a WP:Reliable source mentions other scientists in an article about a scientist, then someone else, i.e. a qualified, peer-reviewed expert scholar, has judged these relationships to be important. A Wikipedia editor however cannot decide on their inclusion simply as 'a nice thing to have', because their inclusion implies a relationship, and that is original research. Constantine ✍ 17:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Understood! Tzim78 (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

• New collections:
  • Edward Elgar
  • E-Yearbook
  • Corriere della Serra
  • Wikilala
• Collections moved to Library Bundle:
  • Ancestry
• New feature: Outage notification
• Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Aghlabid governors of Sicily has been nominated for merging

Category:Aghlabid governors of Sicily has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi

The article Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi for comments about the article, and Talk:Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Nasafi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Siege of Thessalonica (1422–1430) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Siege of Thessalonica (1422–1430) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 23, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 23, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Ibn al-Ash'ath

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Ibn al-Ash'ath, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations, amd thank you today for Siege of Thessalonica (1422–1430), introduced (in 2018): "An article on a long and complex blockade of Thessalonica, involving Byzantium, Venice, and the Ottomans, which finally ended with the Ottoman capture of the city. A seminal event, as it heralded the fall of Constantinople, and showed the limitations of Venice's mercantile maritime empire when faced with a large and determined land power."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		The Military history A-Class medal with swords
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal with Swords for Battle of the Blacks, Excubitors, and Sayf al-Dawla. Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Gog the Mild (talk)! Have a happy New Year! Constantine ✍ 08:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Kalends of January

		Happy New Year!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Ealdgyth! For you and your loved ones likewise a happy and rewarding new year! Constantine ✍ 17:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Cplakidas!

Happy New Year!

Cplakidas,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Moops, likewise the best wishes for the new year to you and your loved ones! Constantine ✍ 18:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

TY! Apparently my sending too many of these greetings caused me to get blocked! Hope you did not find these well wishes to be disruptive. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Not at all, thanks for sending them :) Constantine ✍ 18:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Cplakidas,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Ibn al-Ash'ath scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 27 February 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 27, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

New Source on Ionian Island Units

Hi. I found an open access article by Nicholas Charles Pappas from 2021 which offers a lot of details on the Greek Legion (Septinsular Republic) and bits and pieces on the Albanian Regiment (France) and the 1st Regiment Greek Light Infantry. I added it to each article's further reading section. I am focused on other content right now so I thought you might be interested in taking a look. Catlemur (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Catlemur, that looks interesting. Unfortunately also out of my focus currently, but will get around to it eventually :). Constantine ✍ 07:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Husayn ibn Numayr in Marj Rahit

@Cplakidas: @Cplakidas: Does the source not mention the presence of Husayn ibn Numayr at the Battle of Marj Rahit (684)? Thanks A154 (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi A154 not that I know of. Al-Tabari for example mentions his presence in the debates about the nomination of a new caliph, but nothing of his participation in the battle. Constantine ✍ 07:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

@Cplakidas: hi too. Maybe use another source. Perhaps the premier sources have been translated. The source in question could be something like Al Kamil fi al Tarikh by Ibn al-Athir or Ansab al ashraf by al Baladhuri. Given that Bani Kinda participated in the battle and one of their leaders, Malik ibn Hubayra was also present, it is not known whether Husayn actually participated or whether he chose neutral. A154 (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Chios (1912)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Chios (1912) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Byzantine emperors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Byzantine emperors, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Byzantine emperors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

• New collections:
  • British Newspaper Archive
  • Findmypast
  • University of Michigan Press
  • ACLS
  • Duke University Press
• 1Lib1Ref 2023
• Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capture of Lemnos (1912)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capture of Lemnos (1912) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capture of Lemnos (1912)

The article Capture of Lemnos (1912) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Capture of Lemnos (1912) for comments about the article, and Talk:Capture of Lemnos (1912)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Greek Military Veterinary Terms

I want to write an article about the Hellenic Army Veterinary Service but I am confused about how I am supposed to translate Greek ranks like επικτηνίατρος into English. Any ideas? Aside from that I think bringing the Greek front of the First Balkan War to Good Topic status is achievable, especially if we get some people from Greek WP to participate. Cheers. Catlemur (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Catlemur! επικτηνίατρος would be Major of the Veterinary Corps, as English does not have specific titles for the different corps/services (unlike German, where I think we got this from). On the Balkan Wars, I will be glad to help. The quality of the topic and its articles is generally low... I have, as you know, the abridged Greek army history, which is amazingly detailed even so. Constantine ✍ 18:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

A local library was gifted a lot of the official Greek army history books recently. For the Balkan Wars they have all the tomes except for the first one which covers the Macedonian front operations during the first war. But they have both the abridged tome and the medical services one (which has Greek army casualty estimates for each battle). Unfortunately they do not loan books so I have to bring my laptop there and I have a weird work schedule so that will slow the whole process down. Right now there are 13 articles about battles on the Greek front. 5 are Good articles and I nominated Battle of Sorovich and Battle of Driskos at GAN as well. I don't know if there are more battles to be written about like the Battle of Gribovo, or they should just be mentioned in passing.--Catlemur (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

@Catlemur: I definitely think that there are some battles of some importance still missing, such as Gribovo, Elassona, Ostrovo, the early attempts to capture Ioannina, just off the top of my head. I also want to add more info on the naval aspect of the war somewhere, and some more neglected events like the Icarian Revolution or the capture of Samos could also get a proper treatment. Constantine ✍ 21:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Speaking of Greek terms, what would be the appropriate translation for "τάγμα των μετόπισθεν"?--Catlemur (talk) 03:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

@Catlemur: a direct translation would be 'rear areas battalion', but depending on context, it could be something like 'rear area protection/security battalion', 'support battalion', or 'depot/replacement battalion' (for regimental depots). Constantine ✍ 07:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John I Orsini

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John I Orsini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nicholas Orsini

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nicholas Orsini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Richard Orsini

The article Richard Orsini you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Richard Orsini for comments about the article, and Talk:Richard Orsini/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nicholas Orsini

The article Nicholas Orsini you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nicholas Orsini for comments about the article, and Talk:Nicholas Orsini/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John I Orsini

The article John I Orsini you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John I Orsini for comments about the article, and Talk:John I Orsini/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Chinese Central Asia has been nominated for renaming

Category:Chinese Central Asia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		With this barnstar, Ghazaalch and I gratefully recognize your valuable and thoughtful feedback and your commitment to the review process, without which Muhammad al-Jawad would have not passed its GA nomination. We look forward to upgrading key Shia articles with your help. Albertatiran (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you both, Albertatiran and Ghazaalch. TBH it was quite a bit more in-depth than a 'regular' GA review, but I think it was a good thing for all of us, and for the article. I am looking forward to your next articles on Shia figures! Constantine ✍ 16:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

You Can Get Much Further with a Kind Word and a...

Hi @Cplakidas, I don't think there was any need for the comment "correcting complete shambles about the location of this station" --✠ Emperor of Byzantium ✠ (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Adid

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Al-Adid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

RFC on Byzantine Empire text

Hi! I would appreciate if you could participate in an RFC that just opened up. Thanks! Elias (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 18:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah

The article Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah for comments about the article, and Talk:Al-Fa'iz bi-Nasr Allah/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Adid

The article Al-Adid you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Al-Adid and Talk:Al-Adid/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Adid

The article Al-Adid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Al-Adid for comments about the article, and Talk:Al-Adid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Chios (1912)

On 17 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Chios (1912), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Greek forces captured the Aegean island of Chios in January 1913, its annexation to Greece was not finalized until 1923? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Chios (1912). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Chios (1912)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Sayf al-Dawla

Congratulations, Cplakidas! The article you nominated, Sayf al-Dawla, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

February songs

my daily stories

Congratulations! Thank you today also for Ibn al-Ash'ath, "about an Arab aristocrat who led one of the largest rebellions against the Umayyad Caliphate in the early 700s. His story is essentially the story of the Iraqi Arabs under the Umayyads, and especially during the governorship of al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf." - and a DYK also! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda! I hope you are well and enjoy the articles :). Cheers, Constantine ✍ 16:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Check out my talk about wellness, - yes, I enjoy the articles. Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Buildings of Justinian I

Category:Buildings of Justinian I and others may be renamed or deleted. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 16#Category:Buildings and structures by monarch. – Fayenatic London 08:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daoud ibn al-Adid

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daoud ibn al-Adid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 23:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Nicholas Orsini

On 27 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nicholas Orsini, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nicholas Orsini became Despot of Epirus by murdering his uncle, only to be in turn killed by his brother five years later? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Orsini. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nicholas Orsini), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)