User talk:Gragin
Al-Mustansir billah II Ali Shah moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Al-Mustansir billah II Ali Shah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rActalk to me 15:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Editing articles
[edit]Hello! Please do not change referenced information, or insert new material into referenced sections, without providing a reference to back the changes up. Otherwise this contravenes WP:VERIFY. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 18:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! You rely only on one source and of course I did not provide anything from me and you can browse this site http://www.ismaili.net/histoire/main.html ,Thank you.
Gragin (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The source I rely on is one of the chief modern scholars on Isma'ilism. ismaili.net is not a WP:RS, not only as it is affiliated with, and is written from the perspective of, the Isma'ili faith, but because its content is drawn straight from Isma'ili tradition, and is thus outdated or at odds with scholarship. See, for example, the regnal dates given, or the making of Anjudan as headquarters by Gharib Mirza rather than al-Mustansir II. At any rate, please always cite sources for any additions or changes you make. Constantine ✍ 22:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2022
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/علوي قزلباشي, you may be blocked from editing. DanCherek (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
That user is slandering me and trying to link me to a user I have to relation to Gragin (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)My edits were right, so I wasn't edit warring! (Optionally, a very long explanation on why you are right and why everyone else is wrong follows.) This is an unfair block! I am new here! I did nothing wrong! The blocking administrator hates me! UNBLOCK ME IMMEDIATELY, THIS IS CENSORSHIP, I HAVE A RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH!!! User:A and User:B conspired to have me blocked!!! Corrupt admins condone their doings, they are POV railroading against me! Here, this is a list of their great wrongs!: If you block me, you have to block User:OtherUser too! He has been vandalizing even more! Please unblock me. My sister / brother / mother / father / friend / roommate / enemy / pet used my computer and pretended to be me. I won't let this happen again. Oh lighten up, I was drunk / having a bet with a friend / just playing around. It was a joke! Oh come on, the blocking administrator is stupid / arrogant / idiotic. Remove his administrator rights and block him! He blocked me for nothing! My account was hacked / my computer was infected with a virus; I didn't make any of the edits I was blocked for / I've regained control of my computer. If you do not promptly unblock me, I will have absolutely no choice but to sue Wikimedia in order to get my editing rights back. If you do not unblock me, I WILL continue to harass User:A and other people. I WILL REALLY shoot my dog if you do not unblock me. I'll make a big donation to Wikipedia if you unblock me as a sign of my good faith. This isn't fair. Admin X is from Z country and they are biased against me and my country. This is discrimination, not vandalism. I only made those edits to prove to my students / kids / parents / friends that you can't trust what it says in a Wikipedia article. I only made those edits to test Wikipedia's security. THIS IS AGAINST THE LAW! Wikipedia is AGAINST THE LAW!! Gragin (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]My edits were right, so I wasn't edit warring! (Optionally, a very long explanation on why you are right and why everyone else is wrong follows.) This is an unfair block! I am new here! I did nothing wrong! The blocking administrator hates me! UNBLOCK ME IMMEDIATELY, THIS IS CENSORSHIP, I HAVE A RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH!!! User:A and User:B conspired to have me blocked!!! Corrupt admins condone their doings, they are POV railroading against me! Here, this is a list of their great wrongs!: If you block me, you have to block User:OtherUser too! He has been vandalizing even more! Please unblock me. My sister / brother / mother / father / friend / roommate / enemy / pet used my computer and pretended to be me. I won't let this happen again. Oh lighten up, I was drunk / having a bet with a friend / just playing around. It was a joke! Oh come on, the blocking administrator is stupid / arrogant / idiotic. Remove his administrator rights and block him! He blocked me for nothing! My account was hacked / my computer was infected with a virus; I didn't make any of the edits I was blocked for / I've regained control of my computer. If you do not promptly unblock me, I will have absolutely no choice but to sue Wikimedia in order to get my editing rights back. If you do not unblock me, I WILL continue to harass User:A and other people. I WILL REALLY shoot my dog if you do not unblock me. I'll make a big donation to Wikipedia if you unblock me as a sign of my good faith. This isn't fair. Admin X is from Z country and they are biased against me and my country. This is discrimination, not vandalism. I only made those edits to prove to my students / kids / parents / friends that you can't trust what it says in a Wikipedia article. I only made those edits to test Wikipedia's security. THIS IS AGAINST THE LAW! Wikipedia is AGAINST THE LAW!! Gragin (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)