User talk:90.216.134.193

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Gay bar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gay bar was changed by 90.216.134.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93412 on 2014-01-12T16:47:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kumbaya has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kumbaya was changed by 90.216.134.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877725 on 2014-01-15T12:23:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kumbaya with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Orlan

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Buddhism in Scotland, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover ^(Talk) 17:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Obverse Books. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. According to Amazon.com, the title of ISBN 978-1909031241 remains the same. If there's been a change, please cite your source. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 18:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Bilel Mohsni, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Hello, I'm MadGuy7023. Your recent edit to the page Caroline Flack appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015

Hello, I'm Helpsome. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Helpsome (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scott Brown (DJ) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 14:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015

Hello, I'm Accents. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sky (United Kingdom)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Accents 14:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kevin12 x d 16:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Evans

Here's an idea IP, rather than taking the lazy route by adding citation tags to articles like Norman Evans, try sourcing the information yourself, that way we actually fix the problem rather than leaving it to someone else to rectify. Cassianto ^Talk 12:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Derry Mathews— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A m i t 웃 18:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jordan lewis hill, 19 year old gamer from Manchester

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jordan lewis hill, 19 year old gamer from Manchester, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Rob^Talk 22:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm JWNoctis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Church of St Mary, Hulme— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JW Noctis^{talk to me} 16:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Cowie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 13:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Danny Swanson. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 13:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Swanson. Giant Snowman 13:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you familiarise yourself with WP:BLP, WP:RS and WP:V before editing again. Giant Snowman 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you wait two minutes before jumping in like a keyboard warrior.

June 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tunguska event— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Kosack. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eric Bailly have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 09:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noted your comments regarding my 'vandalizing' the Wineville Chicken Coop Murder page

I read your comments accusing me of 'vandalizing' the Wineville Chicken Coop Murder' Wiki page. Please log into the talk page for the wineville chicken coop murder page and state your case on the talk page. I am more than interested in hearing what your concerns are. At best, I think you are editing the page and attmpeting to suggest that Gordon Northcott did not sexually abuse either sanford clark or his victims...............but on the other hand, your editing is using incompelte sentences.

I am quite confident that I am only stating what the court record and legal case was against Gordon Northcott. I am not just making this stuff up. It is taken from the court records and testimony.

If you have something you wish to discuss on the talk page, please join in. I am not a bully and I will be happy to retract any and all sentences on the page, where you can provide factual and truthful information that varies from what I have written.

Looking forward to the discussion as well as hearing your point of view.

Beaconboy (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Lourdes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dominic Dale have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lourdes 16:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dawn French. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 16:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Jordan (author) (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Jordan (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 90.216.134.193, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Jordan (author) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Clearly too soon in his career as still none of this establishes genuine notability in Wikipedia policy and I found nothing to suggest convincing it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Jordan (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Will Jordan (author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Will Jordan (author). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Cameron11598. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John Fraser (footballer, born 1978)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 14:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Will Jordan (author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Will Jordan (author). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Jordan (author) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hardly any significant coverage (a few pieces from his local newspaper, but that's it) or reviews of his books. Blogs are not suitable references. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Jordan (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Will Jordan (author) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Will Jordan (author), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Will Jordan (author)

Hello, 90.216.134.193. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Will Jordan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 12:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Winston Churchill, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mel B—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mark Stone (journalist), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 22:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm ARoseWolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Roy Farrell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ARose Wolf 17:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.