Talk:Throne of Fire
 | Throne of Fire has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 11, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Throne of Fire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 23:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
{{doing}} Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 23:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks good. I did some tweaks but I think almost everything meets criteria.
- Well written
- Not sure the article is "brilliant", but the prose is competent and clear, and I had no issues with comprehension.
- Verifiable
- I spot-checked statements attributed to refs 4, 5, 7, 9, and 11, and didn't see any issues with referencing or plagiarism. References are from reputable sources.
- Coverage
- It's a short article, but covers gameplay, development, and reception. No issues here.
- Neutral/Stable
- Not a problem
- Images
- While I think File:Throne of Fire cover.jpg and File:Throne of Fire gameplay.png have adequate reason for being included, their fair use rationales need work. I'm not sure why sections are marked as "not applicable" instead of explaining, and "to illustrate X" in an article is not a compelling NFCC#8 purpose justification. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- I reworked the rationales. GamerPro64 17:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. With that being the only outstanding issue, I'll pass the article. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 02:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I reworked the rationales. GamerPro64 17:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- While I think File:Throne of Fire cover.jpg and File:Throne of Fire gameplay.png have adequate reason for being included, their fair use rationales need work. I'm not sure why sections are marked as "not applicable" instead of explaining, and "to illustrate X" in an article is not a compelling NFCC#8 purpose justification. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
