Talk:Tales of Vesperia: The First Strike

Tales of Vesperia: The First Strike has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 8, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Tales of Vesperia characters#Flynn Scifo|Flynn Scifo]] The anchor (#Flynn Scifo) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[List of Tales of Vesperia characters#Alexei Dinoia|Commandant Alexei]]
[[List of Tales of Vesperia characters#Rita Mordio|Rita Mordio]] The anchor (#Rita Mordio) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[List of Tales of Vesperia characters#Repede|Repede]] The anchor (#Repede) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Film: Japanese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Outfolded (3 participants)
NoFrag (1 participant)
VoxelStorm (0 participants)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Overseas licensing / English dub dispute

Cyberlink420 and Sn1p3r87, please try and resolve the dispute via open communication on this talk page instead of constantly reverting each other's edits. --Remy Suen (talk) 11:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the edits is that he's reading too much into one offhand comment. All Baker ever said was that he hopes that someone does license the Tales of Vesperia movie, and that they ask him to play Yuri again. Nowhere in there was a confirmation, a denial, or even a hint, and as Wikipedia is not a place for speculation, the edit does NOT belong on the page. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the information being added, I would say that it fails WP:Verifiability. No one can independently verify what Baker said during a panel at a convention unless the convention, or someone on their behalf, recorded the panel and released the recording. 64.127.58.192 (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone DID record it. The problem, however, is that as I mentioned before, all Baker ever said was that he hopes that someone does license the Tales of Vesperia movie, and that they ask him to play Yuri again. There's no "hint" anywhere. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tales of Vesperia: The First Strike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 17:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done anything with this article, I think. I'll take this up. It may take a few days though. --ProtoDrake (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Just a few points I noted

In the lead: the sentence "He expressed pressure due to First Strike being his debut as a director and thus elaborated on how difficult was creating the storyboard." I feel that the grammar could be better.
In Reception: "Tales of Vesperia: The First Strike is a standalone offering, or at least one that might have done better had it focused solely on Yuri and Flynn and left the rest of the 'cast of thousands' far in the background.". I think maybe you should use italics for the film's title.
If possible, I think you should add creation dates for Refs 6 to 9, 21 to 26. Authors are not essential, but where it can be done or it's not obvious due to the reference's title, I think you should add the author of the online article.

Once these are addressed, the article should be fit to sport the GA icon and be a part of the GA list.

Added dates. However, I can't find ones for refs 6-9

Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I think this now rates as a Pass.

Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]