Jump to content

Talk:Solar Jetman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSolar Jetman has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSolar Jetman is part of the Rare Replay series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2015Good article nomineeListed
August 2, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

The title of the NES game is Solar Jetman: Hunt for the Golden Warpship.[1] The proper title is displayed on the NES game's startup screen and throughout the game's instruction manual. Is this article misnamed, or is the NES version the only port with this name? - New User 11:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that this problem extends throughout wikipedia. The only articles I found with the proper name for this game are List of NES games (which had a red link) and, oddly enough, the first sentence of this article. Since every source I can find other than wikipedia, including the game itself and the instruction manual, give the title Warpship, I am moving this article and I will clean up every instance I can find of the incorrect name (by using What links here). - New User 11:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Should it be moved back to Solar Jetman? That is the common name. JuJube 12:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Solar Jetman already links to the article --Zagrebo 17:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Solar Jetman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AdrianGamer (talk · contribs) 14:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I should be able to get this done before Friday. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content

[edit]
  • When it was released for the "PlayChoice-10"?
  • Monday, 1 January 1990, and apparently it only made 500 sales in the United States. I know, I can't believe I found it either! I'm sceptical over the New Years Day release date though, as MobyGames (which is never usually right) states it was released on PlayChoice in 1991[2]. I'm going to go with the most prominent reliable sources and state it was released later in 1990 (IGN states it released in that year, but gives no month) JAGUAR  13:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Solar Jetman: Hunt for the Golden Warpship is a shooter video game developed by Zippo Games - multi-directional shooter. Sounds more accurate.
  • Can we split a new paragraph for gameplay in the lead. For now it is a bit short, and it looks a bit weird. The lead does not give any indication on who Jetman is. The game's protagonist?
  • but criticism was directed at the game's hard difficulty - remove "hard" for consistency
  • in similar vein to Gravitar and Thrust. - Do we really need to compare this game to these two games. They don't really help readers to understand.
  • Can we have some very brief information about who Jetman actually is and the setting of the game. It would make the remaming part of the gameplay section to feel less confusing. (For instance I have no ideas what Jetman is, why he has a pod, what planets etc.)
  • on each world bringing back a piece of the Golden Warpship - instead of world, use "planet"
  • a piece of the Golden Warpship - Any description of what the "Golden Warpship" is?
  • Items are collected with a tow cable that makes flight more difficult - Why?
  • Jetman will eject out of the pod and will walk around in an agile but vulnerable spacesuit. - do not need two "will". A space is needed after the full stop
  • There is quite a lot of development information about this game. Therefore, about the part Rare founding the company may not be necessary.
  • Solar Jetman was the first game to be released under Rare - Their first game?
  • This section seems to have assume that readers know the history of Rare. This may need some clarifications.
  • Zippo Games primarily focused on developing - can be rephrased it to "Zippo Games was known for developing Ironsword".
  • I do not quite get the relationship between Zippo Games and Rare
  • I've explained a little. Zippo Games were independent but were bought out by Rare during development of Solar Jetman. Please let me know if anything still sounds unclear? JAGUAR  17:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Pickford brothers started development of Iota - Is Iota the Rare's commissioned project?
  • PlayChoice 10 was not mentioned in the development and release section.
  • to a workforce of several people - Any information on how many there actually is?
  • announced ports and screenshots - screenshots would not be "announced"
  • The reception section is very short. It needs some expansion.
  • The part about it having a poor sales should be mentioned again in the reception section.
  • Why the Ultimate Play The Game Template is here when it was developed under the name "Rare"?
  • The article says "presented in a horizontal wrap around environment", which I don't think is correct. I'm pretty sure there's no horizontal wrapping on this game, and viewing the various maps and walkthroughs online shows no evidence of wrapping. 141.142.42.15 (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)gauauu[reply]

References

[edit]
  • The gameplay section only have one source. Can some of the review sources be moved to the gameplay section?
  • Should be quality over quantity, but the number of sources used here is a bit, well, too small. Would be nice if you can add more in. It is just a suggestion.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list corporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Overall it is a nice article. However, some content is not clear to readers, especially the part about the history of Rare. The reception section needs some expansion. With all the issues fixed the article should be good to go.

@AdrianGamer: thanks for the review! I hope I've addressed everything, if you can take a look? Whilst looking for more sources I found the actual release date from Giant Bomb, so I've added that in the article. Miraculously, I also found the exact date development began from the Pickford brothers' website. I really wasn't expecting that! JAGUAR  17:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With all the issues fixed, the article is good to go! Solar Jetman is now a . Congratulations. AdrianGamer (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Solar Jetman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Solar_Jetman&oldid=1205352180"