Talk:Limia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Limia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Surtsicna (talk · contribs) 10:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Great nomination. I'm looking for your response and/or edits on point 2.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Great article! Looking forward to when red links resolve and allow for the Species section to flow in prose instead of relying on a list. No change requested today on this topic.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Spot check references to verify citations. Reviewed CopyVios tool against sources.

• Reference 7: File extension typo "repository.naturalis.nl/pub/504959/BEAU2002052006001.pdff"

Fixed. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Reference 13: Are you able to cite page(s) or inline page ref with {{rp|p=124}}?

Done. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad coverage in habitat, discovery, and characteristics while staying centered on overall genus.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are own-work of several users. Captions provide context.

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

• Limia
• GAARlandia

)

Limia tridens male

• ... that limias (L. tridens pictured) and other freshwater fish and land vertebrates are controversially hypothesized to have colonized the Caribbean islands via a mysterious land bridge?

• Source: Historical biogeographical reconstruction supported the GAARlandia DEC+j model as the best fitting model for colonization.

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jews in the Polish Army, Template:Did you know nominations/Gifted (2022 novella)

Improved to Good Article status by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 187 past nominations.

Surtsicna (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - Minor, see below
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I just saw the Limia page on the recent list of Good Articles (congrats btw!), so I had to give this double nom a look. There is just one minor thing I'd fix: either beside or at the end of the sentence containing the direct quote "weak and non-existent" in the GAAR article, could you put a citation? Other than that, everything else checks out and I'd be happy to pass this. Cheers! Johnson524 09:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Of course. Done. Thank you for noticing limias! :) Surtsicna (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Approved for both hooks, cheers! Johnson524 22:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)