Jump to content

Talk:Arnold Palmer Tournament Golf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use images

[edit]

Qst is essentially correct. There is no justification whatsoever for 3 fair use images on an article this small, particularly when 2 of them have no fair use rationales and are hence eligible for deletion. 1 should be quite enough. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 15:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The images were added before the upload image page came with the rationale template by default. It's trivial to add them back. I don't see why I can't have the title screen and another image of the actual game. I can find countless pages that have more than one screenshot image. The Qst guy was just harassing me because I edited one of "his" pages and he didn't like it. I think people need to think about the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law. Apavlo (talk) 17:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arnold Palmer Tournament Golf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]