Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 January 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Foreseeable that the scope of this template will become too broad (see Russia and France), and thus has been partitioned in three. DemocracyDeprivationDisorder (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use citation template from 2020; subst and delete as clearly not as widely needed as expected. Primefac (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Citation templates should have a large amount of usages for them to be created. Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full of red links. The two remaining blue links are redirects. Nothing to navigate. plicit 14:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:NGC objects:7500-7840 with Template:NGC objects:7000-7499.
(And rename to Template:NGC objects:7000-7840.) Dropping redlinks and redirects to the list of NGC objects has shrunk the number of articles in these templates to less than half the previous amount. The lists are segmented by thousands, so it would be more consistent to have the nav templates segmented that way, too. I expect many of the other articles currently listed will be determined to be not-notable per WP:NASTRO and will be redirected to the list as well (so these templates will keep shrinking). -- Beland (talk) 10:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. For now. The inconsistency at the -99 and -00 cutoff between the list articles and the templates will need to be addressed first before any merger action should be taken on the templates. As it currently stands, there remain 68 and 135 (09:31 edit: corrected figure) articles linked respectively, let it whittle down further for a bit. DemocracyDeprivationDisorder (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a preference as to whether to end on -99 or -00? -- Beland (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I'm more in favour of a -00 cutoff simply because that's what the corresponding articles split off at. DemocracyDeprivationDisorder (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LFP Ligue templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both templates are currently broken due to the website change with the new sponsor. Some links are archived so it could be changed to be similar to {{LFP}}, but someone would need to go through all 700 uses, so I don't think it'sworth it. Nobody (talk) 07:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All individual articles were redirected to the parent article per this AFD, rendering this template unnecessary. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.