Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 5 July 7 >

July 6

[edit]

Template:Missouri Valley Conference championships navbox

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicates the bottom section of Template:Missouri Valley Conference navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Desouk weatherbox

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary box which would be single-use if used. Desouk has the same weather box as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Good catch. I meant to say revert the edit that added the template and go back to the version before it's placement as a single-use item. The template can be outright deleted and thus reverting back wouldn't require another edit of copying and pasting onto the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
better to substitute, since the div tags are not needed and cause problems for narrow screens. Frietjes (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox natural region of Germany

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 14. Primefac (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:David Cameron cabinet 4 vertical

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in only a single article. It encodes a table which is better served as directly editable within the article itself instead of sequestering it into the template space. It is highly unlikely for this template to be used on any other articles. Per WP:TMP, the template namespace should not be used to store article content. Subst and delete. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:7TeamBracket-NCAA

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{7TeamBracket}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As long as the relevant pages have been updated, no argument from me. PensRule11385 (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:10TeamBracketReSeed

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{10TeamBracket}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 16:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the 10TeamBracket template is structured better and makes viewing easier. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colebrookdale Railroad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template as it exists is misleading--the Colebrookdale Railroad, a heritage railway, does not and did not serve most of the stations shown, and the actual line was abandoned north of Boyertown long before it came on the scene. I recently created Colebrookdale branch and {{Colebrookdale branch}} to properly cover the history of the infrastructure. A refactored version of this template would show the only two "active" stations, Boyertown and Pottstown, and that wouldn't be all that useful. Mackensen (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rostock S-Bahn

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Rostock S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Number table sorting/Qno/Fno/Sno/0

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates of Template:Number table sorting, which was converted to Lua in 2019. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Films based on the Ramayana

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already fulfilled by Category:Films based on the Ramayana. As the creator myself, I now keep wondering, "Why on Earth did I create this?". Since I can't find any other navbox beginning with "Films based on", I think this shouldn't exist. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Besides speed and ease of navigation, I feel that the way it has been organized according to release date adds some value compared to alphabetical ordering of the category page. If you're seeking similar navboxes as precedent, see {{Batman in film}}, {{X-Men in film}} and {{James Bond in film}}. There appears to have been a botched attempt to incorporate it into Template:Ramayana, so merging instead of outright deletion is an option. Alternatively, convert to list article Ramayana in film or with expanded scope Ramayana in film and television. A basic sortable table (release date, country, language, etc.) will already be of value, and there is potential to flesh out further (see: Middle-earth in film, Tarzan in film, television and other non-print media). -- 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 08:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 07:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vegetarianism per Dutch political party

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, categories, or template code. I suppose this could be single-article content, but I don't know where it was or where it might belong. Insert it into an appropriate article if desired, and then delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite Deutsche Autos-4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Tagged CSD G7. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused single-source citation template with no documentation, categories, or incoming links. There do not appear to be citation templates for any of the other volumes of this book set. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chart of NZ wine production in litres over time

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content in a not-very-complex template. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I intend to use this on a couple of other New Zealand wine region pages, I just haven't quite got around to it yet. I do not want to have to repeat it more than once, and also updating each year's data will update it in all locations. That's what I thought templates were for, one reason anyway. — Jon (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wayback

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under speedy deletion criteria G7 (author request) and G4 (recreation of a page deleted a a result of a deletion discussion). JBW (talk) 07:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Wayback}} is not nor ever was compatible with {{Webarchive}}. A substitution will create either breakage or unintended results. If instances of {{wayback}} get imported from other wikis or old diffs, the correct action is a red error message [missing template] so they are fixed. A lot of work was done to get rid of {{Wayback}} years ago when {{Webarchive}} was created, we had 100s of thousands, bringing it back from the dead is a bad idea for a couple reasons. GreenC 03:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G4. Gonnym (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_July_6&oldid=1098145105"