Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 17

October 17

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 17, 2021.

Taagad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taagad → Yes (Israel) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect not named in target for the purposes of explaining or contextualizing why it redirects there. Bearcat (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is the Hebrew name for an Israeli television series known as Charlie Golf One in English. It gets mentions in the biographies of a few actors connected with the series but we don't have any other coverage I can find. My only guess as to the current target is that it was broadcast on one of that network's channels, but that's only a guess. Redirecting to any one biography would be inappropriate and with no other mentions there is nothing we can do other than delete. Thryduulf (talk) 00:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indian nation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 25#Indian nation

Internally riffled boiler tubes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Anarchyte (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Internally riffled boiler tubes → Internally rifled boiler tubes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Please delete. Only one article (GWR No. 36) used this, and that now links direct. It does not seem a likely or common mis-spelling. Verbarson (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This a {{R from move}} - the article was at this title for 5 years. The redirect got almost 100 hits last year, some of that probably came from the delinked article but we can't be sure whether that was the only source (it could be linked from somewhere outside Wikipedia). Thryduulf (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the description in the article says ribbed. Ribbing would be riffling, and not rifling, since rifling is grooves cut into the surface, and not ribs sticking out of the surface. -- 64.229.90.53 (talk) 16:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(OP) Comment The spiral nature of the rifling is of the essence, since the imparted centrifugal motion of the fluid improves the heat exchange. That applies to water-tube boilers, which is what the article mainly refers to; the Serve boiler tubes used on a locomotive are fire-tube boilers.--Verbarson (talk) 10:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Valid redirect from move, we can always tag it as a "R from incorrect name". But the fact it gets hits means that traffic is being generated from somewhere (probably Google searches), so valid to keep redirect. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Courtenay Edward Stevens

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Resolved. Article created, discussion is now moot. (non-admin closure) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtenay Edward Stevens → Leila Buckley (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The link for the classicist Courtenay Edward Stevens redirects to his wife, the author Leila Buckley. It seems to me that this should be removed, leaving a red link which will hopefully one day be populated. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As is mentioned here. Although there is not much info here, someone searching for this person would at least learn they were "a renowned Oxford classicist" and know the era in which they lived. If someone were inclined to write an article about this person, they could replace the redirect as easily as if it were a redlink. Until then, it is an aid to readers. MB 19:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Close as moot. I've created a biography over the redirect - Dumelow (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Richard Groff

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Groff → Regis Groff (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete. Richard Groff and Regis Groff are not the same persons, and "Richard" is not mentioned in Regis' article. Geschichte (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 20:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, not same person Joseph2302 (talk) 08:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

San Diego Wave FC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego Wave FC → San Diego NWSL team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is not in the article, and I can't find reliable sourcing that would indicate that this is the name. I see some social media rumblings, but I don't think that's enough to make a redirect. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2030 in association football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No consensus for the retarget proposition even after relisting. Most suitable outcome from the discussion is to delete under WP:TOOSOON. Anarchyte (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2030 in association football → FIFA World Cup hosts#2030 FIFA World Cup (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This was targeted here by an IP before the article on the 2030 FIFA World Cup was created. This redirect doesn't make sense because the 2030 FIFA World Cup is not the only major association football event that will take place in 2030. It is also worth noting that articles on prior years of association football do not exist (for instance there is no article on 2025 in association football). So I'd propose deleting this page or possibly retargeting this page somewhere else. ColinBear (talk - contributions) 19:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Thryduulf (talk) 00:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until there is something to say about it. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the same vein as Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_October_18#2060_Summer_Olympics. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Category:2030 in association football for now. We do know about something going on in football that year, and we ought to show what we have. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of Tavix's proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.