Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MDanielsBot 8
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Mdaniels5757 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 01:14, Monday, August 3, 2020 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: [1]
Function overview: Background: This is one of User:HasteurBot's AfC tasks. HasteurBot was deactivated due to the death of its owner. I now have access to the Toolforge account that it ran on. This will be a direct replacement for HasteurBot 3.
The actual task: Once a day, traverse Category:AfC submissions with missing AfC template and evaluate the membership looking for any AfC template that applies the AfC submissions by date category. If at least 1 template exists, remove the defect tracking category. If the defect tracking category exists on the page but is disabled, remove it.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot 3
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: Variable
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: See above and Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot 3.
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I know this is a direct copy, but it never hurts to ensure everything's good. Primefac (talk) 23:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, this is embarrassing. I thought this was an active task, but it looks like it hasn't been run anytime recently, and the script doesn't seem to work. I withdraw my request for approval. Withdrawn by operator. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.