User talk:Zhenghecaris

This is Zhenghecaris's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Zhenghecaris! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Killarnee was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Killarnee (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,but I was not able to find much information about Zirabagtaria. Zhenghecaris (talk) 11:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zhenghecaris! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Killarnee (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I cannot find many more sources,but I will try to add more . Zhenghecaris (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to see many sources, but they do need to be a) published and b) reliable. Whatever "d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net" is, it doesn't seem to satisfy either of these requirements, and isn't therefore a valid source. Also, more than one source is usually required. Wherever you got this information from, you need to cite that source. And you need to cite it correctly; see WP:REFB for advice. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My source is supposed to be reliable,it is the pdf of a book. Zhenghecaris (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then you need to cite that book, not some random URL, as your source. In the case of offline sources such as books (assuming no online version exists – if one does, then please cite that) it's important to provide sufficient bibliographical detail to enable the source to be reliably identified for verification purposes; see WP:OFFLINE for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I did it. Zhenghecaris (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korifogrammia (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korifogrammia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korifogrammia (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not one of the supposed sources can be used to verify anything in this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korifogrammia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you view the sources? Zhenghecaris (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can verify it by going to the library at AMNH and read the book. Zhenghecaris (talk) 18:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Houcaris, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotAGenious was:

Doesn't appear to be an accepted taxon as absolutely no sources are available.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NotAGenious (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is because barely anyone wants to study it , for the original description read the book deep time analysis a coherent view of the history of life. Zhenghecaris (talk) 13:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus all sources are from Mark Mcmenamin. Zhenghecaris (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clementechiton (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs in-text citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clementechiton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clementechiton (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clementechiton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t find more sources. Zhenghecaris (talk) 22:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop copyright violation

Please do not upload any images without Creative Commons (not NC) licence to Wikimedia Commons. That is copyright violation. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Zhenghecaris (talk) 22:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clementechiton (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clementechiton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clementechiton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clementechiton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clementechiton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zoe Aria (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be deleted but I don’t know how to do that. Zhenghecaris (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zhenghecaris. Thank you for your work on Proterozoic chitons. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zhenghecaris. Thank you for your work on Zirabagtaria. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zhenghecaris. Thank you for your work on Vendamonia. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zhenghecaris. Thank you for your work on Palankiras. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zirabagtaria has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zirabagtaria. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Palankiras

Hello, Zhenghecaris

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Palankiras, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Palankiras.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vendamonia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Vendamonia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Vendamonia until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 21:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Zirabagtaria" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zirabagtaria has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Zirabagtaria until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 21:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabagtaria (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As per advice from WikiProject Paleontology, taxons identified only by Mark McMenamin are ignored by other researchers and therefore are not recognized by secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabagtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Zhenghecaris! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kimberellomorphs

A tag has been placed on Category:Kimberellomorphs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberella

I reverted your addition to Kimberella because you indicated it was in development. Anything you add to an article is subject to scrutiny, modification, or removal by another editor. If you want to work on material to add to an article without other users editing it while you work on it, you can add the Template:In use, but note that will not actually prevent other editors from editing your work. I recommend you work on major changes in your sandbox, or in a subpage under your user page, until you are ready to add it to an article. I have done that many times for developing both new articles and significant additions to existing articles. For instance, I built some cladograms on a subpage (User:Donald Albury/Zamia clades) before moving them into an article here. Donald Albury 21:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Zirabagtaria" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zirabagtaria has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 26 § Zirabagtaria until a consensus is reached. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Clementechiton

Draft:Clementechiton, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Clementechiton and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Clementechiton during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Please do not move your page to a non-existant user's page. Thanks. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Kimberella have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. See Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided, no. 9. Donald Albury 22:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimberellomorpha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimberellomorpha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberellomorpha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 12:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion discussion

Hi, I told to Commons talk page but seems not responded, can you leave the comment to c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zhenghecaris? This is unfair because I started the discussion while you were blocked. Therefore, the discussion cannot be closed without your comment. It's up to you whether you want to keep the images you upload or not. (put vk (keep) or vd (delete) surrounded by {{}} on the first line of comment) Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]