User talk:IC1101-Capinatator

This is IC1101-Capinatator's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi IC1101-Capinatator! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oelandocaris has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oelandocaris. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I couldn’t find the original paper describing it, so I tried to create a description and etymology for it. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I found the original paper and will edit the draft in a few hours accordingly https://www.idunn.no/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1983.tb01704.x IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oelandocaris has been accepted

Oelandocaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goticaris has been accepted

Goticaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add some WP:CATEGORIES @IC1101-Capinatator Qcne (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanazios has been accepted

Tanazios, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Captopodus has been accepted

Captopodus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cascolus has been accepted

Cascolus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Martinssonia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martinssonia. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martinssonia has been accepted

Martinssonia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aspidella

Please can you describe what you were trying to achieve here? Further work may be needed. Thanks. YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to place it as a possible animal, on account of it possibly being a microbial colony IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you happy with how the page looks now? YorkshireExpat (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks good now. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musacaris has been accepted

Musacaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 13:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leverhulmia (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sole source is research gate, which is a deprecated source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leverhulmia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IC1101-Capinatator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leverhulmia has been accepted

Leverhulmia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jurassic angiosperms"

Any claims of pre-Cretaceous angiosperms are extremely controversial, and it is inappropriate to jump the gun on new studies regarding claims like this, when many previous claims have been rejected. See this paper for an introduction to the topic [1] Put it this way, if they had an actually legit unambiguous Jurassic angiosperms, why is this being published in a MDPI journal rather than in a more presitigous publication like Nature? Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096519220301713

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-27334-0

Are these good enough, or is Nanjinganthus still dubious? IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, because they are the same authors that originally published the study claiming Nanjinganthus was an angiosperm, it doesn't demonstrate that the claims are widely accepted by paleobotanists. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I guess the Hunting the Snark paper was right after all! Although the fact that it mostly got dismissed because it wasn’t pentamerous is a bit odd when many modern flowers aren’t. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buccaspinea has been accepted

Buccaspinea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 12:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary Etiquette

Regarding your edit summary on Mobulavermis, it does not abide by the rules we should follow by, you're a new user so these mistakes are bound to happen. Edit summaries should not be made with snide or rude remarks as per the rules surrounding them (which can be found here). The goal of edit summaries is to note the changes made and explain the reasonings if nessesary, not to shame fellow editors who are only doing the best they can. In this instance, "Fixed typos + added Category:Cambrian Nevada" would've been a more than appropriate edit summary to use. Keep in mind you have no idea the circumstances of your fellow editors. The goal should be encouraging any who are willing to edit to do so, that includes people with disabilities. Language such as that of what you used in your edit summary counters that goal of accessibility. I know for a fact that other editors will not take a personal attack as lightly (nor will some of the admins) as I do, so please be more careful in the future if not for following the rules, for your own sake. Sauriazoicillus (talk) 06:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I’ll try to avoid it in the future. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 06:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits that look as if they are claiming facts from existing citations

Hi, sorry to trouble you, but your recent edit to Arthropod, while surely intended to be constructive, would make it look to future readers and editors as if the link you added named a taxon that was in the source cited immediately afterwards: only, it wasn't. The effect of this is to break the connection, essential for verification, between the text and its citations.

That connection is vital and central to how Wikipedia works.

With it, we have {claim: fact + source}, a verifiable encyclopedic claim.

Without it, we have {unsupported fact} + {abused source that does not support the facts placed next to it}. That structure permits any kind of original research, fraudulent claims, self-promotion, advertising, political lobbying, in fact any kind of nonsense at all.

Therefore, it is essential to add a citation when you add a fact, or equivalently to verify by inspecting the existing source that the claim you are making is in fact verifying your fact already. The whole structure and reliability of Wikipedia depends on this one thing, so it really matters. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tuanshanzia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tuanshanzia. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuanshanzia has been accepted

Tuanshanzia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lenisicaris has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lenisicaris. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lenisicaris has been accepted

Lenisicaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sanfordiacaulis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sanfordiacaulis. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanfordiacaulis has been accepted

Sanfordiacaulis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhenghecaris has been accepted

Zhenghecaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wujicaris has been accepted

Wujicaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Broc (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, IC1101-Capinatator. Thank you for your work on Wujicaris. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobodiscus has been accepted

Lobodiscus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambrocaris has been accepted

Cambrocaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambropycnogon has been accepted

Cambropycnogon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utahnax has been accepted

Utahnax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rehbachiella has been accepted

Rehbachiella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bredocaris has been accepted

Bredocaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Your work in paleontology is great! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

And expect much more from me (especially when it comes to Orsten fauna) over the coming months! IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dala (crustacean) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dala (crustacean). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dala (crustacean) has been accepted

Dala (crustacean), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rotaciurca has been accepted

Rotaciurca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westrichus (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Westrichus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 10:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, there don’t seem to be any references for Westrichus other than the one describing it. Second, I translated the Italian Wikipedia article (which shows that it can, in fact qualify for an article) and used that as a base: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westrichus_kraetschmeri IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for declaring that you translated this draft from its equivalent itwiki article. Please next time, when translating articles from other language Wikipedias, you must follow WP:TFOLWP. Please do that before resubmitting this draft. You could just do a dummy edit. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I’m sorry about that. I didn’t know about the “text from other-language Wikipedias” rule. Also, I’m curious how Westrichus is “not notable enough” for an article, because it meets all the notability criteria just as much as something like Cambrocaris does. (I.e. the only reason there’s one source is because nothing else has been published about it yet) IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Westrichus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Westrichus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Westrichus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Westrichus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westrichus has been accepted

Westrichus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thuchomyces has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thuchomyces. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thuchomyces has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thuchomyces. Thanks! Java Hurricane 15:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thuchomyces has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thuchomyces. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thuchomyces has been accepted

Thuchomyces, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Xenusion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 15:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walossekia has been accepted

Walossekia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henningsmoenicaris scutula has been accepted

Henningsmoenicaris scutula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sandtorpia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandtorpia. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandtorpia has been accepted

Sandtorpia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]