User talk:Voidz

Voidz, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Voidz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 03:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carly Alyssa Thorne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Inspirational and Anorexia

Mark DeCarlo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Host and Travelogue

NioGold Mining (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Abitibi and Malartic

QuHarrison Terry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glendale and Fairfax

Wanda Strickfaden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Channel 3 and FCBA

Nan-ao, Yilan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rural township

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing articles at AFC

Be sure to add as much of the following as applies (or that you know) to articles about people, especially living ones, when you accept them:

[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:yyyy births]]
[[Category:yyyy deaths]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Lastname,Firstname}}

and be sure to add the following to the article's talk page:

{{WPBiography|living=yes or no|listas=Lastname,Firstname}}

You can skip the defaultsort and listas= parts if the article name is "the" name for sorting purposes, as would be the case for a stage name or someone from a country where people sort names by the "first" name.

If you are using the beta version of the AFC submission script, this will be done for you if you check the appropriate boxes when you accept the submission, BUT if you are doing someone with a stage name or a "sort by first name" name, you need to correct the defaultsort and listas that the bot adds, because it assumes that the last name is the family name, which is not true in all countries.

I fixed up Jim Elvidge and its talk page for you. Thanks for all you do at WP:AFC. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy-A7 of Blacktop Comedy

Hey there—I'm letting you know that I've nominated Blacktop Comedy for speedy deletion A7, because it doesn't seem to indicate why the company is important. (It also seems overly promotional, though I didn't tag it as such; the fact that the references only point to "it exists!" or "upcoming events" pages doesn't help, nor did the fact that you put its street address in the lead.) Feel free to contest this on the talk page. Thanks, —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 22:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Egypt Lawson

The article Egypt Lawson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY; closest thing to a notability claim, the CNN coverage, is not in sources listed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm NatGertler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Blacktop Comedy because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 23:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to SIM lock. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Joja lozzo 01:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephan Cappon

The article Stephan Cappon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If we remove the uncited material, the material not actually n the citations given, and the boastful material for which the source is ubject's own page, we're left with literally about two sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hairline Illusions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hairline Illusions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hairline Illusions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joja lozzo 15:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The MonsterJunkies (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The MonsterJunkies (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MonsterJunkies (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovende

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lovende requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 01:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop contributing promotional content

Some of your contributions are helpful and I'm encouraged that you are able to edit from a neutral point of view. However, much of what you are contributing is promotional and is supported by unreliable sources. If you do not understand what I mean by promotional content or unreliable sources please say so, otherwise I expect this to end immediately. Thanks. Joja lozzo 02:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephan Cappon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephan Cappon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Cappon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joja lozzo 19:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inartmedia

The article Inartmedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Wrong Guys for the Job

The article The Wrong Guys for the Job has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable web series, awards are not major, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Tibbenham

The article Matthew Tibbenham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable director, lacks multiple significant roles, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erik Daniel Shein (author)

The article Erik Daniel Shein (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable author, awards are not major, lacks notable works, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of local puff and listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ankaka

The article Ankaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and a listing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Latency Optimizer

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Latency Optimizer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abdelhay Elanbassi

The article Abdelhay Elanbassi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nnon notable producer, lacks multiple significant roles, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morocco Film Production

The article Morocco Film Production has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of non mentions, pr and non reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Kripsy

The article John Kripsy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable rapper/footballer. awards are not major. football team is a Dubai Amateur League team from Middlesex University. rap career is a pair of mixtapes lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of shop, pr and non reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, Voidz. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
Your role is to summarize, inform and reference — not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
Have us review your draft.
Work with us and we'll work with you.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Please note that Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaun Polack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun Polack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Polack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Howarth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Howarth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Howarth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arkwatch logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arkwatch logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

The recentcly deprodded articles are now af AFD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morocco Film Production, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelhay Elanbassi, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inartmedia, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Daniel Shein (author), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kripsy. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Latency Optimizer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latency Optimizer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latency Optimizer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 10:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zohar (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zohar (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zohar (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Community Cash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Community Cash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Cash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LPS (lubricant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LPS (lubricant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LPS (lubricant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NioGold Mining Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NioGold Mining Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NioGold Mining Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of QuHarrison Terry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QuHarrison Terry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuHarrison Terry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Carly Alyssa Thorne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carly Alyssa Thorne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Alyssa Thorne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Community Cash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Community Cash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Cash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

HACC Cambodia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Networking, Representation and Coordination

Milky Way Improv Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Improv

Pari Hoon Main (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MoroccoFilmProduction.png)

Thanks for uploading File:MoroccoFilmProduction.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some articles that might be deleted

for general info, other spam by Voidz that may be deleted. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Rainforest (book), Wealth Transfer Show, Jim Bond (producer), Dramatics NYC, Frostbox, DJ Drops, Johnny Juarez (singer), Miriam Slozberg, 13 Witches, The Wrong Guys for the Job, Platinum City Entertainment

Nomination of Miriam Slozberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Slozberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Slozberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joja lozzo 21:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voidz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked as a sockpuppet of user Papisjap which i'm not [1], kindly, unblock me.

Decline reason:

You were blocked as a promotion-only account - see the block notice above. JohnCD (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

According to the block reason provided in the block template, you were blocked for using your editing privileges to promote and advertise individuals, products and companies. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 12:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ankaka Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ankaka Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bachelors Abroad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bachelors Abroad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachelors Abroad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Communitycashlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Communitycashlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Frostboxlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Frostboxlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Rainforest(book)1stEdition.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Rainforest(book)1stEdition.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:13-witches.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:13-witches.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zohar Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Zohar Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stella Mahlisa

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stella Mahlisa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

blatantly promotional - sole purpose of this non-submitted page in WP:AFC space seems to be to promote the named company.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erik Daniel Shein (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Daniel Shein (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Daniel Shein (author) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Carly Alyssa Thorne.png

The file File:Carly Alyssa Thorne.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Carly Alyssa Thorne. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]