User talk:Vera Cruz

AfD nomination of Aliens from Space: The Real Story of Unidentified Flying Objects

I have nominated Aliens from Space: The Real Story of Unidentified Flying Objects, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliens from Space: The Real Story of Unidentified Flying Objects. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David R. Morgan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David R. Morgan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:ACADEMIC, tagged since 9/07.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vera Cruz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 11 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Francisco Castro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert B. Hawkins, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David R. Morgan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charles E. Silberman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marvin D. Free, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joy Lee Sadler - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stephen Walt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David R. Morgan

The article David R. Morgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced for over 7 years. Unless references are added do not remove this tag. I'll be happy to userfy this article upon request if you don't have time to reference it now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 07:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Managing Urban America

The article Managing Urban America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced for over 7 years. Unless references are added do not remove this tag. I'll be happy to userfy this article upon request if you don't have time to reference it now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 07:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert E. England

The article Robert E. England has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced for over 7 years. Unless references are added do not remove this tag. I'll be happy to userfy this article upon request if you don't have time to reference it now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 07:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of David R. Morgan

I have nominated David R. Morgan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Morgan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. THF (talk) 02:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marvin D. Free, Jr.

The article Marvin D. Free, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Associate professor, fails WP:PROF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 03:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leo Niehorster

The article Leo Niehorster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article's subject does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Article is currently unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dead Serious (organization)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dead Serious (organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elaine Riddick Jessie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine Riddick Jessie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Riddick Jessie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of barracks, bases, fields, and forts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of barracks, bases, fields, and forts. Since you had some involvement with the List of barracks, bases, fields, and forts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Post of Limay

The article Post of Limay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this individual posting location is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Leo Niehorster" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Leo Niehorster. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Leo Niehorster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. b uidhe 04:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leo Niehorster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leo Niehorster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Niehorster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 17jiangz1 (talk) 01:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert B. Hawkins Jr.

The article Robert B. Hawkins Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find evidence that he was a notable soldier or businessman

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 02:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert B. Hawkins Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert B. Hawkins Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert B. Hawkins Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 17:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justice Research Association

The article Justice Research Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no citations, external link is dead, could not find any evidence of news coverage or notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SimLibrarian (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Padgitt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Padgitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Padgitt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SmarTruck II

The article SmarTruck II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. (Apparently) never produced concept design spoofed by Jon Stewart.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schierbecker (talk) 22:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SmarTruck I

The article SmarTruck I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. (Apparently) never produced concept design spoofed by Jon Stewart.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schierbecker (talk) 22:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Richardson (Cisco)

The article James Richardson (Cisco) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BilledMammal (talk) 13:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Diplomacy

The article Global Diplomacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article about a video game lacks sources and seemingly lacks notability per the advice at WP:NVG. The linked webpages are also dead, indicating no continued relevance. One alternative would be to merge with Email Games, the game's publisher, but there is no such article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 23:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for O. J. Simpson (RD)

On 11 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article O. J. Simpson, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arnold Henry Bergier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnold Henry Bergier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Henry Bergier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for O. J. Simpson (blurb)

On 16 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article O. J. Simpson, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]