Jump to content

User talk:Titan877

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Fettlemap (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy editing suggestions

[edit]

I've noticed you doing yeoman's work on copy editing and formatting some highway articles. I have a suggestion for you to keep in mind though. In a few situations, you've downcased "Interstate" to "interstate". This has the effect of changing intended meaning though. An "Interstate Highway" or just "Interstate" (with a capital "I") is a component of the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways, aka the Interstate Highway System. An "interstate highway" crosses state lines. I-10 is both an "Interstate Highway" and an "interstate highway", but I-610 is only an "Interstate Highway" and does not cross state lines. As a counterpart to this, US 2 is also an "interstate highway", but it is not an "Interstate Highway"; it is also a "US Highway", and all of these examples are "US highways". In short, capitalization matters.

One other thing: you don't have to pipe a link just to insert a non-breaking space. MediaWiki treats regular and non-breaking spaces alike in figuring out a link. Imzadi 1979  02:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I restore the piped link in I-215's article for SR 60 though. The state name isn't really part of the highway's name, so we usually pipe the link to remove it unless context requires it. WP:USSH has a good chart of the official naming schemes for reference. Imzadi 1979  17:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, we really shouldn't put spaces around the slashes in concurrent highway designations. There was a provision in the Manual of Style for a number of years that if we joined two named with an en dash we had to space it if either term had a space within it. In other words, if talking about a state line, we'd format it as "Michigan–Wisconsin state line", but "Pennsylvania – New York state line". {{jct}} mimics this with the slashes, but the MOS was changed a few years ago to drop the spacing requirement, so now "Pennsylvania–New York state line" is correct, and the other example is not. {{jct}} hasn't been updated yet, but it really should be. Imzadi 1979  17:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another piece of feedback: not all states call their roadways "routes". "US Highway" is just as valid as "US Route", and in many states, they have "county roads", not "county routes". A good rule of thumb is that if that state calls them state routes, then they have US Routes and county routes. Otherwise, they are US Highways and usually county roads. Imzadi 1979  05:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking Redirects

[edit]

Hi! I'm Signed, I Am Chaos (talk), and I noticed that you recently blanked two redirect pages 1 2. I've undone both of those edits, as they appear to be appropriate pages. If you think the pages should be deleted entirely, please see either WP:PROD or WP:RFD. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special routes of U.S. Route 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German reunification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundesgesetzblatt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert at I-355

[edit]

My reversion may have been a blunt move, but it was easier than trying to undo the problems and save the rest.

To wit:

  • We don't actually need to use non-breaking spaces in many of the locations where you added them. For example, 75th Street doesn't need one; the line could break there without being an issue.
  • "west side" is two separate words.
  • About half of the references to ISTHA could have remained as "tollway authority" for variety in wording. I-355 is a Featured Article, so the prose quality needs to remain high, and repetitive uses of an acronym can be bad writing.
  • Not all references to a cross road need to be "highway abbreviation (name)"; the other format may be preferable if the road is better known by name rather than number.
  • The preferred plural is "oases" in Illinois, not "oasises" (which my spell check flags as misspelled).
  • When referencing something stated by a municipality, like "Village of New Lenox", then yes, "Village" should be capitalized.
  • "pre-opening" should have a hyphen. Ditto "multi-use".
  • The decimal points should be retained in the mileages for consistency. I'd agree with removing all the ".0"s if there weren't ".5"s and the like in that paragraph too.

I appreciate that you did not change any fully spelled out highway name links to just the abbrevation redirects this time. For various reasons, it's a better idea to use [[Illinois Route 53|IL 53]] than [[IL 53]]. (Yes, you can use a non-breaking space in a link.) Imzadi 1979  03:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Interstate 64 into Interstate 64 in Kentucky. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Interstate 69 in Michigan

[edit]

I reverted for the following reasons:

  1. The jct template does not hyphenate US Highways in Michigan, and yet you changed the abbreviation convention to be inconsistent with the the template.
  2. "North Drive North"? Sorry, but the major roadways in that county are lettered, and that one happens to be called N Drive because it falls between M Drive and O Drive. Please double check before editing things to make sure you aren't adding inaccuracies.
  3. "Old M-78" is the name of a road. See #2 above.
  4. The name of the highway that I-69 connects to at the international border is "Highway 402". Our article may be titled with the province in the name, but that doesn't mean that is restates the actual designation.
  5. Honestly, dates do not need non-breaking spaces, or else that would be listed in MOS:DATE.
  6. The MDOT railroad map is only citing the names of rail lines. The rest of that one sentence comes from other sources. Source–prose integrity is important.
  7. Each half of "This alternative highway was maintained on the 1955 plan for the "National System of Interstate and Defense Highways" and numbered I-67 in August 1957." was cited to a different map, and it's better to maintain the connection between sentence segments with the respective source than to bundle both footnotes at the end.

Featured Articles have already been reviewed and judged to be part of "our finest work". That doesn't mean that there aren't things that could be done to improve them, but please don't make them worse with your editing. Imzadi 1979  06:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe that I have to tell you that "oneway" is not a word, and it should have its hyphen. (Many compound words should have hyphens that you've been removing.)

Also, please don't indiscriminately move footnotes around. Sometimes they're very specifically placed in the middle of a sentence for a very specific reason.

Lastly, do you not reply to messages on your talk page, ever? Imzadi 1979  05:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad for unhyphenating "one-way" and moving the footnotes. Also, I just haven't found any need to reply to messages so far. Is there any reason I should? Titan877 (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's just nice to get some acknowledgment after someone takes the time to offer tips and advice. Imzadi 1979  17:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thanks. Titan877 (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 74 lengths

[edit]

It looks like you added added Google Maps sources for segments in North Carolina to the length from the 2002 FHWA source to derive a new total length for I-74. This is problematic. Maybe you didn't know that the 2002 Route Log and Finder List has been updated, and it's current as of earlier this year. In fact, the links to the old 2002 source redirect to the newer listing at the FHWA website. So I just updated the source and the lengths from within it. According to FHWA, I-74 is shorter than your computations, so either you double counted something FHWA had already counted, or you counted something FHWA doesn't consider to be I-74 yet. Imzadi 1979  18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing that, but I didn’t make those computations. I actually got them from the length said on the Interstate 74 in North Carolina article. I can fix the one on that article if needed. Titan877 (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's one thing we as a project need to try to watch sometimes: the state articles getting updates that the national one lacks, and vice versa. When it comes to highways in active or semi-active construction, there will be some level of uncertainty/inconsistency as well. Imzadi 1979  20:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Héctor P. García, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpus Christi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPUI variants

[edit]

I marked the whole "variants" section of Single-point urban interchange with a neologism template. For example, when I do a Google search for "inverted SPUI" with quotes, every one of the few results that I get appear to be either WP articles or their mirrors, or blog or forum posts, except this Virginia DOT document, and even that puts it in quotes, implying that it's not an established term, and even if it can be shown that it is, two mentions in one document of one transportation agency probably aren't enough to make it usable on WP. Mapsax (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Titan877

Thank you for creating 2022 US baby formula shortage.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Titan877

Thank you for creating 2022 US infant formula shortage.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Titan877

Thank you for creating Kinze Manufacturing Inc..

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 180 (Nebraska), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oil drum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Interstate 182, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SounderBruce 07:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. One cannot cite a December 2022 resource in July 2022. Where are you even getting these numbers from? SounderBruce 20:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what you mean by citing a “December 2022 resource in July 2022”. Also, I got the length numbers from the FHWA Route Log on the FHWA website. Titan877 (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Titan877: I think he means that in this edit, you ascribed a December 31, 2022, publication date for the FHWA Route Log and Finder List webpage. This is logically impossible as it's only July 2022. Imzadi 1979  21:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviations

[edit]

When abbreviating highway designations for special routes, don't forget to put a period at the end of "Alt.", "Bus.", and "Byp." and so on. This is standard in American English, and in this case, it also helps to prevent a possible ambiguity between a business route and a bus route. Imzadi 1979  20:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Will do that from now on. Titan877 (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of articles that need correction, could you go back and make that correction? Imzadi 1979  20:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Primary State Highway 23 (Washington), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SounderBruce 02:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Primary State Highway 23 (Washington) and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Primary State Highway 23 (Washington) until a consensus is reached. SounderBruce 03:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 5 in California, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interstate 35W and Interstate 35E.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 40 in Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malfunction Junction.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting issue

[edit]

I had to revert part of your edit here for semantic reasons. While cosmetically nothing looks different, and your format looks simpler, there is a semantic reason why you should not start a line with a semicolon like that. The rendered text tells screen readers that those lines are part of a definition list, like dictionary definitions. By just making them bold, we avoid that semantic meaning. Imzadi 1979  20:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Hatnote"

[edit]

In this edit, you didn't add a hatnote. You added a maintenance template. Hatnotes are the things like:

This article is about the section of highway in Michigan. For the entire length of highway, see U.S. Route 41.

at the top of U.S. Route 41 in Michigan. Calling the other templates a hatnote in the edit summary is confusing. Imzadi 1979  23:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I will remember the correct term next time. Titan877 (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hurricane warning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Special routes of U.S. Route 10. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because the page is bereft of content. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979  02:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In short, that draft was not ready for main space. The article sections need more content than an infobox for the page to be moved over. We've tagged articles that were just an infobox for deletion, so at a minimum, I would expect to see a paragraph of prose in each section before that draft is moved back. Were it found by a less charitable editor, it would have been nominated for deletion instead of reverting your publication. Imzadi 1979  02:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page U.S. Route 23 in Florida, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi Titan877! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at [[:Wilbur Soot]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 23:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Titan877. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Special routes of U.S. Route 10, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Titan877. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Special routes of U.S. Route 10".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]