User talk:TerrydatRealterryo

Welcome!

Hello, TerrydatRealterryo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of St Jude's Church, Swansea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St Jude's Church, Swansea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://parish.churchinwales.org.uk/s464/about/history/information-on-the-old-st-judes-church/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Saqib (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve St Jude's Church, Swansea

Hi, I'm Caorongjin. TerrydatRealterryo, thanks for creating St Jude's Church, Swansea!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be useful to add different references and to omit or rewrite (e.g., write in prose the landmarks) much of the latter text.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Caorongjin (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austenasia

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Katechon08 (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat copyright violations

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

so you Refencance you own Webpage to your Page and you still get Blocked even Thought you Own the Copy Right again how is this RIGHT?

If, after the expiration of this block, you add copyrighted content again, you will be blocked indefinitely. If you're not willing or able to read and comprehend our WP:COPYRIGHT policy, you probably shouldn't be editing Wikipedia in the first place. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

so the Copy right you Talking about we had a Church Own its from our Own Webpage on our Own Wiki Page yet we upload our own WIki page and Ref it from our Own Church Webpage and you keep removing it. Again how if we Own the Copy Right are We breaching Copy Right Rules?

So we Give permission to upload our Wiki Page as you know we own the Copy Right to we Give permission to upload that so how am I braking the your WP:COPYRIGHT policy if AGAIN we Give permission to upload our Wiki Page as you know we own the Copy Right to we Give permission to upload.

^Talk 00:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Do you not Understand that if someone owns the Copytright and there the ones uploading the Content then they obviously Giver Persimmon for it to be used or did this fly past you.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TerrydatRealterryo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do you not Understand that if someone owns the Copytright and there the ones uploading the Content then they obviously Giver Persimmon for it to be used or did this fly past you~

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is licensed to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. Text must be released to one of these licenses. In other words, you are in the wrong here. PhilKnight (talk) 03:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TerrydatRealterryo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PhilKnight Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the works of expression, with some important exceptions: If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright so you are very wrong also under LAW to both in the UK where Our Church is and in the USA where Wiki is I have know sent this on to the Arbitration Committee as the Admin who Originally Blocked me is Known to be Taken Bribes to remove Content. also Works in the public domain are free for anyone to copy and use. Strictly speaking, the term "public domain" means that the work is not covered by any intellectual property rights at all (copyright, trademark, patent, or otherwise) under US law to so Again if we first own the Copy right Second its in the Public Domain as in the uk the Church is a Public Entity owned by the people for the people expaine what rules have been Broken. so this has turned in to a war of Editing by the other admin and your self now as you seam to not understand basic Copy riggt laws and rules

Decline reason:

Since you greatly misunderstand what copyright is and how it works on Wikipedia and have made unfounded accusastions against another user, there are no grounds to remove the block. I can only reaffirm what you were told above in that you will be blocked indefinitely should this activity continue. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot May be do some checking yourself about the First Admin also as someone who deals with Copy right in Courts daily I believe you are wrong this has been past on to your Arbitration Committee |Arbitration committee}}the Thetas are enough for a Systematic Bullying charge and I have also Emailed your Legal Team as your braking GDPR by holding a person IP Address

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331dot just a note that this user has contacted ArbCom, and speaking entirely for myself I view their comments above as "I contacted your legal team about this", not necessarily "I'm going to take legal action". I will, however, leave it up to you whether to keep their talk page access revoked and require them to appeal through UTRS. Primefac (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Primefac The user referred to a "Systematic Bullying charge" and "your braking GDPR by holding a person IP Address" which sounds like some sort of law. 331dot (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]