User talk:Synorem/Archive 1

Archive 1

December 2023 Revert

Hi Synoreum,

Some of my edits to the Rhinovirus article were recently reverted and tagged as vandalism by your account through Ultraviolet. While these were major changes to an article, they were made in good faith to correct for major redundancy, lack of summaries, and out of date information. Can you review these changes? If necessary, please provide constructive feedback on whether this otherwise violates editing policies.

@WalkEFelix WalkEFelix (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Changes to Thanos

The way that it is now, all of the alternate universe things are grouped together aside from the bit about the Ravagers. On pages for a number of other Marvel characters, their alternate universe versions have been organized into a list like that. Examples include Gamora, Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter. I was just changing the format to match what was done to other pages which looks a lot better. It's really clunky and too clustered together like this and it looks better organized as a list like that. Thanos just has too many alternate selves for it to work as a single paragraph group. 32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your edit was factually incorrect. You stated Thanos had been "defeated by the illuminati" instead of by Supreme Strange. Sources, specifically a quote from Professor X state otherwise.

Oh!!! You reverted the whole thing, just change the title of the section instead. I thought that writing Supreme Strange as the title for a section about Thanos didn't make much sense. My mistake.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

PS: the text in that section was what was already there in the Other Versions section that I reorganized, I didn't write that, I just moved it. In case you were talking about the text instead of the title itself.--32.220.224.39 (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Changes to Saim Ayub page

Hello synorem,I just noticed you reverted my category add that i did on Saim Ayub’s page of Test crickrter but if you actually look at his biography he was once selected for a test series against Australia so that technically makes him a test cricketer. Wikicontributerr (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Y A mistake was made. I apologize, it seems like I had made a mistake and as such I have restored your edits. Your warnings have also been removed. Synorem (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello fellow traveller! A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Hello fellow traveller! You've beaten me to the punch at reverting vandalism 3 times tonight! I encourage you to apply for rollback. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

USVI 2024 GOP caucus

Hello, I removed some candidates from the list of candidates who have since withdrawn. I have noticed other editors have done the same action on author primary/caucus articles, as those candidates (Christie, Burgum, etc.) are no longer declaring candidacy. Thank you Colin.1678 (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

If possible, when removing large portions of texts adding an edit summary helps recent change patrollers like myself understand why you had removed the text you had. If possible, including a source that shows the candidates have withdrawn always helps too. Thank you :) Synorem (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your revert at Coquettes

Hi there, Regarding your reverts/edits to Coquettes, what's going on there? 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

@Filmssssssssssss Not sure what the deal is with the foreign article, however my revert relates to the vandalism/un-constructive edit that served as a climate-activism warning. I've fixed up the language now, removing the vandalism Synorem (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

LDS Church

I am attempting to edit errors, and remove unsupported and unnecessary statements on this page? Are you a member of the LDS Church? WarBishop (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello there. I do not know what the LDS Church is, nor am I a member of it. I am, however, a member of Wikipedia - and your edit went against Wikipedia's rule on unsourced content. If you going to amend information, please cite your sources to ensure verifiability of your information. Synorem (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

How do I cite the fact that an unsupported opinion statement was removed? I’m am senior clergy of this Church WarBishop (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

You changed the word "alleged" to "confirmed". Could you include who or what confirmed this? How did you know this were confirmed? Synorem (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Got it, Yes, their are statements from his wife and the postal record. I will find them. WarBishop (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks in advance! Just redo your edit and cite these records and your changes should be all good :) Synorem (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Zombie Land Saga not including any elements from Zombieland movies

I'm curious, why didn't Zombie Land Saga include the rules from Zombieland movies such as Cardio, double tap, etc.? 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Having not watched any of these movies, I'm going to assume you're here because of your reverted edits to Zombie Land Saga. The section you began with "WARNING" did not provide constructive material relating to the production of the movie. Could you fill me in as to what the sentence "Approximately 10 years will be required before we can safely confirm their Swiss army knife. Unfortunately, we will either beware of bathrooms, or do we have anyone to carry on my Bowling ball." meant for the production of the movie? Synorem (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I was talking about the production of Zombie Land Saga. 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Could you fill me in as to what the sentence "Approximately 10 years will be required before we can safely confirm their Swiss army knife. Unfortunately, we will either beware of bathrooms, or do we have anyone to carry on my Bowling ball." meant for the production of the movie? I can't say I see how this relates to the production. Synorem (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

That's just the parody of the intro of the first Mega Man X game! 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

And this related to the production of a movie how? I hope you can appreciate why your edit was undone. Synorem (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Because I thought that Zombie Land Saga was based on Zombieland movies due to its title alone 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

I mean, they want to include the rules from Zombieland movies such as Beware the bathrooms, bowling ball, Swiss army knife, etc. And Zombie Land Saga was released almost 10 years after the first Zombieland movie! 114.124.210.40 (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Synorem, this IP is an WP:LTA. I've blocked (again). -- ferret (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Ah, makes sense. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Articles needing cleanup: Domnall Ua Lochlainn

Hello. You've reverted a cleanup I made on the above page, in effect creating a nonsense statement. Please desist. Hibarnacle (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your edit contained the phrase "the the first king to construct something" which amounted to unconstructive editing. My revert was for the sake of accuracy. If you believe a page is 'in serious need of cleanup' please use the correct tags as seen here. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Dakota kai

Please stop removing my #KingKotaMovement #WeWantDakota #VegaKingdom #WeWantZelina Zelina and Dakota know about it, that's why I'm adding it 2603:7080:EEF0:60B0:4D7C:CEF7:A9B1:B94C (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Simply adding the hashtags to their page is not constructive. Please see WP:NOT. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Page on Kim Tok Hun

Hi, just to let you know, you tried to undo one of my changes because I took down some images, however these images were clearly AI generated. Please allow them to be removed. Kind regards. 185.160.113.242 (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi there - AI generated images are allowed as it is considered public domain. The edit of yours I reverted did not remove anything, but you had merely added "THIS PICTURE IS CLEARLY AI GENERATED!" onto an image label, which does not help in a constructive manor. I have taken the liberty of updating the copyrights of the image and updating the page. Synorem (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

samael aun weor

my intention is not to vandalism but to make it visually apparent upon first reading that the aforementioned person is distinguished as he truly is which is a cult leader.

my intention is to help others avoid this cult. as a quick google search would have saved me and many others from years of horrific abuse at the hands of this movement. Surface surfer (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Surface surfer the word 'cult' is a contentious label, and is listed as a generally disapproved word as in our Manual of Style's words to watch. I understand you have good intentions by warning others, but Wikipedia serves to inform - not warn, our users. Synorem (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I believe that is informative to describe him as such. Jim Jones has cult leader in the info section of his bio. What justifies that?

Perhaps the fact that he used his beliefs to commit mass murder, which literally fits the definition of a cult. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

What kind of sources do I need to legitimize the statements about him being a cult leader? Surface surfer (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

First it must fit the definition, then to avoid NPOV & MoS issues, most likely a third-party source such as a news article. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

he also is listed amongst the list of cult leaders on wikipedia does not justify the title? Surface surfer (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

That is because YOU made the edit that he was a cult leader, @Surface surfer. Synorem (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Stonehenge of the Netherlands

Hello, it is possible to reach my site through other pages now. I removed the orphan tag, i hope that's ok. DutchPatriot (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Yep, looks better now @DutchPatriot Synorem (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Great! Wish you a good day DutchPatriot (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Mistake

Hi there! I completely understand your emphasis on Wikipedia having a neutral point of view; I completely agree too, and keeping a neutral point of view is a high priority in my edits. I appreciate you putting in the effort to prevent people from injecting their own opinions into articles.

With all due respect, I do think your reverting of my edits was mistaken. It seemed automated, so I don't blame you, but all I did was echo some of the information already stated later in the article. I also didn't think the article's introduction did enough to illustrate how influential the film was (one publication even called it the "beginning of a renaissance"; this is, again, later in the article. Why should it not be at least hinted at in the introduction?), or the status it holds among modern critics and publications (especially in contrast to its contemporaneous reception).

Alas, the articles for other similarly influential and revered films use the exact same language which I added to the article. My main goal was/is to encourage more consistency between all articles on Wikipedia. The article for Seven seemed to deviate from the norm a little bit, and did not do enough to illustrate how it is regarded by critics today, or how influential it was (from an objective point of view, like every other film article does). I'll reinstate my edits but use more neutral language. Thank you! RMLF (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi there @RMLF, thanks for getting in touch. Unfortunately I stand by my point of your edits being biased.

Your statement was "Seven is generally regarded as one of the best and most influential thriller films ever made". Without any sources, this sounds to me like a opinion - especially as you did not cite this publication you mention. The words 'best' is even listed as a word of puffery that may introduce bias on the Wikipedia's MoS Words to watch list. Having looked at your newer edit, however, I think we can come to a conclusion that it is a lot better in terms of neutrality than your former edit, and I am happy for your new edit to stay, as it definitely seems like you've taken aboard my point.

Thanks again for asking, and thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place :) Synorem (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism

You reverted an edit by 219.74.120.63 to the Jürgen article. The vandal has now repeated his vandalism, which I've reverted. This is just to alert you to the renewed problem. 24.189.193.10 (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

No problem - thank you for your help! :) Synorem (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

The upcoming Zombie Land Saga anime movie will bring back the staff members of the Jesse Eisenberg movie titled Zombieland

Hello, I'm here because of 182.3.42.96's edits of MAPPA regarding Zombie Land Saga the Movie. But will Ruben Fleischer direct Zombie Land Saga anime film like himself did to the live action Zombieland movies? 2404:C0:5C20:0:0:0:7F9:D392 (talk) 06:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ferret LTA most likely. Synorem (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Yep. Blocked. -- ferret (talk) 01:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add back my changes

>:( LilacBliss (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

"(and better ads)" is not constructive, nor was it sourced or explained what you meant by 'better'. Synorem (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) 100.2.103.83 (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Synorem!

I hope you're having a good day. Can you share with me which hyperlinks you deleted and why? I'd be happy to do more research in order to find the correct ones if these were inappropriate.

Thanks! Danah El Kaouri (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there @Danah El Kaouri - The link I deleted was the Paris one, which led to the Google search results for "paris" which of course wasn't really helpful. I see now you've linked it to Paris which is much better :) Synorem (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

9 March 2024

I'm wrong about something? 109.165.94.181 (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your edits to Roderich Kiesewetter are directed towards him, as well as making unconstructive insults towards him. Wikipedia is not meant for this, and correctly, your edit was reverted as it was unconstructive. Synorem (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

11 March 2024

buddo i got raped the world must know 203.214.46.130 (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your local police force must know; not Wikipedia. Please read what was left on your talk page. Synorem (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

re changes on Jonathan Glazer

Hi, you have removed my edit stating it to be "not neutral", but you did not delete another person's comment that states that "His acceptance speech at the Oscars will go down as one of the most destructive antisemitic deeds of our time ironic for someone who made a film about the holocaust and the murder of 6 million Jews systematically. This will indeed mark a turning point in progressive thinking as like the snake who ate its own tail Glazer seems to be self sabotaging his own legacy with self inflicted cheap soundbites." Is this neutral to you? 46.34.193.134 (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there - Huggle only monitors recent changes. Your edit was listed for review, not theirs, thus why I removed yours and not theirs. You are correct in stating that the other edit is un-neutral, and I see someone else has taken the liberty to remove it from the article. Synorem (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

stop harassing me via my wikipedia page

user keeps adding DOB information that is both private and inaccurate to my page as a form of harassment. 66.108.111.65 (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

@66.108.111.65 Nothing I reverted of yours had to do of anything like that. You made an unconstructive edit of placing a '=' symbol in the word "She". I had left a message to notify you that your edit was reverted and why. I would also like to stress the fact that you do not own Wikipedia pages. Synorem (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Megasteel32

Blocked them after their initial tirade continued across multiple archived pages and then turned to yourself. Revoked TPA after they decided to carry on. If/when they come back ping me if they direct any more in your direction. Amortias (T)(C) 20:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Will do, thank you for catching up on that. Synorem (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Y'all really don't know what a personal attack is Megasteel32 (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

@Megasteel32 Welcome back from your block. "Fuck off" is not an observation, by literal definition. This was already explained on your own talk page. Synorem (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Well it certainly ain't a personal attack. This was also already explained on your own talk page (like blud you pasted the same message twice you're acting like you already addressed this.) Megasteel32 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

@Megasteel32 An administrator had already agreed that "fuck off" did, in fact, constitute a personal attack. My source for that is your block. Your message of "fuck off" not being a personal attack was also repeated, I'm not sure what your last point in your statement is meant to be. Synorem (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I explained why I repeated my statement lmao. And no, they blocked me for my personal attack on the original commenter. In what world is "fuck off" a personal attack? It is a command at best, it makes no commentary on your person. Megasteel32 (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

An abusive command at that - which again, falls under WP:NPA, first section. I am confused between you admitting you personally attacked someone, then on the same page you state that we do not know what a personal attack is. Synorem (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

If that's what counts as abuse on this site we need to get some skin thickeners. Megasteel32 (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

While your opinion is accepted and welcomed on Wikipedia, if your edits and comments goes against the editing policy, it is removed - regardless of the density of someone's skin. This is something we expect from all editors. Synorem (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

im sorry, but that Rhain person is ruining some pages by removing info. There were many pages that had enough info to be on their own, but Rhain merged it. Stop him because he's boring. GylonVisagie (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

If they haven't given a valid reason as to why they're removing information, you can simply revert them and ask them why directly. Insulting them on their talk page doesn't solve anything. Synorem (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Mel Brooks @ VMI

The infobox for Mel Brooks lists his education at VMI. That is improbable, but since I lack an authoritative secondary source for his education, I defer to you. You revert vandalism in that article, and belong to CVU. Thanks, AndersW (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Can you check my Swedish Semigallian war article I have sources now?

Can you check threw my article and check if you could let it threw? Karl Erik Edvin (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Apologies

I deeply apologize for my mistake as i did not realise it at the time only after your message on the 29th of march i realized about i deeply regret and i hope for forgiveness. I swear on my name it won't happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingofhellfire (talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

No worries mate :) Synorem (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Star of the Barns

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to the punch multiple times tonight on Huggle. Your speed is inspiring my competitive spirit! -REDACTED403 (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Powar

The content you restored on Powar page should not be on Wikipedia as it can hurt the sentiments of that particular community and may create disputes in society. It may create a cold war in society for writting such things on Wikipedia. Alex Cupper (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Stating that a cold war will start between countries because of an edit on Wikipedia is a bit of a stretch. You may not clear sections of an article just because it may offend someone/a group of people. Synorem (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Sir it will not start cold war between countries but it will definitely start cold war between communities in india as it is bit of an offensive information regarding the community. Alex Cupper (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

There are a handful of articles that could be deemed offensive or grotesque in nature here on Wikipedia, but again - that is not a reason for it to be removed. Wikipedia is not censored. Synorem (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

I reverted the edit you accepted on Skopje because the IP editor didn't cite a source for their changes. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

No worries; thanks for the oversight! Synorem (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:2601:249:9280:3820:F822:5605:7F9F:13E9

This user's AIV query was removed without them being blocked. What happened and why did it disappear? Best --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

It expired. Reports become stale and expire after 8 hours if administrators take no action. See here.

I'd recommend re-reporting them, but they haven't been active since, so it wouldn't be of any use. Synorem (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Northanger Abbey Removal

Hi! I saw your message on my talk page and just wanted to reach out. I did leave a message on the Talk page of Northanger Abbey about my removal of the baseball section, but I forgot to put my reasoning in my edit summary. The baseball section is not relevant to Northanger Abbey and is already on Origins of baseball. Lindy Sachse (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

@Lindy Sachse Hi there - thanks for letting me know; if it was just a case of a missing edit summery then no worries. Removed the notice on your talk page, you're welcome to redo your edit with the summary included (if you haven't already) Synorem (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Lies

You deleted a post in less time than it would have taken to watch the Video mentioned. Are you ideologically driven. Or a bot? 129.222.194.247 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there - I can confirm I am neither ideologically driven, neither am I a bot. Your edit was reverted because "The following paragraph is a lie" is not constructive in any manor. If you have cited evidence it is false, why would you keep it in the article? Furthermore - you did not cite this 'video' you stated, so I suppose you could say it was also reverted for unsourced content. I recommend you flick through Wikipedia's edit policy whenever you have some time on your hands. Synorem (talk) 23:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Congratulations on ranking among the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Yeah! Boiska (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Please Accept my link

Respected Sir,

I'm not trying to promote my service, but rather help people find maid services in UAE. To guide users, the content refers to the United Arab Emirates. Kindly consider reinstating my link.

Please accept my humble request. 103.132.57.11 (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Regardless of what your intention is, this goes against Wikipedia's policy on advertising, and is therefore not allowed. Synorem (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

We respect your views and will not go against your rules at all. I have some good information which I want to share with people so that it can help people, this is my aim. 103.132.57.90 (talk) 04:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Problem with the list of unproduced DreamWorks Animation Projects

I was trying to add in a cancelled project which was a reboot of Underdog that was to be planned back in 2015 but it was canceled. JonHaroldMeyer96 (talk) 04:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Message

Globallycz (talk) 18:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry i do not remove content without putting a reason unless it is a straightforward matter. Please cite examppes of your allegation. Otherwise it will be disregarded. Thank you. Globallycz (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Globallycz - I have cited an example of my allegation in my message left on your talk page, where it says 'this edit'. In the edit, you had done as you had described - added information regarding an alias of Armand, however you had also removed a significant portion of his early career, along with 3 citations. There was seemingly no reason for you to remove this portion of his page.

I strongly discourage you to "disregard" the contributions of other editors, as it can be considered edit warring and result in a further warnings and/or administrative action. Synorem (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Skyline High School page

As a representative of Skyline High School, I removed the section about "shootings" as it had nothing to do with the school, and is an inflammatory and unfair entry on the page. Unless all businesses and schools that have been impacted by crime and violence have all these incidents listed, it should not be listed on the Skyline page. Thanks for the help removing it. 2601:644:9183:5C00:B575:D62D:74E9:FA6C (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out regarding this @2601:644:9183:5C00:B575:D62D:74E9:FA6C.

I understand your concern, but in regards to Wikipedia's notability policy, the actions that had occurred at the school are notable in nature and therefore justify addition to the article, as it is cited by reliable third-party sources. The goal is not to unfairly associate the school with negative events, nor is it to intentionally damage the reputation of the school. It is so that we can reflect and record notable history factually and impartially - as it could be argued that erasing these events could be considered as censorship - which Wikipedia does not support. Synorem (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Notice

Hello Synorem. I thanks for restoration of my edit. I saw in the url that was dead, so i removed thar one. If my edit is mistoke i ask appology to you. Thanks. --Balu1967 (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Balu1967 - No worries, I understand you were trying to help. Our rules around 'link-rot' - when a link dies and is no longer available - it is Wikipedia policy to keep the link there, and see if there are other methods of repair. My main reason of reverting the edit was also because of a missing edit summary, telling me what you had removed and why. Without that, to me, it just looks like you're removing random information from an article - which I know isn't the case here. Synorem (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Pidakala war disccusion

Can you please ask someone to close the topic since it has become a sensitive topic and alot oof communities are being included based on biased editing, can you ask someone to put a lock on edits so that only top moderators could edit it instead of being available to the puvblic? I beg you because this is getting out of hand, i use wiki daily and seeing this makes me sad Zezo39 (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

It has been requested - twice - on WP:RPP. You can help by leaving it alone for now, any and all people who contributed in the edit war are likely to get punished. Synorem (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay thank you very much, sorry for any disturbance Zezo39 (talk) 16:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Why did you write my edit as vandalism

Sorry that the image did not render properly. But this diff is not vandalism. Please tell me if I am wrong. Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 15:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

No problem, @ObserveOwl fixed it Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

@Anonymous1261 In regards to the both of you - no worries, I understand it wasn't necessarily vandalism, thus no template warning. It was due to the overly large image which filled up the page. Good to see it's fixed :) Synorem (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

I see then, that's fine. I've never used Ultraviolet so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@Anonymous1261: On the Wikilove tool, insert just the filename (Dosa at Sri Ganesha Restauran, Bangkok (44570742744).jpg) on the "Enter an image filename", you don't need to insert the square brackets or "File:" or all that. The script does it for you. ObserveOwl (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 17:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Please stop protecting clearly trolling fake accounts

Thanks, (Personal attack removed). 73.206.161.228 (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

No. Synorem (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

You made my day

I know giving people "Happy First Edit Day" and "Happy Birthday" messages is a daily (and under appreciated) thing, but I was in a pretty bad place today and you snapped me out of it. So thank you, no matter how trivial it is. You genuinely made my day, and I hope you don't mind me letting you know about it. And don't worry about the double-templating, the more messages the merrier. :) EF⁵ 21:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Always happy to hear I've helped brighten up the day of someone else, regardless of how. You're very much welcome, and I hope you're doing all that bit better now @EF5 Synorem (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

re:The Adventures and Misadventures of Maqroll

Hi, thanks for your message. I'm confused - the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works both say that "Novellas which are only published as parts of collections use quotation marks." Do they call for italics in addition to quotation marks?

Thanks to your editing, I discovered that Mutis apparently won the 2002 Neustadt Prize for his body of work, not for any one work. You were right to remove the award from the page.

I very much appreciate your assistance. Don Q314 (talk) 01:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi there @Don Q314 - nice to see you around!

If I'm not mistaken, in this case there would not be a need for italics in addition to quotation marks. Per MOS:TITLE, the goal is to distinguish these shorter works from standalone novels, which in turn, would be italicized. I appreciate your attention to detail in your article editing - both with the MoS and with the 2002 Neustadt Prize. Keep up the good work! Synorem (talk) 01:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I'm sorry, I thought it was you who had added the italics. Since we agree, I will remove the italics.

Also, my Plot section paragraphs for the final novella, "Triptych on on Sea and Land", have vanished. Was there a problem with these paragraphs?

Thanks for your patience - I'm new to this game. Don Q314 (talk) 01:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

One more question - the name of Flor Estevez was removed from my summary of "The Snow of the Admiral", but her name is important in my (since removed) summary of "A True History of the Encounters and Complicities of Maqroll the Gaviero and the Painter Alejandro Obregón". Was there a reason to remove her name? Don Q314 (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Not a problem! When I undid your revision, I undone the whole of your work, not just the uncited part. Not to worry - you too can undo my action from the view history section. From there you can simply keep what was beneficial to the article, and remove the italics, the award, and such.

So no worries - I hadn't seen anything of concern other than the uncited material. Should be all good to add back Synorem (talk) 01:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

OK - thanks again. Don Q314 (talk) 02:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes it was deliberate because the info was completely irelevant

There was no reason for that info to be there. 2001:BB6:7DC4:500:30F6:5B65:6214:22DB (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Removing information and replacing it with "I removed it because it didn't seem at all relevant." is not in line with our editing policies.
This is something that could've been discussed on the page's talk page rather than removing the information outright. Synorem (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

How to make an edit without an article's presence on Wikipedia?

If you could create the page, I could gladly share the article links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandnewmonk (talk • contribs) 08:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Need help. Brandnewmonk (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm confused what you mean here - as in, you want to make an edit on an article @Brandnewmonk? Synorem (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I want to create an article about TableSprint from a third party perspective. I even shared the article links about the organisation. I am not getting paid by them anyway but I found their app interesting and hence do my bit for them. Brandnewmonk (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

You can click here to learn how to begin making a draft for a new article, if you believe there is reason for it to be created. It will be reviewed by our new page patrollers within due course. Synorem (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Removal of Link

Hi @Synorem thank you for removing the link, I made a mistake and when I when I realized it when immediately checked the link was already removed. Thank you! Appreciate it Sacchiboo (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Dispute continuation

Hi, I am creating this section so that I can ask for a WP:THIRDOPINION (seems they don't discuss there, you just list a discussion and they come to the discussion). Thinking about it more, it was probably inappropriate of me to engage with you that much on the IPs talk page, for sure it involves them but they didn't ask for the notifications, and they also never replied.

So, for reference, the discussion happened here: User talk:108.5.196.213#November 2024.
I am reviving it because I noticed another new instance of a warning to an IP user based on private filters: filter hits. – 2804:F1...02:ACA0 (::/32) (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Ok. If you wish to continue the conversation, this is probably the best way to go about it, yes.

I'll try my best to engage on it when the case arises. Synorem (talk) 18:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

I did list it there, I guess we just wait? – 2804:F1...02:ACA0 (::/32) (talk) 19:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Just a note: WP:3O is for disputes about article content, not about warning other editors. That said, you should not warn an editor if you don't even know what their edit was because it was blocked by the filter. As has been pointed out, the filters sometimes get things wrong. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

In response to the note, I asked at Teahouse if there was a "third opinion" for conduct disputes (was that a bad description of this?), and was directed to THIRDOPINION, which I take has something to do with the 4th paragraph of #How to list a dispute saying other forums 'may be' more appropriate instead of 'are'. – 2804:F1...02:ACA0 (::/32) (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Alas; an error filter log patrollers and the filter themselves suffer from. Duly noted. Synorem (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

How's your night going?

Hope it's going well. "silvanusthewizard" (talk) 06:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

All going well indeed, thank you. I hope the same for you Synorem (talk) 06:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hi my user page was deleted? Soumenkarmaka (talk) 06:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Because you were attempting to advertise a Kolktan-based escort service. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertisement. Synorem (talk) 07:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:DENY

No need to give them more recognition. Admins can see the deleted edit and figure it out. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Just AIV it then leave it, I presume? Synorem (talk) 13:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, that's the best way to handle it. Thanks for helping out. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Please don't tag the user pages. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Ah, alright, understood. Would've thought that'd help with creating a profile. My apologies. Synorem (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

We already have a pretty strong profile established, no need to give them a scoreboard. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)