User talk:Soetermans/Archive 2007

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Soetermans. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 2000

←

Archive 2005

Giant sub-heading changes

I've let your changes stand this time, but next time you change headings in articles please check which other articles link to them (using the # command) and then change the links yourself. Richard75 17:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

If you have continued issues with Vandalism, you may want to post a request for intervention at WP:AIV. Alan.ca 12:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

a balladeer

Hi! I've been around Wikipedia for quite a while now and recently I came to the discovery that one of the articles I started has been deleted. The article was about the Dutch musical group a balladeer, but as you can see, it is no longer there. If you can, would you please tell me why it has been deleted? I'd rather not see this happen in the future, you see. Thanks a lot. --Soetermans 11:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello. According to the deletion log, it was deleted per criterion A7 of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion as "an article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject." If you think the article could be improved to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on notability and attribution, you can ask for undeletion at the deleting admin's talk page (User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson in this case). Let me know if you have further questions. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 12:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

del.icio.us sample pages

Hi, I'm wondering why you made this edit - I think it's a useful part of the article and I'm in favor of keeping it, but I can also see that most articles about websites don't include similar sections. An edit summary would have been helpful? Maybe we should just link to [1] and [2] instead. What do you think? Dreamyshade 20:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I clicked over to your page and it looks like it's your birthday today. Happy birthday. :) I recently turned 20 too. Dreamyshade 22:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Tina Turner

hi there!, you removed the bold text that i added in tina turner's article, i just want to know if i can revert it in the way it was, i just felt that the article would get more 'beautiful'! can i??? thanks! Salmoria 24 june 2007 .

BUT IF I DID REACT THERE YOU WOULD NEVER SEE, AND I'M BEING POLITE WITH YOU,JUST ASKING IF I COULD DO THAT FOR THE PERSON WHO REMOVED. Salmoria 25 june 2007.

Link you removed is not spam

Hi Soetermans, I placed that link as a reference to the edits I made on "Songs in the Key of Life" where Stephen St.Croix had a direct contribution. You don't think that site is reliable enough? [3] Jrod2 17:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks man. You are a fair person. My regards to you. Jrod2 13:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey Soetemans, I am confused. When did I write "St.Croix". According to this diff I had it under "St. Croix. No? Jrod2 23:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I see. I must have been distracted when I created the article. Thanks, I think it will be better to have a redirection anyway, just in case someone messed up like I did. Best. Jrod2 13:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Wilhelm

Some people have nominated The "list of media using the wilhelm scream" page for deletion. Know you have contributed greatly to this article and should know. To opine go to the page and follow the link in the nomination. Then go to the pages nominated on sept 11. Viperix 02:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Punisher 2

I have reverted your move of the article. The title you moved it to is only a working title for pre-production, not the intended release title. Until we have citation that it, or another title, is the release title, please leave it at Punisher 2. Articles about the movie continue to call it Punisher 2, and while there are statements that it represents a third incarnation, unconnected to the 2004 film, that's changed before, as has the working title, which was briefly called Welcome Home, Frank, as a working title. As details continue to change, it makes no sense to continue to move the page, update all links, and on and on. Thank you. ThuranX 13:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Not a big deal, but a simple way to avoid that in the future is to check the talk page. Being BOLD is great, but being bold without checking first that there's a reason others have not done what you're considering makes for less bold moves, but more often, the bold moves you make will stand. Hope you continue to help build the page, ans as soon as we've gota good solid citation for a release title, be sure that we'll move it to where it belongs. ThuranX 00:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

B-52 nuke incident

70 people were punished in respect to this incident. They have not yet been "fired" and are still part of the US Air Force. Criminal charges MIGHT be filed for gross negligence. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Anything to help a fellow Wikipedian! By the way, keep pressing on the other Wikipeidas. They'll come around to better standards eventually. Just remember "I never thought I could shoot down a German plane, but last year I proved myself wrong." — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Powderfinger DYK

There is a selection procedure for DYK, see Template talk:Did you know for the place where new hooks are nominated, and see WP:DYK for the rules. I have posted your note on the suggestions page under a new nomination for another Powderfinger article (see here).-Andrew c ^[talk] 16:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Rogue Galaxy

I found out that you recently deleted character and planet information on the aforementioned article. I strongly disagree with you. You said your reason was because "this belongs in a faq", this is not true. There are plenty of video game articles with characters listed, Dragon Quest VIII, Jet Set Radio Future, and Destroy All Humans 2 are examples. Are you going to delete those too? Now I'll be fair, I may agree with the deletion of the planets and minor characters, but why the main 8? They are important to the story and should stay. I am also curious at this point why you did not delete the voice actor section, because what is the point if people don't know who the characters are? I want to reach a compromise, so why not have just the main 8, Jaster, Steve, Simon, Kisala, Zegram, Lilika, Jupis, and Deego. In that order as that is the order they join. Then the voice actors are put next to their names. I feel this is fair and does not break any Wikipedia rules. BioYu-Gi! 20:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)