Jump to content

User talk:Shyamsunder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

can you help in creating a company page?

no

[edit]

Either all the other economic activities in the whole of australian history, or none - to add maritime - is correct in a literalist usage of english - but unless every other activity that economists can measure - it is a clear case of WP:UNDUE - cheers JarrahTree 06:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

shock, horror

[edit]

I would like your interaction please, even your opinion - you have just allocated something to a category freight railway in the title.

However the word order in the categories at the bottom of the page (ie parent categories) actually have railway freight in their titles. Would it make sense to you if we/I change the title? I would be interested in your response. JarrahTree 12:25, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you havent replied, I have gone ahead - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Freight_railway_companies_of_Australia - cheers JarrahTree 23:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of stadiums in India

[edit]

Re Category:Lists of stadiums in India, please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_October_9#Category:List_of_stadiums_in_China. – Fayenatic London 13:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sdyney

[edit]

You recently created a category called Category:Tunnels in Sdyney. The city in question is called Sydney, and is named after Thomas Townshend, 1st Viscount Sydney. Could you please rename the category? Dimadick (talk) 13:27, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Sorry for the lapse. Thanks for pointing out .Shyamsunder (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mainline Electric Multiple Units of India has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Mainline Electric Multiple Units of India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 22:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American subsidiaries of foreign companies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Shyamsunder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Economic history of India (1947–90) has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Economic history of India (1947–90), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

error rate is up recently

[edit]

trust you are ok. JarrahTree 10:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 10:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
fair enough, have a good christmas new year anyways JarrahTree 10:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. You too have a nice year end break and enjoy summer . JarrahTree . Shyamsunder (talk) 10:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In regards of Camel Research Farm, Bikaner

[edit]

Hello Shyam Sundar. You created the mentioned page in 2010. That's fine. But today i added relevent info along with the references on Camel Research Farm, Bikaner page which you Reverted. Can i ask why ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visiya (talkcontribs) 12:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shyamsunder: Thanks for acknowledging my contribution & inviting me for further constructive talks. Vishal S Yadav (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

just as wrong

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Local_government_in_Victoria_(Australia) - there is something wrong about that as well -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Local_government_in_Australia - has 'government in australia' as a parent cat

so from that just 'victoria' I am sure is just as wrong. JarrahTree 23:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sheesh - going off and creating that - there is a whole huge outside of australia (or india) already existing complex array is very very unwise my friend - just look at what already exists out there... JarrahTree 23:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ignoring the already complex array of what https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Country_subdivisions_by_administrative_level implies may well be a serious problem, believe me. JarrahTree 23:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly tourist attraction is not necessary the only qualifier for a states world heritage sites... protected sites or national parks comes first - i could be convinced that tourism is added only if the other aspects of protected/heritage are included in some way as well JarrahTree 11:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bihari Puraskar for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bihari Puraskar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihari Puraskar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXray 21:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you create a whole category for Mangere?

[edit]

No other Auckland suburbs have their own category. This seems excessive. Anyone who wants to find Mangere-related pages could already easily do so via searching.

I suggest that you remove this category.

In particular, I suggest reading WP:OVERCAT
Ross Finlayson (talk) 09:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have just nominated this category for deletion. (Feel free to discuss there if you disagree.) Ross Finlayson (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss first

[edit]

Show your wp:AGF - and discuss first before throwing something into CFD, thank you. JarrahTree 13:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will do in future. AGF. Shyamsunder (talk) 09:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I could have explained both to you, context and the rationale - but have no further interest once its in the zoo - all the animals come out and the conversation is lost. JarrahTree 10:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian categories

[edit]

I have added some more years to Category:2018 in Australian politics and Category:2010 disasters in Australia as I think that new "by year" categories should cover several; years up to 2018 or 2019 so that new articles go into the new right category from the start. Hugo999 (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help - Vipul D Shah

[edit]

Hi shyam need your help on one of the articles Vipul D Shah i have created. though i had put in a lot of references however it has been declined. Can you please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movingframes (talkcontribs) 10:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bus routes in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is proposed for speedy renaming to Category:Jewellery industry in India. – Fayenatic London 21:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Internet marketing companies of India has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Internet marketing companies of India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Companies of India by type has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Companies of India by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of players in Indian domestic cricket by team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maharashtra MLAs 2014– has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Maharashtra MLAs 2014–, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ミラP 19:40, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Dinesh Oraon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 11:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Childbirth in India has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Childbirth in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Crime in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review

[edit]

Hi Shyamsunder, It'd be a great help if you could review, expand and publish Operation Kamala, Operation Kamala in Karnataka, J. Narasimha Swamy, Anand Asnotikar and B. C. Gourishankar articles.122.182.231.28 (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unwise

[edit]

to allocate an identified town as a city....otherwise keep up the good work JarrahTree 10:32, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

by precedent, someone else has put museums in oz by city for the alice, so I am trumped by an earlier incorrect assertion - up to you to add... if you so wish... JarrahTree 11:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Shyamsunder talk could you please help review the page yaldor sub sector and help me take it live.Joydeep ghosh (talk) 20:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

have a good

[edit]

crhistmas and new year, thanks for your work on Australian categories this year - best wishes JarrahTree 10:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and wish you JarrahTree too a joyful Christmas and year end festivities. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Varsha Bungalow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The is a stub of stub, because a CM of a state in a country in this world lives somewhere cannot be significant enough to be made a article which have just one line and just one citation, and indeed all citation only mention this line "move to Varsha Bungalow". Its utterly bizzare and if such a article is made, then I think in wikipedia any article can be created by just one line and one citation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 14:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unincorporated

[edit]

In my books says that it is not 'local government' area - I think you need to either show a good ref to explain how an unincorporated area is anywhere in a local government area - it doesnt follow. JarrahTree 05:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , noted. Shyamsunder (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
np - just one of those things ... JarrahTree 08:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prameela Sasidharan for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prameela Sasidharan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prameela Sasidharan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Prabhakar Kore has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

perth

[edit]

you really sure about your edits there? the cultural centre is a physically designated area - removing what you did does not make sense. JarrahTree 10:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

getting weirder - the metro development authority is about Perth, and is based in the CBD - I do not see the logic of your changing things JarrahTree 10:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and the cultural centre is buildings and structures - so not sure why that went,.... JarrahTree 10:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

adding 'a history of wa transport' to sections of railway lines does not make sense, please hold off on that - thanks JarrahTree 09:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijaya Rahatkar for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijaya Rahatkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijaya Rahatkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B.L. Santhosh for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B.L. Santhosh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.L. Santhosh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXray 16:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

quite clear

[edit]

you are not at university :) - if you look at all the texts, and understand what the academic version renders it another way - it is Historical geography not the other way around, now that is a boo boo that might take some fixing up !!! JarrahTree 07:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geographic history of Australia has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Geographic history of Australia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JarrahTree 07:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The base of the category tree that exists is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Historical_geography, and the reverse order is basically wrong. JarrahTree 07:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Win Chadha for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Win Chadha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win Chadha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

semantics. maybe ambiguity

[edit]

having law enforcement as a subcat of emergency services - yes and no... hmmm... in practice. but also its a bit of a long shot when considering law enforcement is to do with law not emergencies. JarrahTree 11:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not my doing. I do not agree with that though. Shyamsunder (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
so youre following other precedents - good on you, that is good.

Having been an emergency service volunteer - we had no rights to enforce anything other than have rights to break into fire affected properties :) - whereas law enforcement aka police - have roles and responsibilities well beyond emergency - so the category is very limited in its scope - it is not in any way representative of the full range of roles of police within the communities they serve. JarrahTree 11:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.Shyamsunder (talk) 11:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
categories and projects in wikipedia are constrained and limited by some of the most absurd ideas as 'cover' for ranges of subjects, so many times I follow through from when editing your new categories/whatevers - into the main part of wikipedia - and so often there inadequate project scopes for tslk pages, or absurd category tree 'bases' - where the 'fit' has clearly not been thought through, or in many cases the talk pages of higher level categories are empty on the talk page, and have no-where to go, just inadequate project scope completely. In the face of all of that as a permanent issue, well done with your work - good stuff! JarrahTree 11:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
True. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Rajesh Tope has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another article already exists for this person with the title, (Rajesh Tope) (politician).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jonathansammy (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agrawal College, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Raaj Tilak (talk) 09:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agrawal College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Raaj Tilak (talk) 10:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Satish Chandra Agarwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Raaj Tilak (talk) 06:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Faqir Chand Aggarwal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Raaj Tilak (talk) 06:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help with an article open defecation

[edit]

Hi there. I would like to request your help in editing this article Open defecation. There are misrepresented and biased article posts done by people with anti-indian sentiments and i have appallingly found myself banned. I am not fond of editing here so i request if you could help on this issue. I refer to the section on "India and Hinduism". Thanks --Hari147 (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Debt Bondage in India Review

[edit]

Hi there! I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and recently worked on my second article, Debt bondage in India, as a part of a college project. I saw that you were one of the original editors of this page and was wondering if you had any advice about how to improve this page. Any feedback is appreciated. Thank you! Prashanth314 (talk) 02:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isi activity in riots

[edit]

Brother . Isis is using a lot of money for penetrating indian democracy loop hole they are using religious scholars and indian religious leader . Pakistani isi has been trying to curb the global image of India in any way by using loop holes present in Indian democracy. For this activity, the foreign agency has given a lot of funding to religious leaders. So that it can pace India on the basis of an unsatble country. Indian NIA is investigating on this issue. I am sharing a link on this issue which is a valid link of Hindustan Time.https://m.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indian-agencies-point-to-pak-link-in-anti-caa-protests/story-qWCiqnXCO285Qsv1rFQJeL.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiv bharose (talkcontribs) 21:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Seven Sister States has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Seven Sister States has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding List Of State Governments Dismissed Indian National Congress

[edit]

Draft:List of the Indian State Governments Dismissed By Indian National Congress


These Page Is also Showing The Defections Made Illegally From Other Parties.


So Please Suggest Some Name.

Please Check The Page Entirely KumarVenati (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nope

[edit]

not and never have been that at all, sorry... they primarily started as things that do not relate to that category - cheers JarrahTree 10:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no worries. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
if you trove checked cmo's they were at state level (victoria dominates in the first trove page) as well as federal in oz - wouldnt be suprised if they were in india during colonial era :) JarrahTree 10:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not have much knowledge of the health in Colonial India. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 10:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
heheh - I have a small level of knowledge as I have an ancestor who was a traveller in India in the 1930s - mind you I am very impressed by the Indian project backlog - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_India_articles - there are a few part of the Australian project like that :) JarrahTree 11:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Australian project is better in terms of backlog as it has benefit of many regular and dedicated editors like you. India project used to have excellent and enthusiastic editors once upon a time but they were slowly pushed out by many new aggressive editors.Shyamsunder (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Consensus is that articles related to Allahabad and Faizabad should use those names. So changing to other category names is wholly inappropriate. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Prayagraj division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ayodhya division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Transport in India in Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Xavier's School, Behror

[edit]

Hey Shyam , May I have your kimd attention .I have been improving articles of my hometown .In that sequence I tried to improve an article of St. Xavier's School, Behror which was in older version wrongly redirecting to St. Xavier's School, Jaipur , After sometime these were reverted by some admin from Ireland User:The Banner on basis that St. Xavier's Behror is a part of St. xavier's Jaipur which it isn't but both are under DSJ equivalent institutions .But he is admant on this on a misquote in Times Of India article even when Another legal proofs were provided . I would like to draw you in that discussion since you are local to India and will be more able to understand hindi artICles as well .I invite you on the deletion review page .Please accept the request .I respect Wikipedia's community policies and I contributed keenly witj time I would not like to go that waste .Since I read beforehand Wikipedia Policies . And also a suggestion for any deletion page there must be an admin with local knowledge on that page . Link to deletion Page ---- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/St._Xavier%27s_School,_Behror_(2nd_nomination)


There is a govt document on that page by admin who accepts that and made retain comment but don't know Why The Banner user is hell bent on rejecting anything ...Even the another admin accepted that page must be there .You might provide local nuanve there . राकेश5678 (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Category:Indian legal films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bridges over the Yamuna River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 01:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Urs festival, Ajmer for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urs festival, Ajmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urs festival, Ajmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Marketing research companies of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request regarding Metropolitan status of Allahabad

[edit]

Hello ShyamSundar! Hi. I would like to bring to your kind notice that a certain user named Kashmiri, (a user who takes keen interest in editing controversial topics, as his edit history says) has made edits to page Prayagraj that appears to be affecting the whole neutrality of the article. I do not intend to name any user in particular, I just need to bring to light some particular edits, done consequently one after one, that has changed some of the long standing status of the page. Firstly, the user removed the metropolis status off the page stating that it isn’t really a metropolis, without providing any reference to the edit made, while the Census commission states those cities which are in prominence, centred, administrative headquarters which have a population more than one million, are referred as Metropolis, and the population is already referenced. I have no intention to get involved in any conflicts with any user. I know and understand that he might have done that in good faith, I just would like you to only revert back the metropolis status of the page since the population of the city is exceeding one million, and it is a city of importance, I do not ask you or intend to add anything, I just want neutral data to be restored back. I even provided Government link for the city given on the Government Urban and Environmental Studies website about the stats of the city. Under Chapter 2, City profile, section 2.3.1 it clearly says ” Allahabad city comes under Allahabad metropolitan area along with Cantonment board and urban outgrowths. Population of metropolitan area is 12,16,719. Male constitutes 655,734 and female constitutes 560,985 of the total population.” http://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/19UP_Allahabad_sfcp-min.pdf The user Kashmiri hasn’t participated in any talks on talk page, nor has provided any significant reference on why the edit that was long stable was suddenly removed from the page. Alongside, I also provided a media article link back in 2006 when Allahabad was mentioned along with 5 other cities in the states and given metropolitan status. https://m.timesofindia.com/city/lucknow/Six-cities-to-get-metropolitan-status/articleshow/2210886.cms I asked him to kindly not revert it until the matter is not solved and a consensus reached on talk page, but he still reverted it, this time changing the Metropolitan status to city. I have provided much citations Sir, and as a fair, neutral editor, I feel like this is biased editing, and hence I need to draw your attention to this. We editors look up to you for everything. Kindly help. Harshv7777 (talk) 11:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not only this, he also removed the IAS, IPS titles following the District Magistrate and Police Official’s names in the city’s infobox. Now if we consider, pages of cities in India, in the infobox, all the official’s names are followed by their services title. He even removed that. Overall, he has messed up the city’s stable page. Harshv7777 (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harshv7777 thanks for your note. I am not familiar with the subject and I do not have time and interest to get involved. I suggest you report the matter at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thank you Shyamsunder (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tahir Hussain Siddique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Hussain (politician). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ministers of Human Resource Development of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:32, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. Gopikrishnan for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Gopikrishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Gopikrishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 22:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shyamsunder, Kautilya3, Harshv7777, Tayi Arajakate, Vishal S Yadav, Kailash29792, KumarVenati, The above mentioned article was deleted a moment ago by an editor who is not an admin, Toddy1, for being an attack piece. However, Wikipedia has many articles that are "attack pieces" so please let me know what to do to restore the article.—Dr2Rao (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my objection here. Please read it and let me know what else to do.—Dr2Rao (talk) 09:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was restored by an admin but is now up for discussion at AFD here - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Religious_conversions_in_Pakistan#Religious_conversions_in_Pakistan so please go there and comment.—Dr2Rao (talk) 13:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please add citations to the Religious conversions in Pakistan article wherever you feel additional citations are needed and try to make the article more "neutral" by adding any response with citations or else the article may be deleted. Thanks!—Dr2Rao (talk) 23:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India's National Action Plan for Climate Change (NAPCC)

[edit]

Sir.... user is creating disruption by repeatedly nominating this article for delition under G11 criteria.And even discussion is not allowed.Heba Aisha (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animal monuments in Australia has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Animal monuments in Australia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding adding Autonomous State medical College, Shahjahanpur to Wikipedia

[edit]

Sir, Autonomous State medical college was established by UP government in 2019 Under KGMU. It would very help u edit this government Medical college in "The List of Medical colleges in India" on Wikipedia. Thanku College website-www.smcshah.in Surajwise (talk) 12:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request help on Goa page

[edit]

Pls help to improve the page List of animal rights groups in Goa which is currently facing a deletion challenge, despite trying to bring it to standard. We're trying real hard to get more Goa-related content on to the Wikipedia. fredericknoronha (talk) 10:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourism attractions in Kurukshetra district requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me

[edit]

Shyamsunder talk I created a new article Draft:Karikku sent for review. A reviewer was impressed and was ready to accept. Just to be sure about the reliability of the sources, I have provided, he asked a question in Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. He recieved my replies, including those from jojo@nthony, but he is looking for more.I request you to give your review here ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#I_need_a_notability_check_here) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlantis77177 (talkcontribs) 07:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. However I am not good at these things. Sorry. Shyamsunder (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between cats

[edit]

Hi, I'm a Spanish wikipedia user. Could you clarify what is the difference between the following two categories: Category:Bankers associations and Category:Banking organizations? I believe banker is the people and banking the service or industry, but I don't understand the differential aspect. I want to create a category for the Spanish Banking Association in es.wiki. Thanks for your help! Triplecaña (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've realised the first is associations and the latter is organizations, a broader concept. Thanks! Triplecaña (talk) 12:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can still help

[edit]

Shyamsunder talk, I respect your honesty and dedication to Wikipedia.Yet, I think you did not properly evaluate the querry put forward by the reviewer. He wanted to know if the references in my article were reliable or not (WP:N). Most of the used references are of national level rather than being regional. As you are an experienced editor, your review will be highly valued. Please help. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#I_need_a_notability_check_here ) --Atlantis77177 (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of museums in Rajasthan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Museum. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali 2020

[edit]
Happy Diwali

Hello Shyamsunder,
Hope you are doing well.
Wishing you a happy, safe, and prosperous Diwali. Stay safe. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Geography of Daman and Diu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jammu has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Jammu has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 14:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category nominated for renaming

[edit]

Please see my nomination of Category:Tourism by state or territory in Australia for speedy renaming Hugo999 (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to Create Page with "Atul Raghav"

[edit]

Hello sir, Hope you are doing good. I wanted to create a Page with "Atul Raghav". You can google about him for more information. He is an Indian Taekwondo Player.

On a positive note, waiting for your repy. Atul Raghav (talk) 11:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) This user has made the same request on several user talkpages. I have warned them to desist. Bishonen | tålk 11:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Bishonen, Thanks for warning the user. :) Tatupiplu'talk 12:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neera Shastri for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neera Shastri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neera Shastri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘 Discuss 07:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you

[edit]

You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.

The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.

Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.

You can discuss this newsletter here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Sent by Hulgedtalk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of India has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of India has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Dilip Wagh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jp×g 02:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jharkhand MLAs 2010–2014 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Jharkhand MLAs 2010–2014 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  22:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Hi sir , iam தனீஷ் , now iam a confirmed user of Wikipedia , can I be a Autopatroller or roll backers or new Article reviewer or any other , if iam eligible , pls make me sir . Thank you. — Preceding undated comment added 07:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

தனீஷ் I do not know the answer to your question and so am unable to help.Sorry. Shyamsunder (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply brother 🙂 தனீஷ் (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For wishes

[edit]

Hi Dear friend Shyamsunder , today I stepped into my twentieth year ( my birthday) , at this moment , I want your wishes for the best of future in Wikipedia. Thanks. தனீஷ் (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hashu Advani for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hashu Advani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashu Advani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4meter4 (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of Green politicians who have held office in Canada

[edit]

A little confused as you why you removed from List of Green politicians who have held office in Canada the category Lists of current political office-holders in Canada. Perhaps you could tell us over at Talk:List of Green politicians who have held office in Canada? I have reversed it for now. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Categories by city in Western Australia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

whoa whoa

[edit]

Category:Water supply and sanitation in Australia by state or territory to add he tassie hydro to a subcat of this

is a very sluppery slope and dangerous

if you dont get it - you are creating an invented and fictitious mode of operation for the hydro - they have primary scope of electricity supply - their involvement in 'water supply' is a very basic misnomer, and quite misleading.

JarrahTree 11:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you.Shyamsunder (talk) 11:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a lot less your problem - it is what is available in the category trees into which very little thought has been given - I would have a very skeptical approach towards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Water_management_in_Tasmania as being economics of tasmania considering the rainfall - but hell, as I say it is nowhere near the very complex international law and massive environmental and economic issues that beset the Indian government over the Brahmaputra and its source. JarrahTree 11:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Shyamsunder (talk) 11:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate you contribution

[edit]
Appreciate you contribution
Hi Shyam,

I really appreciate your contribution to the list of marketing research firms. However, few company names are still missing. Please let me know if I could help you with few company names falling on that list, it would be my honor. Santhaliagaurav (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency, Template:Infobox Kerala Niyamasabha Constituency, Template:Infobox Vidhan Sabha constituency and Template:Infobox state assembly constituency has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency. You are invited to comment on the discussion at wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 14#Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency. Thank you. 122.167.185.249 (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cashew has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Cashew has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 13#Arbitration and Conciliation ( Amendment ) Act 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 03:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Engineering colleges in Kanpur indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Overseas Indian restaurants has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Overseas Indian restaurants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of restaurants by ethnicity has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Lists of restaurants by ethnicity has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing an article

[edit]

Hello. I made major edits to this article, where I saw your name in the edit history list. Can you please look at the substantive part of my edits? Thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxwallah

Anderson1970 (talk) 17:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rivers of Gippsland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rivers of Melbourne indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 21:33, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American international schools in India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 15:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S.P.U. College, Falna for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S.P.U. College, Falna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.P.U. College, Falna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laptopinmyhands (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Agra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Bhopal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tourist attractions in Agra for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Agra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Agra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Bhubaneswar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Ahmedabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Chandigarh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tourist attractions in Bhopal for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Bhopal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Bhopal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tourist attractions in Dehradun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Policies violated by this page:

WP:NLIST Not all of the entries discussed as a set by independent reliable sources.


WP:NOTDIRECTORY "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."

WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia is not a travel guide. We have Wikitravel for that, and many of these pages could be recreated (or already are) there.

The core content policies are: 1) neutral point of view, 2) no original research and 3) verifiability. This page violages policies 2 and 3.

WP:VERIFY What are the criteria to meet to be in the list? This page has vague or no criteria. By definition, then, there is no way to verify the inclusion or exclusion of any particular site in the list.

WP:NOR Original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented." Who says that each of the items in the list are tourist attractions? Given the lack of inclusion criteria, that's understandable, as there is no need to justify being in a list that doesn't have standards for inclusion. However, that also points to original research as being the source for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Government College, Sirohi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shyamsunder, before de-prodding, it is recommended that you fix the problems pointed out by the editor who proposed the deletion. For notability issues, read WP:N, and especially WP:NSCHOOL to see how the problem can be fixed (independent, reliable sources, which cover the subject of the article in depth). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Government College, Sirohi for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Government College, Sirohi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government College, Sirohi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tagore Government College of Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tagore Government College of Education for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tagore Government College of Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagore Government College of Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Agrawal College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ISKCON Temple, Mumbai for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISKCON Temple, Mumbai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Mumbai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page The News Today has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dal bati churma" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dal bati churma and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Dal bati churma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Assembly constituencies of Lucknow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Defunct legislative assembly constituencies of Indian states has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Yadav family of Uttar Pradesh has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Yadav family of Uttar Pradesh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Yadav family of Bihar has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Yadav family of Bihar has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename categories

[edit]

Please see my proposals to rename Category:Human rights abuses by period to Category:Human rights abuses by century and Category:Crime in Australia by time to Category:Crime in Australia by century. Hugo999 (talk) 04:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please create this article

[edit]

Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited

Please create this article DotServer (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramzan Ali for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramzan Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramzan Ali (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 17:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Nagavanshi classification

[edit]

Hello Shyam! Manoj here, from Chennai. Just wanted to ask your assistance with the page on "Nagavanshi." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagavanshi). As per all historians of Indian history, there are 4 Kshatriya houses: Suryavanshi, Chandravanshi, Agnivanshi and Nagavanshi. While the first 3 have been given the "Kshatriya" description, it is missing from the Nagavanshi wikipedia page. Please add the word "Kshatriya" in the description, as when I try to add, someone immediately deletes it. Cheers! 89.100.169.76 (talk) 03:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kanwar (Sen or Sain)

[edit]

Hlo Sir As per padma award records his name is Kanwar Sain and you have also used SAIN in whole article. But why SEN in heading Plz update this from Sen to SAIN

I'm Ashish from his hometown TOHANA Avimehta21239 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Political families of Jammu and Kashmir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
  • It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 18:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ghantsala" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ghantsala and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Ghantsala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raj Rishi College for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raj Rishi College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Rishi College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of Satara district for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Satara district is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Satara district until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iamsanatani (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on History of Satara district requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20090610154614/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/SATARA/his_muslim_rule.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shri Kalyan Government College for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shri Kalyan Government College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Kalyan Government College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lordofhunter (talk) 00:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Towns in Gippsland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rulers of the Kingdom of Marwar has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Rulers of the Kingdom of Marwar has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Janak Kotak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't fall under Wikipedia: Notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Opposition leaders in India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Opposition leaders in Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

viact.ai

[edit]

Can we create a page for this? 2402:E280:2317:509:6:F5D7:E11B:D9EE (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Anosh Ekka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian hospitality has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Indian hospitality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kakaji Maharaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability other than the stamp, and no one has added any other really significant information about him in 13 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Allahabad indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourist attractions in Allahabad district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Engineering colleges in Allahabad indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Rao Rajendra Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

only one sentence. Relies on a Singular Source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SKAG123 (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2015 in foreign relations of India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2016 in foreign relations of India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jharkhand Silk Textile and Handicraft Development Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jharkhand Silk Textile and Handicraft Development Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of Rajasthan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jharkhand Silk Textile and Handicraft Development Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jharkhand Silk Textile and Handicraft Development Corporation (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article S.L.U. Arts and H. & .P Thakore Commerce College for Women has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable institution

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 03:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Shyamsunder!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 15 § Category:Religious universities and colleges by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 25 § Sports venues in India on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Airports in Kanpur indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Recipients of the Sahitya Akademi Award on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 19:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

actor page creation require

[edit]

Dear Sir,


Can you create page of Gaurav Dewasi as its notable person..


https://g.co/kgs/hm9XKTa 103.162.178.238 (talk) 08:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rajput era has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Rajput era has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maharajas of Punjab, India has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Maharajas of Punjab, India has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Education in Sonbhadra district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of Bahawalpur District has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:History of Bahawalpur District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 6 § Category:Historical geography on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 01:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Urban development in India has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Urban development in India has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Ancient history of Fooland on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mauryan emperors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islam and slavery has been nominated for purging

[edit]

Category:Islam and slavery has been nominated for purging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Morarji Desai Residential Schools for Minorities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Only primary sources provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § Category:Closed military installations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Prisons in Uttar Pradeh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:State urban development authorities of India has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gedrose (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Your Article

[edit]
Notice

The article Netraheen Vikas Sansthan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advertising without any relevant or encyclopedic content & its only source is a dead link

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 1.127.110.74 (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Man-eaters of India has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Man-eaters of India has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]