User talk:Shibbolethink/Archive 29
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Shibbolethink. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 35 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Libreboot on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Essay critique
I have created a new essay and would welcome some critique on the talk page there:
Valjean (talk) (PING me) 22:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Will do! Happy to help. At first glance, looks like a great and much needed essay. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 15:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for your improvements. Really great stuff. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Will add more! Just consumed by unpacking and other such life-stuff atm, but I like the essay and would love to help out further — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 20:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- For some unknown reason, I don't think I knew you were a physician, so we're both in medical fields. I'm a retired PT, with a PA education. The same for my wife, but she is also a nurse. I share your interests in skepticism, alternative medicine, and quackery. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hahahha yeah, that still sounds weird to me, as I've only been a "physician" for like 32 days! But I'm glad to see we have very knowledgeable (credentialed) persons like yourself out here combatting misinformation with their retired time! I figured you had some training but I didn't know it was that far ranging... I hope I have as much gas left in the tank when I retire!! :)) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well, you have my unreserved respect and support. You have chosen a great profession that is unfairly maligned by altmedders and quacks. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hahahha yeah, that still sounds weird to me, as I've only been a "physician" for like 32 days! But I'm glad to see we have very knowledgeable (credentialed) persons like yourself out here combatting misinformation with their retired time! I figured you had some training but I didn't know it was that far ranging... I hope I have as much gas left in the tank when I retire!! :)) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 14:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- For some unknown reason, I don't think I knew you were a physician, so we're both in medical fields. I'm a retired PT, with a PA education. The same for my wife, but she is also a nurse. I share your interests in skepticism, alternative medicine, and quackery. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Will add more! Just consumed by unpacking and other such life-stuff atm, but I like the essay and would love to help out further — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 20:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for your improvements. Really great stuff. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Half a barnstar for you!
The Half Barnstar | ||
For excellence in editing cooperatively in the GA review for Covid-19 pandemic. The other half goes to Ozzie10aaaa. Nice work! —Ganesha811 (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
|
‘Ridiculous,’ says Chinese scientist accused of being pandemic’s patient zero
I'm not sure where this ought to go, but it seems like it should go somewhere:
- Cohen, Jon (23 June 2023). "'Ridiculous,' says Chinese scientist accused of being pandemic's patient zero". Science.
XOR'easter (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's honestly so wild that Hu had to deny this lol. I'm not sure it's DUE enough to include even the denial, but the fact that this is being reported in Science means maybe we should mention it lol. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 19:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- It's also a sober secondary reference for the contents of the ODNI report, which could be useful somewhere, I suppose. XOR'easter (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Short note
Hi @Shibbolethink. I wanted to let you know that I saw the COI accusation against you and thought it was egregious. I am glad it was shut down immediately and, honestly, think that Wikipedia should have a clearly articulated and enforced COI exception for anyone involved with non-profit work just to save everyone some time. Anyway, keep up the great work. Ppt91talk 19:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'd like to second that. Subject matter experts are valued here, and to have someone like that diss you is beyond the pale. Keep up the good work. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'll third that--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks folks :) It means a lot. I like it around here, and plan on sticking around!! No worries, I think this sort of thing just comes with the territory!But I will tell you just so nobody gets concerned: I start my intern year of residency tomorrow (in neurosurgery) and I think it's highly likely I won't be around much for a while as a result... but I am quite confident I'm leaving my old haunts in exceptionally good hands. Good luck and good vibes! — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 01:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Shibbolethink "On the next episode on WP:TROLL: does being so intimately familiar with the human brain trigger COI for articles related to the homo sapiens? We'll pull out a dummy and speculate wildly!" Jokes aside, that's really impressive, and congratulations! I do hope you'll be back whenever time permits. :-) Ppt91talk 16:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Firstborn hypothesis
Kudos on creating the firstborn hypothesis article. I had planned on doing so about two years ago, but completely forgot about it. Around that time I first saw a very strange hobbyist video on YouTube that was created by someone with a lot of time on their hands. The video must have taken them a month to put together. Basically, they ran through the entire hypothesis, from soup to nuts. I wish I could remember it, but I'll see if I can find it, as it was most comprehensive. (Was it your video?) I think I first saw it on Hacker News, so I'll look through their archives. Do you have any plans on expanding this article? Viriditas (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?