User talk:Sherlock502

{Can you update tamar Braxton because she has nominations for the world music awards}}

At the Teahouse:

You have a response to your query, Teahouse/Questions: Harold Finch (Person of Interest), from ~Eric:71.20.250.51 (talk) 06:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transcendence

Hello, regarding Transcendence (2014 film) and this edit, we should not be inserting so many genre mentions upfront. WP:FILMLEAD states, "At minimum, the opening sentence should identify the title of the film, the year of its public release, and the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." It is simple enough to call Transcendence a science fiction film. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 02:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eidetic memory, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC, Red Dragon and Dark Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Harold Finch (Person of Interest) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

rescues Casey and takes him to Finch, which he persisted on not allowing anyone to see him (which he .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Smart. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Be familiar with the guidelines and style
Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Widefox; talk 11:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Batman194, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Widefox; talk 12:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about and I cannot help you with your investigation. I'm sorry. I'm retired and I'm going to be gone forever. I'm very serious. Please do give my sincere regards. Thanks. Sherlock502 (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of baritones in non-classical music, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 22 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of tenors in non-classical music page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to David Lee Roth seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 17:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Weeknd, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 07:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to David Bowie seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 23:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]