Jump to content

User:SummerPhDv2.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:SummerPhD)
This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 5 months and 21 days.
This user previously used another account: SummerPhD.




This user page is for SummerPhDv2.0.

From June 12, 2006 through May 25, 2015, I edited as SummerPhD, making roughly 90,000 edits.[1] I then managed to lose my password and was unable to prove my identity as I had not updated my email address. Through some browser gymnastics, I was able to login to my original account to add this note on October 20, 2016 to confirm the story.

Same ornery Lesbian Space PopeTM, new user name.


Stuff I can never find:

Discretionary sanctions notifications

[edit]

If you are here because I left one or more notices of discretionary sanctions on an article, I am saying you edited a page that the sanctions apply to. I am not saying there was (or wasn't) a problem with your edit(s). I typically notify every editor I see editing one of several pages who has not been notified in the past 12 months -- including admins.

Editing on these pages and their talk pages tend to generate more heat than light and attract a disproportionate number of trolls and unstable extremists. The discretionary sanctions help keep this nonsense to a minimum, but only if editors are warned. The problem editors (and a few of the nonproblem editors) often feel "targeted" by the notices. It isn't necessarily about you, but if you are part of the problem, you've been notified.

NOT

[edit]

SummerPhD is subject to frequent churlish attacks and point-y allegations. Additionally, despite evidence to the contrary, she:

  • is not on "a bizarre rampage" with "no apparent reason" and no "attempt to explain (herself)"
  • did not libel or defame the American Academy of Financial Management in various ways.
  • does want to free poor Bailey.
  • is not retired and does not need to retire.
  • is not vandalizing Wikipedia by requesting deletion of copyright violations posted by sock puppets.
  • does not work for the UK government.
  • does not work for Cher.
  • is not Katie Couric's assistant.[2]
  • is not a "lobbyest" for Rita's Italian Ice.
  • is not employed by Kraft or any of its subsidiaries.
  • is not Tom Billings.
  • is not Morris Krok.
  • is not a supporter of White Power.
  • is not a supporter of Ben Klassen.
  • is not Stephen Barrett.
  • is not an "anti-fruitarian".
  • is not someone with a grudge against a diet.
  • is not prejudiced against a diet.
  • is not "pro-steak"
  • is not trying to hide that I am making a comment on a talk page.
  • does not have a personal grudge against some random neighborhood in Philadelphia.
  • is not anti-black.
  • will not go away.
  • is not a bully.
  • does not consider you a reliable source.
  • does not have personal animoisty (sic) towards some random editor.
  • is not nitpicking at Wiki pages I have no actual knowledge of to make up for deficiencies in my real life to feel a brief flare of self worth.
  • does not have "mod status".
  • does not consider you adding your POV to be a helpful contribution.
  • may or may not be a dumbass.
  • is a smart ass[no citation needed]
  • is not a relative of David Burchell.
  • is not a "Dunedinite".
  • was not previously involved with some choir in New Zealand.
  • is not anti-gay.
  • is not anti-white.
  • is not a clone.
  • is not out to sabotage any articles.
  • is not part of a transnational conspiracy to suppress the benefits of butter and the insidious danger of margarine.
  • is not hoping for a premature, all-natural, organic death from a diet of milk, blood and dirt.
  • does not have an ax to grind against firefighters and police officers.
  • is not a cop.
  • is not fighting to discourage contributions to the project.
  • is neither a Philadelphia police officer nor has another relationship with the department.
  • is not in any way connected to the video game Five Nights at Freddy's.
  • is not biased against some random teen pop singer.
  • is not being paid by Autism Speaks to write this.[3]
  • is not a "shill" for Coca-cola.[4]
  • is not a bot.[5]
  • is not Donald Trump.[6]
  • is not guilty of "anti-western bigotry".[7]
  • is not "a sock of blocked sockpuppeteer user:Elmodivot".[8][9]
  • is not Wendy Mesley.[10][11][12][13][14]".0948937#phone_call_from_cbc_reporter[15]
  • is not "a wee lass with blue hair" who supports sarkeesian and loves "cuck".[16]
  • does not doubt that "An overseer is responsible for overseeing the overall operations of the overseer-ship."[17]
  • is not a "a shill for the reviled Oobi".[18]
  • is not "always touting corporate products".[19]
  • does not "have sex with gay mongo trees".[20]
  • is not a "Lesbian feminist (with a) PhD in gynofascist studies".[21]
  • is apparently exempt from magic spells cast by lonely guys.[22][23]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

I have repeatedly been accused of having one conflict of interest or another, many of which are noted above. I've been accused of being a Philadelphia cop, a representative of a choir in Australia, a relative of an obscure fringe food writer, a shill for Kraft foods and a whole lot more.

Like a lot of editors here, there are articles I clearly would have a conflict of interest editing to one degree or another. As a sometimes-author, there are countless topics I have tangential connections to.

As a rule, I strive to give a wide berth to anything I have been paid to research, study, write about or otherwise have a financial connection to. If I edit an article about Spacely Sprockets, you can bet I have never dealt closely with Mr. Spacely, his company, sprockets in general, Coswell Cogs, The Jetsons, any of the voice actors on the show or the company that made (makes?) the show in any professional context, nor do I personally know anyone fitting that description.

Yes, I have had occasion to call or talk to police on various occasions. I've been to Australia. I've met people touting various fringe ideas. I've eaten Kraft products. If any of those are conflicts of interest, no one over the age of 20 can edit anything on Wikipedia without declaring.

My work is or was cited in several articles. (I didn't put it there and have not edited those articles.) Someone floated an article about me, but it didn't last. We have enough articles that are little more than filmographies/discographies/bibliographies/CVs. No need to add mine, thanks. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC) 

I'm Dox, and I approve this message.

Current work and discussions

[edit]



"To be used only for remakes, spin-offs, and adaptations" per Template:Infobox_television

Bad source clean outs

[edit]
**New interaction utility
**DOB templates

WikiBlame

User:SummerPhDv2.0/Fringe




To check

[edit]

Articles I've created

[edit]

I know what you're thinking: "Summer, you've make like 14 bazillion edits (15 bazillion if we include "discussions" with editors begging to be blocked). Why only 25-30 new articles?" Well, the way I look at it, if we had 10,000 editors just like me, we'd have close to 300,000 articles about semi-obscure basketball/tennis stars, vaguely mobbed up restauranteurs and defunct aquariums. Isn't that what Wikipedia is all about?

Redirects created for later expansion

[edit]

Significant improvements

[edit]

Articles that clearly signal the approach of the Apocalypse

[edit]

List of Unicode characters

Disruptive child

[edit]

{{ipsock|98.198.33.72}}

Kent Hovind

Due to extensive vandalism, ALL numerical changes to kids' media and train-related articles MUST cite reliable sources.

Late 80s songs

[edit]

An extensive history of unsourced/unexplained changes to song dates, often at a rapid pace, sometimes focusing on one artist at a time. Frequently involves artists/songs from the mid to late 1980s. Ignores talk requests and blocks.

See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hill93
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SummerPhDv2.0&oldid=1219921512"