User talk:Shadzane

This user may have left Wikipedia. Shadzane has not edited Wikipedia since September 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Shadzane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 14:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Surfing Day

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article International Surfing Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Triwbe (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lorelei Hill Butters

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lorelei Hill Butters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lorelei Hill Butters seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lorelei Hill Butters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work with Shoshana Bean

Just reviewed your edits, and I was quite pleased with the quality of your efforts. Thank you! — X S G 03:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hiram Lodge, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tim1357 (talk) 02:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

All in a day's work. I added them back in just now. The thing about List of United States Christmas television specials is that it's 99% about Christmas-themed episodes of regular television series, plus it doesn't give any information other than the title and year of the episode or film. BTW, thanks for the redlinking -- that was something I was going to do when I logged on today, but you had already done it. Softlavender (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Special Delivery (2000_film)

The article Special Delivery (2000_film) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feel free to write to me for any assistance. Wireless Fidelity Class One (talk 18:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point. You could create a disambiguation page titled Special Delivery, and then disambiguate the various links to the different movies, at the same time providing links of the disambig page on the movie pages too. That'll stop other editors from tagging your movie entry. (Do reply on my page in case you do) Wireless Fidelity Class One (talk 14:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Such a page already exists. So I'm putting a disambig tag on top of your article. Wireless Fidelity Class One (talk 14:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Wireless Fidelity Class One (talk 05:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peepshow (burlesque)

Hello, Shadzane. Are you planning to create this article? If not, I do not see any good reason why it should remain linked. I do not believe that this article will be created any time soon by anyone else. Flyer22 (talk) 03:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I linked it hoping someone else would create the article. (I don't think I'm up to creating an article on a theatrical show.) Since no one has now after several months, I suppose it's time to remove the link... Shadzane (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thanks for responding. Sorry for my late response. Since you recently linked it again, I won't remove it again for at least some months. We'll see if it causes someone to finally create the article. Flyer22 (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Shadzane! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Peggy Holmes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Around the World in Eighty Days. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Sassy Girl

How is this based on actual events??? BollyJeff || talk 23:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to Bollyjeff over on his talk page Shadzane (talk) 23:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I had not read the article fully, but by remembering the film I did not think it was possible for it to be real, haha. Thanks for responding. BollyJeff || talk 00:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Little Shop

Okay, Mr. HOT SHOT. WHERE did you get information that Frank Oz created the show? And don't say IMDB, Wikipedia, or anywhere else where ANYONE can add information. --Taco Wiz (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the page itself, in the infobox... Shadzane (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just TOLD YOU "And don't say Wikipedia". That's a lie. Frank Oz is NOT credited as the creator anywhere except Wikipedia. Thanks for not listening to me. Now find me a source besides Wikipedia and IMDB and the like, or I change things back to my way. --Taco Wiz (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you change the infobox too, that's all right with me...Shadzane (talk)

License tagging for File:Archies Pals n Gals 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Archies Pals n Gals 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Liberation Day, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Liberazione and Vijay Diwas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. When you recently edited Night of the Twisters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shelter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reelz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shadzane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MsVictory.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MsVictory.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Desperately Seeking Santa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desperately Seeking Santa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desperately Seeking Santa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 00:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santa Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santa Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christmas Town

The article Christmas Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Dennis the Menace Christmas

The article A Dennis the Menace Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM with not enough reviews to pass the guidelines, with none found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Married to a Stranger

The article Married to a Stranger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Everythings Archie 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Everythings Archie 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]