User talk:Rwiggum/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rwiggum. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

The Get Up Kids edit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I didn't make the edit you are refering to. I think the confusion was caused by a comment I made on the discussion page for TGUK. The guy who made the edit did not sign his comment, which I responded to, and it looks like it's all one statement. I think you've done great work on the page, as well as Blackpool Lights. I'm actually from Kansas City and I think it's great that these pages are getting some attention. Keep up the good work.Natt the Hatt (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem on the mix up, it happens. Thanks for your kind words. I've expanded the story section for Broken Bride. If you get a chance, take a look and let me know what you think. Hopefully we can work together on some other projects.Natt the Hatt (talk) 02:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Broken Bride

Sorry, I didn't realalize that you had trimed a previous story section here. I reverted my edit, but I'm wondering if there is a more appropriate place to put a more in-detail storyline.Natt the Hatt (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunatly, Ludo has never given definite answers.Natt the Hatt (talk) 05:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Team Fremont Live

A tag has been placed on Team Fremont Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 21:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

My first concern is that we don't even have an article on Team Fremont, so a podcast about them pretty much fails notability right there. Then there are so many self-published sources, and nothing that seems to meet WP:RS. Plus it's really hard to prove notability of a podcast, they're generally a dime a dozen. Corvus cornix_talk 21:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

What I meant by my last comment is that the vast majority of podcasts are not notable, even if the subject is. I'm still not seeing reliable sources. Corvus cornix_talk 21:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll be honest that I never heard of those sites before, but is there some way to verify that they're notable? Do notable sites use them as references? Corvus cornix_talk 21:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I know that Gawker isn't a reliable site. Corvus cornix_talk 21:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I've given my reasoning. We'll let an admin decide if the article should stay or not. Corvus cornix_talk 22:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Read the criteria for Template:db-web. Corvus cornix_talk 23:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Team Fremont Live

An article that you have been involved in editing, Team Fremont Live, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Fremont Live. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Since an editor with no other edits decided to remove the speedy deletion tag, I decided to take another look at this article and the associated references. Even if the sites you claim are reliable sources, the links to those sites are themselves are little more than "boy, that's a cool podcast" sorts of things, and links to videos. No discussion about the site. Corvus cornix_talk 18:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. I never heard of this podcast until yesterday. Provide reliable sources, and this will all be fine. Corvus cornix_talk 22:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Where did I ever say "I never heard of it"? How many times do I have to ask for reliable sources? Take this to the AfD page, I'm through discussing this with you, since you are not interested in discussing this civilly. Corvus cornix_talk 22:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I appreciate your comments. Corvus cornix_talk 20:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Mariusz Wlazly

Hey. I removed the speedy tag from Mariusz Wlazly. Being on a national team is a claim of notability. If you disagree, then go ahead and nominate it for AfD. Corvus cornix_talk 23:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree, it needs better sourcing. I had passed by the article and thought about it, but thought that the national team membership was enough to let it pass. Putting an unsourced tag on the article wouldn't hurt, though. Corvus cornix_talk 23:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Four Tildes

Please sign your comments on any talk page with the four tildes (~~~~), or click the button right above the edit box. Thank you. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 00:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Signature

It doesn't sound stupid at all. You could view the wiki markup article for information on wiki formatging and other things.

First, go to your preferences, and where it says "signature", that is where you can insert your signature. Make sure the box is checked.
Another way, you could look at my sig. ('''''[[User:Willisis2|Ŵïllî§ï$2]]''''' ('''''[[User talk:Willisis2|Talk!]]'''''/'''''[[Special:Contributions/Willisis2|Cont.]]''''')), and other signatures four fonts, styles, and colors.

Have fun editing on Wikipedia! --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 00:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Could I see what you've come up with? --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 01:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I found your error. You never put in a after one of the s. Here is your new sig: [[User:Rwiggum|Rwiggum]] ([[User talk:Rwiggum|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rwiggum|Contrib]]) --Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 01:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Your Welcom!!! --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 01:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

One more thing, that last message you left me was missing a parenthese at the very end. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 01:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

No I don't mind about the access bars. I stole them from User:Liveste!!!! --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 01:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles Blair

Hi Rwiggum, I've JUST started the entry on Mr Blair. His achievements in aviation are quite impressiveFoofbun (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shorty (song)

I have nominated Shorty (song), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shorty (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ani Mate 22:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Since the song never charted, and was self-released, it might be better to make it a one-paragraph section of the band's article. Corvus cornix_talk 23:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

RX (film)

Thanks for the information I reverted my tagging. To move a page to a new name you can use the move tab at the top of the page, this automatically creates a redirect from the original location. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Cashbox

I wondered by curiosity why the 1981 number-one hits from Cashbox magazine have to be deleted? Is there some incorrect data than I need to re-check? I think it could be a interesting idea to post a list of #1 hits from Cashbox magazine on Wikipedia to compare them with the ones from Billboard magazine? --Sd-100 (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Wahab Iyanda Folawiyo

I've declined your {{db-bio}} request on Wahab Iyanda Folawiyo. There is no earthly way this was a candidate for speedy deletion, as at the time of your nomination it not only contained multiple assertions of notability, but had two legitimate references to back the assertions up. If you haven't already, please make sure you familiarise yourself with the speedy deletion criteria; this kind of nomination is very disruptive, as it not only wastes the time of the admins who have to deal with it, but potentially drives the editor off the project. CSD should only be used in a very limited circumstances, and not because you don't like an article; if you feel an article like this is inappropriate, use AFD instead.

In this case, your tagging was particularly inappropriate, as you nominated it for deletion eight minutes after the article was created, when the author was likely to still be working on it; except in the case of blatant vandalism or attack pages, please give the editors a chance! — iridescent 22:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Those two "Dubious looking websites" (to quote your post on my talk page) are one of Nigeria's leading newspapers and a major news website. Please stop being disruptive. — iridescent 22:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop wasting my time with this. From his bio before he died:

"He is the Grand Patron of Nigerian Muslim Council; Chairman, Executive Council of the Lagos Central Mosque; Honorary Fellow, Chartered Institute of Transport; Fellow, Commonwealth Journalists Association; Chairman, Maize Association of Nigeria, and Patron, Institute of Freight Forwarders of Nigeria. He was also honoured with the key to DADE County, Florida, in the United States of America. He is the proud recipient of the national honour of Order of Federal Republic, OFR, conferred on him in 1982, as well as, Commander of the Order of the Niger, CON, on November 16, 2000.
The University of Lagos also conferred on him - the Millennium Award of Doctor of Science. He was appointed CHANCELLOR, Lagos State University on 17th April, 1999. He is the Patron of the Nigerian-British Chamber of Commerce."

I got that within 10 seconds on Google. Regardless of that, there is no way you should ever be CSDing articles eight minutes after creation. Did you actually read those newspaper articles referenced? — iridescent 23:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

PMPRB

I took your comments to heart, friend. But, I think there's still need for a good article on the PMPRB. Could you make some substantive edits? You seem to be of sound mind and reasoning, so I think we'd all benefit from your insights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlphaFactor (talk • contribs) 23:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Wahab Iyanda Folawiyo afd closing

Hi, this page might help you out if you are wondering how to close the discussion WP:NADC. Cheers, Nk.sheridan Talk 19:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I usually just put closed in double brackets and someone else comes along and cleans up for me, but, you appear to have done it properly. --Blechnic (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shorty Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shorty Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Recent edit

Hi there Rwiggum!

Thanks for taking the time to edit my new article (Jefferson (surname))! Although I am sure you had good intentions, the article is dealing exclusively with people that have the surname Jefferson. If you have any other Jefferson related topics that you would like to add, please tdo so at Jefferson. Thanks!--Pecopteris (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VMA Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VMA Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

hi rwiggum

you locked the talk page on a wikipedia page i created and requested to delete it. unlock the talk page so people can talk about it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scary dragon atop the hill (talk • contribs) 00:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah thanks

Just trying to clean it up and give reader more info on the type of discussion since im a listener of the podcast but its cool that your fixing up the page thanks for giving me some constructive criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.88.232.72 (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

1up

hey if you have a 1up page add me as a friend i see your appreciation and understand the mistake of my edits, if you want to add me as a friend my 1up Id is mfza2890A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaf263 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

the previous

Just to let you know I was he one with the bad edits and the previous comment sorry forgot to log on it just put my ip address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaf263 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Genre

I just think calling the genre gaming instead of gaming journalism is to vague and often confused to gambling and casino gaming —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaf263 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Braydon Szafranski

I added some references to Braydon Szafranski, and I think the article now passes notability. --Eastmain (talk) 00:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Live Your Voice Tour

If you're going to AfD Live Your Voice Tour, why not bundle all the other Tim/Faith tours into the AfD? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

This Town's Disaster

Think this afd could just be speedy closed? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Blackpool Lights (EP)

I have nominated Blackpool Lights (EP), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackpool Lights (EP). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Rework ready to look at

Please see the revised Soul2Soul II Tour 2006, and my new comments about it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Your Voice Tour. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Please now also see the revised Soul2Soul Tour article, and my new comments about it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Your Voice Tour. And thanks for the work on the merged later article. But as I say in the AfD comment, I'm certain that the 2000 article should not be moved in with the 2006/2007 article; they're different beasts. Wasted Time R (talk) 23:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Blackpool Lights EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackpool Lights EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Get Up Kids

It's widely known that THE BAND is a kansas city band, but it is also known that those members i modified grew up and went to school in Olathe, KS which is a Kansas City, MO suburb. I went to olathe south and know people who were classmates with them and it is widely known around town that they are from olathe kansas. I will be undoing your revisions shortly unless you have further issue with that. You can even look up the band members on social networking websites and they list Olathe, KS as hometown. One example would be Jim Suptic on Friendster.com, (no registration required to see his profile) where he lists Olathe, KS as his hometown. Ryan2845 (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Here is the link to Jim Suptics profile, listing Olathe, KS as hometown profiles.friendster.com/5457102 Ryan2845 (talk) 19:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm nearly 100% sure that the Popes and Suptic grew up and went to high school in Olathe, there are numerous articles on the internet verifying that. Heck, i can go to my highschool and grab a year book if need be :)

Another example is you can search on Classmates.com under Olathe South and see that Rob, Ryan and James are all listed as Alums http://www.classmates.com/directory/school/Olathe%20South%20High%20School_5.jsp?org=15406 Ryan2845 (talk) 19:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll do some more research and get back to you. Its highly possible that Suptic could have lived in Liberty as a young child and moved to Olathe for his highschool years? His own friendster page lists Olathe as hometown? Who knows, I'll look into it, but i'm positive they all 3 AT LEAST went to Olathe South for highschool, that much I am 100% sure of. Ryan2845 (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I just found this article from Pitch magazine (the authority on all things music related in the Kansas City area).

Quote from the article: "The group got together in 1995, when Pope and guitarist and vocalist Jim Suptic were seniors at Olathe :::South High School."

http://www.pitch.com/2005-06-30/music/all-good-things/

Ryan2845 (talk) 19:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, Pryor and James are DEFINITELY from KC, MO. I never edited their pages, sorry i got that mixed up in the comment above.

Ryan, Rob, and Jim are all from Olathe, KS Ryan2845 (talk) 19:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Your resolution sounds fine to me. I'll make the changes. Just glad I could contribute something, big get up kids fan! Ryan2845 (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Signature reminder

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Orange Mike | Talk 02:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Island Savings

I added some references to Island Savings and removed the speedy tag. I think that notability is now demonstrated. --Eastmain (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Nick RienThompson article

Why did you change my Speedy Delete tag from 'db-nonsense' to 'db-bio'? Nick RienThompson doesn't exist. Google has never heard of him and the claims made in the article are nonsense and impossible. ("From the age of 9 he studied rock music and guitar technique under his heros such as Angus Young, Jimmy Page and the late Jimi Hendrix.") Kind regards, Channel ® 00:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The article doesn't make sense. Read it carefully. "World renowned rock guitarist and soccer star"? "plays for Led Zeppelin"? Total nonsense. Anyway, I'm sure it'll soon be gone. Channel ® 00:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

BTW, I removed your Speedy Deletion tag on Guy Bonnet. The article is in pretty poor shape but the guy is definitely notable. Even I've heard of him and I hate French chansons. See Google. Cheers, Channel ® 00:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Nicktoons Planet Quest

The fact that this article was created by a ~~sock of a known hoaxster~~ has me convinced that it's a slam dunk G3. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh whoops, I misattributed. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Guitar Praise isn't released yet... few information available

Hello. I wrote an article about Guitar Praise. I'm not really that excited about the game coming, but I figure that it could use a Wikipedia article. There has been no screenshots released, and also, the beta testing was limited to California residents. There is little known about this game, which will release in about 6 weeks, so I put the {{future game}} tag on it.

I am unable to write more than a stub about an unreleased, privately beta tested video game. If there is anything that I can do to improve the article, please let me know. Thank you. LetsGo67 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I wrote an article about Guitar Praise. I don't mind whether or not it gets deleted for now. Later, there will be more sources, screenshots will be released. LetsGo67 (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Buried and ressurected?

Will the article just be 'buried and ressurected', then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LetsGo67 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Sirnick1990

I saw your discussion with Sirnick1990 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) at Talk:Nicholas R. Beek. In my view, Nicholas R. Beek is a hoax (Google does not show any hits for Nicholas Beek or Nicholas R. Beek at nytimes.com), and Sirnick1990 is a vandalism-only account. --Eastmain (talk) 05:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Lobster ball

I've rejected the speedy delete. The article provides enough context to explain to a reader what it is about. The proposed deletion is still in effect. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 06:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I corrected the message. Sorry for confusing you! I probably better go to bed. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, buddy!

		Civility Award
		Thanks for showing me the way while keeping calm and cool, especially in comparison to some other editors. DRosenbach ^{(Talk \| Contribs)} 18:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is My Time Tour

Hey, did you notice that Raheemistheone's only edit is the This is my time tour AfD page? I suspect it might be a Sockpuppet per below. Thanks, H2H (talk) 07:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

And of course. Please look closely at the:

The time he/she edited. (17:57)
The time the account was created at "This is my time tour" AfD. (17:44)

H2H (talk) 07:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

It is done; Ravenfan4ever is blocked indef, H2H (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Marnie Weber

You recently nominated the article for Marnie Weber for deletion. I assure you that in the art world, especially, though hardly limited to, here in Los Angeles, that she is an artist of note. I have cited nearly all the information that has been added. I will continue to improve the article, adding citations from more and more sources, as there are plenty from which to draw - much has been published about her and her work. In the meantime, I request that you reconsider the tag for her article. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamstamp (talk • contribs) 19:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Conduct

From reading this page I can see I am not the only person to be confused and frustrated by your requests for deletion. As has been stated here several times it would be much more helpful and polite to request for additional information etc than jumping to the delete button. If you actually help edit a page rather than just request it's deletion in future it would be appreciated. I will copy such conduct myself when this occurs.--Cabinfeveraaron (talk) 11:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Flat_Daddy - speedy deletion ?

Hi Rwiggum, I challenged the speedy deletion you requested under the ground of "unverified concept" here Talk:Flat_Daddy cheers --Ofol ^(t) 21:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

QSE.

Hi, I know the page has been doing a little better, and my personal feelings aside, may I ask why you feel the link to the People magazine article is irrelevant? I have added that link to to show that Sarah Silverman did the song, and to possibly give some background. I respect your opinion, and since you have deleted it twice, I will leave it out, I was just wondering how, seeing as they did a spoof, the original shouldn't have a reference? Just a quandary. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 16:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I do agree that it doesn't fit the notability and that a lot of the sources are bogus. I just felt that even though it does not reference the article, it references the text contained in the article (i.e.- the original Silverman song), which I believed would also need a source. But if you feel it shouldn't be there, I can respect that and I shall drop the subject. (I also am a Kevin Smith fan.) And, as I said before, I do agree the article isn't notable. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 16:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Naruto Ultimate Ninja Heroes 3

Just a friendly note on Naruto Ultimate Ninja Heroes 3. I declined your speedy deletion request, as there was plenty of context and content to the article, even when you tagged it. (Yes, it could use some copyediting, but that's not a deletion issue). --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstars 'R' U

		The Hidden Page Barnstar
		I award you one for finding Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 01:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC) (BTW, if you don't already know, it's usual to add at the bottom, not the top, on all talk pages.)

Lady with the Dog

Why did you move the article without any discussion? The original title is just as correct as yours and more widely used (all the articles that link to that use it, and they were written before I wrote the article). And the article refers to it by the original title so it's inconsistent. Gr8white (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Bug Sessions Volume One

Just a friendly note about the prod removal on Bug Sessions Volume One. WP:MUSIC clearly says albums by a notable band may be notable, not are notable. Long precedent at AfD shows that notability for albums is not automatic just because an artist is notable.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

External Links on Comedian Pages

Hey there! I've just had a few links removed from a few stand-up comedian sites, I believe you took mine down from Maria Bamford's page. I was just wondering why it's not ok to post those links, because I would have figured that people interested in Maria and her comedy would enjoy watching some of the clips on RooftopComedy. I'm not an expert on Wikipedia, so perhaps you could help me to understand what I did wrong? I'm just trying to connect fans with good content, and I'm confused why it's not allowed! Any info you could give me would be much appreciated. --Blenz (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Update - Thanks for the reply, Rwiggum. I guess I'd like to argue my point a bit more. I checked out your links to the guidelines for editing, thanks for those. Over at RooftopComedy we work with up and coming comedians, get their sign-off to air their clips, and then post them online so they can use them to self-promote. In addition, we like to take it a step further to act as online agents and promoters for these artists to help get their work out to the masses. I don't see linking to a profile and group of clips on our site as spam so much as an informational link that provides interested fans with another outlet to view work by the people referenced in the article. As for our site not being verifiable, I'm unclear what that means. All our comics write their own material and grant us permission to post - we check that the performance is the correct person before adding it to a performer's profile. And I'm just not sure why links to these artists performances on Comedy Central are allowed but ours aren't. I know you're not the only one taking my links down, so I suppose I just want to get a feel for why we're seen as spam by you and others! Thanks again for all the help, I truly appreciate any light you can shed! --Blenz (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Breakemall.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Breakemall.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MER-C 11:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Hello. I noticed today that you were doing newpages patrolling but are not marking some of the pages you visit as patrolled. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! Thanks. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Ranks in Call of Duty 4

My last attempt at this article was quickly deleted by you, and for good reason. I've made second attempt at the article (List of Ranks in Call of Duty 4) and I was hoping you could tell me if it meets the standards for a wikipedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishvara7 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Hopkin Green Frog Deletion Request

I removed your request for deletion of this article, as deletion had already been discussed in 2005, with a result of No Consensus. As per Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion, articles previously discussed in AfD are not eligible for proposed deletion. thanks. ikes (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Bruce Silverstein Gallery

Hello. I have contested your speedy deletion/ removal of the Bruce Silverstein Gallery Wiki. Several sources have been listed and the site is not intended for blatant advertising or self promotion. Please Help!

moopsie@mac.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by BSG2420 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newpepsilogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newpepsilogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Album article ratings

Hi.

Look, i gotta be honest with you; the difference between stub, start and C are quite clear, but between C and B arem at least to me, not that clear, if i had to say a reason why your articles have Cs is because they lack references, but i`ve seen articles with less references with Bs, so to upgrade them to B, i suggest to add section of charts or certification (gold, platinum, diamond) and add references, sorry i can`t be more specific but the only real diference between C and B is, "No blatant source problems", whatever that`s suppose to mean.

If i failed to explain myself or you need something else, just contact me Zidane tribal (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, see this for example Natty Dread and Mistaken Identity (Delta Goodrem album), they are both Bs, but the first one has no refs whatsoever while the second one has a bunch, i really don`t get it, but i know one thing i`ve seen articles not as good as yours with Bs, so with the charts positions i`ll make them Bs. Good luck getting them to GA.

Contact me if you ever need me again Zidane tribal (talk) 00:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Ludo

What I've been doing with Ludo lately is trying to keep everything cleaned up. Since they started getting bigger, a lot of people check out the page and add stuff that doesn't belong. Other than that, I havn't had the time to do a lot. Feel free to add to them, and keep an eye out for vandals, there seems to be a lot lately.Natt the Hatt (talk) 20:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

List of Warped Tour lineups by year

Mate,

I'm a bit concerned about the work that you've been doing on these articles. I closed the AfD in good faith, and I felt that there was no consensus to delete the articles, but that's what you appear to have done. Also, I'm having an awful lot of trouble going through and seeing what you've done, because when I check your diffs, they are thousands of lines long, with images everywhere. My poor old Mac with Firefox is thrashing the hard disk and hanging when it tries to display the pages.

Can I ask why you've done this? I don't think that you have consensus. Also, if my browser can't easily churn through your work, I imagine other people are having problems too. - Richard Cavell (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

The O₂

You have, however, deleted numerous references for some significant events which had been contained in the table whilst I was trying to resolve a difficulty relating to the article. --➨Candlewicke ^{:) Sign/Talk} 00:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah no, 'tis fine. Another editor transcribed all the refs into the table and wiped out my original prose. I was just trying to reason with the same editor for at least the existence of both the prose and the table (without the ticket availability section, which was really going too far into advertising) just as you removed it! :) No matter, it can be sorted through the history. --➨Candlewicke ^{:) Sign/Talk} 00:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zack-miri-cute-poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zack-miri-cute-poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Killers day age.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Killers day age.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Killers day age.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mattie ^TK 22:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for posting this here (I'm not sure where to edit to contact you) but my last few updates were meaningful and I was updating some of the old outdated info on the section. I know it was a mistake to write that nonsense earlier about 1up so I apologize for that. After the stupidity I tried to be constructive and decided to update the Castlevania Judgment section with new updated info that is not currently there, but yet it was still deleted. Well, anyways, I apologize for the annoyances that I posted a while ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.178.12 (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Unprotection request

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Zack_and_Miri_Make_a_Porno you're the one who semi-protected Zack and Miri Make a Porno. WP:RFUP suggests that this request for unprotection come to you first. Thanks. 67.100.222.178 (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC).

Notability

I found the messagebox amusing. Nonetheless, from your user page, it seems as though you enjoy challenging the notability of articles for the fun of watching people jump to defend them. No matter what your reasoning, at least for the article Buddy Nielsen, I would like you to demonstrate how he is not worthy of an article. Although the article itself is poorly constructed and written, I haven't had the time to improve it yet. Nonetheless, I am capable of seeing that it is deserving of its own page. Please explain. Daniel Musto (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Folie a Deux

Please stop policing the page for this article. The information placed there is accurate and there is no need to try to be an internet tough guy. You're not doing anybody any favors by deleting the information placed on that page and then spamming the edit box with notices. I am currently in possession of a copy of the CD in question because I work at a record store who just recieved a shipment of the album yesterday. If you don't want to accept that, then you can try again tomorrow or the day after when my CD arrives in the mail anyways. Since the information is accurate, let it be for now. People who come to that page looking for information are doing just that - looking for information - not looking to see how well moderated the page is. You're being ridiculous, and behavior such as yours does not help improve the credibility of this website (which, as I'm sure you are aware of, is already much scrutinized). Chill out. The page is being reverted again. It contains accurate information and there is no reason to delete it just because it makes you feel better. Kmanning2008 (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

This person above obviously doesn't understand Wikipedia and its policies. Thank you for your help with this particular article. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 01:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I understand Wikipedia and its policies. I also understand that it is a source of information. People do not come to the website looking for moderation. The information is correct as is. I also understand that you are preventing the flow of information which is something that I don't believe Wikipedia or it's "policies" endorse.

The page is being reverted because it contains accurate information. Both of you will be reported if it is changed back. If so, I will also be adding the information again when I receive my own personal copy of the album within the next 48 hours. Kmanning2008 (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Maria Thayer

Hey, don't tell me what do do! Who the hell are you to say it's not constructive? Any data introduction is constructive! Eliminating data certainly isn't. Just because you like to play with little presentation boxes it doesn't mean people have to ommit episodes and other complementary information. And calling direct-to-video films "DVD extras" is just misinformation, a movie about a movie isn't a part of a DVD movie, is a film by itself, a documentary!... And I won't stop! Why do you think you can force me, why not the opposite? And since when does wikipedia say that we can't mention episodes is forbidden, people want to know when actors appeared, without detailed information wikipedia is just a crapp, as are people who like that!... I think the problem is that some people are resented with IMDb's completudiness, call it "not constructive" and "incomplete" (!!!!!) and then just attack people and (try to) destroy their work!... The last think I wanted was another SOB with this kind of pretensions. You want war? Well, you got it!... And like a disrespecting SOB you call people's efforts and work "incidents"!... Incidents are your idiotic arguments and trollings!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Except you're not being constructive!... And for what I know, destroying mere boxes without destroying the information that was there and remains there (and what was there before wasn't that much hard to do) only with another presentation isn't exactly a lack of respect for anyone!... I had more trouble, you're the one who is pining your mistakes on the ones you attack!... And destroy real work is far more worse that a mere lack of civility you so much like to invoke when you get bothered!... I've allways seen documentary films about films, how do you know those were all just DVD extras? You'd have to be some fatso at the basement without a life just watching DVD's to know something like that!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

So, "wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information", that is, it's a reductive site that should be the most complete information database on the Planet but according to some's interpretation has to ommit elements because it can't collect any information!... And why do (stupid) people allways keep interpreting "extra film and television information" as being "indiscriminate collection of information"?... They're two different things!... Indiscriminate collection of information would be personal and minor details over someone, or just adding sentences without any organization or connection, but that doesn't mean information should be banned!... What would be of a real Encyclopedia with that line of "thought"?... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I delete because I just want to do my job without some ass naging around and I don't want to lose my time with conversations much less with you!... And that's exactly what I want, an Administrator to see this!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

And I don't want trash in my page!... If there is a final word by an Administrator, independently of being subjective and so often unfair and unintelligent sometimes, then just post the conclusions there!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

What's all this complication for? Isn't much easier to search and call one Administrator and just ask him what to do?... That's how I do, it's way much faster!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 15:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I thought it would be clear that I've said yes, just that calling someone at the moment be faster!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

If I don't want my conversations at all the time being around for anyone to see and I prefer to delete them, they're my words. What's that up to you?... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 15:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

You know what? With all your insistance (making me loose my time) even after I said yes, now I say no!... I'm sick and tired of losing my time!... The problem is solved!... I'll have to stick with your precious little boxings and loose three times more (of my little) time I use to loose, and you if you're not too pushy might be open not to remove some extra information, as long as it is properly presented!... And that's solved!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I can't work with those boxes, if I delete them for some times it's because I can't get with all those rowspans|| and stuff, at least in an useful amount of time!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Message Deletion

But these are my words, and despite you own this page you don't own other people's words, and if they want to delete them I wish you respect that!... Simple privacy, I know you Americans have some troubles with it because of that First Amendment thing that allows violations of privacy in the name of press and knowledge and stuff!... We had a World War because of people like that!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

They're "public", but they can be deleted, can't they? And I wouldn't be forced to speak publicly if someone hadn't made me do it!... Every "public" forum is deleted at some point, except on this right violating wikithing!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 16:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Cupertino

See User:Dismas/user for more on your buddy, Cupertino. And yes, he blanks his messages on my talk page as well. And yes, it bothers me when he blanks his own. It makes it difficult to carry on a conversation with him. Dismas|^(talk) 17:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Ha, Dismas, ya beat me too it! The frustrating thing is he does provide worthwhile content, he's just extremely difficult to work with. -Verdatum (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't want to maintain conversations with anyone, I just want to solve things and move on!... If I don't keep conversations it's because I don't want to maintain conversations, retards!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

new sources? they are listed!

look at the packaging! what sources more do you want, a picture of the receipt? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kizacolo (talk • contribs) 00:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Listen, you son of a bitch...

Don't go after my work in which I've lost months just to put boxes! Don't delete information about episodes just because it can't look like IMDb! Your luck is that I just don't know who you are, or you would see... And yes, I did personal attacks and violate some shit, that's what people do when sons of bitches have more protection against personal attacks than people that work against people who destroy others' work!... Now if you want you can go and cry to an Administrator!... How can you expect people not to be angry and to be civil when they're work is destroyed? G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

You deleted things that I've added even after you make your precious little boxes, you even deleted links to pages that don't exist for now but most likely will be created in the future to have them now, you even took the tiles when titles must have them mandatorily, you even took the "" from episodes titles, another mandatory procedure that, if is allowed, means that names of episodes aren't supposed to be deleted like you do, and all that just because I didn't agree with you I've made personal attacks!... I thought the problem was just with the box and the reverse chronology!... Do you even know how much I've wasted for this crapp? And boxes aren't mandatory! You even deleted links to pages with the subjective reason of "red links" look oh so horrible!... I hope it will be you and not me who is going to check everytime if the movies already have an article and add it to every dozens of pages that have blanks!... This just shows how much of a son of a bitch you are!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

You know what? You do the job, I'm sick and tired of this scumbag "people"! I wonb't make any more contribution to anything else film or television related. I didn't do it for sub-humans like you, I did it for information and for the sake of the actors themselves, but enough is enough!... Oh, "I do a useful job, some articles need filmographies", then don't ruin them, much less under the cover of "conveying info better", whatever that might be, since, again, nothing makes us use boxes, but I won't do that job anymore, you do it, I won't let you explore my contributions and my time! In fact, I'll even difficult it for you. Wikipedia is a shit, and so are you guys who "work" on it, we don't need this site, anything worthy we can just copy and past to IMDb to be more complete, IMDb IS more complete, specially now they're creating pages for characters, and as I said you can't handle that!... You say it's not credible, but guess what, one day it will be, and then it will be the best database on films, while wikipedia won't be anything!... Wikipedia will just be a secondary source to complete IMDb!... Wikipedia is the not credible one, exactly because of "people" like you!... Check this out: www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/lies-damned-lies-and-the-wickedness-of-wikipedia-1388050.html. Enjoy it!... And go ahead and delete my account, I can't wait for it, I'm sick of having to check every retarded message you people post in my page!... If it gets deleted it gets permanently blanked!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Then go ahead and block me!... It's really what I want!... G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

While I'm reluctant to become involved in other people's problems, I've blocked Cupertino for 31 hours for this gross incivility and harassment. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Maria Thayer.

For the Mediation Committee, WJBscribe (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheetah-licious Christmas (song)

I forgot one of the four songs. Feel free to change your vote if necessary ... I doubt that you will have a different opinion on this one If I Never Knew You (The Cheetah Girls song), but there is always a chance.—Kww(talk) 19:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:FMMLP2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FMMLP2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Your userbox images

I was wondering how you created them. To me, they look like low resolution publicity shots. Are you sure you own the rights to them? J Milburn (talk) 22:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

This'll probably sound ridiculous, but I'm concerned about the copyright of them. If they are based on publicity shots, then they will count as derivative works, meaning the copyright still belongs to the band photographer. This means that they aren't "free", and should not be used in the userspace. J Milburn (talk) 23:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

That's great, thanks for understanding. J Milburn (talk) 23:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

File:TFL Logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TFL Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Same for File:TFL After Hours.jpg. --Sherool (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to apologize if I came across as overly accusing in the nomination of these images. I guess I have become a tad jaded over the years from seeing too many cases of someone granting a limited permission to use something in one context and the user then turning around and saying "ok I have permission to use this now so it's PD", so I assumed the same was the case here, especialy since it's virtualy unheard of for anyone to release any rights to their logo (not even Wikipedia's logo is free licensed). --Sherool (talk) 14:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Messages from User:MichaelQSchmidt on my talk page

I am a bit puzzled as to why you considered the messages vandalism. Anyway, no harm done. Ohconfucius (talk) 01:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Home Movie (2008 Film)

You might still feel it non notable, but I just gave the article a major overhaul. Lots better. Plenty of reviews. Significant coverage. Per WP:NF and WP:GNG it passes. Easily. Do I need anything else? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you and Happy New Year. No doubt we'll meet again at AfD's, but I can see that we are both here to improve Wikipedia. So I sincerely hope you have a terrific 2009. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:1UP Show.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:1UP Show.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:B0009A21U8.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)

You've uploaded File:B0009A21U8.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/G.-M. Cupertino

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/G.-M. Cupertino/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/G.-M. Cupertino/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 16:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/G.-M. Cupertino

The "G.-M. Cupertino" arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision is available at the link above.

G.-M. Cupertino is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year. Should he return to editing following his ban, he is limited indefinitely to using one account to edit. He is to inform the Committee of the account he has selected, and must obtain the Committee's approval if he wishes to begin using a different account.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
Mailer Diablo 23:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Serbian soccer players

Hi there. I noticed you put up a request for the speedy deletion of Predrag Jerinic, an article authored by Zuull (talk · contribs). For some obscure reason, the consensus for quite a while has been that professional athletes and top-level amateur athletes are considered to sort of "automatically" have notability, regardless of how obscure they may actually be. As such, article stubs on pro footballers no one's ever heard of are at least as safe from deletion, due to utter non-notableness, as Pokémon characters used to be. For specifics on just how low the bar is set for athlete articles, see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Athletes. --Dynaflow babble 08:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Ludo: You're Awful, I Love You

Hello. I wanted to write you and ask why you deleted my updates to the Ludo album You're Awful, I Love You? I added valuable and correct information about the album's bonus tracks but then today I noticed that my updates had been removed.

I added the following information in my update...

Bonus Tracks

CD Pregap Hidden Track - "Goodbye Bear" - 1:26
Rhapsody Digital Edition - "Safe In The Dark" - 4:12
iTunes Digital Edition - "Japan It!" - 3:22

I added brand new information about the CD Pregap Hidden Track "Goodbye Bear" which is available as a bonus track on the CD version of the album. "Goodbye Bear" is located before the first song "Love Me Dead" and is hidden in the Pregap of the CD. Pregap Hidden Tracks can be played by playing the first song in a CD player and then rewinding (more accurately, seeking in reverse) until the actual start of the hidden audio track. You can read more about Pregap Hidden Tracks at Pregap.

Additionally, I updated the information about the two other bonus tracks "Safe In The Dark" and "Japan It!" by giving more detailed information about which editions these bonus tracks can be found. Specifically, that they are available on the Rhapsody Digital Edition and the iTunes Digital Edition.

So I'm just wondering why you would delete this additional information from Wikipedia since I think that all Ludo fans would find this very valuable if they were trying to track down all the bonus tracks from this album.

Thank you for your reading this and hopefully I will hear back from you. JohnnieYoung (talk) 01:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

CSD A9

Hello. Please make sure that articles you tag as CSD A9 fit the relevant criteria. In particular, The Ataris does have an article. In fact it's been there for six years! That does not mean that every single one of their songs needs an article but it does mean that speedy deletion is not the way to go. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 02:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

If an article has been around for 6 years and has been edited by multiple people then I guarantee you that no responsible admin will speedy-delete it. I've speedy-deleted gazillions of articles and it's a little annoying to find tagged articles that clearly don't meet the criteria. Not to mention that it's annoying for the article's creator to get a message explaining that their article will be deleted under criterion so and so when it's clear that their article doesn't qualify as such. The CSD A9 clearly states "An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article has never existed or has been deleted" (emphasis mine). In all likelihood, these two articles won't be deleted because admins who look at expired PRODs err on the side of caution. In the case of Summer Wind Was Always Our Song, at least one editor removed an earlier notability tag [1] and that in itself indicates that it isn't uncontroversially a deletion candidate. Note also that the guideline you cite discourages deletion and recommends merging the article to the album. Basically, both the speedy tag and the PROD tags are a waste of your time (which is ok) and a waste of other editors' time (which is not ok). Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jungle Disk

If you're going to speedily delete Jungle Disk then please get the justification right. The article is not about a company so it doesn't qualify for section A7. It is about a piece of software. "A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." The article is basically a find/replace of the Elephant Drive article, a very similar product with a very similar article in Wikipedia. Most of the online backup tool articles are very similar to mine, so it would only be fair to delete them all. Thanks! DanielHolth (talk) 02:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

American Idol Hot 100 singles

I have made some changes to American Idol Hot 100 singles and since you voted Delete in the AfD, I would appreciate you looking at the article and telling me what you think. Aspects (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge

Hey Rwiggum. I was thinking that the genre, because of the controversy, should simply be changed to "disputed subgenres." Why did you revert it? Thanks. Friginator (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Ben Lyons page

Don't panic at the most recent edit after yours; the one right after yours is mine. I toned it down, as you will see, but the essence remains. I also paraphrased the criticism into a more "Caspar Milquetoast"-ish style, because wikipedia articles are supposed to be neutral in tone in that way, or at least as neutral as possible. You can read my comments on the discussion page.

Also, when Mobbqbc does his newest edit, as I'm sure will happen, before you react, you might want to check Mobbqbc's editing history on wikipedia, which you might find of interest. Just for myself, I have no personal feelings one way or the other about Lyons, as I stumbled on that Chris Lee article by accident whilst looking for something totally different. My only concern is well written and cited articles on wikipedia with appropriately neutral and objective language, although from reading the criticism about him, I can understand where the tone comes from. But that reaction must not prevent one from continuing to be calm and detached in adding material to any given wikipedia article, Ben Lyons or anyone else.

Good luck with keeping an eye on it. At least because all edits on a wikipedia article are saved, I can always put mine back later one fairly easily when the occasion arises, as no doubt that it will. DJRafe (talk) 07:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I put some new comments in on the Ben Lyons discussion page. Hope you don't mind my reworkings regarding the reference format. I think we're on the same page regarding him, although my perspective is somewhat more of a "disinterested bystander" than most, I guess. Thanks, DJRafe (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the late follow-up; just incorporated the Filmspotting reference in "formal" style. DJRafe (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

As you've noticed, Mobbqbc is back, so the edit wars are back on. (Not hard to guess who it is, yes?) However, I have to say that after listening to the Filmspotting file, BL doesn't actually use the phrase "I don't get it", so that could be toned down (FWIW). Anyway, back to the grind, DJRafe (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Mobbqbc is back yet again; I restored a revised version of the pre-Mobbqbc-treated edition just now. DJRafe (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Could use some help

Hello Rwiggum,

As a fellow Kansas Citian (sp?) I was wondering if you have any insite on Johnny Dare. I was looking over his page, and it is in terrible shape. I've started a little clean up, but could use some help if you could spare some time. Or if you could direct any other editors from KC over there, that would be great. Thanks for everything, and keep up the good work.Natt the Hatt (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

P.S. The work you've done with The Get Up Kids is amazing.Natt the Hatt (talk) 22:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

How I Met Your Mother

But there are all kinds of How i met your mother pages who list the errors ocurring in any episodes... like this Where Were We? (How I Met Your Mother) Ninjason (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Well thats a pity, since i really likeed scrolling through those. They had something called the "light bulb moment". But if its a violation to the wikipedia rules, i guess theres no helping it. Well anyhow, thanks for not reverting my edit uncommented - now i know what the reason was and I feel not turned down ^^ (made an account, maybe I can contribute sth useful at some time) Ninjason (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Little Minnesota

Please stop removing the cultural references section from the Little Minnesota (HIMYM episode) article. It is not a "list of indiscriminate facts" and hence does not fall under WP:TRIVIA, it is instead a list of cultural references made in the episode. Maelin (Talk | Contribs) 04:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Great job

Great job on your work with The Get Up Kids articles. They've always been one of my favorite bands, especially being born and raised in KC. Keep it up! conman33 (. . .talk) 06:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

i need help creating new page for a Taqwacore artist

there is a possible deletion pending. its for The Sagg Taqwacore Syndicate. I have several link and articles and I interviewed the main guy yesterday in Vancouver.

I have picture and quotes.

They are going to be featured in the upcoming Taqwacores movie. Michael Muhammed Knight has a wiki page and so does Taqwacore.

This info is relevant, I need help to fix and keep new page.

cheers and thanks (Im a big new fan of the artist) -Randle Taylor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papasagg242 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Dear Science,

Please stop reverting. It is not a typo. I repeat it is NOT a typo. It was conceived under that title hence why some reviewers have used that title as that was the title on their promo copies.

In fact, if you check the sources carefully instead of being reactionary, you will that the REF no.1 (Pitchfork) on the page explicitly talks of "Dear Science," quoting that the comma is indeed intentional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.217.155 (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. I bet you any money WesleyDodds will remove the comma and the funk refs as soon as he can. He's been doing it a few times already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.217.155 (talk) 13:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, well the only reason is discussion. User:WesleyDodds, who's contributed to all sorts of Alt-Rock featured articles, gave individual reasons in his edit summaries as to why he was changing the things posted by 129.234.217.155. When that sort of thing happens and you disagree with the changes made to your edits, my understanding was that you were suppose to go the discussion page and find some kind of consensus. 129.234.217.155 failed to do that, and instead just reverted back and included what I felt were some strident comments. In the past when this sort of thing arises, I typically defend the more experienced editor, who is typically more right, and revert back to the edits they've made, leaving a note as to why I've done it. This is what I did. (Notice, I didn't change the part you approved of.) 129.234.217.155 then came back and re-did his edits, again with out discussion. Now, I'm not personally invested in the article. I'm just a recent changes patrol-man. He could very well be right on about everything, but since he seems set on not hitting that discussion button and getting consensus with the people who really disagreed with him, I thought the only thing to do would be report the whole thing to the admins and let them straighten it out. Personally, I think this is really immature, especially the highly personal way he's taking all of this.

Also, if he's banned, how is it he's stilled editing? I think I'm missing something. --Leodmacleod (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I disagree. It's his fight and his responsibility. Now, as I said, I don't have an opinion on the record and I couldn't care. I'll take it off the watchlist and mind my own, but I'm telling you this; Dodd's right, and he will get the article the way he wants it. Because that kid knows jack-squat about music. --Leodmacleod (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

<--- Definitely more than you mate. History of it, extensive genres in my library, multiple instruments played, you name it.

Haha, if Leodmacleod and WesleyDodds actually listened to the album instead of spending their time with pedantry they'd realise it is funk or maybe they don't know what funk is. Anyway, the sources are conclusive. Cheers for the help. Might create an account if I can find the time in between papers.129.234.217.155 (talk) 13:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Not Without a Fight

Ok, no problem.

I personally think "The Album Project" is a notable review. It's a webzine that specializes in music reviews and was the first review of the album posted before the release.

Also, Punknews.org is another notable source of reviews for this genre.

I'm happy to add these and leave the Spin review in. If the Spin review is "notable" then surely the above two are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostLikeTearsInRain (talk • contribs) 00:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Puh-leez!!!

PLEASE REVERT IT TO MY ORIGINAL THING AND ADD "SEE ALSO" AND PUT RACE TO WITCH MOUNTAIN THERE!DownAirStairsConditioner (talk) 20:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

All I'm trying to say is...

to please put my original page for gliesonians back, and add the "see also" section, and add the link for 3/13/09'^s big hit by UFO: Race to Witch Mountain.DownAirStairsConditioner (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, okay... but please change it back.DownAirStairsConditioner (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

How?

Hey, Rwiggum, how did you change the color of your page link?DownAirStairsConditioner (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey! guess what? My new signature is DASC!!! But how do you change the color? Oh, and you're quite nice! DASC (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to show how to change the color. Oh, one more thing: You are something of a nice guy. DASC (talk) 11:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi Reference your message on my talk page, I conclude you are talking about the The Clinton School for Writers and Artists page. This page is not redirecting to a userpage but instead to an article MS 260 (which is proposed for deletion currently). As it is redirecting to an article it is not eligable for speedy deletion unless the article it is redirecting to is itself deleted. I hope this is helpful and was the page you were talking about. Davewild (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: The Ghost of You

Sorry about the reverts. I was, however, completely aware of the graphic novel. The song I believed the title was referring to, These Foolish Things, was written in the 1930s, and well before the 1980s book. The ad in the Watchmen graphic novel was a reference to the original song. I had reverted several similar edits before those done by SuperFlash101, but none of them had been sourced. I hadn't seen the video, and simply thought the editors were mistaken. Thanks. Friginator (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

page for possible deletion

Hello, there's a fairly new wikipage called "Nowhere Boy" (a forth-coming movie on the childhood of John Lennon) which appears to be a promo for the movie. considering there have been countless other Lennon biopics, I'm not sure why this one warrants a page, since it doesn' even exist yet.Hotcop2 (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

What constitutes a notable, credible source?

I would like to know what constitutes a "notable, credible source" for album reviews? In case you are not aware, KevinNottingham.com is a highly regarded website in the hip hop community. It is NOT a personal website. We have a staff of 8 personnel, one of whom also writes for HipHopDX.com and another who writes for Okayplayer.com. We generate 12-15,000 unique hits a day. We get asked by record labels and artists to review their albums. If that does not qualify us as a notable, credible source, I don't know what does. Please let us know what we need to do to add our review links to Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pan21897 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)