User talk:Rockk3r

If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page, unless you request otherwise.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

January 2008 – May 2008

May 2008 – August 2008

September 2008 – December 2008

Re: List of Iron Maiden band members

Merge all, per Template:Infobox Musical artist#Past members ("Past members of the group, listed in order of joining..."). See also: List of Megadeth band members. Canniba loki 17:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay! Not a reliable source. Canniba loki 17:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Metallica band members

I think I have solved your comments. How is the list now? Nergaal (talk) 09:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Nergaal (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bruce Dickinson discography, Pt. 2

Hi Rockk3r, as you requested, I provide some suggestions for improvement. See Talk:Bruce Dickinson discography. I will comment more later. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:IMPERFECT. Canniba loki 02:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BRUCE DICKINSON: New Artwork Revealed For Solo Album Reissues – May 18, 2005

The entire Bruce back catalogue re-mastered and expanded... Canniba loki 02:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, again. Rockk3r Spit it Out! 02:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HammerFall discography

I can do a cleanup in this list? Just to help you... Canniba loki 17:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, okay. Other question, you use QUI? Canniba loki 17:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is so funny? I also want to laugh!

Canniba loki 17:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Number of the Beast

You placed the template {{underconstruction}} on The Number of the Beast (album), but I can't find an edit summary where you mention the template. How long has it been there? --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 02:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, then. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 23:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may not have noticed, but the edits you made to this article on 28th January have introduced some invalid references - you've reused sources, but there's no indication of what the references actually are - specifically, the references called "BD_bio-BoH" and "Samson_Biography-sing365". Cheers. CultureDrone (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Iron Maiden awards

Cool, I'll help you, starting now! Canniba loki 01:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I don't know. Canniba loki 02:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Canniba loki 05:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know about anything, your mind is your guide.

Canniba loki 03:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll merge this list with the main article, okay? Canniba loki 20:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That "Miscellaneous" section will not change anything in the list, and what makes Metal-Rules.com a reliable source and/or relevant? Canniba loki 17:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canniba loki 17:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, see why below:

Both "Finnish Emma Awards" and "Finnish Metal Music Awards" have questionable metodology regarding their existence and how the awards are presented.
"Online Metal Awards" and "Metal Storm Awards" (quasi-Fancruft; 100% irrelevant and giving hands to "Metal-Rules.com")

Ask to Scorpion0422 (talk · contribs) and see if him can help you. (I think he is online) Regards, Canniba loki 18:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canniba loki haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj to all.

List of Bruce Dickinson band members

You just need write the text. Canniba loki 04:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skunkworks

Please propose a move discussion on the relevant pages, and gain a consensus for the move first. We will then ask an administrator to make the move, if it passes. - BillCJ (talk) 23:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bruce Dickinson discography

Lead looks good, but I don't really work with discography articles. You'll have better luck asking someone like User:Dabomb87 for help. Gary King (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Iced Earth discography/archive1

Hi. I was wondering if you could please elaborate on your comments made at the above FLC. What is it about the page that makes it not suitable to be a FLC. You said "It still needs some work, it can easily be improved." What work? Improved how? The nominator cannot be expected to work on it or improve it without being given direction, and the FL directors may decide that your comment is not valid without something to back it up. Regards, Matthewedwards : Chat 03:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iced Earth Members

sure i can help out. im also trying to improve Thrash Metal page. i can maybe create at least a stub with a picture of maybe 1 or 2 of the guys. im glad to help. CallMeAndrew (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

im kinda have a tough time finding any information on the uncreated Iced Earth band members. its also what happened to me when i was making the Greg Handevidt article. as you can see, its not very good, its a small stub that doesnt even have a picture because of the limited info i found. so, this might take awhile. CallMeAndrew (talk) 23:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry i just cant help you. i searched alot of stuff, on Dave Abell and Randall Shawver, the only things that came up are things we already know. they were former members of iced earth. doesnt even say their age, where they are from or anything. its just not working out. maybe they shouldnt get an article. but i could maybe help on somthing else, or when im in a big project, i could get a bit of help from u. CallMeAndrew (talk) 22:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do this again and tell other people this too

This edit you made to the discography section of the Iron Maiden main article was completely unnecessary and... wrong. The consistant format for discography sections of bands/artists with a seperate discography article is studio albums only, with the year in parenthesis after each album. Actually, listing "Year: Album" could be described as "technically incorrect" because that implies all the albums the band/artist made on that year should be listed on that line. Iron Maiden only released one album per year so it isn't a huge deal for them, but for other bands it could be a large problem. A year in parenthesis after each release is correct by all standards and is common on most publications and etc.

I am just telling you this so that you don't make the same mistake again and that you can tell other people this too. Thanks! A vision of it (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC 3b review

Hello, I noticed that a recent FLC that you nominated failed because of the criterion 3b. I have started a review of the criterion here, and any comments or opinions that you have about it would be more than welcome. Thanks, Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 23:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC: List of WarCry band members

I have nominated List of WarCry band members for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 23:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rockk3r! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Alberto Rionda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Leo Jiménez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metal Gods – Tributo a Judas Priest

The article Metal Gods – Tributo a Judas Priest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable compilation/tribute album. No references given or found to indicate suitability for inclusion, and no likely target for a redirect

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Avalanch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Avalanch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalanch. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection

i saw you renamed rob zombie's "20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection" album article. the new name doesn't match with user Feduciary's main article (20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection), which lists all the albums with their names conforming to a specific style. unfortunately the albums' links in that main article point to articles whose names don't conform. even the names of the albums in the article don't match the article's name itself (but that might be due to wiki software limitations with punctuation in article names). its category (Category:20th Century Masters albums) is even worse: some articles have 2 colons, some have 1 hyphen/1 colon, some dont include "20th Century Masters", and others put "20CM" and "TMC" and the band's name in all different kinds of orders. instead of having rob zombie and kiss fans determine what those artists' albums' articles should be called, they should conform to Feduciary's main article. i left the same message for user Cyrus XIII. i'm not lazy, i've just never renamed an article and think someone who's done it before (like you 2) should/could do it, and to avoid edit wars between us. if not for all 161 albums (62 with articles), at least for your respective favorite band. i can handle editing the main article's links to point to the new album's article's names, afterwards. maybe this comment can be mentioned in WikiProject Albums, to apply to all compilation series listed in Category:Compilation album series. Ivansevil (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Taringa!

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Taringa!. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taringa!. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of À Tout le Monde (Set Me Free)

The article À Tout le Monde (Set Me Free) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not relevant for an article of its own

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 18:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alea Jacta Est back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alea Jacta Est back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Believe in Nothing (Nevermore).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Believe in Nothing (Nevermore).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opeth LamentationsCD.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Opeth LamentationsCD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demon97 back cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Demon97 back cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demon97 cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Demon97 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mägo de Oz Fest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mägo de Oz Fest.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (On concert).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (On concert).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Ramil On Pamplona (On concert).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manuel Ramil On Pamplona (On concert).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (concert).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (concert).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (Concert).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manuel Ramil on Pamplona (Concert).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Victor García on Pamplona (Concert).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Victor García on Pamplona (Concert).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WarCry logo grey.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WarCry logo grey.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Manuel_Ramil_on_Pamplona.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manuel_Ramil_on_Pamplona.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Roberto_Garcia_on_Pamplona.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roberto_Garcia_on_Pamplona.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Directo a la luz alternate.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Directo a la luz alternate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pablo_Garcia_on_Pamplona.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pablo_Garcia_on_Pamplona.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rafael_Yufueros_on_Pamplona.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rafael_Yufueros_on_Pamplona.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jose_Rubio_on_Pamplona.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jose_Rubio_on_Pamplona.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darna (band).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Darna (band).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relative Silence (band).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relative Silence (band).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TnP1010131.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:TnP1010131.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JP1010170.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:JP1010170.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HP1010329.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:HP1010329.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DP1010242.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:DP1010242.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Teufel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teufel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WarCry - La Quinta Esencia tour posters.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WarCry - La Quinta Esencia tour posters.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGoldenBeast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheGoldenBeast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alive in Athens – The DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alive in Athens – The DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tattooed Millionaire.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tattooed Millionaire.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trilogy (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trilogy (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trilogy (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 15:29, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stravaganzza

The article Stravaganzza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of independent reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bolhones (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Dark Sun disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark Sun disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Dark Sun disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WarCry - Alea Jacta Est Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WarCry - Alea Jacta Est Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WarCry - El Sello De Los Tiempos Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WarCry - El Sello De Los Tiempos Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Megadeth anarchy in the uk.jpg

The file File:Megadeth anarchy in the uk.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Regardless of the release's notability, the cover art is insufficiently supported by critical commentary of the article. Furthermore, if success matters, the version charted in just the United Kingdom (not in top 25) and New Zealand to this date. Uncertain whether deleting the image would affect the understanding of the song, originally sung by the different band Sex Pistols. Defaulting to decide that deleting the image would be harmless, just in case. May fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Jane (Megadeth song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Jane (Megadeth song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Jane (Megadeth song) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lauren Harris albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Lauren Harris albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Contra El Viento.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Contra El Viento.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 12:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WarCry - El Sello De Los Tiempos.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WarCry - El Sello De Los Tiempos.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 11:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]