User talk:REDISCOVERBHARAT

This is REDISCOVERBHARAT's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

November 2022

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sankaravarman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Use talk page to discuss/challenge the article, gutting with. Poor ref reason is not enough, explain the issues ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 14:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Loriendrew: Most of the content is unsourced, ungrammitical and only sourced part is using century old source. Can you revert yourself? REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 16:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with an old source, especially if there is nothing newer. After re-reading what was there, I would agree it was some horrible writing. Even the writeup at Utpala dynasty#Sankaravarman is not very good.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vishnu Shankar Jain

Hello, REDISCOVERBHARAT. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vishnu Shankar Jain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vishnu Shankar Jain

Hello, REDISCOVERBHARAT. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vishnu Shankar Jain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm TheChunky. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mohammed Zubair (journalist) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to reach out to you regarding your recent edits on the Mohammed Zubair (journalist) Wikipedia article. Upon reviewing your edits, it appears that the information you removed from the article was from reliable sources and had been verified.

As you may know, Wikipedia relies on the contributions of volunteers to maintain the accuracy and reliability of its articles. As such, it is important that all edits be explained and relevant to the article's content.

In this case, your edits were unexplained and appeared to remove important information from the article. I kindly ask that you refrain from making such edits without providing a clear reason for doing so.

If you have any questions or concerns about the content in the article, please feel free to discuss them on the article's talk page or reach out to me directly.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 08:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please put all of your query on talk page, I will respond all of it. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mohammed Zubair (journalist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Black Kite (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Removal of facts and important information. Thank you. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 11:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Mohammed Zubair (journalist)) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

REDISCOVERBHARAT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I rechecked all references and the information. I agree that there was no justification for me to remove the reliably sourced information. I did it because I thought it was not providing proper balance but after carefully reading I understood I was wrong. I request unblock because I am not going to pursue this dispute. I will be more careful with editing next time. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are only blocked from one page and have no need to edit that page yet, as you have not yet established consensus on that article's talk page. As soon as you do, please request an unblock. Yamla (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Black Kite and Doug Weller: REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would be more sympathetic to this request if you were using the talk page to establish consensus. PhilKnight (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree I should have used talk page right after I was reverted for the first time. After re-assessing the dispute more carefully, I have decided not to pursue this dispute. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you need to be unblocked? You are free to edit every page except one. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am seeking unblock because I acknowledge where I was wrong and also because the block is no longer preventive. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I noted in the request that I request unblock because I am not going to pursue this dispute. I will be more careful with editing next time. That's why I am not posting on the talk page. Thanks REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]