User talk:PrimalMustelid

Hello, PrimalMustelid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Amphicyonidae

I've reverted your change. All sources I've seen say Haeckel. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok the sources of who erected the Amphicyonidae are definitely inconsistent, because from I've seen, some sources of the Amphicyonidae [1] [2] [3] say that it was Trouessart in 1885 who erected the family, but according to some other sources [4] [5] [6], it was Haeckel in 1866 who erected the family. I must've read the source starting that it was the former, and so I've decided to investigate the respective primary sources. According to the German source "Generelle Morphologie der Organismen" (Volume 2) by Haeckel, he does recognize the family "Amphicyonida," but he recognizes two genera: Amphicyon and Hyaenodon. Now according to "Catalogue des mammiferes vivants et fossiles (carnivores)" by Trouessart, the subfamily "Amphicyoninae" is recognized under the Canidae family, although it recognizes more genera that are today defined as members of the Amphicyonidae family (and misidentifying the hemicyonines as amphicyonines).

So as a result, I was incorrect, my apologies, but this is the result of using sources that state the Amphicyonidae as being originally erected by Trouessart. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diplobune

		The Bio-star
		Diplobune is an excellent, excellent article – well done! Have you considered nominating it for DYK? Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the barnstar, I really appreciate it! I'm definitely going to consider nominating it for DYK, likely going for the fact that unlike other "even-toed ungulates," all species of Diplobune had entirely three-toed feet! PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enhydriodon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Diplobune

On 16 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Diplobune, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the three-toed species of Diplobune (fossils pictured) were mammals of the order of "even-toed ungulates"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Diplobune. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Diplobune), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ballet

You just approved Appalachian Spring for DYK, and I looked at the nomination for the first time. Of the hooks, I find the original the weakest, tickling "Indian girl" a bit but not even supplying the knowledge that it is a ballet. Yes, it's an iconic ballet, and many reader will know that it's one of Copland's most successful compositions, but isn't the Main page for other readers as well? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ps: The other hooks have the same problem of not saying what it is, but the original has the extra load of "Indian" - do we even say that without quotation marks in 2023? - And without context, it would mean "from India". - I'd chose the "Simple gifts" hook, as including substantially the spirit of the work, while the original just says what it is not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did choose the "Indian girl" fun fact because I thought that cut content of famous works are interesting, and in hindsight, I didn't think about asking the nominator to correct the term to "Native American" for more preciseness. I decided to roll with that one initially because the reviewer suggested that either that hook or the popularity one was interesting, and I thought that the details of the latter one could be interpreted too differently from how it reads in the main text. The counted text count is 149 words, so the hook would probably need a rework if we change "Indian girl" to "Native American girl." Pinging @theleekycauldron for input and possible reworks of the hook.

Regarding the gifts hook, I'm not completely sure if it is consistent with what is suggest in the article's text. The article says, "Shaker themes are also heavily present in Appalachian Spring. This idea is found in the original "House of Victory" script, where the Pioneer Woman is said to sit in a 'Shaker rocking chair.'" Not to mention also that the reviewer considered the hook "less interesting."

By the way, we can just discuss these issues in the talk page of the DYK page instead of in my talk page. PrimalMustelid (talk) 09:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anoplotherium

On 11 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anoplotherium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1822, the Paleogene mammal Anoplotherium commune (reconstruction pictured) was the first fossil species to be subjected to a brain cast study? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anoplotherium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anoplotherium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gordo, we hardly knew ye

Hello, and I come by to ask that you please reconsider your close of the merge discussion at Gordo (dinosaur). Gordo has many notable points in his favor. He is one of the two largest specimens of his species, is the most complete specimen of the species, is the largest dinosaur fossil in Canada, and is the showcase fossil of the Royal Ontario Museum (even mounted to be exhibited through the second floor series of museum windows). These seem a formidable foursome.

The close per "majority consensus" brings up an unusual fact: the members of Wikipedia's dinosaur project seem to object to additional stand-alone fossil pages. Their possible "I don't like it" reasoning, that everything in the Gordo page is already on the merge target page, diminishes the addition of very good new sources and text by Econterms, as well as the promise of new photographs, made and taken during an edit-a-thon at the museum during the recent North American Wikimedia Conference. It was nice observing Gordo with Econterms and meeting a young librarian from the UK whose panoramic photo of Gordo will be a nice addition to the page, or any page on dinosaur specimens and who expressed a longtime interest in becoming a Wikipedian. Would also like to point out that editor Bluerasberry was shown the changes and additional sourced material as they were being added, and quickly, through keen eye and site discernment, recognized that a save had taken place. This save would likely apply to probably most mainspace articles outside of a local consensus, and I'd ask that you consider re-judging it accordingly. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the merge proposal. Please also see Gordo's talk page for the 2017 close to mainspace as well as the shiny 2023 North American Wikimedia Conference improvement template. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		DYK promoter of the month
		For making the highest number of promotions in the month of November 2023 (91 promotions, or 40% of the total output), I hereby present you with this DYK promoter's cap! Prep building is hard work, no question about it, and this cap symbolizes the dedication, friendliness, and obviously supreme judgement of the promoter :P Thank you for all your work at DYK!

Feel free to pass this onto the next person, or, I'm happy to do it myself :) Bruxton (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A WP:DYK holiday award for you?

		The DYK holiday award goes to?
		Thank you for allowing me to work with you in this section of the project. I wish you happy holidays! I have appreciated your contributions. Lightburst (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Merry Christmas, PrimalMustelid!
Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity.

RV (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anoplotherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anoplotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 20 upper -- 20 upper (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anoplotherium

The article Anoplotherium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anoplotherium and Talk:Anoplotherium/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 20 upper -- 20 upper (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anoplotherium

The article Anoplotherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anoplotherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Anoplotherium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 20 upper -- 20 upper (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on your first GA, please keep it up! 20 upper (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reviewing the article, I really appreciate it! PrimalMustelid (talk) 07:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dacrytherium

On 2 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dacrytherium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dacrytherium, literally meaning 'tear beast', was named after its "tear-pit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dacrytherium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dacrytherium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ephelcomenus

On 5 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ephelcomenus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artiodactyl Ephelcomenus is thought to have been capable of burrowing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ephelcomenus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ephelcomenus), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Literature search

Hello. Can you help me find digital literature on the topic?

Sudre. J. 1983. Interpretation de la denture et description des elements du squelette appendiculaire de l'espece Diplobune minor (Filhol 1877): apports a la connaissance de l'anatomie des Anoplotheriinae Bonaparte 1850; pp. 439-458 in E. Buffetaut, J. M. Mazin, and E. Salmon (eds.), Actes du Symposium Paleontologique. G. Cuvier, Montbeliard.

Abusch-Siewert S. 1989. Bemerkungen zu den Anoplotherien (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) der Pariser Gipse. Munchner Geowissenschaftlicher Abhandlungen (A) 15: 55–78.

Dor M. 1938. Sur la biologie de l’Anoplotherium. (L’Anoplotherium etait-il aquatique?). Mammalia 2: 43–48.

Thanks in advance. Arctodus-simus (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! If you want to request academic sources in the future, I would suggest checking out the Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request and making a request there. Besides that, I could send you pdfs for the first and third sources, but you need to enable your email for your Wikipedia account first if you want me to email you from there (same thing for the wikiproject). PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I'm sorry, I'm new here and don't really know my way around yet. I changed my email settings. Please write to me if possible.

Thanks in advance. Arctodus-simus (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email to you via Wikipedia, just make sure to respond to my email message using your email, and then I can know what email I should sent it to. PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help and the sent files! Arctodus-simus (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Streets of Rage Remake

The article Streets of Rage Remake you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Streets of Rage Remake for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 04:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Catodontherium

On 2 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catodontherium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that due to a misunderstanding, Catodontherium was moved from its original genus name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catodontherium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Catodontherium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mixtotherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mixtotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Lewes Friends Meeting House

Thanks for promoting the hook! Not sure if I'm missing something, but the nom was for two articles approved separately, and I only saw Horsham Friends Meeting House being added to prep. Could you please check if the Lewes Friends Meeting House hook has been processed?. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I didn't notice that it was a dual hook nomination, my apologies, so I added the missing Lewes House hook into prep. PrimalMustelid (talk) 09:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Paul_012 (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chandelure

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandelure you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mixtotherium

The article Mixtotherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mixtotherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Mixtotherium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK:Transvestism and Transsexualism in Modern Society

Hello! Thank you so much for promoting the DYK for this page - I relaised today however that I made a mistake with the page title originally. As spelled in the DYK it would appear as a redirect, so should/could it be changed to Transvestism and Transsexualism in Modern Society rather than ... Transsexuality... Apologies and thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I changed the redirect title in the DYK to the main one. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYKVAR

Hi there, thanks for your recent activity at DYK prep sets. Please try to not place biography-hooks next to each other in sets per WP:DYKVAR; it helps to maintain a sense of variety. Thanks for the rest of your work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll make sure not to place biography hooks next to each other next time. PrimalMustelid (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Enhydriodon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Enhydriodon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chandelure

The article Chandelure you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chandelure and Talk:Chandelure/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 01:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Diplobune

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Diplobune you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 07:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chandelure

The article Chandelure you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chandelure for comments about the article, and Talk:Chandelure/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Diplobune

The article Diplobune you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Diplobune for comments about the article, and Talk:Diplobune/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mixtotherium

On 27 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mixtotherium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the extinct genus Mixtotherium, meaning 'mixed beast', has traits of both extinct primates and hyraxes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mixtotherium. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mixtotherium), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great work with the paleontology articles. X (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK promotions

		The DYK Barnstar
		For reaching over 225 promotions. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unpromote Lapse (social network) and Fūka Izumi from Prep 5: the former was created and nominated by a sockpuppet, so it should probably be checked over, while the latter has a specific request to delay until 24-hour-sets return. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I missed the latter hook's request, my apologies. Very well, I undid both promotions. PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that you have to manually place them back at WP:DYKNA if some time has passed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Placed the former hook into the awaiting approval log given raised concerns and the latter back into the approved log. And thank you for the barnstar! PrimalMustelid (talk) 19:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chandelure

On 25 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chandelure, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the chandelier Pokémon Chandelure is a playable character in the fighting game Pokkén Tournament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chandelure. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chandelure), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Streets of Rage Remake

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Streets of Rage Remake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NatwonTSG2 -- NatwonTSG2 (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Enhydriodon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Enhydriodon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Streets of Rage Remake

The article Streets of Rage Remake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Streets of Rage Remake for comments about the article, and Talk:Streets of Rage Remake/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NatwonTSG2 -- NatwonTSG2 (talk) 14:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Enhydriodon

The article Enhydriodon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Enhydriodon for comments about the article, and Talk:Enhydriodon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mrs. Brisby

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mrs. Brisby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 22:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnsatar for you

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For being quick with replies and being easy to work with. I passed the Mrs. Brisby article. :) FishLoveHam (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mrs. Brisby

The article Mrs. Brisby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mrs. Brisby for comments about the article, and Talk:Mrs. Brisby/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mrs. Brisby

On 1 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mrs. Brisby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the mouse protagonist Mrs. Brisby from The Secret of NIMH had her name changed because of a trademark issue from a toy named "Frisbee"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mrs. Brisby. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mrs. Brisby), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The image for Bonfire (Dark Souls)

There is already a previously uploaded image of a Bonfire used for the article that exists at Soulsborne. You may want to use it instead, adding a new rationale, and remove the newer one as redundant. If you disagree let me know, but I do think the old one's original Firelink background is a bit more evocative than DSIII's ash pit :P ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there! Originally, I was going to consider using the Dark Souls III image because it was the latest rendition of one, was later going to replace the Dark Souls I image if necessary. However, you may have a point about the iconicity of the original Dark Souls bonfire. Very well, I reused the Dark Souls I image with a new rationale and had the Dark Souls III set up as an orphan-based deletion. PrimalMustelid (talk) 11:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Slowpoke (Pokémon)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Slowpoke (Pokémon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 02:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Slowpoke (Pokémon)

The article Slowpoke (Pokémon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Slowpoke (Pokémon) for comments about the article, and Talk:Slowpoke (Pokémon)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 21:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Sunderland

Hey, you down to work James Sunderland at Cukie's draft? 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 14:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I’m down to work on James Sunderland at Cukie’s draft tomorrow. PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bonfire (Dark Souls)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonfire (Dark Souls) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Xiphodon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xiphodon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dichodon (mammal)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dichodon (mammal) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PrimalMustelid. Thank you for your work on Research history of Palaeotherium. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very high quality work (and interesting article); you should be autopatrolled.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi PrimalMustelid, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 21:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bonfire (Dark Souls)

The article Bonfire (Dark Souls) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bonfire (Dark Souls) for comments about the article, and Talk:Bonfire (Dark Souls)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dichodon (mammal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfamily.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dichodon (mammal)

The article Dichodon (mammal) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dichodon (mammal) for comments about the article, and Talk:Dichodon (mammal)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Palaeotherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Palaeotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dacrytherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dacrytherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IJReid -- IJReid (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dacrytherium

The article Dacrytherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dacrytherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Dacrytherium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IJReid -- IJReid (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Editing Template:Taxonomy/Hippomorpha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Editing Template:Taxonomy/Hippomorpha, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Template:Taxonomy/Hippomorpha. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Template:Taxonomy/Hippomorpha, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. If you don’t mind me asking, is there a reason for a deletion of the Hippomorpha taxonomy template page? This is mainly intended to be for use for the brontothere and possibly equoid taxonomy template pages. PrimalMustelid (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because the page already exists at Template:Taxonomy/Hippomorpha, and you created a duplicate with an incorrectly formatted namespace (note that "Editing Template" is not a valid namespace). CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. My apologies, I should’ve noticed, but I was preparing some taxonomy stuff as I was heading to bed. I already contested it before your message, so I seemingly can’t retract it. PrimalMustelid (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. The patrolling admin will likely notice the error and delete the page. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Palaeotherium

The article Palaeotherium you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Palaeotherium for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Palaeotherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Palaeotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pokken Tournament Chandelure.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pokken Tournament Chandelure.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Palaeotherium

The article Palaeotherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Palaeotherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Palaeotherium/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Catodontherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catodontherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Age 3

Well done on the Scrat rewrite. I think the “reception” section for ICE AGE 3 could do a rewriting too. 80.45.146.138 (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Rewriting the other Ice Age articles isn't on my agenda in the near future, but I do agree that they can and need to be updated. PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Conestoga wagon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Conestoga wagon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Catodontherium

The article Catodontherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catodontherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Catodontherium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Duerotherium

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Duerotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]