Jump to content

User talk:Pinay06

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This user assumes good faith.
RespectRespect other people's views!
Current time: Monday, December 23, 2024, 14:34 (UTC) Number of articles on English Wikipedia: 6,928,753

Pinay06

Hello! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Please sign by adding ~~~~ at the end of your message when you post here. Thanks.

The Boxing Day

[edit]

I observed it myself. I am in Indonesia, at Jakarta. The connection Timed Out at 26-28 December to this enormous site and all sites I've usually visited. Thank God there were improvements at 29 December. (It's 30 December now in my time). I was able to visit Wikipedia and Yahoo! Search, but I couldn't visit Google. UTC 18.24 29 Dec 06 Marhadiasa.

From Fro

[edit]

Ahaaah, so here's how to use this; I'm still learning. Please bear with me, Pinay. I guess you keep tab of my IP ad heheh. (Fro)

Philippine Tarsier Foundation GA hold

[edit]

This is on GA hold for 7 days for: needs more refs (ex: all of background only has one), refs are not consitently formatted, not enough wikilinks. Sumoeagle179 23:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GA, no action taken.Sumoeagle179 23:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am getting/working on the citations and have them offline, and isn't the 7th day on the 28th yet? Please re consider. Thank you. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 04:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was only about one hour from that day and no action had been taken and I had no reason to expect any. If you address the issues, renominate it and let me know and I'll expedite it.Sumoeagle179 10:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your statement - "I had no reason to expect any" is very very low, and subjective for a fellow Wikipedian of stature! After having put so much time and effort into this article, any additional time for me is immaterial. Besides, I had to make sure everything is covered from my end, so as not to compromise the value and integrity of the article. Please look into my list of GAs in my userpage to understand me and how I work! In addition, in Wikipedia, we do not assume the negative! We always abide by WP:AGF. BTW, FYI, I am not re-nominating this yet. I have submitted this for WP:GA/R, just so you know. I hope you do not do the same thing to other well-meaning wikipedians next time. What I am trying to say is check the credentials or credibility of the major contributor first before you use the axe! Thank you for your time. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 18:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You should assume good faith also, with no response after over 6 days, I stand by my statement.Sumoeagle179 18:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
BTW, GA/R takes longer than an expedited renom.Sumoeagle179 18:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the heads up. Sorry for the miscommunication. or the failure to communicate. I simply had so much in both RL and WL. Maybe i will take you up on your offer of the renom, if I can drag myself our of the depression of the failed GA. I will let you know before the week ends. It's just that I owe it to Bohol and its people to make this article WP:GA, which is my hope for all others in Portal:Bohol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pinay06 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 1 March 2007 (U

Hey

[edit]

I'm visiting Bohol this summer. Any suggestions what places or sights I must go to aside from Chocolate Hills and Tarsiers? Berserkerz Crit 10:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. It depends on what you feel like doing? snorkelling, kayaking, river cruise, mountain climbing, spelunking, sleeping, ballroom dancing, sing along, chatting, shopping, antiques. etc...anything! and whatever you like. Send me an email I will send you pics of the places you can go to: Panglao Island is a must, dolphin/whale watching, Pamilacan island, Balicasag island, Hinagdanan caves, well read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Bohol. Let me know if you need help with hotel reservations as well as a good tourist guide or what! But we can arrange it ourselves. I can give you a suggested one...Also a good personal guide...pili ka lang: student o teacher, congressman o gov? hehehehehe --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 07:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Me and my family (for a total of five) are staying in the Bohol Beach Club (ata, san bang city to?) for 4 days and 3 nights. So I guess aside from the Chocolate Hills and Tarsiers, we only have our sched free for one more activity (kasi gusto ng mama at ate ko mag shopping or tingin tingin lang around hehe). Snorkeling, kayaking, river cruise, mountain climbing, spelunking, sleeping (wat da hehe) are definitely out of the question from my family's type of activities. So I guess good places for shopping and obtaining Bohol-exclusive items. Congressman wahaha bigtime wag na nid siguro nun mangampanya hehe. Berserkerz Crit 12:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, what are the specific dates? Holy Week? BBC is the best choice! You couldn't be in any other paradise! It is in Panglao town of Panglao Island. Please note that the owner of BBC, Anos Fonacier, is also the one of the top guys of the Philippine Tarsier Foundation. So, make sure you get in contact with him, too. So, are you doing the Chocolate Hills and Philippine Tarsier by yourself? The BBC can arrange the site visits for you, but will entail additional expense. If it is not Holy Week, I can arrange for some cool guys and gals (?) to meet you and take you around for a special feel of our island nation hehehe, as well as a taste of night life Bohol-style. (Let me know age-range preferences! hehehe I am serious!). Well, it wouldn't hurt to say Hi to the congressmen, even through txt messages. (Email me for specific details!). As for the shops, they are all over the place! The cheap ones will be in the old Torralba market, the Cogon Market, Agora and Dao (Satellite City) markets. There are also souvenir shops outside of the Hinagdanan cave, as well as along the Loboc River (Cruise) and Chocolate hills, but understandably with marked up touristy prices. The new and modern mall is the Island City Mall. Pics are in the article on Bohol. Let me hear from you more... --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 07:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Kagwang

[edit]

Sige ate tignan ko kung maasikaso ko yung article. May naglagay yata nang drawing lang ng kagwang pero hindi siya okey para sakin. kaka-submit ko lang ng first draft ng thesis ko at ngayon ko malalaman kung okay na siya (wag naman sanang paulitin sa kin yun) ----Lenticel 01:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA na pala ang Eskaya

[edit]

I award you this exceptional antique barnstar from Andres Bonifacio's shed for getting Eskaya to GA status and improving plenty of Philippine-related articles. Berserkerz Crit 12:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back

[edit]

Ooooh, vacation was so nice. I thoroughly enjoyed being able to spend time with my parents again. We decided not to make the trip to Paquime, though, since that would have been eight hours of driving on the day after we had travelled thirteen hours. I've been back for a couple of weeks but have been very busy with a side project that is consuming a lot of my time. Wikipedia has been calling my name, though, so I'll try to steal some time here and there to edit. I see you've stayed busy all this time. How is the work with the legislature progressing concerning the images? SWAdair | Talk 05:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Hi Pinay06! I've done a little contribution in the article of Bohol. I think the grammar will be quite bad. Revise that if it's badly written. Bye. Miguel303xm 15:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

controversial quotes

[edit]

Message for Titopao: Any idea how we should respond to this? I am still stalling heheheh! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 17:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Posted a response at the talk page. You're in for a huuuge surprise ;) Btw, I'll email you the long-overdue homework (LoL) before the week ends. --- Tito Pao 06:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paring Bol-anon

[edit]

I've nominated Paring Bol-anon, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Paring Bol-anon satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paring Bol-anon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Paring Bol-anon during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.RJASE1 Talk 06:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a quick note (without reading your comments in the article talk page, etc. then on the same note - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Honolulu_-_Clergy should also be AfD nominated? For consistency, that is. Otherwise I'd say that the nomination is purely and simply subjective and/or condescending..Also, which particular portion of Wikipedia policy does it say that these two articles are both unencyclopedic? --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up - I'll nominate that article for deletion also. I cited the particular policies I was concerned about in the AfD nomination. Salamat... RJASE1 Talk 08:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Going back to December of 2006, I wish the second one had already been AfD nominated! Then we would have been spared of all the long hours and calls to different parts of the world to track all these people down...Perhaps you would re-consider and nominate to move the article to List of Paring Bol-anon (currently a redirect) linked to the Diocese of Tagbilaran and/or Bohol articles? Also the Immaculate Heart of Mary Seminary. It really is such a waste of time, energy, people, long distance calls, internet time, etc! just to have the article just deleted like that! Note: I still have not gone to the Talk page yet! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would definitely take your argument to the AfD pages of the affected articles... RJASE1 Talk 09:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm...Well, thank you for the heads up! I will check out the talk page now, or maybe later. My spirits are dampened now! BTW, how do you know salamat? My answer will be "walang anuman pero masakit pa rin! kahit papaano"! hehehe --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LOL - My wife is from Lunsod ng Cebu, and we've been married for 20 years, so I know a little Tagalog. Nothing personal, I just don't think this particular list is right for Wikipedia - maybe a category for the notable people in the list? Otherwise I think it will be impossible to maintain. RJASE1 Talk 09:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LoL! Why don't I make it painless by tagging it {{db-author}} now? Perhaps this will be more appreciated and in place in the Cebuano wikipedia. yes? --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Opo - maraming salamat! Let me know if there's ever anything I can do for you...Timyong RJASE1 Talk 09:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okey! I will tag it {{db-author}} tomorrow after many of the Paring Bol-anon have seen the tag! Btw, okey lang. Baka mas masaya sila sa Cebuano Wikipedia. Although many of them are in the U.S. etc na. Anyways, share Portal:Bohol with your wife. Maybe she will inspire you to do Portal:Cebu, or both of you tour Bohol...Let me know. That will be interesting.--Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, Cebu is just 1 1/2 hours away from Bohol by fastcraft! Just FYI! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny - just last night I had a conversation with a Pinay on my talk page here... RJASE1 http://ceb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paring_Bol-anonTalk 09:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm...sa title pa lang, nakakahiya na! naku! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, check wiki email. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oo, walang hiya.... :). I'll check mail, thanks. RJASE1 Talk 09:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O, BTW, the link to the Cebuano wikipedia entry is this! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 09:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kumusta, Ate...I would just let the AfD run its course, no need for a speedy deletion. RJASE1 Talk 00:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is this?

[edit]

How is this going to help anything? I'm merely pointing out that Filipinos are not a related ethnic group to Hispanics. That is all. Than k You. Cali567 06:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

learned something?

[edit]

All I've learned is that you think you have all the power in the world to talk/write to me as if I were a kid...Relax and enjoy life, don't let the fact that Filipinos are not related to Hispanics get you down..K? Cali567 19:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

hahahaha! I did not even think nor do I care if Filipinos are not related to Hispanics. I am just pointing the Wikipedia policies that apply to your edit/s. hehehe As for my WL? it couldn't be better! While my RL is very outstanding! I live in a wonderful world! --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 21:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danao/Dagohoy/Inabanga

[edit]

Sirs/Madam, In one of your history version of Danao it was said that Danao was once a barrio of Talibon. If this is the case how come that the famous Francisco Dagohoy was an Inabangnon or from Inabanga, as Philippine history states and a very accepted fact, if Dagohoy was born in Danao and Danao was formerly part of Talibon ? Is it not that Danao was once a part of Inabanga and not Talibon and that Dagohoy was not born in Danao. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.213.76.209 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

just a sharing

[edit]

FYI, pls read this --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 06:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um...okay, so...pinag-usapan na natin 'to, di ba? In one of the phone conversations, that is. Di ba sabi ko sa yo noon, hayaan mo na lang? I'll be posting a more comprehensive response on his talk page later, but I'd want to see how the two of you will get to resolve this on your own. --- Tito Pao 01:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And, no, unlike you, I do not intend to place them on comments ;-) --- Tito Pao 01:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ate!

[edit]

Napasa ko na bound thesis ko! Kayo po kumusta na. Alam kong maraming haggard na prof at students ngayon. May eyebags na rin nga yung eyebags ko eh. Sana ay hindi kayo masyadong stressed out.

Anyways I could now devote more energy to Wikipedia. Maybe after the Holy Week we could work on Phil. endemic creature articles (Kagwang?). Ate you could check out the Tamaraw article which Shrumster and I are pushing to GA status. Basically we only lack pictures and a few citations but I think its GA worthy.--Lenticel 01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine blogs awards night

[edit]

Before anything else. Thanks for the comments and help with the tamaraw article. Sensysa po pero meron po yatang gimik yung lahat kaming magka-batch sa weekend. This weekend lang kasi kami pwedeng mag-relax. (bawal next week kasi Holy Week). --Lenticel 23:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, you DO deserve it, after all the hard work! I remember all the overnight in Mactan Island we had, after every major Bio test! hehehehe! Those were my UP Bio days. nakakamiss din. So, enjoy mo while you are in it! Ingat din. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 03:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PGMA Talk page

[edit]

You won't believe how some people are so hardheaded:

Talk:Gloria_Macapagal-Arroyo#To_those_who_insist_on_discussing_the_.2Asubject.2A_instead_of_the_.2Aarticle.2A

If they still don't get it after this, then I don't know what. I-report ko na kaya sa admin? --- Tito Pao 06:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is always good to already include the admin at the start, for easy contexting later. hehehe...-Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do I send you my pics

[edit]

I need help, says your email address is not working.

I wrote to you before regarding pictures I have of Inabanga.

Stew —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stew.alexander.inbox (talk • contribs) 06:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You may follow the instructions here as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fielsvd#ANSWERS_TO_QUESTIONS--Ate Pinay (talk•email) 08:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is my first time use with wikipedia. No malice intended. Im removing the changes I made to Bohol entry, but I was not the one who edited or made "vandalism" with the Holy Name University.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bohollogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bohollogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bohollogo.jpg

[edit]

Hello, Pinay06. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bohollogo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Pinay06/Places. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Citilogo.gif

[edit]

Hello, Pinay06. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Citilogo.gif) was found at the following location: User:Pinay06/Contributions. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please support to retain the quick counts

[edit]

Vote Disagree and for more supporters please rizalninoynapoleon 20:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Go to Talk:Philippine general election, 2007 immediately[reply]

Eto...

[edit]

...The Tambayan decided that it was about time for a meet-up (and naturally, those who showed up were also talking about each other and the other editors, you included ;) There was also a ruckus at the Tambayan over another editor claiming that a Senator contacted him about the Philippine general elections, 2007 article, which turned out to be a fake (read all the sordid details at the talk page of the Tambayan...hehehehehe ;-) Cheers --- Tito Pao 03:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alburlogo2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alburlogo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LCC-group.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. bluemask (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:24massescover.jpg

[edit]

I have tagged Image:24massescover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bishopyiet.jpeg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bishopyiet.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tamaraw up for review

[edit]

Hi Ate!

I submitted tamaraw article for a review. content-wise it is ok although more data will be helpful. What we sorely lack are pictures.--Lenticel (talk) 06:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prguingona.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Prguingona.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MassOfStRita.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MassOfStRita.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An edit long ago

[edit]

While this edit was a long time ago, I expect you to not add things like this in articles anymore. — Save_Us_229 06:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RyanCover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RyanCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 1 413 x 600 .jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 1 413 x 600 .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SHADOWbook.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SHADOWbook.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SPOTtapecover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SPOTtapecover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 06:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DearJesusAlbum Lungay.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DearJesusAlbum Lungay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dagohoy.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dagohoy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LCC-CD.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LCC-CD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew-25-logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew-25-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vfalogo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vfalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dwuflogo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dwuflogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HSSlogo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HSSlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User Neworleans

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:User Neworleans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Let me follow.jpg

[edit]

I have tagged Image:Let me follow.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for Image:Let me follow.jpg, Image:ChopaSLO.jpg, Image:SPOT2cover.jpg, Image:Choruspaulinus.jpg and Image:Kantada sa Semana Santa 3 600 x 572 .jpg. --Geniac (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Bohol Floral - orchids

[edit]

Hello Pinay, I had a look on your pictures from the flora of Bohol and others. I can identify some of the plants (at least the genus)
Flora Bohol 5: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 6: I'm not use, Cattleya alliance, but I have no further idea
Flora Bohol 7: Phalaenopsis aphrodite
Flora Bohol 8: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 9: Dendrobium, probably a hybrid
Flora Bohol 10: Spathoglottis hybrid
Orchid 2: Dendrobium bigibbum or hybrid with bigibbum
Dendrobium.jpg: Dendrobium bigibbum or hybrid with bigibbum'
 Regards --Toapel (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) de:user:Toapel[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cebulogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Bagongbuwan.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bagongbuwan.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:PTFI Board.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:PTFI Board.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sandugo2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sandugo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for Image:Logo missionaries.gif, Image:Dwulogo.gif, Image:Tagbilaranlogo.jpg, Image:Trinidadlogo.gif, Image:Sandugopromo.jpg, Image:Hss.gif, Image:Dioceseoftagbilaranlogo.gif, Image:Dioceseoftalibonlogo.jpg, Image:Panaghoyposter.jpg and Image:Panaghoy.jpg. --Geniac (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dekada70vcdcover.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dekada70vcdcover.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:SWSlogo.JPG)

[edit]

You've uploaded File:SWSlogo.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Dauischurch.jpg

[edit]

File:Dauischurch.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Dauis Church.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Dauis Church.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICM.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Island City Mall.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Escudero

[edit]

Hi! Our office are bothered with the write ups in this page. Some are not factual. I have tried editing some points but i cant seem to edit the beginning paragraph. Office of Sen. Escudero —Preceding unsigned comment added by Queen nefertiti30 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bohol

[edit]

Hello Pinay06, how are you, im very amaze the way you represent bohol. im richard and 25 years old and im very proud also to be a boholano.. f you can email me, please send it to: Richard.Falar@apac.sykes.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.4.8.51 (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

email response sent some time ago...you can continue to stay in touch here or via email... Pinay (talk•email) 19:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia meetup in Cebu, May 2009

[edit]

Greetings, a Wikipedia Meetup is planned in Cebu to be held this first week of May 2009. Being in or near the area, your presence and contribution in this meetup will surely make this a success. Please see the meetup page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Cebu 2. Jordz (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Tool box

[edit]

Template:Tool box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Nasa-verve (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zscout370#Good_articles

[edit]

The three anthem articles I mentioned in the email are listed here. I would go more for a mix of what was done for the Singapore and Russian articles because they are newer. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rene Relampagos

[edit]

The article Rene Relampagos has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bluemask (talk) 03:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:YHSCorridor-3Nov05.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I already fixed it Ate Pinay. It was just a misspelled template.--Lenticel (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 'tol...long time no hear...how's life ante college? hehehehePinay (talk•email) 15:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rene Relampagos

[edit]

Chris, Hi I am back! I need help with wiki formatting etc etc the millions of things you usually do. Please? thank you so much. Pinay (talk•email) 01:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it a little polish. Who's going to update the children's grades every year? That seems like too much detail. Chris the speller (talk) 02:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
removed children;s grades haha -Pinay (talk•email) 10:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How can I thank you enough...the article looks really "neat and clean" now! - Pinay (talk•email) 07:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cesar Tomas M. Lopez

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cesar Tomas M. Lopez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ηyχαμς 08:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the article said he was the Board Member of the province of Bohol, Philippines - a lot more work is still beiing made offline. Pinay (talk•email) 19:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pinay06. You have new messages at Nyxaus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cesar Tomas Lopez

[edit]

The article said he was a board member of the province of Bohol, Philippines. In Portal:Bohol, he is identified as notable people of Bohol. Pinay (talk•email) 19:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The person themselves may be notable, however A7 denotes "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." The article you created did this and therefore was suitable for speedy deletion. Take a look at Your First Article. - ηyχαμς 19:29, 26 May 2010 (UT::
I am still getting sooo there. I have to tell you FYI, in case you did not know that I did all these: Arnold Zamora, Edgar Chatto, Francis Escudero, Antonieto Cabajog, Rene Relampagos and many more. These are the rest of my contributions to wikipedia here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pinay06/Contributions So it goes without saying that i know what i am doing and i am getting there. i just needed a little bit of time. something came up when i was starting ths stub that i had to stop and deal with it first off wiki...I will appreciate it if you can restore it back so i can continue my work, and you can do yours. Ciao Pinay (talk•email) 19:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, no offense intended. If you have created so many articles before then are you not familiar with creating an article in your user space until ready to move to the main space? This would mean your start up article won't get slapped with a tag which, can I remind you, was appropriate in this case, as an Admin did indeed delete the article. I am not an Admin, and did not delete it, just nominated it under Wikipedia's guidelines, I have no way of getting your article back. - ηyχαμς 19:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apology accepted. My advice for next time is check on the credentials of the editor first before doing something, or maybe give it say 24 hours if not sure? anyway, before i responded to your posts, i had already informed the admin User:Zscout370 since he and I worked on almost all my articles together as well...Good job though in handling this situation. you are to be commended for such maturity, openness and speed. Stay in touch! -Ate Pinay (talk•email) 20:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Rene Relampagos

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Rene Relampagos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 21:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress

[edit]

I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to miss it! barely made it as i was in HK for the week and arrived Manila on the 18th! perhaps next time...Pinay (talk•email) 03:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Word College of Laoag

[edit]

Chris, I got more work for ya. Please do the million things you do for this article. BTW, congrats on being one of the top 400 performers in wiki. my kudos, man. more power, too! Ate Pinay (talk•email) 22:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I toned down the caps and cleaned up the lists a little; the rest looked pretty good. If you get a complaint from anybody, it might be that the History section could use a few subsection headings. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I broke up the History section. Hope that helps. Chris the speller (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arnold Zamora for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnold Zamora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Zamora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Written_in_the_Sand.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Written_in_the_Sand.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine WikiCon

[edit]

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Vfalogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Vfalogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of alumni of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Seminary, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diocese of San Jose and Kailua, Hawaii (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking of account

[edit]
Hello, Pinay06. You have new messages at Sky Harbor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copyvio

[edit]

Stop icon Your addition to Symbols of Bohol has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Matty.007 18:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Alburmap.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kinampay, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://web.archive.org/web/20051112001400/http://www.inq7.net/globalnation/sec_phe/2004/jan/14-01.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Kinampay saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

[edit]

Hello, Pinay06. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The CCI has been opened here. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trinidadlogo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trinidadlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Talibon logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Talibon logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pinay06 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is to acknowledge copyright violations at the beginning of my editing history, but in later articles, I have read and have been more knowledgeable and compliant with Wikipedia policies. I just found out I have been blocked because I have not received any notice about it. Thank you! Pinay (talk•email) 04:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As I mentioned below, the incidences of copyright violations as incurred by this user happened early in her career. I think at this point, it would be wise to give a second chance especially given that we should be growing our community in places where they ought to be grown, but I strongly urge Pinay06 to please be more observant of Wikipedia's copyright policies. --Sky Harbor (talk) 16:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does look like the worst violations are from his early career back in 2006, but this was one of your most recent edits. Granted, you haven't really made any major edits since 2010, so I have nothing to compare the earlier issues to. Wizardman 14:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input, Wizardman. Just so you know, Pinay06 is female. :)
At this point I think a second chance is warranted, given that these incidents took place quite a while back, and she has expressed a desire to edit more seriously once again. Copyright issues aside, I think that we can still use editors like her, given that she is from a part of the world that is underrepresented, and the net benefit she can give as a member of the community still outweighs the potential liability that she poses should she lapse into this behavior. She appears sincere in her statement that she has been more knowledgeable about copyright (and admittedly, this is a very big problem in this part of the world), and I think it would be wise to help them better understand Wikipedia's copyright policies than to just ban them outright for copyright violations that they may not be knowledgeable about.
This is what I'll do then: if you don't mind, I'll lift the block on Pinay06, but I strongly encourage her to please stick to her word. Observing Wikipedia copyright policy, no matter how complex, is important, and we certainly need people in this part of the world who are knowledgeable about these policies so that others will also be knowledgeable about them. I think it won't hurt if we give her a second chance. --Sky Harbor (talk) 02:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Tagbilaran logo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Tagbilaran logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kantada sa Semana Santa 3 600 x 572 .jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kantada sa Semana Santa 3 600 x 572 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Let me follow.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let me follow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HSViewFromPriestRoom-3Nov05.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HSViewFromPriestRoom-3Nov05.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same message applies to File:YHSCorridor-3Nov05.JPG. — Diannaa (talk) 00:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Roel Lungay for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Roel Lungay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Roel Lungay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeilN talk to me 13:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Roel Lungay for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Roel Lungay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Roel Lungay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 23:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

[edit]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Singing Priests of Tacloban (album)

[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Singing Priests of Tagbilaran (1998)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Singing Priests of Tagbilaran (1998) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Raabbustamante (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pinay06. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alburmap.jpg

[edit]

The file File:Alburmap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pinay06. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Bohol

[edit]

Portal:Bohol, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bohol and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Bohol during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 19:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Singing Priests of Tagbilaran (2003)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Singing Priests of Tagbilaran (2003) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPOT2cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPOT2cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Choruspaulinus.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Choruspaulinus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joyofchristmascover.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joyofchristmascover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you heard about PhilWiki Community?

[edit]

Did you know that there is a small community of editors in the Philippines who meet up and conduct activities online and offline to promote Wikimedia projects? Please take a look at our profile here. You might be interested to join. Thanks. --Filipinayzd 12:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bohol Wisdom School for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bohol Wisdom School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohol Wisdom School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holy Spirit School of Tagbilaran for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Spirit School of Tagbilaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Spirit School of Tagbilaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pinay06&oldid=1129617493"