User talk:Pavolkrisko71

This is Pavolkrisko71's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Gasparik (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Gasparik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pavolkrisko71! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jamiebuba,

first of all please dont be antisemitic. Can we agree on that?

Second, Peter Gasparik is mentioned in all the reliable databases.

Other sources are also reliable as newspaper Zivot (Life.) His books are in every store in Slovakia. Film are shown at national czech and slovak televisions and in festivals.

So please let us know what is Your problem? Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 09:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So please Buba, what is reliable source? Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Gasparik (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Gasparik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, but your reproach is not relevant. All the sources are not relevant and important. There are now more important sorces in my country.

Where are You from? Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 15:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Gasparik (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Gasparik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thilsebatti, hi... I am afraid You are wrong. Anyway I had Dream last night that woman relative of somebody with this name will keave this woeld... hopefully doesnt but Shiva is coming to You to destruct evil... Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Qcne (talk) 14:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Gasparik (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these sources are interviews so not WP:INDEPENDENT, but a couple (medziknihami; zivot.pluska.sk) potentially work as sources. A few more of those calibre would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Gasparik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for Your reaction. Finally somebody constructive. I wanted to add reference You explained me, but suddanly I am blocked completly.

(here are references and I can add many more:

https://kultura.pravda.sk/kniha/clanok/680032-odhalene-tajomstva-stiavnickej-ruzovej-vily/

https://www.cas.sk/clanok/864142/peter-gasparik-nakrutil-film-o-svojej-mame-a-o-postihnutej-sestre-cattani-bol-u-nas-doma-s-delonom-som-telefonoval-a-felliniho-dazdnik-som-stratil/ )

I dont know I am blocked. The true is that I am treated unfair. Look at another slovak writers, many of them nobody knows and they are almost without references. Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 14:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, the article is wiped out... Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Pavolkrisko71. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutly unfair. Ive just denounced that after declining this article I recieved email with a offer of assistance. Of course I shoul pay 500 dollars before and 500 dollars after.

Thats it.

Sorry if did something wrong. Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 14:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a scam; email paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org and delete that email and all further ones you receive along those lines. There are, unfortunately, quite a few scammers who go thru recently-declined drafts to hunt for victims. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 16:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavolkrisko71 "Sorry if I did something wrong": you accused a reviewer of being anti-semitic and made a thinly veiled death threat to another reviewer. Completely unacceptable behaviour for a project like Wikipedia and it would be completely unacceptable behaviour in real life. Qcne (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pavolkrisko71, as stated, don't give money to anything regarding articles on Wikipedia. They will take your money and disappear.

You won't be unblocked if you can't promise to stop attacking other editors when you don't get your way. This is a collaborative editing project and civility is required. There are a lot of disputes on this project and we can't go around insulting and threatening other people. There are also some other problems mentioned in your block notice like copyright issues that you will have to address in an unblock request if you want to return to editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean if YOu mean that asking somebobody not to by antisemitic is ofensive, I dont know.

If somebody gives absolutly unprofessional statetment, there can everytime be something personal. Reproche was out of leage and without explanation.

References are from national medias and organisations.

If You think other way, You have bad informators.

Look at other articles and about writers and filmakers from Slovakia and quality of their articles.

Finally Qcne gave something constructive.

I wont attack other editors.

Just please, give here somebody who knows the reality.

Its up to You.

Enjoy Your time. Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I am not Peter.

Second: is this blackmailing? Really? When You answer they write You the price!

Many mails like this.

Hello,

I read your article Peter Gasparik in the Wikipedia rejection list. I noticed that you’ve faced challenges in getting your Wikipedia page published. As specialized Wikipedia editors, we focus on saving rejected Wikipedia pages.

We’ve successfully assisted many individuals and businesses in publishing their previously rejected content. Our expertise lies in navigating the intricacies of Wikipedia guidelines, increasing your chances of acceptance.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Warm regards,

Lewis Martin

9:05 (pred 3 hodinami)

komu: mne Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 11:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavolkrisko71 As has been explained to you, that is a scam.

Because Wikipedia is public, scammers target users like yourself when they see drafts rejected or declined.

Wikipedia will never ask for money in return for editing.

Do not respond to any requests for money, instead report this to the Wikimedia Foundation by following the instructions at WP:SCAM. qcne (talk) 11:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavolkrisko71: I will repeat what I said above, with a link: That is a scam; email paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org and delete that email and all further ones you receive along those lines. There are, unfortunately, quite a few scammers who go thru recently-declined drafts to hunt for victims. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 19:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt pay anything. My main goal is to understand how You work. I am convinced now that people who block are connected to that who ofer validation. Pavolkrisko71 (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your assumption is incorrect. qcne (talk) 13:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]