User talk:Palisades1

Welcome

Hello, Palisades1, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! RashersTierney (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

WikiEditing

Thanks for your updates to Wikipedia. While you have provided some useful information, you have, in each case, formatted your information completely incorrectly. I have gone over your edits and corrected them according to Wikipedia standards. Look at the changes I did to your edits in Albany, New York, Hugh J. Grant and Northern Campaign (Irish Republican Army). If you are not familiar with Wikipedia's editing facilities, you should take some time to work through the tutorial. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eoin Mcnamee (Irish Republican) (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Palisades1/Eoin Mcnamee (Irish Republican) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Palisades1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eoin Mcnamee (Irish Republican) (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Palisades1/Eoin Mcnamee (Irish Republican) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Signing your talk page posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 06:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eoin McNamee (Irish Republican) has been accepted

Eoin McNamee (Irish Republican), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mahensingha (talk) 16:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

We still need page numbers (and dates for the newspaper reference) for them to be valid references. I'm also wondering why you took out the one footnote. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Palisades1! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 22:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 23:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican). Thanks! 333-blue 23:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Woodstop45 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Woodstop45 (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Sean catfish.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sean catfish.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Barns at Hamilton Station Vineyards".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Help me!

I'm stuck with the format for an article that I'm trying to get published:  Thomas Harte (Irish Republican).

I've tried to show why the article/person is important and I think I've got it right but I'm new to this and don't know how to cite references and categories (there are many) at the bottom. Can you help?

Thanks!

Please help me with...

Palisades1 18:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

I don't have immediate access to the offline sources, but the online sources seem somewhat lacking in formatting, quality and content.

1. It's unclear which parts of the draft are supposed to be supported by them. Unlike the offline sources, the footnotes are not attached to any specific parts of the draft. You may want to check out WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes for your sources.
2. An Phoblacht provides very little information on Harte, and that seems to be entirely redundant to what's already covered by the offline sources, with the possible exception of his age: He was captured during a raid on a safe house in which two policemen were murdered, was sentenced to death, shot, and later re-interred somewhere else. That's pretty much all, and it's very little, particularly regarding "showing why the person is important".
3. The Irish Republican Bulletin Board is not a reliable source, neither is the oration it reproduces. This seems to be the basis for much of the draft's content, but even that highly biased source does not claim Harte or his actions were significant enough to play a role in the creation of Irish or British anti-terror laws as the draft suggests.
4. The third link is broken, and it pointed to a free website with no indication of editorial oversight that, at least when the Wayback Machine archived it, provided no information whatsoever about Harte. Another page on the same site apparently once had a "ballad" about Harte; Wikipedia content should be based on better sources than songs.

That leaves us with the two offline sources, one of which is the original court documents which will not help establish Harte's notability. The last source, the book by Coogan, does say a little about Harte, but I rather doubt it suffices to support the draft's content (and right now it's only cited as a source for a single paragraph). Huon (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Harte".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^unEins^uno 08:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Harte".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Help me! Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican)

Can someone help placing the sources correctly and adding hyperlinks to the several individuals and organizations appearing in this draft?

Thanks very much.

Please help me with...

Palisades1 17:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Palisades1, I have now used the "Cite" button and "<ref>...</ref>" HTML tags to improve the draft a bit. Feel free to use the "Cite" button yourself, in the visual editor, to add more references. If there are questions left, feel free to use the "help me" template again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Help me!

Hi can someone take a look at the draft Ive created to check for format issues? Draft:Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) Thanks.

Please help me with...

Palisades1 16:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Palisades1 16:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

You might want to take a look at WP:LEAD, which desribes how to properly "introduce" a subject, but otherwise I see no major formatting issues. If you wish to submit the draft for review, place {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page and it will be reviewed by an experienced editor. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Palisades1! You created a thread called "Related Articles" question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Harte (Irish Republican) has been accepted

Thomas Harte (Irish Republican), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Palisades1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, add link to a person with a common name, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hi Palisades1! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Palisades1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how is a title edited?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Palisades1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Amkgp 💬 16:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Palisades1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, informal review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Patrick McGrath. (Irish Republican)jpg.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Patrick McGrath. (Irish Republican)jpg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I've lost touch with the source of the photo so I've deleted it in hopes that the article can be reviewed (and hopefully accepted).Palisades1 (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican) (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BrownHairedGirl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

PS I did a quick search of the Irish Times, and found the following:

• https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/80-years-ago-how-%C3%A9amon-de-valera-had-his-old-comrades-executed-1.4346580
• Several archives hits in this search: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/80-years-ago-how-%C3%A9amon-de-valera-had-his-old-comrades-executed-1.4346580

The archives are subscriber-only, but the first month costs only €1

That's just a suggestion. I am sure there are other sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion on my talk page

Hi Palisades1. Re this: I didn't ask you if you thanked BrownHairedGirl for her help (still less for a copy of the post). I said it would be nice if you responded in some way to what we said on my talk page, rather than ignoring it and asking Worldbruce for advice instead. Was anything we said useful to you at all? Did you look at the books I linked? Did you try FDW777's tip? Are you going to tell me where you saw that Patrick McGrath was 21 when he took part in the 1916 Rising? Do you not think we deserve some response?
By the way, a new section heading is only if it's a different discussion to the one above. It's not for every time you post to the same thread. Scolaire (talk) 10:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Tom Harte and Paddy McGrath.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tom Harte and Paddy McGrath.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Wikiacc (¶) 02:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican) has been accepted

Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 03:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlie Daly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RIC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1923 irish hunger strikes

Hello Palisades1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1923 irish hunger strikes for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 18:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1923 irish hunger strikes

Hello Palisades1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1923 irish hunger strikes for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 18:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jack McNella (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack McNella (Irish Republican), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony D'Arcy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maurice O'Neill (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maurice O'Neill (Irish Republican), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Your edit to Draft:Jack McNeela (Irish Republican) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

DOTY articles

Please expand the citations you add to days of the year (DOTY) articles. Please don't add references which don't mention a DOB or DOD. Please do not add duplicated wikilinks for years. Please ensure the references you add are to reliable sources. Kind regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 23:43, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denny Barry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Cohalan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 13:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Lennon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liam Lynch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eamon Dee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vincent White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Whitty (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Whitty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Whitty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 10:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andy O'Sullivan (Irish Republican) has been accepted

Andy O'Sullivan (Irish Republican), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jack McNeela (Irish Republican) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jack McNeela (Irish Republican). Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 22:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seamus Woods (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seamus Woods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seamus Woods, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 06:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McNeela (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack McNeela and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack McNeela, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 06:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack McNeela has been accepted

Jack McNeela, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 08:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

• Well done on creating an informative and detailed page. Please note that prior to accepting the page I cleaned up the citations and made use of the helpful templates that are provided (especially the book template), which I would encourage you to use as it will speed up any future pages you file for creation and makes the citation easier for readers to find. Cabrils (talk) 08:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Citing sources

Please don't use bare URLs in your citations, even on DOTY pages. Deb (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hunger strike

I replied on my talk page, and moved your comment to the bottom in case you're wondering where it is. Canterbury Tail talk 11:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Whitty has been accepted

Joseph Whitty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Please note that I view my acceptance as borderline. I have made a note of this on the article's talk page. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I know the Joe Whitty needs help and I will continue to search for good sources to improve the page.

Whitty is the last of the 22 Irish hunger strikers (who died as a result of hunger) to get a page here on Wikipedia.

Again, thanks Palisades1 (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikimedia ZA Annual General Meeting 2021

This is just to let you know that the Wikimedia ZA AGM will be taking place on 25 September 2021 See below for more details.

• Time: Saturday, 25 September 2021, starts at 10:00 to 16:00. With intermission at 13:00
• Location: held digitally online this link

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

The 1981 Irish hunger strike article, as well as other articles relating to The Troubles, Irish Nationalism and British Nationalism in relation to Ireland, is under a 1-revert-restriction, meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. FDW777 (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jack McNella (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack McNella".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liam Lynch (Irish republican), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IRB and Michael Collins.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seamus Woods has been accepted

Seamus Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Anti-Catholicism in the United Kingdom. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banbridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dromore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For good efforts of helping improve wikipedia Aaryan2704 (talk) 06:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maurice O'Neill (Irish Republican)

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maurice O'Neill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Your edit to Irish War of Independence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Fourth and final warning. — Diannaa (talk) 21:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Palisades 1 how do I get to contact you about a book I have, I believe the notes written in the back are dated 6th May 1946 and during the time of this man's hunger strike 5 days before his death, although it isn't signed it could be written by a prisoner.

See above I have no idea what I'm doing I'm trying to contact palisades 1, my name is Vicky Kavanagh I'm from Carlow and on Facebook or vickykavanagh1@gmail.com 78.18.156.106 (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Im interested in any writings you might have for inclusion. Who wrote the notes? What book is it?Palisades1 (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Would that be Seán McCaughey? Palisades1 (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to George Plant, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Palisades1

Thank you for creating James McCormick (Irish republican).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello are my recent edits to The Troubles in Northern Ireland (1920–1922) article the cause for my account being blocked? I can't view my recent edits on that page so I have no way of knowing what the issues are. However, I will review/undestand the Wikipedia policies on copyrights and write a statement with a commitment to follow those rules. Do I send the statement to you?

Thanks, Palisades1 (talk) Palisades1 (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Content you added to The Troubles in Northern Ireland (1920–1922) was copied from here. You can view the overlap by accessing this report and clicking in the iThenticate link.

Your statement needs to be posted here on this talk page as part of your unblock request. Here are some questions you can use to formulate your response, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks, Palisades1 (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Palisades1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked for violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. I have reviewed and understand the issues relating to the proper use of copyrighted material on Wikipedia. In the past I did not understand the complex policies on copyrighted material, I do understand them now. I will not use copyright materials improperly on Wikipedia. I have created over a dozen articles and have a long record of adding proper references to articles that often contained none. I hope to continue adding articles and needed references (the page in which my recent violation occurred has 162 references - almost all entered by me). Below I've outlined my knowledge of the issues related to my block:

What is copyright? Copyrights protect the copyright holder from the copying of material without the permission of the copyright holder. Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation known as close paraphrasing. Copyright violations harm Wikipedia's ability to be redistributed and can create legal problems.

How is Wikipedia licensed? According to Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and, except where otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). These licenses permit text (but not media) to be freely redistributed, reused and built upon by anyone. Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed would likely to be a copyright violation.

Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Materials that infringe the copyrights of others may never be used. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. It is acceptable to read an article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia, so long as you do not follow the source too closely.

How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? Generally, Wikipedia must have permission to use copyrighted works. I have used short quotes (referenced) as an effective way to make a point. I understand that the absence of a copyright does not mean the material is in the public domain. I understand that Wikipedias goal is to be a free content encyclopedia with content that is free from copyright restrictions. In the future I will summarize source material in my own words and continue to use appropriate inline references. I look forward to continuing my contributions to the encyclopedia.

Palisades1 (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As below, you've copy-pasted blocks of text from our policies. I don't think you understand the concept of "using your own words". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You appear to have copied some of this from Wikipedia:Copyright violations. It doesn't show that you really understand our policy, and it doesn't inspire much confidence that you intend to do better in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Belfast Shipyard Clearances of 1920

Hello, Palisades1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belfast Shipyard Clearances of 1920, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Palisades1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. I understand that my blocking was due to several copyright violations (Wikipedia:Copyright problems). In the past I have unknowingly or carelessly used sections from books and newspaper articles (cut/paste and/or lack of references) which violated Wikipedia's copyright policy. Those edits have been removed and that type of violation will not be repeated by me. I have reviewed Wikipedia's Copyright policy, Use of non-free content, Neutral point of view and Violations guidelines and believe that I now have a thorough understanding of the issues relating to the copying of material without the permission of the copyright owner. I understand how important it is for Wikipedia to maintain articles free from copyright violations. I understand that attribution must be given whenever a page is created or altered (Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia). I also understand how Wikipedia licenses allow for text to be used and edited by Wikipedia members. In my articles/edits I've used many short quotes (usually from the subject of the article or associates), I think they are powerful tools that often get insightful points across to the reader. I have always referenced the quotes from reliable sources and do not paraphrase. Many of the pages I've started or edited deal with controversial historical subjects. The use of properly referenced material and adherence to Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policy are essential for the integrity of those types of articles. For Wikipedia to continue to succeed is important to closely adhere to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Verifiability policy while not violating our copyright policy. In the future I will remain alert to copyright issues, will summarize material in my own words and continue to use appropriate references. I look forward to contributing properly referenced material and will ensure that no further copyright violations occur. Thanks, Palisades1 (talk) 20:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am accepting your unblock request, as you now seem to understand how copyright applies to Wikipedia editing, and have made a commitment not to violate our copyright policy any more. I will be watching your edits for compliance. — Diannaa (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks.Palisades1 (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

value your edits in the controversial areas you have chosen. Please don't fail us by being blocked again. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks Palisades1 (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Belfast Shipyard Clearances of 1920

Hello, Palisades1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belfast Shipyard Clearances of 1920".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irish Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rory O'Connor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andy O'Sullivan (Irish Republican).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andy O'Sullivan (Irish Republican).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Palisades1! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:53, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Your edit to Eric Laakso

Hello! Offering some fraternal correction as a reviewer at WP:FEB24, and please correct me if my readings are wrong:

• The project instructions at WP:FEB24 say only to tag one edit summary per page with WP:FEB24 (you've tagged Eric Laakso twice).
• Why are you inserting WP:FEB24 into the article body?
• I added the More citations needed tag because the main paragraph is unreferenced, but we can quibble and put an in-line Citations needed tag instead. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Palisades1 for collecting more than 5 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!Palisades1 (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denis O'Brien (police officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick McGrath.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)