User talk:CostcoantimationsS

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CostcoantimationsS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to make updates to 2022 FIFA World Cup articles such as 2022 FIFA World Cup Group A, 2022 FIFA World Cup Group B, 2022 FIFA World Group C, 2022 FIFA World Group D, 2022 FIFA World Group E, 2022 FIFA World Group F, 2022 FIFA World Group G, 2022 FIFA World Group H, and 2022 FIFA World Cup Final and when the games happen I will track them live and update them immediately. Oddballslover (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were already given a response to this that you removed from this page. As it noted, there is no block on this account. If you cannot edit, please tell what message comes up when you attempt to. 331dot (talk) 20:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2023 California wildfires moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 California wildfires, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 05:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023 California wildfires moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 California wildfires, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2034 Winter Olympics moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating 2034 Winter Olympics. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is poorly written (with almost no content). Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Timothytyy (talk) 07:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

World Junior Alpine Skiing Championships 2023 moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating World Junior Alpine Skiing Championships 2023. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and very few information is provided. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Timothytyy (talk) 08:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Junior Alpine Skiing Championships 2023 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Junior Alpine Skiing Championships 2023 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Junior Alpine Skiing Championships 2023 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2023 edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey @Magitroopa, I think the [1] I was thinking I could maybe add a new article about the stats of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Oddballslover (talk) 04:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2034 Winter Olympics (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2034 Winter Olympics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oddballslover! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paris Aquatic Centre (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paris Aquatic Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023

The article Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wait before making this. I don't even think this will be notable enough for an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Poodle23 (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado outbreak of January 24-25, 2023 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

United States Man (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please do not create new tornado outbreak articles without consulting members of WP:SEVERE. The project has strict criteria for article creation, and this outbreak doesn't meet those criteria. United States Man (talk) 02:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2023 California wildfires—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist I orignaly created Draft:2023 California wildfires. Oddballslover (talk) 03:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Penitentes (talk · contribs) created 2023 California wildfires after that. Why do you delete that page? Materialscientist (talk) 04:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist I have told you already I created Draft:2023 California wildfires and the article is not worthy and notable enough to be it's own article. Oddballslover (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD is the proper venue for that discussion. You could probably make the case that the article in its current form violates WP:CRYSTAL. However, please don't just unilaterally redirect articles with proper sources, especially to the draft namespace, as drafts aren't meant to be linked to from mainspace. Also, having created a draft first doesn't give you ownership over the article. — SamX [talk • contribs] 01:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 California wildfires (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 California wildfires instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 California wildfires and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 04:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx, I redirected Draft:2023 California wildfires since It was a copy from 2023 California wildfires. Oddballslover (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! If there are any other information on the draft that wasn't on the mainspace, feel free to do so! Tails Wx 04:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2023 California wildfires

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:2023 California wildfires, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. `~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 22:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, United States at the 2024 Summer Paralympics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:United States at the 2024 Summer Paralympics where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, it is not my first time creating an article. Oddballslover (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Is there a reason you made these non-constructive edits ([2], [3], [4])? Whatever the possible reason, stop doing it or you may be blocked. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Oddballslover (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Rolling Fork–Midnight–Silver City tornado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Rolling Fork–Midnight–Silver City tornado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Rolling Fork–Midnight–Silver City tornado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Poodle23 (talk) 15:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 19:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of aftershocks of the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake, you may be blocked from editing. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 19:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page is too long, it has a warning for deletion. Oddballslover (talk) 00:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Disney Cruise Line into List of Disney Cruise Line ships. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not completely copy it. Oddballslover (talk) 01:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The rule must be followed whether the copying was large or small, and whether you copied it exactly or modified it a bit. — Diannaa (talk) 12:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm ChrisWx. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tornadoes of 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ChrisWx (talk - contribs) 01:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Third Sudanese Civil War. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Also note that as an involved editor in an on-going Requested Move discussion, it is inappropriate to carry out page moves when the discussion has not closed yet by an uninvolved editor. – robertsky (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:2023 Sudan conflict, you may be blocked from editing. – robertsky (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! – Material Works 19:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Oddballslover. Thank you for your work on List of Disney Cruise Line ships. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. I enjoy list articles which impart information rather than simply just listing things.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit my talk please

Can you please not edit my page (or any one else talk page). The talk page is not for you to edit unless it’s a conversation you are involved in. What you have removed is not a duplication but two different issues that I am using to fix a bot. Regardless, please do not edit anyone talk page again. You seem to be keen on editing on Wikipedia and there is alot of venues where your enthusiasm will be appreciated but not users talk page.

Let me know if you want to collaborate on a project in the future. Take care FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy’s Waterhole fire moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jimmy’s Waterhole fire, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On challenging the closure of Requested Move discussion

Do not revert the close of a Requested Move discussion, as you had done at Talk:2023 Sudan conflict, if you are challenging the closure of the discussion. You are strongly encouraged to open a discussion with the closer about their rationale. If you are unable to achieve an agreement with the closer, a move review can be initiated to have the closure reviewed by another uninvolved editor. – robertsky (talk) 14:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As Robertsky mentioned, you always have the option of using the move review process, but I wanted to leave a comment in here in case you're not acquainted with Wikipedia's consensus-building procedures yet. The rationale from the closing editor was that there is "Clearly no consensus to move", and when deleting this rationale, you said it was "not a good reason". I don't believe you'll find much agreement if you challenge the closure, because consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental method of decision making. I know you believe that your proposed title is more appropriate, but you did initiate a requested move discussion to see if others agree, and they did not; their input holds as much weight as yours. These discussions are held to find agreement and to avoid unilateral decision-making like this. I hope you'll understand. Vanilla Wizard 💙 18:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

List of international goals scored by Kylian Mbappé

Why did you remove the redirect at List of international goals scored by Kylian Mbappé? There is clear consensus that this should only be a page reserved for a nation's top-scorer or if a player has above 50 goals (or something like that). Mbappé is on 38 goals and is not the top scorer. Could you please provide rationale? Otherwise I will redirect it back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

38 goals, is still alot, for example List of international goals scored by Lionel Messi was created on only his 49 goals. Oddballslover (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of Honolulu Rail Transit stations

The page List of Honolulu Rail Transit stations has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been moved, also it is still in the prosses of becoming a proper article. Oddballslover (talk) 02:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12-25 May 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2023 Atlantic hurricane season. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. The January subtropical storm was never named Arlene, and stating otherwise is a blatant WP:HOAX. Please do not do this again. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2026 FIFA World Cup. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 01:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia, as you did at Tornadoes of 2023. Elijahandskip (talk) 01:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MLW Wiffle Ball moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to MLW Wiffle Ball. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and all of the sources are primary. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Pitzzaboy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pitzzaboy. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a sock puppet, but this account was made nearly 9 months ago and I have made no accounts since then, check your facts User:Girth Summit. CostcoantimationsS (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74225

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CostcoantimationsS. Thank you for your work on 2023 Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever outbreak. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2034 Winter Olympics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2034 Winter Olympics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2034 Winter Olympics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]